throbber
Paper 43
`Date: November 27, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`APPLE INC.,
`ZTE CORPORATION and ZTE (USA) INC.,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`E-WATCH, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`_______________
`
`Case IPR2015-004121
`Patent 7,365,871 B2
`_______________
`
`Before JAMESON LEE, GREGG I. ANDERSON, and
`MATTHEW R. CLEMENTS, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`CLEMENTS, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Trial Hearing Order
`35 U.S.C. § 326(a)(10); 37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`
`
`1 IPR2015-01366 has been joined with IPR2015-00412.
`
`

`
`IPR2015-00412
`Patent 7,365,871 B2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Both parties requested a hearing pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a).
`
`Paper 40; Paper 42. The request is granted.
`
`Also, in response to an inquiry from the Board asking for alternative
`
`hearing dates, the parties requested to move the hearing to a date between
`
`January 6, 2016 and January 15, 2016. That request also is granted.
`
`Each party will have forty-five (45) minutes of total time to present
`
`arguments. Petitioner bears the ultimate burden of proof that Patent
`
`Owner’s original patent claims at issue are unpatentable. Therefore, at oral
`
`hearing, Petitioner will proceed first to present its case with respect to the
`
`challenged claims and grounds with respect to which the Board instituted
`
`trial. Petitioner may reserve some of its argument time for rebuttal.
`
`Thereafter, Patent Owner will respond to Petitioner’s presentation,
`
`having available to it the entirety of its allotted argument time.
`
`Finally, Petitioner may make use of the time it has reserved to rebut
`
`Patent Owner’s opposing presentation with regard to the original patent
`
`claims.
`
`The hearing will commence at 1:00 PM Eastern Time on January 8,
`
`2016, and will be open to the public for in-person attendance on the ninth
`
`floor of Madison Building East, 600 Dulany Street, Alexandria, Virginia.
`
`In-person attendance will be accommodated on a first-come, first-served
`
`basis. The Board will provide a court reporter for the hearing and the
`
`reporter’s transcript will constitute the official record of the hearing.
`
`Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b), demonstrative exhibits must be served five
`
`business days prior to the hearing. They shall be filed at the Board two
`
`business days prior to the hearing, and the parties must initiate a conference
`
`2
`
`
`

`
`IPR2015-00412
`Patent 7,365,871 B2
`
`
`call with the Board by two business days prior to the hearing to resolve any
`
`
`
`dispute over the propriety of each party’s demonstrative exhibits. Any
`
`dispute over the propriety of demonstrative exhibits that is not timely
`
`presented two business days prior to the hearing will be considered waived.
`
`The parties are directed to CBS Interactive Inc. v. Helferich Patent
`
`Licensing, LLC, IPR2013-00033, Paper 118 (October 23, 2013), regarding
`
`the appropriate content of demonstrative exhibits.
`
`
`
`Questions regarding specific audio-visual equipment should be
`
`directed to the Board at (571) 272-9797. Requests for audio-visual
`
`equipment are to be made 5 days in advance of the hearing date. The
`
`request is to be sent to Trials@uspto.gov. If the request is not received
`
`timely, the equipment may not be available on the day of the hearing.
`
`The parties are reminded that the presenter must identify clearly and
`
`specifically each demonstrative exhibit (e.g., by slide or screen number)
`
`referenced during the hearing to ensure the clarity and accuracy of the
`
`reporter’s transcript. The parties also should note that two panel members
`
`will be attending the hearings electronically from a remote location and that
`
`if a demonstrative is not filed or otherwise made fully available or visible to
`
`the judge presiding over the hearing remotely, that demonstrative will not be
`
`considered. If the parties have questions as to whether demonstrative
`
`exhibits would be sufficiently visible and available to all of the judges, the
`
`parties are invited to contact the Board at (571) 272-9797.
`
`The Board expects lead counsel for each party to be present at
`
`hearing, although any backup counsel may make the actual presentation, in
`
`whole or in part. If any lead counsel will not be in attendance at hearing, the
`
`3
`
`
`

`
`IPR2015-00412
`Patent 7,365,871 B2
`
`
`Board should be notified via a joint telephone conference call no later than
`
`
`
`two days prior to the hearing to discuss the matter.
`
`ORDER
`
`It is
`
`ORDERED that Due Date 7 is reset to January 8, 2016, and the oral
`
`hearing will commence at 1:00 PM Eastern Time on that date; and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the previous agreement of
`
`ZTE Corporation and ZTE USA Inc. (Paper 23), arguments on behalf of
`
`Petitioner will be presented only by counsel for Apple Inc., unless Apple
`
`Inc. has been terminated from this proceeding.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`

`
`
`
`IPR2015-00412
`Patent 7,365,871 B2
`
`FOR PETITIONER APPLE INC.:
`
`
`
`Brian Buroker
`Blair Silver
`Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
`bburoker@gibsondunn.com
`bsilver@gibsondunn.com
`
`
`
`FOR PETITIONER ZTE CORPORATION and ZTE (USA) INC.:
`
`Steve Moore
`Richard Thill
`Barry Shelton
`Brian Nash
`Pillsbury Law LLP
`steve.moore@pillsburylaw.com
`richard.thill@pillsburylaw.com
`barry.shelton@pillsburylaw.com
`brian.nash@pillsburylaw.com
`
`5
`
`
`
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`
`Gregory S. Donahue
`gdonahue@dpelaw.com
`
`
`Robert C. Curfiss
`bob@curfiss.com
`
`David O. Simmons
`IVC Patent Agency
`dsimmons@sbcglobal.net
`
`Andrew DiNovo
`adinovo@dpelaw.com

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket