throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`
`
`Paper 8
`Entered: February 24, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`TRW AUTOMOTIVE U.S. LLC,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`MAGNA ELECTRONICS INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Cases IPR2015-00436, IPR2015-00437,
`IPR2015-00438, and IPR2015-00439
`Patent 8,599,001 B21
`
`Before JUSTIN T. ARBES, BART A. GERSTENBLITH, and
`FRANCES L. IPPOLITO, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`ARBES, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`DECISION
`Petitioner’s Motion to Correct Filing Date
`37 C.F.R. §§ 42.5, 42.6
`
`
`
`1 This Decision addresses an issue pertaining to all four cases. Therefore,
`we exercise our discretion to issue one Decision to be filed in each case.
`The parties are not authorized to use this style heading for any subsequent
`papers.
`
`

`

`IPR2015-00436, IPR2015-00437, IPR2015-00438, IPR2015-00439
`Patent 8,599,001 B2
`
`
`Petitioner filed, in each of the instant proceedings, a motion to correct
`the filing date accorded to its petition. See IPR2015-00436, Paper 2
`(“Mot.”); IPR2015-00437, Paper 2; IPR2015-00438, Paper 2;
`IPR2015-00439, Paper 3. Patent Owner did not file an opposition to any of
`the motions. See 37 C.F.R. § 42.25(a)(1). As the papers and facts of the
`proceedings are similar, we cite to the papers filed in Case IPR2015-00436.
`The petitions in the instant proceedings were accorded a filing date of
`December 19, 2014—the date when the petitions and accompanying
`documents were submitted in the Patent Review Processing System
`(“PRPS”). Paper 7, 1. Petitioner filed, with each petition, a “motion” and
`“supplement to motion” stating that it began the process of filing in PRPS on
`December 16, 2014, but could not complete the process because of a PRPS
`outage. See Mot. 1; Paper 4, 1. Petitioner states that the petitions and
`accompanying documents were mailed to the Office on December 16, 2014,
`in accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(b)(2)(i), the filing procedures listed on
`the Board’s website, and instructions received from Board administrative
`personnel during the time that PRPS was unavailable. See Mot. 1; Paper 3,
`62 (certificate of mailing); Paper 4, 1. The petitions include an authorization
`to charge the deposit account of Petitioner’s counsel for the filing fees, and a
`certificate of service indicating that they were mailed to Patent Owner on
`December 16, 2014. Paper 3, 4–5, 60–61, 63. Petitioner requests that the
`petitions be accorded a filing date of December 16, 2014. Paper 4, 1.
`The Board’s rules provide that “[u]nless otherwise authorized,
`submissions are to be made to the Board electronically via the Internet
`according to the parameters established by the Board and published on the
`Web site of the Office.” 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(b)(1). Filing by other means,
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2015-00436, IPR2015-00437, IPR2015-00438, IPR2015-00439
`Patent 8,599,001 B2
`
`such as by mail, requires a “motion requesting acceptance of the
`submission” and identification of the “date of transmission where a party
`seeks a filing date other than the date of receipt at the Board.” 37 C.F.R.
`§ 42.6(b)(2).
`We have confirmed that PRPS experienced an emergency outage on
`December 16–18, 2014, and was unavailable for parties to submit petitions
`or other documents electronically. For administrative efficiency, the Board
`adopted the following special procedure to be followed during this
`emergency outage, and published it on the Board’s Web site (at
`http://www.uspto.gov/ip/boards/bpai/prps.jsp):
`PRPS is currently down as of December 16, 2014 3:00 pm EST.
`PTAB will be extending deadlines for the parties for all matters
`that do not have statutory deadlines until the site becomes
`available. As for petition filings, patent owner responses,
`motions, and requests for rehearing (on institution decisions or
`final decisions) and any other matters that have an imposed
`deadline or statutory due date, the parties should send an e-mail
`to TRIALS@USPTO.GOV indicating the need to file one of
`these items. DO NOT send attachments. PTAB will authorize
`filing of late attachments and PTAB will change the filing dates
`in PRPS to reflect the appropriate filing date. ALL MATTERS
`SHOULD BE SERVED ON OPPOSING COUNSEL ON THE
`APPROPRIATE DUE DATE.
`The Board also indicated to parties who contacted the Board during the
`emergency outage that the Board would consider a petition or document that
`is submitted in accordance with the aforementioned special procedure to be
`filed timely. Subsequently, the Board published on the Board’s Web site a
`second notice regarding the PRPS emergency outage, which, in part,
`provided the following:
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2015-00436, IPR2015-00437, IPR2015-00438, IPR2015-00439
`Patent 8,599,001 B2
`
`
`Accordingly, for a matter with an imposed deadline or statutory
`due date, the Board deems filed, in accordance with 37 C.F.R.
`§ 42.6(b)(1), any paper enumerated in the notice above that was
`submitted in accordance with the instructions set forth above, as
`of the date an e-mail was sent to Trials@uspto.gov indicating
`the need to file the paper, as long as the paper was served on
`opposing counsel on the appropriate due date, and the paper,
`accompanied by
`the appropriate fee, was subsequently
`submitted in PRPS when it became available.
`On December 16, 2014, Petitioner began the filing process in PRPS,
`and then sent emails to the Board for each of the instant proceedings when
`PRPS became unavailable. Petitioner served the petitions and
`accompanying documents on Patent Owner, and also mailed copies to the
`Board. See Paper 3, 62–63. Once PRPS became available again, Petitioner
`exercised reasonable diligence in submitting its petitions, with the respective
`“motion” and “supplement to motion” for each proceeding, on December 19,
`2014, in accordance with the Board’s special procedure.
`Based on our review of the record, Petitioner complied with all of the
`filing requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 312(a) and followed the proper
`procedures for filing its petitions in view of the temporary unavailability of
`PRPS. Accordingly, we conclude that it would be appropriate under the
`circumstances to correct the filing date accorded to the petitions.
`In consideration of the foregoing, it is hereby:
`ORDERED that Petitioner’s motion to correct the filing date accorded
`to its petition in each of the instant proceedings is granted; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that the petitions in the instant proceedings
`are accorded a filing date of December 16, 2014.
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`IPR2015-00436, IPR2015-00437, IPR2015-00438, IPR2015-00439
`Patent 8,599,001 B2
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`A. Justin Poplin
`Timothy K. Sendek
`Allan J. Sternstein
`Josh C. Snider
`LATHROP & GAGE LLP
`patent@lathropgage.com
`TSendek@lathropgage.com
`ASternstein@lathropgage.com
`jsnider@lathropgage.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`David K.S. Cornwell
`Jason D. Eisenberg
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX PLLC
`davidc-PTAB@skgf.com
`jasone-PTAB@skgf.com
`
`Timothy A. Flory
`Terence J. Linn
`GARDNER, LINN, BURKHART & FLORY, LLP
`Flory@glbf.com
`linn@glbf.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket