throbber
EXHIBIT 1033
`
`U.S. PATENT NO. 4,079,422, TO ANAGNOSTOPOULOS
`
`(“ANAGNOSTOPOULOS”)
`
`
`
`
`
`TRW Automotive U.S. LLC: EXHIBIT 1033
`PETITION FOR INTER PARTES REVIEW
`OF U.S. PATENT NUMBER 8,599,001
`IPR2015-00436
`
`

`
`United States Patent
`
`[19]
`
`Anagnostopoulos
`
`[54]
`
`[75]
`
`CHARGE INJECTION DEVICE READOUT
`
`Inventor:
`
`Constantine Nicholas
`Anagnostopoulos, Rochester, N.Y.
`
`[73]
`
`Assignee:
`
`Eastman Kodak Company,
`Rochester, N.Y.
`
`[21]
`
`Appl. No.: 731,077
`
`[22]
`
`Filed:
`
`Oct. 12, 1976
`
`[5 1]
`[52]
`
`[53]
`
`Int. Cl} ............................................. .. H04N 5/30
`U.S. Cl. .............................. .. 358/213; 250/211 R;
`250/578
`Field of Search .................. .. 358/213; 250/211 R,
`250/211 J, 578; 315/169 TV; 340/173 LS;
`317/235 N; 357/30
`
`[11]
`
`[45]
`
`4,079,422
`
`Mar. 14, 1978
`
`[56]
`
`References Cited
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`3,786,263
`
`1/1974 Michon .......................... .. 358/213‘X
`
`Primary Examiner-—Robert L. Richardson
`Attorney, Agent, or Firm—Robert F. Cody
`
`[57]
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`A readout technique for use with a charge injection
`device avoids intensity-distortion resulting from both
`over-illumination and pattern noise. Although the in-
`vention utilizes column- (or row-) capacitance changing
`to produce information signals, it provides readout by
`supplying charge from a reference source (capacitor) to
`the pixel being read, thereby restoring the column po-
`tential of the pixel to a reference level. The readout
`signal corresponds to the voltage change across the
`reference capacitor as a result of its discharge.
`
`5 Claims, 13 Drawing Figures
`
`[54
`C0LUM/V P/?0CE5‘5‘/IVG ELEC7‘ROW/C15‘
`
`MEASURE
`
`E
`
`VIDEO L//VE
`
`SAMPLE
`8 HOLD
`O
`AMPLIFIER I//DEO OUT
`8 FILTER
`
`1033-001
`
`1033-001
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`March 14, 1978
`
`Sheet1of4
`
`4,079,422
`
`V/DEO
`
`D/SPL A Y
`
`L/G‘/1'7’ IMAGES 0/V
`GRAY BACKGROUND
`
`F762 40
`
`F762 4b
`
`1033-002
`
`1033-002
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`March 14, 1978
`
`Sheet2of4
`
`4,079,422
`
`/
`__ ______ _.__.z____.,
`
`PROCESS/N6‘
`ELE6‘ 7'/?0/V/CS
`
`EL'1‘.-_'§‘_7]_?Q/\_//Q_.'S‘W/7Z‘H
`
`IIE/1.5‘U/?E* . OUT
`_._._.__._..._._.._.._.__'_..|
`
`......_-
`
`‘V</Z//MKA/J/A"
`
`//VTEGRATE
`
`E233
`
`//v./Ecr
`
`MEASURE
`
`VIDEO OUT
`
`1033-003
`
`1033-003
`
`

`
`U'.S. Patent
`
`March 14, 1978
`
`Sheet30f4
`
`4,079,422
`
`1033-004
`
`1033-004
`
`

`
`U.S.‘ Patent
`
`«.1W,
`
`1m.
`
`007914:
`
`Sheet 4 of 4
`
`4,079,422
`
`SI?//V0c‘/1.93 73 .9/V/.S‘$.5’.90b’d
`
`
`
`«mo36:.mm\..3o.§\.
`
`.om:qtm...
`
`QqblW
`
`2mqméwmmm
`
`mK§_Eva
`
`.w>\\4QMQS
`
`1033-005
`
`
`
`mtmmwmémuséfiumqmmfimmmuomm>$38
`
`
`
`
`
`1033-005
`
`

`
`1
`
`4,079,422
`
`CHARGE INJECTION DEVICE READOUT
`
`_ BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`1. Field of the Invention
`
`This invention relates in general to charge injection
`imaging devices (see U.S. Pat. No. 3,786,263) and more
`particularly to apparatus for reading out the informa-
`tion stored by such a device.
`2. Description Relative to the Prior Art
`Current thinking with respect to the readout of a
`charge injection device (CID) is to employ any of a
`number of techniques for sensing capacitance changes
`of the charge-collecting image sites or pixels. Tech-
`niques for sensing such capacitance changes have ap-
`peared in the literature, although on such technique is
`described below for purposes of facilitating understand-
`ing of the invention.
`Two problems are associated with capacitance read-
`out techniques: (1) capacitance differences from pixel to
`pixel, which may‘ result from any of a number of struc-
`tural sources» within a CID, manifest themselves as pat-
`tern noise in the device output and (2) under certain
`illumination conditions, the visual image corresponding
`to theoutput‘ of 'the'CID is distorted intensity-wise.
`Although the" first of the above-noted problems is rela-
`tively easy to appreciate, why the second problem
`should occur is another matter: An analysis is presented
`below to explain the source of the second problem.
`
`Published Prior Art
`
`1. Proceedings of 1975 International Conference on
`the Application of CCD’s, Oct. 29 - 31 (San Diego,
`California) pages 351-260.
`2. U.S. Pat. No. 3,949,245
`
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`invention provides a quasi-capacitive’
`The present
`readout technique for use in combination with a CID
`imager, and which technique nullifies the second of the
`above-noted problems and, in so doing, contemporane-
`ously obviates the first, or pattern noise, problem as
`well. In essence, the invention—while utilizing the ca-
`pacitance change occurring at a pixel site as a measure
`of light received at such site—works to restore a quies-
`cent capacitance (and voltage) level at such site, utiliz-
`ing the discharge of a reference capacitor for such pur-
`pose. Thus the voltage change across the reference
`capacitor (which results from its discharge) is represen-
`tative of the light received at the pixel site.
`The invention will be described with reference to the
`figures within.
`FIG. 1 is a plan view of a part of a basic CID struc-
`ture.
`
`0
`
`FIGS. 2a through ’2d are illustrations useful in de-
`scribing a typical prior art readout technique over
`which the invention is an improvement.
`FIG. 3 illustrates the timing associated with the read— .
`out technique of FIG. 2.
`.
`FIGS. 4a and 4b are drawings useful in illustrating
`the nature of a problem inherent in CID readout tech-
`niques similar to that of FIG. 2.
`FIGS. 5a through 5:! are drawings which serve to
`illustrate the cause of the problem inherent in prior art 65
`readout techniques.
`_
`FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram illustrating a presently
`preferred embodiment of the invention.
`
`V
`
`2
`Reference should be had to FIG. 1 which shows four
`pixels of a conventional CID 10: Each pixel, as is
`known, comprises a row-addressable MOS capacitor
`and a column-addressable MOS capacitor. By applying
`suitable address signals from processing electronics 12
`to, for example, X’ and Y’ busses, a pixel 14 of the CID
`may be interrogated to produce a readout signal corre-
`sponding to the light information received at such pixel,
`(In the addressing scheme of FIG. 1, it will be noted
`that the row bus is addressed; then the column bus is
`addressed——readout being “column readout” as evi-
`denced by the double-headed arrows which connect the
`processing electronics 12 and the column busses).
`To appreciate the workings of a typical pixel readout
`technique which is based on capacitance-change sens-
`ing, reference should be had to FIGS. 2a through 2d
`and the accompanying timing diagram of FIG. 3; Up to
`time T= 1, light A causes a corresponding number of
`mobile minority carriers (holes) 16 to form in the body
`of the N-type semiconductor. Since the row gate X is at
`—20V, as shown, the minority carriers flow into the
`depletion region under the gate X. At time T= 2, under
`control of the processing electronics 12, the row gate X
`potential goes to zero volts, causing the minority carri-
`ers 16 to shift to the depletion region under the Y gate,
`which is held at —— l0V by the processing electronics.
`At. time T= 3, an electronic switch 18 withifl the
`processing electronics is opened, causing the potential
`of the Y gate to float. (To be noted is that the Y gate
`potential does not change at time T= 3, this being be-
`cause the Y gate, and the depletion region thereunder,
`constitute, in actuality, no more than a charged capaci-
`tor which has been charged, a11d then removed from its
`charging source).
`V
`.
`At time T=4 (and with the float switch 18 still open),
`a positive-going pulse is applied, via a coupling capacir
`tor 20 within the processing electronics, to the Y ‘gate.
`This causes the stored minority carriers to be injected
`into the semiconductor and gathered by the P-type
`epitaxial layer. Then at time T.-=5 (and with the float
`switch 18 still open), the potential of the Y gate is com-
`pared with the pre-injection potential (- l0V) by a
`difference circuit 22,
`the comparison resulting in a
`video signal voltage representative of light A received at
`the pixel.
`The mechanism for the production of the video signal
`voltage may be appreciated from FIGS. 2b and 2d: In
`FIG. 2b, a relatively large capacitance, corresponding
`to the close proximity of the depletion level 28 tic the Y
`gate, is charged to —-10V. Since, as indicated in FIG,
`2d, the Y gate is still floating after the charge 16 has
`been injected, Y gate electrons are trapped on the Y
`gate. Such being the case, fixed (immobile) holes appear
`in the semiconductor material, thereby to neutralize the 3
`electronic charge on the Y gate. The immobile holes so
`produced characterize a depletion region 28' which, to
`be noted, is not only greater in depth than the depletion
`level 28, but is also greater in depth than the original Y
`depletion region (28”, FIG. 2a). The relatively small
`capacitance that corresponds to the depth of the FIG.
`2d depletion_region 28’ exhibits a larger voltage than
`that which corresponds to the capacitance asscciated
`with FIG. 2b, “signal voltage” being variable inversely
`with capacitance when the charge level is fixed (he.
`cause of the action of the float switch 18), Thus, the
`FIGS. 2b—to-2d . capacitance change translates directly
`into a signal voltage change.
`
`1033-006
`
`1033-006
`
`

`
`4,079,422
`
`3
`Assuming one were to use a CID capacitance readout ,
`scheme as disclosed in connection with FIGS. 2a
`
`through 2d, faithful reproduction of a scene as depicted
`in FIG. 4a would occur so long as the light images
`falling on the imaging face of the CID were not too
`bright. Were the light images to be brighter than a
`threshold level, the CID, per FIGS. 2a through 2d,_
`would be productive of an intensity-distorted display as
`depicted in FIG. 4b. (The intensity-distortion problem
`has heretofore been sidestepped, principally—it
`is
`believed-—because it was not fully appreciated). While
`one solution to such intensity-distortion is to employ a
`filter, or the like, over the imaging face of the CID,
`thereby reducing the light level reaching the CID face,
`such a technique leaves much to be desired since it
`sacrifices the sensitivity of the CID to assure against
`exceeding the above-noted brightness threshold. By
`analysis, the present invention identifies the cause of the
`intensity-distortion problem and provides apparatus
`which—while still basically employing capacitive
`readout——nullifies the influence of such problem cause:
`PROBLEM
`
`FIGS. 5a through 5d depict 2 pixels, say 14 and 40 of
`FIG. 1, wherein the pixel 14 shall be assumed to be
`addressed, for example, as indicated in connection with
`FIGS. 2a through 2d and FIG. 3. Assume further that
`the pixel 40 has been over-illuminated (time T= l), the
`depletion region under its X” gate so overfilling with
`minority carriers that some of such minority carriers
`reside beneath the Y’ gate of the pixel 40. At time T=2
`(FIG. 5b) the voltage on the X’ bus associated with the
`addressed pixel 14 is changed from —20V to zero volts,
`causing the minority carriers of the pixel 14 to shift to
`beneath the Y’ gate thereof. (Since the potential on the
`X” gate of the pixel 40 remains at —-20V at time T= 2,
`the storage of its minority carriers does not change from
`that depicted in FIG. 5a). At time T= 3, the potential of
`the Y’ gate of the pixel 14 is floated.
`In response to a positive “injection” pulse (time T= 4)
`the minority carriers beneath the Y’ gate of the pixel 14
`are injected (FIG. 5c), the minority carriers of the pixel
`40 shifting to reside, at least moreso, under the X” gate
`thereof. After the “injection” pulse (time T= 5), the
`situation depicted in FIG. 5d obtains. As was the case in
`connection with FIG. 2d, the Y’ gate capacitance of the
`pixel .14 at this time has decreased as a result of the
`charge-‘injection—but such charge-injection has had no
`effect on the storage of minority carriers beneath the Y’
`gate of the over-illuminated pixel 40. Since the capaci-I
`tance change which is measured per
`the above-
`described technique is,
`in actuality,
`the capacitance
`change occurring in a “column” of capacitors con-
`nected in parallel, i.e., the “Y’ capacitor” of the pixel 14
`is in parallel with the “Y’ capacitor” of the pixel 40, the
`Y’ column capacitance of FIG. 5d is "greater than when
`the pixel 40 is not over-illuminated. In other words, in
`FIG. 5d, the capacitance corresponding to the depletion
`level 40’, when summed with the capacitance corre-
`sponding to the depletion level 14' produces a greater
`column capacitance than when the capacitance corre-
`sponding to the depletion level 40” is summed with the
`capacitance corresponding to the depletion level 14’.
`Because such column capacitance is greater than it
`ought to be in this instance, all pixels associated with the
`Y’ column which are not over-illuminated, will, when
`addressed, produce a readout voltage which is lower
`
`5
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30’
`
`40
`
`55
`
`60
`
`4
`than what would be representative of the light falling
`thereon. Attendantly, the display of FIG. 4b results.
`Having identified the source of the intensity-distor-
`tion problem, a new problem obtains, viz. how to pro-
`vide capacitive-based readout without having to read
`column capacitance.
`
`SOLIITION
`
`The invention-—while utilizing the mechanism of
`pixel capacitance-changing within a CID for purposes
`of determining the level of light received—does not
`directly ‘convert, say, a column capacitance to a signal
`voltage. Rather, the invention teaches, in the readout of
`a CID pixel, the supply of charge to the pixel being
`read, such charge restoring the capacitance and voltage .
`of the pixel readout gate (and of the column, since all
`pixels in the column are connected in parallel) to its
`pre-light-integration level. The supply of charge is from
`a pre-charged capacitor,
`the voltage change thereof
`resulting from its discharge being a video signal that is
`totally independent of column capacitance; and attend-
`antly a display therefrom will not be intensity-distorted
`as a result of the over-illumination of, column pixels.
`Reference should now be had to FIG. 6: A schemati-
`cally depicted CID 50 is row-and-column addressable
`by processing electronics 52 and 54 as per the discussion
`relating to FIGS. 2a through 2d. Gates 52-which may
`be on-chip MOS switches-—are respectively connected
`to each column bus and are adapted to open when their
`respective columns are addressed, thereby effectively
`insulating the columns from each other. (Gate-opera-
`tion is, for example, designed to occur while “measur-
`ing”, which is a set-time after occurrence of the “injec-
`tion” pulse). The output circuits of the gates 52 are
`connected to one input A of an operational amplif1ery54
`having a reference voltage VR applied to its other input
`B. The reference voltage VR equals the column poten-
`tial —- 10 volts) discussed above in connection with FIG.
`2. A feedback capacitor 56 is connected between the
`output and input B of the amplifier 54; and such capaci-
`tor is periodically charged to the reference voltage VR
`through a gate 58. That is, the gate 58 periodically
`removes the reference voltage source from across the
`feedback capacitor 56 under action of a signal (“mea-
`sure”, time T=5 per FIG. 2a’) calling for a pixel to be
`read.
`
`In reading the minority charge accumulation, say, of
`the pixel X, Y, (FIG. 6), the gate 58 allows the capacitor
`56 to charge (between times T=0 and T=5) to the
`reference voltage VR. Up to time T= 5, the amplifier 54
`has virtually no output since its A and B inputs are
`identical. At time T= 5, however, the gate 58 is inhib-
`ited; and the gate 521 opened. Assuming the Y, potential
`has, as a result of minority carrier injection, gone from
`— 10V to —l2V, the amplifier output goes positive by 2
`volts, thereby causing charge (electrons) to be drawn
`from the Y, gate andiresulting in its potential returning
`to —10V. Since‘ the capacitor 56 works to restore the
`column voltage—and which voltage is not affected as a
`result of over-illumination of other column pixels—it
`develops an information representative voltage-change
`corresponding to its charge-change, the value of the
`capacitor 56 being a constant.
`The invention has been described in detail with par-
`ticular respect to implementations thereof, but it will be
`appreciated that variations .and_modif1cations can be
`effected within the spirit and scope of the invention.
`For example, while the CID of FIG. 6 is operated ac-
`
`1033-007
`
`1033-007
`
`

`
`5
`cording to the readout scheme of FIGS. 20 through 2d,
`other CID readout schemes which are based on “col-
`umn” (or “row”) capacitance change are practicable
`with the invention. See,
`for instance,
`the readout
`schemes appearing on page 35 of ELECTRO-OPTI-
`CAL SYSTEMS DESIGN, Oct., 1975.
`What is claimed is:
`1. In combination,
`(a) a charge injection device having a plurality of
`MOS pixels, each pixel being comprised of first and
`second gate electrodes, said first gate electrodes
`being electrically isolated from each other and said
`second gate electrodes being electrically connected
`together,
`(b) means for applying first and second voltages re-
`spectively to the electrically isolated and electri-
`cally connected gate electrodes, said first voltage
`providing a greater depletion region within the
`body of the semiconductor material forming said
`charge injection device than said second voltage,
`and
`
`(c) means for selectively determining the level of
`minority charges at a given pixel comprising
`(1) means for floating the voltage on the second
`gate electrode of the given pixel,
`(2) means operative while floating the voltage on
`the second gate electrode for varying the first
`voltage to decrease the depletion region beneath
`the first gate electrode of the given pixel, thereby
`to cause the minority charge thereunder to shift
`to beneath the second gate electrode of the given
`pixel, thereby further -causing the capacitance
`between the second gate electrode and the semi-
`conductor body of the charge injection device to
`change, and
`(3) prechargeable capacitive means, cooperative
`with said second gate electrode for supplying
`charge to said second gate electrode to keep the
`voltage thereon constant, the voltage change of
`said prechargeable capactive means correspond-
`ing to said minority carriers beneath said second
`gate electrode.
`2. The combination of claim 1 wherein said pre-
`chargeable means comprises:
`(a) a difference amplifier having first and second
`input circuits and an output circuit,
`(b) a capacitor connected between said output circuit
`and said first input circuit,
`'
`(c) means for applying a bias equal to said second
`voltage to said second input circuit, and
`(d) means for charging said capacitor to said second
`voltage before selectively determining the minority
`charge level of a pixel.
`3, In combination,
`(a) a charge injection device comprising
`(1) a plurality of pixels arranged in columns and
`rows, each pixel being comprised of a row and a
`column gate electrode,
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`4,079,422
`
`6
`(2) row busses connecting the row gate electrodes
`of respective rows of pixels, and
`(3)column busses connecting the column gate elec-
`trodes of respective columns of pixels
`the column and row busses being electrically insulated
`from each other
`
`(b) means for selectively applying and removing de-
`pleting potentials to and from said row busses,
`(c) a potential source for applying to said column
`busses depletion potentials which are less than the
`depletion potentials applied to said row busses, and
`switch means for removing the potential source
`from said column busses,
`(d) difference means selectively cooperative with said
`column busses for comparing the potential of a
`selected column bus with a reference potential to
`produce an error voltage, and
`(e) a capacitor_ adapted to be precharged to said refer-
`ence potential and selectively connectable to said
`column busses, said capacitor being connected to
`the output of said difference means and discharge-
`able in proportion to said error voltage,
`the potential charge across said capacitor correspond-
`ing to an information signal.
`4. Circuit apparatus comprising:
`(a) a charge injection device pixel comprising first
`and second gate electrodes,
`(b) means for applying first and second potentials to
`said electrodes, said first potential providing a
`greater depletion region within the body of the
`charge injection device pixel than said second po-
`tential,
`(c) means for floating the potential on the second gate
`electrode,
`,
`.
`(d) means operative while floating the potential on
`the second gate electrode for varying the first po-
`tential to decrease the depletion beneath the first
`gate electrode, and
`(e) means having a reference potential responsive to
`the potential of said second gate electrode for alter-
`ing its reference potential to maintain the potential
`of said second gate electrode,
`the change in potential of said reference potential means
`being representative of the minority carrier charge
`stored by said pixel.
`5. The apparatus of claim 4 wherein said means hav-
`ing a reference potential comprises:
`(a) a capacitor, adapted to be precharged to the sec-
`ond potential, and selectively connectable to said
`second gate electrode, and
`(b) means for comparing the potential of said second
`gate electrode with said reference potential to pro-
`duce an error voltage, _said error voltage being
`applied to said capacitor,
`,
`whereby said capacitor in response to said error voltage
`charges and discharges to maintain the second potential
`of said second gate electrode,
`the potential change
`across said capacitor being representative of stored
`minority carrier charge.
`#
`It
`*
`It
`4!
`
`1033-008
`
`1033-008

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket