throbber
IPR2015-00483, -00485
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`____________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________________
`
`MICROSOFT CORPORATION,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`PARALLEL NETWORKS LICENSING, LLC,
`Patent Owner
`
`___________________
`
`Inter Partes Review Nos. IPR2015-00483 and -00485
`Patent Nos. 5,894,554 and 6,415,335
`____________________
`
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONER’S MANDATORY INITIAL DISCLOSURES
`UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.51(A)(1) OPTION 1
`
`i
`
`
`
`

`
`
`
`Pursuant to the Agreement on Mandatory Discovery dated April 16, 2015
`
`(Paper 6 of IPR2015-00483; Paper 6 of IPR2015-00485), Petitioner Microsoft
`
`Corporation submits the following disclosures pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.51(a)(1),
`
`Option 1.
`
`I.
`
`LIST OF INDIVIDUALS LIKELY TO HAVE DISCOVERABLE
`INFORMATION
`
`Petitioner identifies the following persons as individuals who likely have
`
`discoverable information that Petitioner may use to support its claims or defenses.
`
`The below identified persons have been retained by Petitioner in connection
`
`with this action and may only be contacted through Petitioner’s counsel at Sidley
`
`Austin LLP, 1501 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20005.
`
`Name
`Dr. Michael D. Mitzenmacher
`
`Dr. Daniel Andresen
`
`
`
`Potential Subject Matter
`• Prior art related to U.S. Patent Nos.
`5,894,554 and 6,415,335 (“the ’554
`and ’335 patents”)
`• Invalidity
`• Background of the technologies at
`issue
`• The state of the art
`• Evidence relating to anticipation
`and/or obviousness
`• Publication of Technical Report
`TRFCS95-17, titled “SWEB:
`Towards a Scalable World Wide
`Web Server on Multicomputers”)
`
`Ex. 1079 at 1
`
`

`
`
`
`(“SWEB 95”) and Andresen et al.,
`SWEB: Towards A Scalable World
`Wide Web Server On
`Multicomputers, April 1996 ("SWEB
`96")
`
`To the extent permitted by the Panel, Petitioner reserves the right to
`
`supplement or amend the above lists in response to evidence or testimony
`
`introduced in this or related proceedings by Patent Owner.
`
`II. DOCUMENT LIST
`
`The following is a list of documents in Petitioner’s possession, custody, or
`
`control that it may use to support its claims or defenses:
`
`Exhibit # Reference Name
`
`1001
`
`1002
`
`1003
`
`1004
`
`1005
`
`1006
`
`1007
`
`1008
`
`1009
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 5,894,554, with Reexamination Certificate and
`Certificate of Correction (“554 Patent”)
`
`Original File History of 554 Patent
`
`Reexamination File History of 554 Patent
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,415,335, with Reexamination Certificate and
`Certificate of Correction (“355 Patent”)
`
`Original File History of 335 Patent
`
`Reexamination File History of 355 Patent
`
`Declaration of Michael D. Mitzenmacher
`
`Curriculum Vitae of Michael D. Mitzenmacher
`
`Andresen et al., SWEB: Towards A Scalable World Wide Web Server
`On Multicomputers, September 1995 ("SWEB 95")
`
`Ex. 1079 at 2
`
`

`
`
`
`Exhibit # Reference Name
`
`1010
`
`1011
`
`1012
`
`1013
`
`1014
`
`1015
`
`1016
`
`1017
`
`Andresen et al., SWEB: Towards A Scalable World Wide Web Server
`On Multicomputers, April 1996 ("SWEB 96")
`
`U.S. Patent No. 5,859,971 (“Bittinger”)
`
`Garland et al., Implementing Distributed Server Groups for the World
`Wide Web, January 25, 1995 (“Garland”)
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,249,291 (“Popp”)
`
`Lagoze et al., Dienst: Implementation Reference Manual (“Dienst”)
`
`U.S. Patent No. U.S. 5,701,451 (“Rogers”)
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,282,569 (“Wallis”)
`
`Stevens, TCP/IP Illustrated, Vol. 1, The Protocols (1994) (“Stevens”)
`
`1018 Webster’s II New College Dictionary (1995)
`
`1019 Microsoft Press Computer Dictionary (3d. ed. 1997)
`
`1020 Webster’s II, New College Dictionary (4th ed. 1999)
`
`1021
`
`1022
`
`1023
`
`1024
`
`1025
`
`
`
`Proposed Constructions, Parallel Networks Licensing LLC v.
`Microsoft Corp., Civ. No. 1:13-cv-2073-SLR (D. Delaware), Dkt. No.
`67
`
`Parallel Networks’s Claim Construction Brief, Parallel Networks
`Licensing LLC v. Microsoft Corp., Civ. No. 1:13-cv-2073-SLR (D.
`Delaware)., Dkt. No. 78
`
`Parallel Networks’s Claim Construction Brief, Oracle Corp., et al. v.
`Parallel Networks, LLP, Civ. No. 06-414-SLR (D. Delaware), Dkt.
`244
`
`Parallel Networks’s Opposition to Summary Judgment of
`Noninfringement, Oracle Corp., et al. v. Parallel Networks, LLP, Civ.
`No. 06-414-SLR (D. Delaware), Dkt. 287
`
`Parallel Networks’s Reply Claim Construction Brief, Oracle Corp., et
`Ex. 1079 at 3
`
`

`
`
`
`Exhibit # Reference Name
`al. v. Parallel Networks, LLP, Civ. No. 06-414-SLR (D. Delaware),
`Dkt. 337
`
`1026
`
`1027
`
`1028
`
`1029
`
`1030
`
`1031
`
`1032
`
`1033
`
`1034
`
`1035
`
`Parallel Networks’s Reply in Support of Summary Judgment of
`Infringement, Oracle Corp., et al. v. Parallel Networks, LLP, Civ. No.
`06-414-SLR (D. Delaware), Dkt. 339
`
`Claim Construction Order, Oracle Corp., et al. v. Parallel Networks,
`LLP, Civ. No. 06-414-SLR (D. Delaware), Dkt. No. 399
`
`Parallel Networks’s Motion for Reconsideration, Oracle Corp., et al.
`v. Parallel Networks, LLP, Civ. No. 06-414-SLR (D. Delaware), Dkt.
`408
`
`Order Finding Noninfringement, Oracle Corp., et al. v. Parallel
`Networks, LLP, Civ. No. 06-414-SLR (D. Delaware), Dkt. No. 400
`
`Opinion on Appeal, Oracle Corp., et al. v. Parallel Networks, LLP,
`375 Fed. Appx. 36 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 28, 2010)
`
`Parallel Networks’s Claim Construction Brief, Parallel Networks LLC
`v. Netflix, Inc., et al., Civ. No. 2:07-cv-562 (E.D. Texas), Dkt. 186
`
`Claim Construction Order, Parallel Networks LLC v. Netflix, Inc., et
`al., Civ. No. 2:07-cv-562 (E.D. Texas), Dkt. 221
`
`Claim Construction Clarification Order, Parallel Networks LLC v.
`Netflix, Inc., et al., Civ. No. 2:07-cv-562 (E.D. Texas), Dkt. No. 318
`
`Parallel Networks’s Reply Claim Construction Brief, epicRealm
`Licensing, LP v. Autoflex Leasing, Inc., et al., Civ. Nos. 2:05-cv-163
`(E.D. Texas), Dkt. 176
`
`Claim Construction Report and Recommendation, epicRealm
`Licensing, LP v. Autoflex Leasing, Inc., et al., Civ. Nos. 2:05-cv-163
`(E.D. Texas), Dkt. 194
`
`1036
`
`Berson, Client/Server Architecture (2d. ed. 1996) (published by April
`11, 1996 per U.S. Copyright Office) (“Berson”)
`
`
`
`Ex. 1079 at 4
`
`

`
`
`
`Exhibit # Reference Name
`
`1037
`
`1038
`
`1039
`
`1040
`
`1041
`
`1042
`
`1043
`
`1044
`
`1045
`
`1046
`
`1047
`
`1048
`
`1049
`
`Pfister, In Search of Clusters (1995) (“Pfister”)
`
`ODBC Web Database Add-On for Microsoft Internet Server Beta
`Release Notes (September 27, 1995) (“IIS-ODBC”)
`
`Gundavaram, CGI Programming on the World Wide Web (March
`1996) (“Gundavaram”)
`
`Declaration of Daniel Andresen
`
`Sandberg et al., Design and Implementation of the Sun Network
`Filesystem, Summer 1985 (“Sandberg”)
`
`Callaghan, RFC 1813: NFS Version 3 Protocol Specification, June
`1995(“Callaghan”)
`
`Derler, The World-Wide Web Gateway to Hyper-G: Using a
`Connectionless Protocol to Access Session-Oriented Services, March
`1995 (“Derler”)
`
`Stein, How to Set Up and Maintain a World Wide Web Site: The Guide
`for Information Provider (August 1995) (“Stein”)
`
`Sun Microsystems, Inc., Solaris 2.4 Introduction, 1994 (“Solaris
`Introduction”)
`
`Powell, Spinning the Web: Setting Up World Wide Web Servers,
`http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/reports/Servers-web.html, September 1994
`(“Powell”)
`
`Yu, Dynamic Transaction Routing in Distributed Database Systems
`(September 1988) (“Yu”)
`
`Bradley et al., Web-based Access to an Online Atlas of Anatomy: The
`Digital Anatomist Common Gateway Interface, 1995 (“Bradley”)
`
`Kaashoek et al., Dynamic Documents: Extensibility and Adaptability
`in the WWW, MIT (Sept. 15, 1994)
`
`1050 Microsoft’s Declaratory Judgment Claims, Quinstreet v. Parallel
`
`
`
`Ex. 1079 at 5
`
`

`
`
`
`Exhibit # Reference Name
`Networks, Civ. No. 06-495-SLR
`
`1051
`
`1052
`
`1053
`
`1054
`
`1055
`
`1056
`
`1057
`
`1058
`
`1059
`
`1060
`
`Order Severing and Transferring Microsoft Corporation’s Declaratory
`Judgment Action Against Parallel Networks, Quinstreet Inc. v.
`Parallel Networks, Civ. No. 06-495-SLR to U.S. District Court, E.D.
`Tex (Dkt. 198, Nov. 3, 2009)
`
`Order Dismissing Without Prejudice, Quinstreet, Inc. v. Parallel
`Networks, Civ. No. 2:09-cv-345-MS-CC (Dkt. 226, Aug. 10, 2012)
`
`Parallel Networks’s Complaint, Parallel Networks, LLC v. Microsoft
`Corporation, Civ. No. 2:09cv172 (Dkt. 1, May 29, 2009)
`
`Docket Sheet, Parallel Networks, LLC v. Microsoft Corporation, Civ.
`No. 2:09cv172 (as of Dec. 15, 2014)
`
`Order Dismissing Without Prejudice. Parallel Networks, LLC v.
`Microsoft Corporation, Civ. No. 2:09cv172 (Dkt. 80, Aug. 8, 2012)
`
`Complaint, Parallel Networks, LLC v. Microsoft Corporation, Civ.
`No. 1:13-cv-02073-SLR-SRF (Dkt. 1, Dec. 23, 2013)
`
`Proof of Service of Complaint, Parallel Networks, LLC v. Microsoft
`Corporation, Civ. No. 1:13-cv-02073-SLR-SRF (Dkt. 5, Dec. 24,
`2013)
`
`U.S. Patent No. 5,925, 108 (“Johnson”)
`
`Allman, Changes in Sendmail Version 8, March 1994 (“Allman”)
`
`U.S. Patent No. 5,754,772 (“Leaf”)
`
`1061 Mogul, The Case for Persistent-Connection HTTP. Computer
`Communication Review, Vol. 25 Issue 4, 299–313 (October 1995)
`(“Mogul”)
`
`1062
`
`U.S. Patent No. 5,293,618 (“Tandai”)
`
`1063 Memorandum Opinion, Oracle Corp., et al., Civ. No. 06-414-SLR,
`Dkt No. 459 (D. Del. Apr. 25, 2011)
`
`
`
`Ex. 1079 at 6
`
`

`
`
`
`Exhibit # Reference Name
`
`1064
`
`1065
`
`Order re Claim Construction Report and Recommendation, epicRealm
`Licensing, LP v. Autoflex Leasing, Inc., et al., Civ. Nos. 2:05-cv-163
`(E.D. Texas), Dkt. 260
`21st Century Dictionary of Computer Terms, 1994
`
`1066 Microsoft Press Computer Dictionary (2d ed.) 1994
`
`1067 Microsoft Press Computer Dictionary (3d ed.) 1997
`
`1068
`
`1069
`
`1070
`
`1071
`
`Kwan et al., NCSA's World Wide Web Server: Design and
`Performance, November 1995 (“Kwan”)
`
`Proceedings of IPPS ’96, The 10th International Parallel Processing
`Symposium, April 15-19, 1996, Honolulu, Hawaii
`
`Administrative Content, Nineteenth Annual Symposium on Computer
`Applications in Medical Care, October 28-November 1, 1995, New
`Orleans, Louisiana
`
`Table of Contents, Nineteenth Annual Symposium on Computer
`Applications in Medical Care, October 28-November 1, 1995, New
`Orleans, Louisiana
`
`1072
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,202,100 (“Maltby”)
`
`1073 Mosedale et al., Administering Very High Volume Internet Services,
`USENIX (Sept. 17-22, 1995)
`
`1074
`
`1075
`
`1076
`
`Ang et al., Integrated Control of Distributed Volume Visualization
`Through the World Wide Web (1994)
`Doyle et al., Embedding Interactive External Program Objects Within
`Open-Distributed Hypermedia Documents (May 1995)
`Varela et al., Providing Data on the Web: From Examples to Programs
`(1994)
`
`1077 WWW Conference '94 Proceedings (1994)
`
`1078
`
`Varela et al., Zelig: Automating Database Provision for the World
`
`
`
`Ex. 1079 at 7
`
`

`
`
`
`Exhibit # Reference Name
`Wide Web (1994)
`
`Petitioner may rely on any exhibits or other evidence filed or relied upon by
`
`Patent Owner.
`
`Petitioner also reserves the right to supplement or amend the above lists to
`
`identify any other relevant evidence from any related proceedings involving the
`
`’554 and ’335 patents in response to assertions made or evidence introduced by
`
`Patent Owner in its opposition or otherwise in this proceeding. Such evidence may
`
`include pleadings, transcripts, orders, or other documents relating to the concurrent
`
`district court litigation involving the ’554 and ’335 patents, evidence pertinent to
`
`obviousness or allegations made by Patent Owner of non-obviousness, or evidence
`
`establishing the authenticity, publication date, or public disclosure of the prior art
`
`references identified above if Patent Owner contends any such documents are not
`
`prior art to the ’554 or ’335 patents.
`
`
`
`Dated: August 7, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/ Joseph Micallef/
`Joseph A. Micallef
`Registration No. 39,772
`Attorney for Petitioner
`
`Ex. 1079 at 8

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket