`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Paper 15
`
`
` Entered: June 4, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`APPLE INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`E-WATCH, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`
`Case IPR2015-00412
`Patent 7,365,871 B2
`
`
`
`Before JAMESON LEE, GREGG I. ANDERSON, and
`MATTHEW R. CLEMENTS, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`Order
`Conduct of Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2015-00412
`Patent 7,365,871 B2
`
`
`The Board instituted trial in this proceeding on May 11, 2015. Paper
`12. On June 3, 2015, an initial conference call was held. The participants
`were respective counsel for the parties and Judges Lee, Anderson, and
`Clements. Neither party contemplated the filing of any motion at this time,
`and none was discussed. We advised counsel for each party that a proper
`Motion to Exclude Evidence should not include arguments alleging that a
`reply exceeds the scope of a proper reply. If such an issue arises, the parties
`should initiate a joint telephone conference call to the Board. We also
`advised the parties that even if a protective order has been entered in the
`case, a motion to seal is still required to place anything under seal, and that a
`motion to seal would not be granted unless the associated burden of proof
`has been met. In that regard, we directed attention of the parties to Corning
`Optical Commc’ns RF, LLC v. PPC Broadband, Inc., Case IPR2014-00736
`(Papers 37, 38, 40).
`We further advised the parties of the distinction between supplemental
`evidence under 37 C.F.R. § 42.64 and supplemental information under
`37 C.F.R. § 42.123. Supplemental evidence supports the “admissibility” of
`initially submitted evidence and is not itself supplemental information.
`During the conference call, counsel for Petitioner requested that the
`date of scheduled oral argument, currently set as December 8, 2015, be
`changed to December 18, 2015. Counsel for Patent Owner does not oppose
`the proposed change in the date of oral argument, if oral argument will be
`held. We granted the request.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2015-00412
`Patent 7,365,871 B2
`
`It is
`
`ORDERED that Due Date 6 in the Scheduling Order dated May 11,
`
`2015 (Paper 13) is reset from November 25, 2015, to December 4, 2015, and
`that Due Date 7 in the Scheduling Order dated May 11, 2015 (Paper 13) is
`reset from December 8, 2015, to December 18, 2015.
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Brian Buroker
`Blair Silver
`Gibson, Dunn, & Crutcher LLP
`bburoker@gibsondunn.com
`bsilver@gibsondunn.com
`
`
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`Robert C. Curfiss
`bob@curfiss.com
`
`David O. Simmons
`IVC Patent Agency
`dsimmons@sbcglobal.net
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
