`
`____________________________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________________________________
`
`APPLE INC.,
`ZTE CORPORATION and ZTE (USA) INC.,
`Petitioners
`
`v.
`
`E-WATCH, INC.
`Patent Owner
`_____________________
`
`IPR2015-00412
`IPR2015-013661
`U.S. Patent No. 7,365,871 B2
`_____________________
`
`PATENT OWNER’S OBJECTIONS TO EVIDENCE SUBMITTED WITH
`PETITIONER’S REPLY BRIEF UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(B)(1)
`
`
`
`
`
`Mail Stop
`Patent Board
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`1 IPR2015-01366 has been joined with IPR2015-00412.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(1), Patent Owner e-Watch (“Patent Owner”
`
`or “e-Watch”) hereby objects to the following evidence submitted by Apple, Inc.
`
`(“Petitioner” or “Apple”) in conjunction with Petitioner’s Reply Brief, Paper 30,
`
`filed on October 15, 2015.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1.
`
`Exhibit 1010 is objected to for the following reasons:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(a)
`
`lack of proper authentication under Fed. R. Evid. 901;
`
`(b)
`
`hearsay under Fed. R. Evid. 801 and 802;
`
`(c)
`
`irrelevant under Fed. R. Evid. 402; and
`
`(d)
`
`unduly prejudicial, confusing the issues, misleading, and
`
`needlessly presenting cumulative evidence under Fed. R. Evid. 403.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2.
`
`Exhibit 1011 is objected to for the following reasons:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(a)
`
`lack of proper authentication under Fed. R. Evid. 901;
`
`(b)
`
`hearsay under Fed. R. Evid. 801 and 802;
`
`(c)
`
`irrelevant under Fed. R. Evid. 402; and
`
`(d)
`
`unduly prejudicial, confusing the issues, misleading, and
`
`needlessly presenting cumulative evidence under Fed. R. Evid. 403.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3.
`
`Exhibit 1012 is objected to for the following reasons:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(a)
`
`lack of proper authentication under Fed. R. Evid. 901;
`
`(b)
`
`hearsay under Fed. R. Evid. 801 and 802;
`
`(c)
`
`irrelevant under Fed. R. Evid. 402; and
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(d)
`
`unduly prejudicial, confusing the issues, misleading, and
`
`needlessly presenting cumulative evidence under Fed. R. Evid. 403.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4.
`
`Exhibit 1013 is objected to for the following reasons:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(a)
`
`lack of proper authentication under Fed. R. Evid. 901;
`
`(b)
`
`hearsay under Fed. R. Evid. 801 and 802;
`
`(c)
`
`irrelevant under Fed. R. Evid. 402; and
`
`(d)
`
`unduly prejudicial, confusing the issues, misleading, and
`
`needlessly presenting cumulative evidence under Fed. R. Evid. 403.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5.
`
`Exhibit 1014 is objected to for the following reasons:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(a)
`
`lack of proper authentication under Fed. R. Evid. 901;
`
`(b)
`
`hearsay under Fed. R. Evid. 801 and 802;
`
`(c)
`
`irrelevant under Fed. R. Evid. 402;
`
`(d)
`
`unduly prejudicial, confusing the issues, misleading, and
`
`needlessly presenting cumulative evidence under Fed. R. Evid. 403;
`
`
`
`
`
`(e)
`
`exceeding the proper scope of a reply under 37 C.F.R. §
`
`42.23(b) due to not being limited to responding to arguments raised in the patent
`
`owner’s response; and
`
`
`
`
`
`(f)
`
`an improper summary of evidence of non-voluminous writings
`
`that is also inaccurate and prejudicial under Fed. R. Evid. 1006.
`
`
`
`
`
`6.
`
`Exhibit 1015 is objected to for the following reasons:
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(a)
`
`lack of proper authentication under Fed. R. Evid. 901;
`
`(b)
`
`hearsay under Fed. R. Evid. 801 and 802;
`
`(c)
`
`irrelevant under Fed. R. Evid. 402; and
`
`(d)
`
`unduly prejudicial, confusing the issues, misleading, and
`
`needlessly presenting cumulative evidence under Fed. R. Evid. 403.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`7.
`
`Exhibit 1016 is objected to for the following reasons:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(a)
`
`lack of proper authentication under Fed. R. Evid. 901;
`
`(b)
`
`hearsay under Fed. R. Evid. 801 and 802;
`
`(c)
`
`irrelevant under Fed. R. Evid. 402; and
`
`(d)
`
`unduly prejudicial, confusing the issues, misleading, and
`
`needlessly presenting cumulative evidence under Fed. R. Evid. 403.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`8.
`
`Exhibit 1017 is objected to for the following reasons:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(a)
`
`lack of proper authentication under Fed. R. Evid. 901;
`
`(b)
`
`hearsay under Fed. R. Evid. 801 and 802;
`
`(c)
`
`irrelevant under Fed. R. Evid. 402; and
`
`(d)
`
`unduly prejudicial, confusing the issues, misleading, and
`
`needlessly presenting cumulative evidence under Fed. R. Evid. 403.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`9.
`
`Exhibit 1018 is objected to for the following reasons:
`
`
`
`
`
`(a)
`
`lack of proper authentication under Fed. R. Evid. 901;
`
`(b)
`
`hearsay under Fed. R. Evid. 801 and 802;
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(c)
`
`irrelevant under Fed. R. Evid. 402; and
`
`(d)
`
`unduly prejudicial, confusing the issues, misleading, and
`
`needlessly presenting cumulative evidence under Fed. R. Evid. 403.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`10. Exhibit 1019 is objected to for the following reasons:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(a)
`
`lack of proper authentication under Fed. R. Evid. 901;
`
`(b)
`
`hearsay under Fed. R. Evid. 801 and 802;
`
`(c)
`
`irrelevant under Fed. R. Evid. 402; and
`
`(d)
`
`unduly prejudicial, confusing the issues, misleading, and
`
`needlessly presenting cumulative evidence under Fed. R. Evid. 403.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`11. Exhibit 1020 is objected to for the following reasons:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(a)
`
`lack of proper authentication under Fed. R. Evid. 901;
`
`(b)
`
`hearsay under Fed. R. Evid. 801 and 802;
`
`(c)
`
`irrelevant under Fed. R. Evid. 402; and
`
`(d)
`
`unduly prejudicial, confusing the issues, misleading, and
`
`needlessly presenting cumulative evidence under Fed. R. Evid. 403.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`12. Exhibit 1021 is objected to for the following reasons:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(a)
`
`lack of proper authentication under Fed. R. Evid. 901;
`
`(b)
`
`hearsay under Fed. R. Evid. 801 and 802;
`
`(c)
`
`irrelevant under Fed. R. Evid. 402; and
`
`(d)
`
`unduly prejudicial, confusing the issues, misleading, and
`
`5
`
`
`
`
`
`needlessly presenting cumulative evidence under Fed. R. Evid. 403.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`13. Exhibit 1022 is objected to for the following reasons:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(a)
`
`lack of proper authentication under Fed. R. Evid. 901;
`
`(b)
`
`hearsay under Fed. R. Evid. 801 and 802;
`
`(c)
`
`irrelevant under Fed. R. Evid. 402; and
`
`(d)
`
`unduly prejudicial, confusing the issues, misleading, and
`
`needlessly presenting cumulative evidence under Fed. R. Evid. 403.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`14. Exhibit 1023 is objected to for the following reasons:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(a)
`
`lack of proper authentication under Fed. R. Evid. 901;
`
`(b)
`
`hearsay under Fed. R. Evid. 801 and 802;
`
`(c)
`
`irrelevant under Fed. R. Evid. 402; and
`
`(d)
`
`unduly prejudicial, confusing the issues, misleading, and
`
`needlessly presenting cumulative evidence under Fed. R. Evid. 403.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`15. Exhibit 1024 is objected to for the following reasons:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(a)
`
`lack of proper authentication under Fed. R. Evid. 901;
`
`(b)
`
`hearsay under Fed. R. Evid. 801 and 802;
`
`(c)
`
`irrelevant under Fed. R. Evid. 402; and
`
`(d)
`
`unduly prejudicial, confusing the issues, misleading, and
`
`needlessly presenting cumulative evidence under Fed. R. Evid. 403.
`
`
`
`
`
`16. Exhibit 1025 is objected to for the following reasons:
`
`6
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(a)
`
`lack of proper authentication under Fed. R. Evid. 901;
`
`(b)
`
`hearsay under Fed. R. Evid. 801 and 802;
`
`(c)
`
`irrelevant under Fed. R. Evid. 402; and
`
`(d)
`
`unduly prejudicial, confusing the issues, misleading, and
`
`needlessly presenting cumulative evidence under Fed. R. Evid. 403.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`17. Exhibit 1026 is objected to for the following reasons:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(a)
`
`lack of proper authentication under Fed. R. Evid. 901;
`
`(b)
`
`hearsay under Fed. R. Evid. 801 and 802;
`
`(c)
`
`irrelevant under Fed. R. Evid. 402; and
`
`(d)
`
`unduly prejudicial, confusing the issues, misleading, and
`
`needlessly presenting cumulative evidence under Fed. R. Evid. 403.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`18. Exhibit 1027 is objected to for the following reasons:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(a)
`
`lack of proper authentication under Fed. R. Evid. 901;
`
`(b)
`
`hearsay under Fed. R. Evid. 801 and 802;
`
`(c)
`
`irrelevant under Fed. R. Evid. 402; and
`
`(d)
`
`unduly prejudicial, confusing the issues, misleading, and
`
`needlessly presenting cumulative evidence under Fed. R. Evid. 403.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`19. Exhibit 1028 is objected to for the following reasons:
`
`
`
`
`
`(a)
`
`lack of proper authentication under Fed. R. Evid. 901;
`
`(b)
`
`hearsay under Fed. R. Evid. 801 and 802;
`
`7
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(c)
`
`irrelevant under Fed. R. Evid. 402; and
`
`(d)
`
`unduly prejudicial, confusing the issues, misleading, and
`
`needlessly presenting cumulative evidence under Fed. R. Evid. 403.
`
`These objections have been timely made and served within five (5) business
`
`
`
`days of the October 15, 2015 service of Petitioner’s Reply Brief.
`
`
`
`By: /Gregory S. Donahue/
`DATED: October 19, 2015
` Gregory S. Donahue (Reg. No. 47,531)
` DiNovo Price Ellwanger & Hardy LLP
` 7000 North MoPac Expressway
` Suite 350
`
`
` Austin, TX 78731
` Telephone: (512) 539-2625
` Facsimile: (512) 539-2627
`
`
`Attorney for Patent Owner E-Watch, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`8
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned certifies service pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e) of a copy
`
`of this Patent Owner’s Objections to Evidence Submitted with Petitioner’s Reply
`
`Brief Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(1) by electronic mail on October 19, 2015 on the
`
`counsel of record for:
`
`Patent Owner:
`
`Robert C. Curfiss, bob@curfiss.com
`
`David Simmons, dsimmons1@sbcglobal.net
`
`Greg Donahue, gdonahue@dpelaw.com
`
`ZTE Corporation and ZTE (USA) Inc.:
`
`Steve Moore, steve.moore@pillsburylaw.com
`
`Richard Thill, richard.thill@pillsburylaw.com
`
`Barry Shelton, barry.shelton@pillsburylaw.com
`
`Brian Nash, nash@pillsburylaw.com
`
`Apple Inc.:
`
`Brian Buroker, bburoker@gibsondunn.com
`
`Blair Silver, bsilver@gibsondunn.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DATED: October 19, 2015
`
`By: /s/ Bob Curfiss
`
`
`
`
`
`9