`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`
`
`Paper 18
`Entered: September 29, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`TRW AUTOMOTIVE U.S. LLC,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`MAGNA ELECTRONICS INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2015-004361
`Patent 8,599,001 B2
`____________
`
`
`
`Before JUSTIN T. ARBES, BART A. GERSTENBLITH, and
`FRANCES L. IPPOLITO, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`ARBES, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`
`1 Cases IPR2015-00437, IPR2015-00438, and IPR2015-00439 have been
`consolidated with this proceeding.
`
`
`
`IPR2015-00436
`Patent 8,599,001 B2
`
`
`A conference call in the above proceeding was held on September 25,
`2015, among respective counsel for Petitioner and Patent Owner, and Judges
`Arbes, Gerstenblith, and Ippolito. Patent Owner initiated the conference call
`to seek an extension of the deadline for submitting its Response (DUE
`DATE 1) from October 9 to October 20, 2015. See Paper 11, 6. Patent
`Owner argued that it needs additional time to prepare and review the
`Response due to the size of the four Petitions involved in this consolidated
`proceeding and Patent Owner’s obligations in other inter partes reviews
`involving the same parties. Petitioner responded that no extension should be
`granted because doing so would require extending the January 11, 2016
`deadline for Petitioner’s Reply (DUE DATE 2), and the parties are
`scheduled for trial in the related district court case in early February 2016.
`After hearing from the parties, we concluded that good cause exists
`for a small extension of the deadlines and that such an extension would not
`unduly prejudice either party. See 37 C.F.R. § 42.5(c)(2). The deadline for
`Patent Owner to file its Response is extended to October 13, 2015, and the
`deadline for Petitioner to file its Reply is extended to January 19, 2016. If
`necessary, the parties may stipulate to different dates for DUE DATES 4 and
`5 in the Scheduling Order, provided the dates are no later than DUE
`DATE 6. Finally, as explained during the call, the parties are expected to
`make their declarants available for deposition promptly and at a convenient
`time for the opposing party to avoid any further scheduling disputes.
`In consideration of the foregoing, it is hereby:
`ORDERED that DUE DATE 1 in the Scheduling Order (Paper 11)
`is changed to October 13, 2015, DUE DATE 2 is changed to January 19,
`2016, and all other due dates are unchanged.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2015-00436
`Patent 8,599,001 B2
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`A. Justin Poplin
`Timothy K. Sendek
`Allan Sternstein
`Jon Trembath
`Douglas W. Link
`LATHROP & GAGE LLP
`patent@lathropgage.com
`TSendek@lathropgage.com
`ASternstein@lathropgage.com
`jtrembath@lathropgage.com
`dlink@lathropgage.com
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`David K.S. Cornwell
`Jason D. Eisenberg
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX PLLC
`davidc-PTAB@skgf.com
`jasone-PTAB@skgf.com
`
`Timothy A. Flory
`Terence J. Linn
`GARDNER, LINN, BURKHART & FLORY, LLP
`Flory@glbf.com
`linn@glbf.com
`
`
`
`
`
`3
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
