`
`Subject:
`
`IPR2015-00410: Request for a Conference Call With the Board
`
`From: Vignone, Maria [mailto:Maria.Vignone@USPTO.GOV] On Behalf Of Trials
`Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 4:14 PM
`To: Peter Armenio; Trials
`Cc: Bateman, John; Shen, Karen; Evangeline Shih; Poche, Thomas
`Subject: RE: IPR2015-00410: Request for a Conference Call With the Board
`
`Counsel:
`
`The parties are authorized to file a joint motion to terminate the proceedings in each case, along with a copy of the
`settlement agreement and a separate request that the settlement agreement be treated as business confidential
`information and be kept separate from the case files under 37 C.F.R. 42.74(c). For guidance on what the joint motion to
`terminate must include, we direct the parties to case IPR2015-00293, Paper 7 (PTAB Jan. 8, 2015).
`
`The papers shall be filed no later than Wednesday, May 20.
`
`
`In light of the foregoing, the deadline for Petitioner’s supplemental brief regarding the real party-in-interest issue, which
`is currently due May 7, 2015, is suspended until further notice.
`
`Thank you,
`
`Maria Vignone
`Paralegal Operations Manager
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`571-272-4645
`
`
`
`From: Peter Armenio [mailto:peterarmenio@quinnemanuel.com]
`Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 12:25 PM
`To: Trials
`Cc: Bateman, John; Shen, Karen; Evangeline Shih; Poche, Thomas
`Subject: IPR2015-00410: Request for a Conference Call With the Board
`
`To Whom It May Concern:
`
`
`Patent Owner in IPR2015-00410 respectfully requests a conference call with the Board to request leave to file a joint
`motion to terminate the proceedings. The reason for the requested leave to file a joint motion to terminate is that the
`parties have entered into a confidential settlement agreement. Petitioners do not oppose this request.
`
`During the same conference call, Petitioners would also like to request that the Board hold in abeyance the deadline
`(which is currently May 7, 2015) for Petitioners’ supplemental brief and evidence on the real party in interest issue
`(which was authorized by the Board’s April 16, 2015 Order (Paper No. 17)) until after the Board decides all issues relating
`to the proposed joint motion to terminate. Patent Owner does not oppose this request.
`
`Counsel for the parties are available for the requested conference call at the Board’s convenience any time today (May
`6, 2015) and tomorrow (May 7, 2015), and have additional availability should the Board so require. Thank you very
`much.
`
`
`1
`
`Adamas Exhibit 2006
`Ranbaxy Labs. Ltd. et al. (Petitioners) v. Adamas Pharms., Inc. (Patent Owner)
`Case IPR2015-00410
`
`Page 1 of 2
`
`
`
`Respectfully,
`Peter J. Armenio
`Lead Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`Peter J. Armenio, P.C.
`Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
`51 Madison Avenue
`New York, NY 10010
`212-849-7070 Direct
`212-849-7100 FAX
`peterarmenio@quinnemanuel.com
`
`NOTICE: The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This message
`may be an attorney-client communication and/or work product and as such is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended
`recipient or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any
`review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
`by e-mail, and delete the original message.
`
`
`2
`
`Page 2 of 2
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
