throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
` ____________
`
`SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT AMERICA LLC
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`APLIX IP HOLDINGS CORPORATION
`Patent Owner
`
`____________
`
`Case No. IPR2015-00476
`Patent No. 7,218,313
` ____________
`
`
`
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,218,313
`IPR2015-00476
`Pursuant to the Board’s June 22, 2015 Scheduling Order (Paper 12), Petitioner
`
`respectfully requests oral argument for the trial currently scheduled on January 19, 2016.
`
`Petitioner notes that oral argument for this IPR is scheduled on the same date as the oral
`
`argument for IPR2015-00229, IPR2015-00230, IPR2015-00396, and IPR2015-00533, for
`
`which Petitioner is filing similar requests for oral argument. Due to overlap between
`
`these proceedings and in the interests of conserving the Board’s resources, Petitioner
`
`requests at least 30 minutes and no less than the time granted to Patent Owner. Pursuant
`
`to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a), Petitioner specifies the following issues, without intent to waive
`
`consideration of any issue not requested, to be argued for this proceeding:
`
`I.
`
`Whether Claims 21-24, 26, 52-56, and 58 are Unpatentable Under 35
`
`U.S.C. § 103 over Pallakoff in view of Liebenow;
`
`II.
`
`Whether Claim 27 is Unpatentable Under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over
`
`Pallakoff in view of U.S. Patent No. 6,469,691 to Armstrong;
`
`III.
`
`Whether Claims 28, 29, 59, and 60 are Unpatentable Under 35 U.S.C.
`
`§ 103 over Pallakoff in view of Hedberg;
`
`Whether Hedberg is Analogous Art; and
`
`Whether Patent Owner’s Secondary Considerations Show Non-
`
`IV.
`
`V.
`
`Obviousness.
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`Dated: December 23, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,218,313
`IPR2015-00476
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`ERISE IP, P.A.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BY: /s/ Abran J. Kean
`
`
`Eric A. Buresh, Reg. No. 50,394
`
`Abran J. Kean, Reg. No. 58,540
`
`6201 College Blvd., Ste. 300
`
`Overland Park, KS 66211
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PETITIONER
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,218,313
`IPR2015-00476
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ON PATENT OWNER
`UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.6
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), the undersigned certifies that on December 23,
`2015 the foregoing Petitioner’s Request for Oral Argument was served via electronic
`filing with the Board on the following counsel of record for Patent Owner:
`
`Michael Mauriel, USPTO Reg. No. 44,226
`Sherman W. Kahn (pro hac vice)
`MAURIEL KAPOUYTIAN WOODS LLP
`15 West 26th Street, Floor 7
`New York, NY 10010
`Telephone: (212) 529-5131 Ex. 101
`Facsimile:
`(212) 529-5132
`E-mail:
`mmauriel@mkwllp.com
`
`
`skahn@mkwllp.com
`
`Robert J. Gilbertson (pro hac vice)
`Sybil L. Dunlop (pro hac vice)
`X. Kevin Zhao (pro hac vice)
`GREENE ESPEL PLLP
`222 South Ninth Street, Ste. 2200
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`Telephone: (612) 373-0830
`Facsimile:
`(612) 373-0929
`E-mail:
`bgilbertson@greeneespel.com
`
`
`sdunlop@greeneespel.com
`
`
`kzhao@greeneespel.com
`
`Dated: December 23, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`ERISE IP, P.A.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BY: /s/ Abran J. Kean
`
`
`
`Eric A. Buresh, Reg. No. 50,394
`
`Abran J. Kean, Reg. No. 58,540
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PETITIONER

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket