IPR2015-00483
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MICROSOFT CORPORATION,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`PARALLEL NETWORKS LICENSING, LLC,
`Patent Owner
`
`Patent No. 5,894,554
`Issued: April 13, 1999
`Filed: April 23, 1996
`Inventors: Keith Lowery, Andrew B. Levine and Ronald L. Howell
`SYSTEM FOR MANAGING DYNAMIC WEB PAGE
`GENERATION REQUESTS BY INTERCEPTING REQUEST AT
`WEB SERVER AND ROUTING TO PAGE SERVER THEREBY
`RELEASING WEB SERVER TO PROCESS OTHER REQUESTS
`____________________
`Inter Partes Review No. IPR2015-00483
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Title:
`
`SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF MICHAEL D. MITZENMACHER
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Microsoft v. Parallel Networks, IPR2015-00483 and IPR2015-00485
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation - Ex. 1104, Cover
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MICROSOFT CORPORATION,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`PARALLEL NETWORKS LICENSING, LLC,
`Patent Owner
`
`Patent No. 5,894,554
`Issued: April 13, 1999
`Filed: April 23, 1996
`Inventors: Keith Lowery, Andrew B. Levine and Ronald L. Howell
`SYSTEM FOR MANAGING DYNAMIC WEB PAGE
`GENERATION REQUESTS BY INTERCEPTING REQUEST AT
`WEB SERVER AND ROUTING TO PAGE SERVER THEREBY
`RELEASING WEB SERVER TO PROCESS OTHER REQUESTS
`____________________
`Inter Partes Review No. IPR2015-00483
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Title:
`
`SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF MICHAEL D. MITZENMACHER
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Microsoft v. Parallel Networks, IPR2015-00483 and IPR2015-00485
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation - Ex. 1104, Cover
`
`
`
`
`
`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`1.
`
`I have been retained by counsel for Microsoft Corporation as an
`
`expert witness in the above-captioned proceeding. In this supplemental
`
`declaration, I have been asked to verify the authenticity of a variety of exhibits
`
`filed in this proceeding that were objected to by Parallel Networks Licensing, LLC.
`
`2.
`
`Exhibit 1009 as filed is a true and correct copy of Andresen et al.,
`
`SWEB: Towards A Scalable World Wide Web Server On Multicomputers,
`
`September 1995 ("SWEB 95"), downloadable from the University of California
`
`Santa Barbara computer science department (“UCSB CS”) website.1 Page
`
`numbers and an exhibit label have been added to the bottom of the document, but
`
`no other alterations have been made. The UCSB CS website shows a date of
`
`September 1, 1995 for SWEB 95. Based on my experience and review of the
`
`website, the UCSB CS website is a place where an authentic copy of a UCSB CS
`
`technical report would likely be found. For example, the UCSB CS website
`
`includes a “Research” menu with a link to a “Tech Reports” listing. 2 This “Tech
`
`Reports” listing includes an entry for a variety of technical reports, 3 including a
`
`
`
`1 https://www.cs.ucsb.edu/research/tech-reports/1995-17 (Ex. 1082 at 2)
`2 https://www.cs.ucsb.edu/ (Ex. 1082 at 4)
`3 https://www.cs.ucsb.edu/research/reports (Ex. 1082 at 6)
`
`1
`
`Microsoft v. Parallel Networks, IPR2015-00483 and IPR2015-00485
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation - Ex. 1104, p. 1
`
`
`
`
`
`link to the SWEB 95 technical report, again showing a September, 1995 date.4
`
`Nothing about Exhibit 1009's condition creates a suspicion about its authenticity.
`
`3.
`
`Exhibit 1010 as filed is a true and correct copy of Andresen et al.,
`
`SWEB: Towards A Scalable World Wide Web Server On Multicomputers, April
`
`1996 ("SWEB 96"), downloadable from the IEEE website.5 Page numbers and an
`
`exhibit label have been added to the bottom of the document but no other
`
`alterations have been made. The IEEE page states that SWEB 96 was published in
`
`the 10th International Parallel Processing Symposium (“IPPS”) in 1996, with
`
`conference dates of April 15-19, 1996. Based on my experience, the IEEE website
`
`is a place where an authentic copy of a previously published IEEE paper would
`
`likely be found. For example, the IEEE website explains that it allows access to
`
`scientific and technical content published by the IEEE and its publishing partners.6
`
`Nothing about Exhibit 1010's condition creates a suspicion about its authenticity.
`
`4.
`
`Exhibit 1012 as filed is a true and correct copy of Garland et al.,
`
`Implementing Distributed Server Groups for the World Wide Web, January 25,
`
`1995 (“Garland”), downloadable from the Defense Technical Information Center
`
`
`
`4 https://www.cs.ucsb.edu/research/reports?items_per_page=All (Ex. 1082 at 8)
`5 http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=508191 (Ex. 1082 at 34)
`6 http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/aboutUs.jsp (Ex. 1082 at 36)
`
`2
`
`Microsoft v. Parallel Networks, IPR2015-00483 and IPR2015-00485
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation - Ex. 1104, p. 2
`
`
`
`
`
`(“DTIC”) website.7 Page numbers and an exhibit label have been added to the
`
`bottom of the document but no other alterations have been made. The DTIC page
`
`lists a report date of January 25, 1995. Garland includes a stamp on the first page
`
`stating “DTIC SELECTED MAR 20 1995.” Based on my review of the website,
`
`the DTIC website is a place where an authentic copy of a DTIC selected
`
`publication would likely be found. For example, the DTIC website explains that
`
`“DTIC enables the defense research and development community to maximize the
`
`availability, use and collaboration of the almost 4,000,000 technical records
`
`resulting from Defense-funded technical activities.”8 Nothing about Exhibit 1012's
`
`condition creates a suspicion about its authenticity.
`
`5.
`
`Exhibit 1014 as filed is a true and correct copy of Lagoze et al.,
`
`Dienst: Implementation Reference Manual (“Dienst”), downloadable from the
`
`Cornell University Library’s eCommons website.9 Page numbers and an exhibit
`
`label have been added to the bottom of the document but no other alterations have
`
`been made. The eCommons website shows Dienst, a technical report, having an
`
`issuance date of May, 1995, published by Cornell University. Based on my review
`
`of the website, the Cornell’s eCommons is a place where an authentic copy of a
`
`
`
`7 http://www.dtic.mil/docs/citations/ADA292221 (Ex. 1082 at 37)
`8 http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/ (Ex. 1082 at 41)
`9 https://ecommons.cornell.edu/handle/1813/7171 (Ex. 1082 at 46)
`
`3
`
`Microsoft v. Parallel Networks, IPR2015-00483 and IPR2015-00485
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation - Ex. 1104, p. 3
`
`
`
`
`
`Cornell University publication would likely be found. For example, Cornell’s
`
`eCommons explains that it is a “service of Cornell University Library that provides
`
`long-term access to a broad range of Cornell-related digital content of enduring
`
`value,” and committed to preserving documents “for the long term.”10 Dienst is
`
`part of the Computer Science Technical Reports collection,11 which is a collection
`
`of technical reports form Cornell’s computer science department from 1968-
`
`2002.12 Nothing about Exhibit 1014's condition creates a suspicion about its
`
`authenticity.
`
`6.
`
`Exhibit 1042 as filed is a true and correct copy of Callaghan, RFC
`
`1813: NFS Version 3 Protocol Specification, June 1995(“Callaghan”),
`
`downloadable from the RFC Editor website.13 Page numbers and an exhibit label
`
`have been added to the bottom of the document but no other alterations have been
`
`made. RFC 1813’s page recites a date of June 1995. Based on my experience and
`
`my review of the website, the RFC Editor website is a place where an authentic
`
`copy of an RFC would likely be found. For example, the RFC Editor website
`
`
`
`10 https://ecommons.cornell.edu/page/about (Ex. 1082 at 50)
`11 https://ecommons.cornell.edu/handle/1813/7171 (Ex. 1082 at 46)
`12 https://ecommons.cornell.edu/handle/1813/5603 (Ex. 1082 at 53)
`13 http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1813 (Ex. 1082 at 64)
`
`4
`
`Microsoft v. Parallel Networks, IPR2015-00483 and IPR2015-00485
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation - Ex. 1104, p. 4
`
`
`
`
`
`explains that it “maintains the master repository of RFCs.”14 The Internet
`
`Engineering Task Force’s website states that “[w]hen in doubt, the RFC Editor site
`
`is the authoritative source page” for RFCs.15 Nothing about Exhibit 1042's
`
`condition creates a suspicion about its authenticity.
`
`7.
`
`Exhibit 1043 as filed is a true and correct copy of Derler, The World-
`
`Wide Web Gateway to Hyper-G: Using a Connectionless Protocol to Access
`
`Session-Oriented Services, March 1995 (“Derler”), downloadable from the
`
`Institute for Information Systems and Computer Media (“IICM”) at the Graz
`
`University of Technology.16 Page numbers and exhibit labels have been added to
`
`the bottom of the document but no other alterations have been made; the
`
`typesetting of Exhibit 1043 is inconsistent with the version available at IICM but
`
`the content appears identical. Based on my review of the website, the IICM
`
`website is a place where an authentic copy of an IICM thesis would likely be
`
`found. For example, the IICM website (when viewing the English version)17
`
`includes a link to “Research,”18 which then includes a link to “Finished Theses.”19
`
`
`
`14 http://www.rfc-editor.org/ (Ex. 1082 at 65)
`15 https://www.ietf.org/rfc.html (Ex. 1082 at 66)
`16 http://www.iicm.tugraz.at/thesis_113/cderler.pdf (Ex. 1082 at 67)
`17 http://www.iicm.tugraz.at/ (Ex. 1082 at 172)
`18 http://www.iicm.tugraz.at/Research (Ex. 1082 at 173)
`
`5
`
`Microsoft v. Parallel Networks, IPR2015-00483 and IPR2015-00485
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation - Ex. 1104, p. 5
`
`
`
`
`
`The “Finished Theses” page includes a link to Derler in the set of 1995 theses.20
`
`Nothing about Exhibit 1043's condition creates a suspicion about its authenticity.
`
`8.
`
`Exhibit 1045 as filed is a true and correct copy of Sun Microsystems,
`
`Inc., Solaris 2.4 Introduction, 1994 (“Solaris Introduction”), downloadable from
`
`Oracle’s Legacy Solaris Documentation website.21 Page numbers and an exhibit
`
`label have been added to the bottom of the document but no other alterations have
`
`been made. Based on my review of the website, Oracle’s Legacy Solaris
`
`Documentation website is a place where an authentic copy of a Solaris user manual
`
`or other document would likely be found. For example, Oracle’s website lists
`
`document libraries for a variety of legacy Solaris versions, including 2.4, 2.5, 2.6,
`
`7, 8, and 9.22 When viewing the document library for Solaris 2.4,23 a section of
`
`documents titled “Solaris 2.4 User AnswerBook” includes a link to Solaris
`
`Introduction.24 I note that other documents also include 1994 dates.25 Nothing
`
`about Exhibit 1045's condition creates a suspicion about its authenticity.
`
`
`
`19 http://www.iicm.tugraz.at/finished-theses (Ex. 1082 at 175)
`20 http://www.iicm.tugraz.at/thesis_113/cderler.pdf (Ex. 1082 at 67)
`21 https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19457-01/801-6610/801-6610.pdf (Ex. 1082 at 183)
`22 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/documentation/legacy-solaris-192993.html
`(Ex. 1082 at 245)
`23 http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19457-01/index.html (Ex. 1082 at 248)
`24 http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19457-01/801-6610/801-6610.pdf (Ex. 1082 at 183)
`
`6
`
`Microsoft v. Parallel Networks, IPR2015-00483 and IPR2015-00485
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation - Ex. 1104, p. 6
`
`
`
`
`
`9.
`
`Exhibit 1046 as filed is a true and correct copy of Powell, Spinning
`
`the Web: Setting Up World Wide Web Servers, September 1994 (“Powell”),
`
`accessible from Virginia Tech’s Digital Library and Archives.26 Page numbers and
`
`an exhibit label have been added to the bottom of this printed webpage but no other
`
`alterations have been made. Based on my review of the website and archive.org,
`
`Powell’s webpage URL is a place where an authentic copy of Powell’s article
`
`would likely be found. For example, archive.org shows that the webpage was
`
`identical to the current version in each of the following years: 2012,27 2008,28
`
`2003,29 and 1997.30 The Virginia Tech website also states that Powell was
`
`“presented at the Southern Ohio ASIS workshops” on “September 19-20, 1994 at
`
`
`
`25 See, e.g., http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19457-01/801-6672/801-6672.pdf (Ex.
`1082 at 251)
`26 http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/reports/Servers-web.html (Ex. 1082 at 277)
`27 https://web.archive.org/web/20120805172123/http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/reports/
`Servers-web.html (Ex. 1082 at 282)
`28 https://web.archive.org/web/20080517034413/http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/reports/
`Servers-web.html (Ex. 1082 at 287)
`29 https://web.archive.org/web/20030803213212/http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/reports/
`Servers-web.html (Ex. 1082 at 292)
`30 https://web.archive.org/web/19971210081923/http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/reports/
`Servers-web.html (Ex. 1082 at 297)
`
`7
`
`Microsoft v. Parallel Networks, IPR2015-00483 and IPR2015-00485
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation - Ex. 1104, p. 7
`
`
`
`
`
`the University of Cincinnati.”31 Nothing about Exhibit 1046's condition creates a
`
`suspicion about its authenticity.
`
`10. Exhibit 1048 as filed is a true and correct copy of Bradley et al., Web-
`
`based Access to an Online Atlas of Anatomy: The Digital Anatomist Common
`
`Gateway Interface, 1995 (“Bradley”), downloadable from the U.S. National
`
`Institutes of Health's National Library of Medicine (“NIH/NLM”) website.32 Page
`
`numbers and an exhibit label have been added to the bottom of the document but
`
`no other alterations have been made. As indicated by the copyright notice on the
`
`footer of the first page, Bradley was published by the American Medical
`
`Informatics Association (“AMIA”). Based on my review of the website, the
`
`NIH/NLM website is a place where an authentic copy of AMIA publications
`
`would likely be found. For example, the NIH/NLM website includes a listing of
`
`AMIA publications,33 including the 1995 Proceedings of the Annual Symposium
`
`on Computer Application in Medical Care34 which includes a link to Bradley.35
`
`Nothing about Exhibit 1048's condition creates a suspicion about its authenticity.
`
`
`
`31 http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/reports/ (Ex. 1082 at 302)
`32 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2579146/ (Ex. 1082 at 304)
`33 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/journals/362/ (Ex. 1082 at 308)
`34 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/issues/173480/ (Ex. 1082 at 311)
`35 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2579146/ (Ex. 1082 at 304)
`
`8
`
`Microsoft v. Parallel Networks, IPR2015-00483 and IPR2015-00485
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation - Ex. 1104, p. 8
`
`
`
`
`
`11. Exhibit 1049 as filed is a true and correct copy of Kaashoek et al.,
`
`Dynamic Documents: Extensibility and Adaptability in the WWW, MIT (Sept. 15,
`
`1994), downloadable from MIT’s Parallel & Distributed Operating Systems Group
`
`(“PDOS”).36 Page numbers and an exhibit label have been added to the bottom of
`
`the document but no other alterations have been made. Based on my review of the
`
`website, the PDOS website is a place where an authentic copy of an MIT computer
`
`science publication would likely be found. For example, the PDOS website
`
`includes a publications section that lists a variety of papers by authors associated
`
`with PDOS,37 including a link to Kaashoek.38 Nothing about Exhibit 1049's
`
`condition creates a suspicion about its authenticity.
`
`12. Exhibit 1059 as filed is a true and correct copy of Allman, Changes in
`
`Sendmail Version 8, March 1994 (“Allman”), downloadable from
`
`ftp.sendmail.org.39 Page numbers and an exhibit label have been added to the
`
`bottom of the document but no other alterations have been made. Based on my
`
`experience, ftp.sendmail.org is a place where an authentic copy of sendmail and its
`
`
`
`36 http://pdos.csail.mit.edu/papers/www94.ps (Ex. 1082 at 355)
`37 http://pdos.csail.mit.edu/papers/ (Ex. 1082 at 367)
`38 http://pdos.csail.mit.edu/papers/www94.ps (Ex. 1082 at 355)
`39 ftp://ftp.sendmail.org/pub/sendmail/past-releases/sendmail.8.7.6.tar.gz
`(internally: \doc\changes\changes.ps) (Ex. 1082 at 455)
`
`9
`
`Microsoft v. Parallel Networks, IPR2015-00483 and IPR2015-00485
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation - Ex. 1104, p. 9
`
`
`
`
`
`accompanying documentation would be found. For example, ftp.sendmail.org
`
`includes a “past-releases” folder that includes prior releases of sendmail.40
`
`Sendmail version 8.7.6 includes Allman with a modification date of May 19,
`
`1995.41 Nothing about Exhibit 1059's condition creates a suspicion about its
`
`authenticity.
`
`13. Exhibit 1069 as filed is a true and correct copy of the cover page,
`
`publication page, and table of contents of the Proceedings of IPPS ’96, The 10th
`
`International Parallel Processing Symposium, April 15-19, 1996, Honolulu,
`
`Hawaii, downloadable from the IEEE website.42 Page numbers and an exhibit
`
`label have been added to the bottom of the document but no other alterations have
`
`been made. Based on my experience, the IEEE website is a place where an
`
`authentic copy of an IEEE proceedings document would likely be found. For
`
`example, IEEE allows you to browse conference publications,43 including the IPPS
`
`
`
`40 ftp://ftp.sendmail.org/pub/sendmail/past-releases/ (Ex. 1082 at 466)
`41 ftp://ftp.sendmail.org/pub/sendmail/past-releases/sendmail.8.7.6.tar.gz
`(internally: \doc\changes\changes.ps) (Ex. 1082 at 455)
`42 http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/mostRecentIssue.jsp?punumber=3743 (Ex. 1082 at
`470)
`43 http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/conferences.jsp (Ex. 1082 at 474)
`
`10
`
`Microsoft v. Parallel Networks, IPR2015-00483 and IPR2015-00485
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation - Ex. 1104, p. 10
`
`
`
`
`
`’96 proceedings.44 Nothing about Exhibit 1069's condition creates a suspicion
`
`about its authenticity.
`
`14. Exhibit 1070 as filed is a true and correct copy of Administrative
`
`Content, Nineteenth Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical
`
`Care, October 28-November 1, 1995, New Orleans, Louisiana, downloadable from
`
`NIH/NLM website.45 Page numbers and an exhibit label have been added to the
`
`bottom of the document but no other alterations have been made. Based on my
`
`review of the website, the NIH/NLM website is a place where an authentic copy of
`
`an AMIA journal would likely be found, as described above with respect to
`
`Bradley. See ¶ 10 above. For example, the NIH/NLM website’s entry for the 1995
`
`Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer Application in Medical Care
`
`includes a link to the Admininstrative content, including journal masthead, notices,
`
`indexes, etc.46 Nothing about Exhibit 1070's condition creates a suspicion about its
`
`authenticity.
`
`
`
`44 http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/mostRecentIssue.jsp?punumber=3743 (Ex. 1082 at
`470)
`45 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2578879/pdf/procascamc00009-
`0002.pdf (Ex. 1082 at 477)
`46 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/issues/173480/ (Ex. 1082 at 518)
`
`11
`
`Microsoft v. Parallel Networks, IPR2015-00483 and IPR2015-00485
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation - Ex. 1104, p. 11
`
`
`
`
`
`15. Exhibit 1071 as filed is a true and correct copy of Table of Contents,
`
`Nineteenth Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care,
`
`October 28-November 1, 1995, New Orleans, Louisiana, downloadable from the
`
`NIH/NLM website.47 Page numbers and an exhibit label have been added to the
`
`bottom of the document but no other alterations have been made. Based on my
`
`review of the website, the NIH/NLM website is a place where an authentic copy of
`
`an AMIA journal would likely be found, as described above with respect to
`
`Bradley. See ¶ 10 above. For example, the NIH/NLM website’s entry for the 1995
`
`Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer Application in Medical Care
`
`includes a link to the journal’s table of contents pages.48 Nothing about Exhibit
`
`1071's condition creates a suspicion about its authenticity.
`
`16. Exhibit 1073 as filed is a true and correct copy of Mosedale et al.,
`
`Administering Very High Volume Internet Services, USENIX (Sept. 17-22, 1995)
`
`(“Mosedale”), downloadable from the USENIX website.49 Page numbers and an
`
`exhibit label have been added to the bottom of the document but no other
`
`
`
`47 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2578880/pdf/procascamc00009-
`0013.pdf (Ex. 1082 at 562)
`48 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/issues/173480/ (Ex. 1082 at 518)
`49 https://www.usenix.org/legacy/publications/library/proceedings/lisa95/
`full_papers/mosedale.pdf (Ex. 1082 at 581)
`
`12
`
`Microsoft v. Parallel Networks, IPR2015-00483 and IPR2015-00485
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation - Ex. 1104, p. 12
`
`
`
`
`
`alterations have been made. Based on my review of the website, the USENIX
`
`website is a place where an authentic copy of a previous USENIX publication
`
`would likely be found. For example, the USENIX website includes a listing of
`
`USENIX conference proceedings and their publications.50 This listing includes the
`
`conference Mosedale was presented at,51 as well as a link to Mosedale.52 Nothing
`
`about Exhibit 1073's condition creates a suspicion about its authenticity.
`
`17. Exhibit 1074 as filed is a true and correct copy of Ang et al.,
`
`Integrated Control of Distributed Volume Visualization Through the World Wide
`
`Web (1994), downloadable from the IEEE website.53 Page numbers and an exhibit
`
`label have been added to the bottom of the document but no other alterations have
`
`been made. As described above, the IEEE website is a place where an authentic
`
`copy of an IEEE publication would likely be found. See ¶ 3. Nothing about
`
`Exhibit 1074's condition creates a suspicion about its authenticity.
`
`18. Exhibit 1075 as filed is a true and correct copy of Doyle et al.,
`
`Embedding Interactive External Program Objects Within Open-Distributed
`
`
`
`50 https://www.usenix.org/publications/proceedings/ (Ex. 1082 at 590)
`51 https://www.usenix.org/publications/proceedings/lisa%252095 (Ex. 1082 at 592)
`52 https://www.usenix.org/conference/lisa-95/administering-very-high-volume-
`internet-services (Ex. 1082 at 594)
`53 http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=346342 (Ex. 1082 at 595)
`
`13
`
`Microsoft v. Parallel Networks, IPR2015-00483 and IPR2015-00485
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation - Ex. 1104, p. 13
`
`
`
`
`
`Hypermedia Documents (May 1995) (“Doyle”), downloadable from the Society of
`
`Photographic Instrumentation Engineers (“SPIE”) website.54 Page numbers and an
`
`exhibit label have been added to the bottom of the document but no other
`
`alterations have been made. As can been seen in the footer, Doyle was published
`
`by SPIE, and the SPIE website also explains that Doyle was published on March
`
`14, 1995.55 Based on my review of the website, the SPIE website is a place where
`
`an authentic copy of a SPIE publication would likely be found. For example, SPIE
`
`explains that the website publishes research papers from the Proceedings of SPIE
`
`and the Society’s 10 scholarly journals.56 Nothing about Exhibit 1075's condition
`
`creates a suspicion about its authenticity.
`
`19. Exhibit 1076 as filed is a true and correct copy of Varela et al.,
`
`Providing Data on the Web: From Examples to Programs (1994), downloadable
`
`from archive.org’s capture of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign’s
`
`Department of Computer Science.57 Page numbers and an exhibit label have been
`
`
`
`54 http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/proceeding.aspx?articleid=991711 (Ex.
`1082 at 597)
`55 http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/proceeding.aspx?articleid=991711 (Ex.
`1082 at 597)
`56 http://spie.org/x86785.xml (Ex. 1082 at 604)
`57 https://web.archive.org/web/19961228221539/http://www.ncsa.uiuc.edu/SDG/
`IT94/Proceedings/DDay/varela/paper.html (Ex. 1082 at 606)
`
`14
`
`Microsoft v. Parallel Networks, IPR2015-00483 and IPR2015-00485
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation - Ex. 1104, p. 14
`
`
`
`
`
`added to the bottom of the printed webpage, as well as a header and footer that
`
`were added when it was printed as is common when printing a webpage, but no
`
`other alterations have been made. Based on my review of the website, archive.org
`
`is a place where an authentic copy of Varela’s website would likely be found. For
`
`example, archive.org explains its “purposes include offering permanent access for
`
`researchers, historians, scholars, people with disabilities, and the general public to
`
`historical collections that exist in digital format.”58 Nothing about Exhibit 1076's
`
`condition creates a suspicion about its authenticity.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`58 https://archive.org/about/ (Ex. 1082 at 616)
`
`15
`
`Microsoft v. Parallel Networks, IPR2015-00483 and IPR2015-00485
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation - Ex. 1104, p. 15
`
`
`
`Microsoft v. Parallel Networks, IPR2015-00483 and IPR2015-00485
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation - Ex. 1104, p. 16
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
