`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`____________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________________
`
`MICROSOFT CORPORATION,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`PARALLEL NETWORKS LICENSING, LLC,
`Patent Owner
`
`___________________
`
`Inter Partes Review Nos. IPR2015-00483 and -00485
`Patent Nos. 5,894,554 and 6,415,335
`____________________
`
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONER’S MANDATORY INITIAL DISCLOSURES
`UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.51(A)(1) OPTION 1
`
`i
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to the Agreement on Mandatory Discovery dated April 16, 2015
`
`(Paper 6 of IPR2015-00483; Paper 6 of IPR2015-00485), Petitioner Microsoft
`
`Corporation submits the following disclosures pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.51(a)(1),
`
`Option 1.
`
`I.
`
`LIST OF INDIVIDUALS LIKELY TO HAVE DISCOVERABLE
`INFORMATION
`
`Petitioner identifies the following persons as individuals who likely have
`
`discoverable information that Petitioner may use to support its claims or defenses.
`
`The below identified persons have been retained by Petitioner in connection
`
`with this action and may only be contacted through Petitioner’s counsel at Sidley
`
`Austin LLP, 1501 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20005.
`
`Name
`Dr. Michael D. Mitzenmacher
`
`Dr. Daniel Andresen
`
`
`
`Potential Subject Matter
`• Prior art related to U.S. Patent Nos.
`5,894,554 and 6,415,335 (“the ’554
`and ’335 patents”)
`• Invalidity
`• Background of the technologies at
`issue
`• The state of the art
`• Evidence relating to anticipation
`and/or obviousness
`• Publication of Technical Report
`TRFCS95-17, titled “SWEB:
`Towards a Scalable World Wide
`Web Server on Multicomputers”)
`
`Ex. 1079 at 1
`
`
`
`
`
`(“SWEB 95”) and Andresen et al.,
`SWEB: Towards A Scalable World
`Wide Web Server On
`Multicomputers, April 1996 ("SWEB
`96")
`
`To the extent permitted by the Panel, Petitioner reserves the right to
`
`supplement or amend the above lists in response to evidence or testimony
`
`introduced in this or related proceedings by Patent Owner.
`
`II. DOCUMENT LIST
`
`The following is a list of documents in Petitioner’s possession, custody, or
`
`control that it may use to support its claims or defenses:
`
`Exhibit # Reference Name
`
`1001
`
`1002
`
`1003
`
`1004
`
`1005
`
`1006
`
`1007
`
`1008
`
`1009
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 5,894,554, with Reexamination Certificate and
`Certificate of Correction (“554 Patent”)
`
`Original File History of 554 Patent
`
`Reexamination File History of 554 Patent
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,415,335, with Reexamination Certificate and
`Certificate of Correction (“355 Patent”)
`
`Original File History of 335 Patent
`
`Reexamination File History of 355 Patent
`
`Declaration of Michael D. Mitzenmacher
`
`Curriculum Vitae of Michael D. Mitzenmacher
`
`Andresen et al., SWEB: Towards A Scalable World Wide Web Server
`On Multicomputers, September 1995 ("SWEB 95")
`
`Ex. 1079 at 2
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit # Reference Name
`
`1010
`
`1011
`
`1012
`
`1013
`
`1014
`
`1015
`
`1016
`
`1017
`
`Andresen et al., SWEB: Towards A Scalable World Wide Web Server
`On Multicomputers, April 1996 ("SWEB 96")
`
`U.S. Patent No. 5,859,971 (“Bittinger”)
`
`Garland et al., Implementing Distributed Server Groups for the World
`Wide Web, January 25, 1995 (“Garland”)
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,249,291 (“Popp”)
`
`Lagoze et al., Dienst: Implementation Reference Manual (“Dienst”)
`
`U.S. Patent No. U.S. 5,701,451 (“Rogers”)
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,282,569 (“Wallis”)
`
`Stevens, TCP/IP Illustrated, Vol. 1, The Protocols (1994) (“Stevens”)
`
`1018 Webster’s II New College Dictionary (1995)
`
`1019 Microsoft Press Computer Dictionary (3d. ed. 1997)
`
`1020 Webster’s II, New College Dictionary (4th ed. 1999)
`
`1021
`
`1022
`
`1023
`
`1024
`
`1025
`
`
`
`Proposed Constructions, Parallel Networks Licensing LLC v.
`Microsoft Corp., Civ. No. 1:13-cv-2073-SLR (D. Delaware), Dkt. No.
`67
`
`Parallel Networks’s Claim Construction Brief, Parallel Networks
`Licensing LLC v. Microsoft Corp., Civ. No. 1:13-cv-2073-SLR (D.
`Delaware)., Dkt. No. 78
`
`Parallel Networks’s Claim Construction Brief, Oracle Corp., et al. v.
`Parallel Networks, LLP, Civ. No. 06-414-SLR (D. Delaware), Dkt.
`244
`
`Parallel Networks’s Opposition to Summary Judgment of
`Noninfringement, Oracle Corp., et al. v. Parallel Networks, LLP, Civ.
`No. 06-414-SLR (D. Delaware), Dkt. 287
`
`Parallel Networks’s Reply Claim Construction Brief, Oracle Corp., et
`Ex. 1079 at 3
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit # Reference Name
`al. v. Parallel Networks, LLP, Civ. No. 06-414-SLR (D. Delaware),
`Dkt. 337
`
`1026
`
`1027
`
`1028
`
`1029
`
`1030
`
`1031
`
`1032
`
`1033
`
`1034
`
`1035
`
`Parallel Networks’s Reply in Support of Summary Judgment of
`Infringement, Oracle Corp., et al. v. Parallel Networks, LLP, Civ. No.
`06-414-SLR (D. Delaware), Dkt. 339
`
`Claim Construction Order, Oracle Corp., et al. v. Parallel Networks,
`LLP, Civ. No. 06-414-SLR (D. Delaware), Dkt. No. 399
`
`Parallel Networks’s Motion for Reconsideration, Oracle Corp., et al.
`v. Parallel Networks, LLP, Civ. No. 06-414-SLR (D. Delaware), Dkt.
`408
`
`Order Finding Noninfringement, Oracle Corp., et al. v. Parallel
`Networks, LLP, Civ. No. 06-414-SLR (D. Delaware), Dkt. No. 400
`
`Opinion on Appeal, Oracle Corp., et al. v. Parallel Networks, LLP,
`375 Fed. Appx. 36 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 28, 2010)
`
`Parallel Networks’s Claim Construction Brief, Parallel Networks LLC
`v. Netflix, Inc., et al., Civ. No. 2:07-cv-562 (E.D. Texas), Dkt. 186
`
`Claim Construction Order, Parallel Networks LLC v. Netflix, Inc., et
`al., Civ. No. 2:07-cv-562 (E.D. Texas), Dkt. 221
`
`Claim Construction Clarification Order, Parallel Networks LLC v.
`Netflix, Inc., et al., Civ. No. 2:07-cv-562 (E.D. Texas), Dkt. No. 318
`
`Parallel Networks’s Reply Claim Construction Brief, epicRealm
`Licensing, LP v. Autoflex Leasing, Inc., et al., Civ. Nos. 2:05-cv-163
`(E.D. Texas), Dkt. 176
`
`Claim Construction Report and Recommendation, epicRealm
`Licensing, LP v. Autoflex Leasing, Inc., et al., Civ. Nos. 2:05-cv-163
`(E.D. Texas), Dkt. 194
`
`1036
`
`Berson, Client/Server Architecture (2d. ed. 1996) (published by April
`11, 1996 per U.S. Copyright Office) (“Berson”)
`
`
`
`Ex. 1079 at 4
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit # Reference Name
`
`1037
`
`1038
`
`1039
`
`1040
`
`1041
`
`1042
`
`1043
`
`1044
`
`1045
`
`1046
`
`1047
`
`1048
`
`1049
`
`Pfister, In Search of Clusters (1995) (“Pfister”)
`
`ODBC Web Database Add-On for Microsoft Internet Server Beta
`Release Notes (September 27, 1995) (“IIS-ODBC”)
`
`Gundavaram, CGI Programming on the World Wide Web (March
`1996) (“Gundavaram”)
`
`Declaration of Daniel Andresen
`
`Sandberg et al., Design and Implementation of the Sun Network
`Filesystem, Summer 1985 (“Sandberg”)
`
`Callaghan, RFC 1813: NFS Version 3 Protocol Specification, June
`1995(“Callaghan”)
`
`Derler, The World-Wide Web Gateway to Hyper-G: Using a
`Connectionless Protocol to Access Session-Oriented Services, March
`1995 (“Derler”)
`
`Stein, How to Set Up and Maintain a World Wide Web Site: The Guide
`for Information Provider (August 1995) (“Stein”)
`
`Sun Microsystems, Inc., Solaris 2.4 Introduction, 1994 (“Solaris
`Introduction”)
`
`Powell, Spinning the Web: Setting Up World Wide Web Servers,
`http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/reports/Servers-web.html, September 1994
`(“Powell”)
`
`Yu, Dynamic Transaction Routing in Distributed Database Systems
`(September 1988) (“Yu”)
`
`Bradley et al., Web-based Access to an Online Atlas of Anatomy: The
`Digital Anatomist Common Gateway Interface, 1995 (“Bradley”)
`
`Kaashoek et al., Dynamic Documents: Extensibility and Adaptability
`in the WWW, MIT (Sept. 15, 1994)
`
`1050 Microsoft’s Declaratory Judgment Claims, Quinstreet v. Parallel
`
`
`
`Ex. 1079 at 5
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit # Reference Name
`Networks, Civ. No. 06-495-SLR
`
`1051
`
`1052
`
`1053
`
`1054
`
`1055
`
`1056
`
`1057
`
`1058
`
`1059
`
`1060
`
`Order Severing and Transferring Microsoft Corporation’s Declaratory
`Judgment Action Against Parallel Networks, Quinstreet Inc. v.
`Parallel Networks, Civ. No. 06-495-SLR to U.S. District Court, E.D.
`Tex (Dkt. 198, Nov. 3, 2009)
`
`Order Dismissing Without Prejudice, Quinstreet, Inc. v. Parallel
`Networks, Civ. No. 2:09-cv-345-MS-CC (Dkt. 226, Aug. 10, 2012)
`
`Parallel Networks’s Complaint, Parallel Networks, LLC v. Microsoft
`Corporation, Civ. No. 2:09cv172 (Dkt. 1, May 29, 2009)
`
`Docket Sheet, Parallel Networks, LLC v. Microsoft Corporation, Civ.
`No. 2:09cv172 (as of Dec. 15, 2014)
`
`Order Dismissing Without Prejudice. Parallel Networks, LLC v.
`Microsoft Corporation, Civ. No. 2:09cv172 (Dkt. 80, Aug. 8, 2012)
`
`Complaint, Parallel Networks, LLC v. Microsoft Corporation, Civ.
`No. 1:13-cv-02073-SLR-SRF (Dkt. 1, Dec. 23, 2013)
`
`Proof of Service of Complaint, Parallel Networks, LLC v. Microsoft
`Corporation, Civ. No. 1:13-cv-02073-SLR-SRF (Dkt. 5, Dec. 24,
`2013)
`
`U.S. Patent No. 5,925, 108 (“Johnson”)
`
`Allman, Changes in Sendmail Version 8, March 1994 (“Allman”)
`
`U.S. Patent No. 5,754,772 (“Leaf”)
`
`1061 Mogul, The Case for Persistent-Connection HTTP. Computer
`Communication Review, Vol. 25 Issue 4, 299–313 (October 1995)
`(“Mogul”)
`
`1062
`
`U.S. Patent No. 5,293,618 (“Tandai”)
`
`1063 Memorandum Opinion, Oracle Corp., et al., Civ. No. 06-414-SLR,
`Dkt No. 459 (D. Del. Apr. 25, 2011)
`
`
`
`Ex. 1079 at 6
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit # Reference Name
`
`1064
`
`1065
`
`Order re Claim Construction Report and Recommendation, epicRealm
`Licensing, LP v. Autoflex Leasing, Inc., et al., Civ. Nos. 2:05-cv-163
`(E.D. Texas), Dkt. 260
`21st Century Dictionary of Computer Terms, 1994
`
`1066 Microsoft Press Computer Dictionary (2d ed.) 1994
`
`1067 Microsoft Press Computer Dictionary (3d ed.) 1997
`
`1068
`
`1069
`
`1070
`
`1071
`
`Kwan et al., NCSA's World Wide Web Server: Design and
`Performance, November 1995 (“Kwan”)
`
`Proceedings of IPPS ’96, The 10th International Parallel Processing
`Symposium, April 15-19, 1996, Honolulu, Hawaii
`
`Administrative Content, Nineteenth Annual Symposium on Computer
`Applications in Medical Care, October 28-November 1, 1995, New
`Orleans, Louisiana
`
`Table of Contents, Nineteenth Annual Symposium on Computer
`Applications in Medical Care, October 28-November 1, 1995, New
`Orleans, Louisiana
`
`1072
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,202,100 (“Maltby”)
`
`1073 Mosedale et al., Administering Very High Volume Internet Services,
`USENIX (Sept. 17-22, 1995)
`
`1074
`
`1075
`
`1076
`
`Ang et al., Integrated Control of Distributed Volume Visualization
`Through the World Wide Web (1994)
`Doyle et al., Embedding Interactive External Program Objects Within
`Open-Distributed Hypermedia Documents (May 1995)
`Varela et al., Providing Data on the Web: From Examples to Programs
`(1994)
`
`1077 WWW Conference '94 Proceedings (1994)
`
`1078
`
`Varela et al., Zelig: Automating Database Provision for the World
`
`
`
`Ex. 1079 at 7
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit # Reference Name
`Wide Web (1994)
`
`Petitioner may rely on any exhibits or other evidence filed or relied upon by
`
`Patent Owner.
`
`Petitioner also reserves the right to supplement or amend the above lists to
`
`identify any other relevant evidence from any related proceedings involving the
`
`’554 and ’335 patents in response to assertions made or evidence introduced by
`
`Patent Owner in its opposition or otherwise in this proceeding. Such evidence may
`
`include pleadings, transcripts, orders, or other documents relating to the concurrent
`
`district court litigation involving the ’554 and ’335 patents, evidence pertinent to
`
`obviousness or allegations made by Patent Owner of non-obviousness, or evidence
`
`establishing the authenticity, publication date, or public disclosure of the prior art
`
`references identified above if Patent Owner contends any such documents are not
`
`prior art to the ’554 or ’335 patents.
`
`
`
`Dated: August 7, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/ Joseph Micallef/
`Joseph A. Micallef
`Registration No. 39,772
`Attorney for Petitioner
`
`Ex. 1079 at 8