throbber
Washington, D.C. - Offices - About Us - Reed Smith
`
`Home > About Us > Offices > Washington, D.C.
`
`Washington, D.C.
`
`1301 K Street, N.W.
`Suite 1100 - East Tower
`Washington, DC 20005
`
`Overview Directions People News & Publications
`
`T +1 202 414 9200
`
`F +1 202 414 9299
`
`The nearly 100 lawyers in our Washington, D.C. office are uniquely positioned to serve clients locally, nationally and internationally. Reed
`Smith began to establish its presence in the nation’s capital with the opening of the D.C. office in 1970, merging with Gall, Lane & Powell in
`1976, and then merging again in 1989 with Pierson Ball & Dowd. The D.C. lawyers have maintained a historical reputation for serving clients
`in areas of regulatory and government affairs, financial services, insurance recovery, health care, import and export compliance, government
`contracts, litigation, real estate, intellectual property, labor and employment, and benefits law.
`
`The D.C. office boasts a substantial litigation practice, with seasoned and experienced trial veterans, focusing on products liability; significant
`antitrust matters; and intellectual property, particularly with the ITC (International Trade Commission) and the PTO (Patent and Trademark
`Office). In addition, the transactional practice is strong in the areas of business and finance; corporate advice and defense; health care; labor
`and employment, primarily representing management; and government relations on local, state and federal levels.
`
`Plus, the lawyers in D.C. routinely counsel clients on regulatory and legislative matters, matters of fraud and abuse, payment, reimbursement
`and coverage, health planning, and licensure, as well as on transactional matters, medical staff affairs and patient care issues, export/import
`compliance, and infrastructure solutions and privatization. Some of the office’s notable clients include Astellas, Children’s Hospital, C. R.
`Bard, Fannie Mae, Omnicare, SAIC and the United Negro College Fund.
`
`The partners and associates of the Washington, D.C. office are very active in the local business community through individual and personal
`involvement in the D.C. Chamber of Commerce, the Federal City Council and Greater Washington Board of Trade. The D.C. lawyers and
`office staff also support the local community through involvement with the DC Bar, Greater DC Cares, Susan G. Komen 5K to fight breast
`cancer, Lawyers Have Heart 10K to fight heart disease, and the Salvation Army's Angel Tree program. Lawyers from the D.C. office also
`serve on various boards of nonprofit organizations.
`
`Please contact Washington, D.C. Office Managing Partner Gary Thompson at +1 202 414 9418 for more information about the legal
`capabilities of our Washington office.
`
`Location Map
`
`search the map
`
`Report a map error
`
`Search
`
`© 2015 Reed Smith LLP. All rights reserved.
`
`http://www.reedsmith.com/Washington-DC-United-States-of-America/
`
`1/15/2015
`
`IPR2015-00399
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1026, p. 1
`
`

`
`Reed Smith
`
`TFW
`
`ashington, D.C.
`+1 202 414 9202
`+1 202 414 9299
`
`Stephen M. Hertzler
`Associate
`
`shertzler@reedsmith.com
`
`Practice Areas
`Intellectual Property
`Patent Litigation
`Trademark Litigation
`Copyright Litigation
`IP Litigation
`
`Education
`George Mason University
`School of Law, 2003, J.D.,
`Intellectual Property Track
`Virginia Commonwealth
`University, 2000, B.S.,
`Chemical Engineering,
`Mathematical Sciences
`Minor
`Governor’s School for
`Government and
`International Studies
`(GSGIS)
`
`Professional
`Admissions /
`Qualifications
`District of Columbia
`
`Overview
`
`Stephen is a member of the Intellectual Property Group in the
`Washington, D.C. office. His practice focuses on managing the
`intellectual property portfolios of his clients, both foreign and
`domestic. Stephen's technical experience includes business
`methods and the software arts, with a focus on computer/network
`systems, digital rights management, network security, mobile
`device security, data encryption, browser and navigational interface
`security, visual/graphical identification methods, and digital
`watermarking. Further technical experience includes the chemical
`and electrical arts, such as polymers, semiconductors, medical
`devices, and nanotechnology.
`
`Employment History
`2010 - Reed Smith
`2001 - Nixon Peabody, LLP
`2000 - Philip Morris USA, Professional Intern
`1999 - Philip Morris USA, Summer Intern
`1998 - BI Chemicals, Inc, Y2K Team Member
`1997 - Lydall, Inc., Southern Products Division, Assistant ISO
`Coordinator
`
`Professional Affiliations
`District of Columbia Bar Association
`
`© 2015 Reed Smith LLP. All rights reserved.
`
`http://www.reedsmith.com/people/detailprint.aspx?attorney=2302&pdf=yes&p=all&sectio...
`
`1/14/2015
`
`IPR2015-00399
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1026, p. 2
`
`

`
`Reed Smith
`
`TFW
`
`ashington, D.C.
`+1 202 414 9249
`+1 202 414 9299
`
`Marc S. Kaufman
`Partner
`
`mskaufman@reedsmith.com
`
`Practice Areas
`Intellectual Property
`IP Transactions
`Patent Litigation
`IP Litigation
`Patent Post Grant
`Proceedings
`Employee Issues Including
`Innovators Patent
`Agreements (IPA)
`Patent Risk Reduction
`Techniques
`Monetization Transactions
`(Licensing/Purchase/Sale)
`Patent Prosecution and
`Acquisition/Portfolio
`Management
`Entertainment & Media
`Industry Group
`Advertising, Technology &
`Media
`Advertising
`Media
`
`Education
`Catholic University School
`of Law, J.D.
`Boston University, B.S.,
`Mechanical Engineering
`
`Professional
`Admissions /
`Qualifications
`District of Columbia
`U.S. Patent and Trademark
`Office
`
`Court Admissions
`U.S. Court of Appeals -
`District of Columbia Circuit
`
`Overview
`
`Marc specializes in assisting clients in managing and monetizing
`their intellectual property assets and in defending against patent
`assertions. Marc is experienced in post grant challenges in the U.S.
`Patent Office, including inter-partes review proceedings. He has
`developed structured procedures for defining and executing
`intellectual property strategies that are aligned with overall business
`objectives. From procuring and enforcing rights both in the United
`States and abroad to structuring and negotiating intellectual
`property transactions, Marc uses his skills and experience to help
`his clients achieve all of their objectives. Marc possesses a unique
`ability to understand the needs of his clients and to deliver relevant,
`timely and practical intellectual property related business and legal
`advice.
`
`Marc has developed and managed patent portfolios that have been
`widely licensed by major corporations. Often times, he guides his
`clients in the sale of patents, that are no longer relevant to core
`objectives. Marc's practice encompasses work in a wide variety of
`technical fields including content aggregation and targeting, digital
`rights management, database technology, document retrieval,
`search engine technology, and data mining.
`
`Marc has spoken across the country, authored several articles, and
`been quoted in notable publications such as the New York Times,
`with respect to a variety of intellectual property issues. Marc has
`served as a chair of the Law Seminars International Conferences
`on patent monetization, which are held across the U.S. to provide
`education and industry insights to business consultants and in-
`house counsel alike.
`
`Employment History
`2010 - Reed Smith
`Nixon Peabody, serving as Patents Practice Group Leader
`
`Honors & Awards
`Named to Intellectual Asset Management's IAM 250 - A Guide to
`the World's Leading IP Strategists, in 2010 and 2011
`Named to the Intellectual Asset Management's IAM 300 - A Guide
`to the World's Leading IP Strategists in 2012, 2013, and 2014
`Recognized in Client Service All-Star national survey by the BTI
`Consulting Group, Inc.
`
`Professional Affiliations
`
`http://www.reedsmith.com/people/detailprint.aspx?attorney=2430&pdf=yes&p=all&sectio...
`
`1/14/2015
`
`IPR2015-00399
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1026, p. 3
`
`

`
`Reed Smith
`
`U.S. Court of Appeals -
`Federal Circuit
`
`Currently serving as Board Counsel to St. Andrew's Episcopal
`School
`
`News & Publications
`Publications
`17 October
`2014
`
`Supreme Court: Should Appeal Give
`Deference to Lower Courts on Claim
`Construction?
`Reed Smith Client Alerts
`Co-Author(s): Robert R. Riddle
`Client Alerts
`
`22 April 2014 The U.S. Patent Minefield
`Network Interference: A Legal Guide to the
`Commercial Risks and Rewards of the Social
`Media Phenomenon (3rd Edition)
`White Papers
`
`10 December
`2013
`
`Patent Suits Becoming More Onerous for
`Plaintiffs?
`Reed Smith Client Alerts
`Client Alerts
`
`16 August
`2013
`
`A New Wrinkle in the Defense of Patent
`Exhaustion
`Reed Smith Client Alert
`Client Alerts
`
`5 June 2013 White House Announces Patent Enforcement
`Recommendations
`Reed Smith Client Alert
`Client Alerts
`
`15 February
`2013
`
`9 May 2012
`
`2012
`
`First Inventor to File System Dictates
`Changes in Patent Filing Strategies
`Reed Smith Client Alert
`Co-Author(s): Louis A. DePaul, Amardeep
`(Sonny) Grewal
`Client Alerts
`
`Effective Patent Monetization Strategy
`IP Monetization 2012: Maximize the Value of
`Your IP Assets
`Articles Published
`
`Petent Monetization Cookbook: A Structured
`Approach to Monetizing Patents
`IP Value 2012 Building & Enforcing Intellectual
`Property Value
`Articles Published
`
`6 February
`2006
`
`Efficient Execution of an IP Strategy
`IAM Magazine
`Articles Published
`
`Speaking Engagements
`
`http://www.reedsmith.com/people/detailprint.aspx?attorney=2430&pdf=yes&p=all&sectio...
`
`1/14/2015
`
`IPR2015-00399
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1026, p. 4
`
`

`
`Reed Smith
`
`18-19
`September
`2014
`
`6-7 March
`2014
`
`19-20 March
`2013
`
`9 May 2012
`
`6 February
`2012
`
`21 February
`2011
`
`Blogs
`22 October
`2013
`
`Calculating & Proving Patent Damages:
`Strategic issues for proving and refuting
`damages claims
`"Patent Valuation: Lessons from Recent
`Transactions in the Patent Monetization
`Marketplace"
`Twelve & K Hotel
`Washington, DC
`Seminar
`
`Law Seminars International Presents: Best
`Practices in Patent Monetization
`University Club of San Francisco
`San Francisco, CA
`Seminar
`
`2013 ANA Ad Law & Public Policy
`Conference
`Four Seasons Hotel
`Washington, D.C.
`Seminar
`
`IP Monetization 2012: Maximize the Value of
`Your IP Assets
`"Implementing a Successful IP Monetization
`Program"
`PLI New York Center
`New York, NY
`Seminar
`
`Law Seminars International Presents: Best
`Practices in Patent Monetization
`San Francisco, CA
`San Francisco, CA
`CLE / CPD
`
`Law Seminars International Presents: Best
`Practices in Patent Monetization - Strategies
`for Getting Value from Patents in the
`Corporate World
`San Francisco, CA
`Seminar
`
`The Patent Fight for Targeted Advertising –
`<Adlaw By Request>
`
`© 2015 Reed Smith LLP. All rights reserved.
`
`http://www.reedsmith.com/people/detailprint.aspx?attorney=2430&pdf=yes&p=all&sectio...
`
`1/14/2015
`
`IPR2015-00399
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1026, p. 5

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket