throbber

`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMIVHSSIONER FOR PATENTS
`PO. Box 1450
`Alexandria1 Virginia 22313-1450
`www.uspto.gov
`
`APPLICATION NO.
`
`13/316,203
`
`ISSUE DATE
`
`08/27/2013
`
`PATENT NO.
`
`ATTORNEY DOCKET NO.
`
`CONFIRMATION NO.
`
`8521234
`
`SOLME.001A2C8
`
`1697
`
`20995
`
`7590
`
`08/07/2013
`
`KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR LLP
`2040 MAIN STREET
`FOURTEENTH FLOOR
`IRVINE, CA 92614
`
`The projected patent number and issue date are specified above.
`
`ISSUE NOTIFICATION
`
`Determination of Patent Term Adjustment under 35 U.S.C. 154 (b)
`(application filed on or after May 29, 2000)
`
`The Patent Term Adjustment is 0 day(s). Any patent to issue from the above—identified application will include
`an indication of the adjustment on the front page.
`
`If a Continued Prosecution Application (CPA) was filed in the above—identified application, the filing date that
`determines Patent Term Adjustment is the filing date of the most recent CPA.
`
`Applicant will be able to obtain more detailed information by accessing the Patent Application Information
`Retrieval (PAIR) WEB site (http://pair.uspto. gov).
`
`Any questions regarding the Patent Term Extension or Adjustment determination should be directed to the
`Office of Patent Legal Administration at (571)—272—7702. Questions relating to issue and publication fee
`payments should be directed to the Application Assistance Unit (AAU) of the Office of Data Management
`(ODM) at (571)-272-4200.
`
`APPLICANT(S) (Please see PAIR WEB site http://pair.uspto. gov for additional applicants):
`
`Michael E. Shanahan, Nyack, NY;
`
`The United States represents the largest, most dynamic marketplace in the world and is an unparalleled location
`for business investment, innovation, and commercialization of new technologies. The USA offers tremendous
`resources and advantages for those who invest and manufacture goods here. Through SelectUSA, our nation
`works to encourage and facilitate business investment. To learn more about why the USA is the best country in
`the world to develop technology, manufacture products, and grow your business, visit SelectUSA.gov.
`
`IR103 (Rev. 10/09)
`
`1
`
`AT&T - Exhibit 101 1
`
`1
`
`AT&T - Exhibit 1011
`
`

`

`
`
`~
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.0. Box I450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`www.usplo.gov
`
`13/316,203
`
`12/09/2011
`
`Michael E. Shanahan
`
`SOLME.001A208
`
`1697
`
`07/31/2013
`7590
`KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR LLP
`‘ 2040 MAIN STREET
`FOURTEENTH FLOOR
`'- IRVINE, CA 92614
`
`BEAMER,TEMICAM
`
`ART UNIT
`2646
`NOTIFICATION DATE
`
`PAPER NUMBER
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`07/31/2013
`
`ELECTRONIC
`
`NOTICE OFVNON-COMPLIANT INFORMATION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
`
`An Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) filed 713a, i8 in the above-identified application fails to
`meet the requirements of 37 CFR 1.97(d) for the reason(s) specified below. Accordingly, the IDS will be
`placed in the file, but the information referred to therein has not been considered. M
`
`
`The IDS is not compliant with 37 CFR 1.97(d) because:
`
`IE/The IDS lacks a statement as specified in 37 CFR 1.97(e).
`
`CI The IDS lacks the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(p).
`
`CI The IDS was filed after the issue fee was paid. Applicant may wish to consider filing a petition to
`withdraw the application from issue under 37 CFR 1.313(c) to have the IDS considered. See
`MPEP 1308.
`
`Lh‘
`[EX 571-2724200 or 1-888—786-0101
`Application Assistance Unit
`Office of Data Management
`
`FORM PTOM327-B (Rev. 02/08)
`
`PageZ of 1
`
`2
`
`

`

`
`
`PTO/SB/08 E - uivalent
`
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE
`
`STATEMENT BY APPLTCANT
`
`—_
`(Multiple sheets used when necessary) —_
`
`
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`Numbzrfztztysgtrtnom
`:szsztfisrgzzzeszsazrvxga
`Example: 1,234,567 B1
`FiguresAppear
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`—\.Au—\fi0:0:,hbCDon<0V
`
`_\ 01‘1
`
`—L—\A—|.NVcu0"—\.°N]—\.
`
`_L NM
`
`6,253,061
`
`6,256,378
`
`6,275,234
`
`6,308,086
`
`6,366,791
`
`6,385,305
`
`6,389,124
`
`06-26-2001
`
`07-03-2001
`
`0814-2001
`
`10-23-2001
`
`04-02-2002
`
`05-07-2002
`
`05—14—2002
`
`Schnarel, et al.
`
`6,400,958
`
`06-04-2002
`
`6,418,330 B1
`
`07-09-2002
`
`Lee
`
`,
`
`'
`
`6,449,359
`
`6,477,580
`
`6,483,531
`
`6,496,692
`
`6,501,967
`
`6,564,056
`
`6,599,147
`
`6,603,985
`
`6,718,021
`
`~
`
`6,720,969
`
`6,728,531
`
`6,754,509
`
`6,778,179
`
`6,829,618
`
`6,831,617
`
`6,845,398
`
`6,848,011
`
`09-10-2002
`
`1 1-05—2002
`
`11-19-2002
`
`12-17-2002
`
`12-31-2002
`
`Bowman-Amuah
`U
`
`Ry
`
`05-13-2003
`
`Fitzgerald
`
`07-29-2003
`
`08-05-2003
`
`04-06-2004
`
`04-13-2004
`
`04-27-2004
`
`06-22-2004
`
`08-17-2004
`
`1207-2004
`
`01-18-2005
`
`Galensky, et al.
`
`01-25-2005
`
`Park, et al.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`an
`
`Cl?
`o o
`
`'6'8'7‘1'084'52"
`
`03-22-2005
`
`Takagaki
`
`6,371,043
`
`
`
`
`173
`a
`,
`
`
`
`
`
`9/ 1 5
`
`61‘2“” Signature
`
`:Temica 8638161.”
`
`Date Considered
`
`01/30/2312
`
`Initial if reference considered, whether or not citation is in conformance with MPEP 609. Draw line through citation if not
`*Examiner:
`in conformance and not considered.
`Include copy of this form with next communication to applicant.
`
`T - Place a check mark in this area when an English language Translation is attached.
`ALL REFERENCES CONSIDEREQ EXCEPT WHERE LINED THROUGH.
`
`/T.B.,/
`
`3
`
`

`

`PART B - FEE(S) TRANSMITTAL
`
`Complete and send this form, together with applicable fee(s), to: Mail Mail Stop ISSUE FEE
`Commissioner for Patents
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`or Ea; (571)-273-2885
`
`
`
`CURRENT CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS (Note: Use Block 1 for any change ofaddress)
`
`INSTRUCTIONS: This form should be used for transmitting the ISSUE FEE and PUBLICATION FEE (if required). Blocks 1 through 5 should be completed where
`in
`appropriate. All further correspondence including the Patent, advance orders and notification of maintenance fees will be mailed to the current corres ondence address as
`leated unless corrected below or directed otherwise in Block 1, by (a) specifying a new correspondence address; and/or (b) indicating a separate " E ADDRESS" for
`maintenance fee notifications.
`Note: A certificate of mailin can only be used for domestic mailings of the
`Fee(s) Transmittal. This certi 1cate cannot be used for any other accompanying
`apers. Each additional paper, such as an assignment or formal drawing, must
`gave its own certificate of mailing or transmiss10n.
`Certificate of Mailing or Transmission
`-
`-
`-
`-
`-
`-
`-
`-
`that this Fee 5 Transmittal 13 being deposned With the United
`I hereb cert1
`erv1ce wx
`su 1c1ent
`sta e or irstcass mm in an enveo
`tates os
`'th
`1)
`'
`p0
`g r
`r
`1
`5
`ml
`'
`'1'
`1
`addressed to the Mail Stop ISSUE FEE address above, or being facsimi e
`transmitted to the USPTO ( 71) 273-2885, on the date indicated below.
`
`04/222013
`7590
`20995
`KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR LLP
`2040 MAIN STREET
`FOURTEENTH FLOOR
`
`IRVINE, CA 92614
`
`(Date)
`
`(DWWiSW)
`(Signature)
`
`APPLICATION NO.
`
`FILING DATE
`
`FIRST NAMED INVENTOR
`
`ATTORNEY DOCKET NO.
`
`CONFIRMATION NO.
`
`13/3 16,203
`
`12/09/201 1
`
`Michael E. Shanahan
`
`SOLME.001A2C8
`
`1697
`
`TITLE OF INVENTION: METHODS AND APPARATUSES FOR PROGRAMMING USER—DEFINED INFORMATION INTO ELECTRONIC DEVICES
`
`APPLN. TYPE
`
`ENTITY STATUS
`
`ISSUE FEE DUE
`
`PUBLICATION FEE DUE PREV. PAID ISSUE FEE
`
`TOTAL FEE(S) DUE
`
`DATE DUE
`
`nonprovisional
`
`SMALL
`
`BEAMER, TEMICA M
`
`$890
`
`2646
`
`$300
`
`$0
`
`$1 190
`
`07/22/2013
`
`455-567000
`
`1. Change of correspondence address or indication of "Fee Address" (37
`
`CFR 1.363).
`'3 Chan e of corres
`Address orm PTO/
`
`
`
`2. For printing on the patent front page, list
`
`
`
`1 Knobbe, Martens,
`(1) the names of up to 3 registered patent attorneys
`
`or agents OR, alternatively,
`ndence address (or Change of Correspondence
`/ 122) attached.
`
`(2) the name of a single firm (having as a member a
`registered attorney or agent) and the names of up to
`1:1 "Fee Address” indication (or "Fee Address" Indication form
`PTO/SB/47; Rev 03—02 or more recent) attached. Use of a Customer
`3
`2 registered patent attorneys or agents. If no name is
`
`listed, no name will be printed.
`Number is required.
`
`
`
`Olson & Bear LLP
`
`2
`
`3. ASSIGNEE NAME AND RESIDENCE DATA TO BE PRINTED ON THE PATENT (print or type)
`PLEASE NOTE: Unless an assi nee is identified below, no assignee data will appear on the patent. If an assignee is identified below, the document has been filed for
`recordation as set forth in 37 C
`3.11. Completion of this form is NOT a substitute for filing an assignment.
`(A) NAME OF ASSIGNEE
`(B) RESIDENCE: (CITY and STATE OR COUNTRY)
`
`Solocron Media, LLC
`
`Tyler, TX
`
`Please check the appropriate assignee category or categories (will not be printed on the patent) : D Individual El Corporation or other private group entity 1:1 Government
`
`421. The following fee(s) are submitted:
`1% Issue Fee
`Publication Fee (No small entity discount permitted)
`1:1 Advance Order — # of Copies
`
`4b. Payment of Fee(s): (Please first reapply any previously paid issue fee shown above)
`[:1 A check is enclosed.
`[:1 Payment by credit card. Form PTO-2038 is attached.
`The Director is hereby authorized to chargeW, any deficiency, or credit any
`overpayment, to Deposit Account Number
`'
`(enclose an extra copy of this form).
`
`PTOL—85 (Rev. 02/11)
`
`Page 24)f 4
`
`4
`
`

`

`5. Change in Entity Status (from status indicated above)
`D Applicant certifying micro entity status. See 37 CFR 1.29
`
`D Applicant asserting small entity status. See 37 CFR 1.27
`
`.
`
`NOTE: Absent a valid certification of Micro Entity Status (see form PTO/SB/15A and ISB , issue
`fee payment in the micro entity amount will not be accepted at the risk of application aban onment.
`NOTE: If the application was previously under micro entity status, checking this box will be taken
`to be a notification of loss of entitlement to micro entity status.
`NOTE: Checking this box will be taken to be a notification of loss of entitlement to small or micro
`D Applicant changing to regular undiscounted fee status.
`entity status, as applicable.
`
`NOTE: The Issue Fee and Publication Fee (if required) will not be accepted from anyone other than the applicant; a registered attorney or agent; or the assignee or other party in
`interest as shown b the records of the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
`
`Authorized Signature
`
`7 - Z Z " Z O ’ 3
`Date
`‘ a g;;: z
`Registration No.
`34:362
`Oh“ R' King
`Typed or printed name
`———————————————_—_——______
`
`‘
`
`
`
`This collection of information is required by 37 CFR 1.311. The information is re uired to obtain or retain a benefit by the public which is to file (and by the USPTO to process)
`an application. Confidentiality is governed by 35 U.S.C. 122 and 37 CFR 1.14. T is collection is estimated to take 12 minutes to complete, including gathering, preparing, and
`subnntting the completed application form to the USPTO.- Time will vafhy depending upon the individual case. Any comments on the amount of time you require to complete
`this form and/or su gestions for reducing this burden, should be sent to
`e C ief In orrnation Officer, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, U.S. Department of Commerce,
`.0.
`Box 1450, Alexan
`a, Virginia 22313-1450. DO NOT SEND FEES OR COMPLETED FORMS TO THIS ADDRESS. SEND TO: Commissioner for Patents, PO. Box 1450,
`Alexandria, Virginia 223 13- 1450.
`
`Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number.
`
`PTOL-85 (Rev. 02/11) Approved for use through 08/31/2013.
`
`'
`
`OMB 06515XBS
`
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`
`Page 3 of 4
`
`5
`
`

`

`Electronic Patent Application Fee Transmittal
`
`Application Number:
`
`13316203
`
`Filing Date:
`
`09-Dec-2011
`
`T't'e °f Inventwn‘
`
`METHODS AND APPARATUSES FOR PROGRAMMING USER-DEFINED
`INFORMATION INTO ELECTRONIC DEVICES
`
`First Named Inventor/Applicant Name:
`
`Michael E. Shanahan
`
`Attorney Docket Number:
`
`SOLME.001A2C8
`
`Filed as Small Entity
`
`Utility under 35 USC111(a) Filing Fees
`
`Description
`
`Fee Code
`
`Quantity
`
`Sub-Total in
`USD($)
`
`
`
`Basic Filing:
`
`Pages:
`
`Claims:
`
`Miscellaneous-Filing:
`
`Patent-Appeals-and-lnterference:
`
`Post-Al|owance-and-Post-lssuance:
`
`Publ. Fee- Early, Voluntary, or Normal
`
`1504
`
`l
`
`300
`
`300
`
`6
`
`

`

`Extension-of—Time:
`
`Total in USD (5)
`
`Miscellaneous:
`
`7
`
`

`

`Electronic Acknowledgement Receipt
`
`“—
`
`——
`
`T't'e °f Inventwn‘
`
`METHODS AND APPARATUSES FOR PROGRAMMING USER-DEFINED
`INFORMATION INTO ELECTRONIC DEVICES
`
`
`
`——
`
`Payment information:
`
`yes—
`Submitted with Payment
`
`KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON AND BEAR
`
`Charge any Additional Fees required under 37 C.F.R. Section 187 (Patent application and reexamination processing fees)
`
`—Authorized User
`The Director of the USPTO is hereby authorized to Charge indicated fees and credit any overpayment as follows:
`
`Charge any Additional Fees required under 37 C.F.R. Section 1.16 (National application filing, search, and examination fees)
`
`8
`
`

`

`File Listing:
`
`Document
`
`.
`
`.
`
`File Size(Bytes)/
`
`Multi
`
`Pages
`
`Issue Fee Payment (PTO-85 B)
`
`SOLME_OO1A2C8_IssueFee.pdf
`
`122105
`
`Information:
`
`Fee Worksheet (SBO6)
`
`fee-info.pdf
`
`e68d4abcbba0820e2f2fb4e5319a02a35bd
`4925b
`
`
`
`This Acknowledgement Receipt evidences receipt on the noted date by the USPTO ofthe indicated documents,
`characterized by the applicant, and including page counts, where applicable. It serves as evidence of receipt similar to a
`Post Card, as described in MPEP 503.
`
`New Applications Under 35 U.S.C. 111
`lfa new application is being filed and the application includes the necessary components for a filing date (see 37 CFR
`1.53(b)—(d) and MPEP 506), a Filing Receipt (37 CFR 1.54) will be issued in due course and the date shown on this
`Acknowledgement Receipt will establish the filing date of the application.
`
`National Stage of an International Application under 35 U.S.C. 371
`lfa timely submission to enter the national stage of an international application is compliant with the conditions of 35
`U.S.C. 371 and other applicable requirements a Form PCT/DO/EO/903 indicating acceptance of the application as a
`national stage submission under 35 U.S.C. 371 will be issued in addition to the Filing Receipt, in due course.
`
`New International Application Filed with the USPTO as a Receiving Office
`lfa new international application is being filed and the international application includes the necessary components for
`an international filing date (see PCT Article 11 and MPEP 1810), a Notification of the International Application Number
`and ofthe International Filing Date (Form PCT/RO/105) will be issued in due course, subject to prescriptions concerning
`national security, and the date shown on this Acknowledgement Receipt will establish the international filing date of
`the application.
`
`9
`
`

`

`PTO/SB/OS E- uivalent
`
`
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE
`
`STATEMENT BY APPLTCANT
`
`(Multiple sheets used when necessary)
`
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`Name of Patentee or Applicant
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Document Number
`Examiner Cite
`Publication
`Pages, Columns, Lines Where
`Initials
`No Number- Kind Code (if known)
`Date
`Relevant Passages or
`‘
`Example: 1,234,567 B1
`MM-DD-YYYY
`Relevant Figures Appear
`-__—
`8,447,290
`(SOLME.001A1C5)
`and its file histo
`
`05/21/2013 Shanahan
`
`
`
`8,452,272
`(SOLME.001A2C11)
`
`
`and its file histo
`
`05/28/2013 Shanahan
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`
`
`Examiner
`Initials
`
`'
`
`.
`
`Publication
`Foreign Patent Document
`Date
`Country Code-Number-Kind
`Code
`Exam Ie:
`JP 1234567 A1 MM'DD'WW
`
`Pages, Columns, Lines
`‘
`Name of Patentee or Where Relevant Passages
`Applicant
`or Relevant Figures
`
`
`
`NON PATENT LITERATURE DOCUMENTS
`
`Include name of‘the author (in CAPITAL LETTERS), title of the article (when appropriate), title of the
`item (book, magazine, journal, serial, symposium, catalog, etc.), date, page(s), volume-issue
`number(_s), publisher, city and/or country where oublished.
`Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority mailed Nov. 21, 2001, issued in
`connection with International Patent Appln. No. PCT/USOO/32920 (7 pages)
`TAKEISHI, ET AL., "Mobile Innovation and the Music Business in Japan: The Case of
`Ringing Tone Melody", Institute of Innovation Research ~ Hitotsubashi University, May
`
`15798565zad
`071513
`
`, Examiner Signature
`
`Date Considered
`
`Include copy of this form with next communication to applicant.
`
`Initial if reference considered, whether or not citation is in conformance with MPEP 609. Draw line through citation if not
`*Examiner:
`in conformance and not considered.
`
`T - Place a check mark in this area when an English Ianguag’HDTranslation is attached.
`
`10
`
`

`

`
`
`PA'l‘ENT COOPERATION TREATY
`
`,
`From the
`INTERNATIONAL PRELIMINARY EXAMINING AUTHORITY
`
`T‘“ MICHAEL E. SHANAHAN
`PO. BOX 331
`
`
`NYACK. NY 10960
`
`
`
`
`PCT
`
`WRITTEN OPINION
`
`(PCT Rule 66)
`
`II f
`I
`'
`Applicants or agent s
`ile reference
`- MES/001
`
`REPLY DUE
`
`within TWO months
`from the above date of mailing
`
`
`
`
`31333333225)
`21 NOV 2001
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`International Patent Classification (IPC) or both national classification and IPC
`IPC(7).- H049 7/32 and US CL: 455/443
`
` Applicant
`
`MICHAEL E. SHANAHAN
`
`
`
`International application No.
`PCT/USOO/32920
`
`Priority date (day/montb/year)
`International filing date (day/manth/year)
`06 DECEMBER 1999
`05 DECEMBER 2000
`
`
`
`1. This written opinion is the fir“
`
`(first, etc.) drawn by this International Preliminary Examining Authority.
`
`2. This opinion contains indications relating to the following items:
`
`Basis of the opinion
`
`IPriority
`
`Non-establishment oi' opinion with regard to novelty, inventive step or industrial applicability
`Lack of unity of invention
`I
`
`Reasoned statement under Rule 66.2(a)(ii) with regard to novelty, inventive step or industrial applicability:
`citations and explanations supporting suCh statement
`
`Certain documents cited
`
`VII El Certain defects in the international application
`VIII D Certain observations on the international application
`
`3. The applicant is hereby invited to reply to this opinion.
`When?
`See the time limit indicated above. wwwmwmfiwmmwmn
`
`How?
`
`Also
`
`By submitting a written reply, accompanied, where appropriate, by amendments. according to Rule 66.3.
`For the form and the language of the amendments. see Rules 66.8 and 66.9.
`
`For an additional opportunity to submit amendments, see Rule 66.4.
`For the examiner’s obligation to consider amendments and/or arguments, see Rule 66.4- bis.
`For an informal communication with the examiner, see Rule 66.6.
`
`If no reply is filed, the international preliminary examination report will be established on the basis of this opinion.
`
`4-. The final date by which the international preliminary
`examination report must be established according to Rule 69.2 is: 06 APRIL 3002
`
`
`
`Name and mailing address of the lPEA/US
`(bnmtissiouer of Patents and Triuleuuirks
`Bax PCT
`Washington. D.(!. 30231
`
`Authorized oflicer
`
`WILLIAM TROST
`
`(703) nor-3230
`Facsimile No.
`Frarni PCT/TPFA/Mfi Ir-nupt' nhvnri Univ [Emmi-
`
`_
`
`'I‘EIEPhO'”e N0-
`
`11
`
`

`

`
`
`PATENT COOPERATION TREATY
`
`From the
`INTERNATIONAL PRELIMINARY EXAMINING AUTHORITY
`
`Tm MICHAEL E. SHANAHAN
`PO. BOX an:
`NYACK. NY {0960
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PCT
`
`WRITTEN OPINION
`
`(PCT Rule 66)
`
`Date of Mailin
`
`(day/month/year)l
`
`
`
`
`
`within TWO months
`Applicant's or agent's file reference
`REPLY DUE
`MES/001
`from the above date of mailing
`
`
`
`
`International application No.
`
`
`International filing date (day/mnth/year)
`Priority date (day/manth/year)
`PCT/ USOO/seseo
`05 DECEMBER 1999
` 05 DECEMBER 2000
`
`
`
`International Patent Classification (IPC) or both national classification and IPC
`IPC(7): Hosg 7/32 and US CL: 455/418
`
` Applicant
`
`MICHAEL E. SHANAI‘IAN
`
`iiI|
`
`l
`
`(first, etc.) drawn by this International Preliminary Examining Authority.
`
`II D Priority
`III
`Non—establishment 0i'opinion with regard to novelty, inventive step or industrial applicability
`
`
`first
`
`
`1. This written opinion is the
`
`
`2. This opinion contains indications relating to the following items:
`
`
`I
`X Basis of the opinion
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EEDD
`
`IV
`
`Lack of unity of invention
`
`Reasoned statement under Rule 66.2(a)(ii) with regard to novelty, inventive step or industrial applicability;
`citations and explanations supporting such statement
`
`VI
`
`Certain documents cited
`
`VII D Certain defects in the international application
`VIII D 'Certain observations on the international application
`
`:5. The applicant is hereby invited to reply to this opinion.
`
`When?
`
`See the time limit indicated above. $heappfieanemayrbemetheespicatien—9Hhaetknehmitfiequest—thie
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`How?
`
`Also
`
`By submitting a written reply, accompanied. where appropriate, by amendments, according to Rule Gus.
`For the form and the language of the amendments. see Rules 66,8 and 66.9.
`
`For an additional opportunity to submit amendments, see Rule 66.4.
`For the examiner's obligation to consider amendments and/or argument-‘3. SEC Rule 66-4“ 5135.
`For an informal communication with the examiner, see Rule 66.6.
`
`If no reply is filed, the international preiiminary examination report will be established on the basis of this opinion.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.
`«i. The final date by which the international preliminary
`examination report must be established according to Rule 69.2 is: 05 APRIL 9009
`
`
`Authorized oliicer
` Name and mailing address of the IPEA/US
`
`
`Commissioner 01' l‘ntcnis and Trademarks
`
`Box PCT
`WILLIAM TROST
`
`
`Washington, D11 20231
` Facsimile No.
`Tehphone NO-
`(703) cor—3230
`
`
`
`Form PCT/IPEAMOS (cover sheet) {July 1998):!-
`
`12
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`WRITTEN OPINION
`
`International application No.
` PCT/USOO/BZQ20
`
`I.
`
`Basis of the opinion
`
`‘
`
`1. With regard to the elements of the international application:*
`the international application as originally filed
`the description:
`
`1-25
`, as originally filed
`NONE
`filed with the demand
`,
`
`NONE
`, filed with the letter of
`
`pages
`pages
`pages
`
`the claims:
`
`pages
`pages
`pages
`pages
`
`, as originally filed
`25—30
`
`NONE
`, as amended (together with any statement) under Article 19
`NONE
`, filed with the demand
`
`NONE
`, filed with the letter of
`
`the drawings:
`pages
`pages
`pages
`
`, as originally filed
`1'13
`, filed with the demand
`NONE
`
`NONE
`, filed with the letter of
`
`the sequence listing part of the description:
`, as originally filed
`pages
`NONE
`, filed with the demand
`pages
`NONE
`
`pages
`NONE
`, filed with the letter of
`
`-
`
`.2. With regard to the language, all the elements marked above were available or furnished to this Authority in the language in which
`the intemational application was filed, unless otherwise indicated under this item.
`
`These elements were available or fiimished to this Authority in the following language
`D the language of a translation furnished for the purposes of international search (under Rule 23.1(b)).
`D the language of publication of the international application (under Rule 48303)).
`I] the language of the translation furnished for the proposes of international preliminary examination (under Rule: 55.2 and!
`or 55.3).
`
`which is:
`
`3. With regard to any nucleotide and/or amino acid sequence disclosed in the international application, the written opinion was
`drawn on the basis of the sequence listing:
`D contained in the international application in printed form.
`|:| filed together with the international application in computer readable form.
`C] furnished subsequently to this Authority in written form.
`[I furnished subsequently to this Authority in computer readable form.
`I: The statement that the subse uently fiimished written sequence listing does not go beyond the disclosure in the
`international application as fi ed has been fiirnished.
`
`The statement that the information recorded in computer readable form is identical to the writen sequence listing has
`been fiimished.
`
`4_
`
`The amendments have resulted in the cancellation of:
`
`NONE
`the description, pages
`
`the claims, Nos.
`NONE
`
`the drawings, sheetsifig
`NONE
`5. El This opinion has been drawn as if (some of) the amendments had not been made, since they have been considered to go
`beyond the disclosure as filed, as indicated in the Supplemental Box (Rule 70.2(c)).
`
`* Replacement sheets which have been fitmished to the receiving Ofi‘ice in response to an invitation under Article 14 are referred to
`in this opinion as "originally filed”.
`1 3
`
`
`
`
`
`13
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`V
`VBHTEN OPINION
`
`International application No.
`
`PCT/ [3500/ season
`
`V. Reasoned statement under Rule 66.2(a)(ii)'with regard to novelty, inventive step or industrial applicability;
`citations and explanations supporting such statement
`
`I.
`
`statement
`
`Novelty (N)
`
`Inventive Step (IS)
`
`Industrial Applicability (IA)
`
`5—9, 12. 19—32
`14,104 1.15—13,
`
`NONE
`1-32
`
`2.
`
`citations and explanations
`Claims 1-4510 lack novelty under PCT Article 33(2) as being anticipated by Uppaluru et al. (5,915.00I).
`
`Regarding claim 1, Uppaluru et al. disclose a system and method for providing and using universally accessible voice
`and speech comprising: providing the user-defined audio file (see figs, element 102 and it description); and enabling a user of
`the telephone to program at least a portion of the audio file into the telephone (see fig.1, elements 105, 109, 111 and its
`description).
`7
`Regarding claim 2. Uppaluru et a1. further comprises providing the audio file from the Internet (see Fig.1. element
`101 and its description).
`Regarding claim 5, Uppaluru et a1. Further discloses providing a plurality of audio files (see fig], element 104- and
`its description) and further comprises allowing the user of the telephone to select at least one of the audio files (see cola, lines
`26-32).
`
`Regarding claims 4-, lo the Examiner takes Official notice that this Feature providing the audio file ti-om a disc drive
`of computer and programmable memory is notoriously well know in the art.
`
`Claim 11 lacks novelty under PCT Article 33(2) as being anticipated by Ohayon et 3]. (5,933,328).
`
`Regarding claim it. Ohayon discloses a recovery mode feature For remote units comprising: programming a user
`defined audio file into a programmable memory in the telephone (see col.6, lines 25-34); playing the user audio deliled when
`receiving an incoming telephone call (see col.6. lines 6-45).
`
`Claims 13-!8 lack novelty under PCT Article 33(2) as being anticipated by Atcheson et all. (5,583,763).
`
`Regarding claim 13, Atcheson discloses a method and apparatus for recommending selection bases on preferences in
`
`a multi-user system comprising a data input device that allows the (Continued on Supplemental Sheet.)
`
`14
`
`

`

`a,
`
`i g i gi ir
`
`, l i ig ii liis i i| l
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`International application No.
`WRITTEN OPINION
`.
`PCT/Uboo/saseo
`
`
`
`Supplemental Box
`(To be used when the space in any of the preceding boxes is not. sufficient)
`
`
`
`
`Continuation of: Bones I - VIII
`
`Sheet. 10
`
`TIME LIMIT:
`
`The time limit set for response to a Written Opinion may not be extended. 37 CFR 1.484(d). Any response
`received after the expiration of the time limit set in the Written Opinion will not be considered in preparing the International
`Preliminary Examination Report.
`
`V. 2. REASONED STATEMENTS - CITATIONS AND EXPLANATIONS (Continued):
`user to select the audio file (see col.l, 20-40); and a programmer circuit that programs the audio file into the telephone
`memory (sec col.1, lines (see oo|.l, lines 23-26).
`Regarding claims 14—16, Atcheson further discloses the-programmer circuit is installed in a computer (see col.1.
`20-40 and see fig.1, col.3, lines 24-38).
`Regarding claims 17-18, Atcheson further discloses the communication link is a wireless link (see fig.l. coi.3. lines
`
`24-38).
`
`Claims 5, 8—9 lack an inventive step under PCT Article 33(3) as being obvious over Uppaluru et al. (5,915,001) in view of
`Wise et al. (5,884,262).
`
`Regarding claim 5, Uppaluru er al. disclose all the subject matters described as objected to claim 1, except for
`editing the audio file. However, Wise discloses a computer network audio access and conversion system comprising an editing
`the audio file (see fig.l, element 121 col.3, line 5i—col.5, line 28). Thus, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary
`skill in the art at the time the invention was made to use the editing technique in Uppaluru's system to edit and download the
`file from the internet in order to select the file appropriate for their convenience.
`
`Regarding 6-9, Uppaluru discloses all the subject matters described as objected to claim 1, except for determining a
`format of audio, converting the audio file fonnat. However, Wise discloses a computer network audio access and conversion
`system comprising determining a format of audio, converting the audio file to the file format required by the telephone (see
`fig.3 and its description). Thus, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention
`was made to use Wise's determining and converting format in Uppaluru's system to convert the audio signal to the format
`required for using in the telephone system in order to transmit the signal properly and quality.
`
`Claim 12 lacks an inventive step under PCT Article 33(3) as being obvious over Ohayon et al. (5,933,328) in view of
`Ateheson et al. (5,583,763).
`Regarding claim 12, Ohayon discloses all the subject matters described as objected to claim ll, except for reading
`the audio file. However, Atcheson discloses a method and apparatus for recommending selection bases on preferences in a
`multi-user system comprising a telephone with computer capability could be used to ”download“ digital information,
`representing, for example, music selections into the memory of the telephone for later playback (see col.1. 20-40). Thus,
`would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to use the selection
`technique in Ohayon's system in order to select the file that user need to listen.
`
`it
`
`Claims 19-32 lack an inventive step under PCT Article 33(3) as being obvious over Ateheson et al. (5,952,918) in view of
`Wise et a1. (5,884,262).
`Regarding claims 19-23, 25-31, Atcheson discloses all the subject matters described as objected to claims 13, 18,
`except for the source of audio file is the Internet. However, Wise discloses a computer network audio access and conversion
`system comprising the source of audio file is the Internet (see fig. 1, col. 1, lines 37-49 and description). Thus. it would have
`been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to use Wise's Internet audio file in
`Atcheson's system in order to access anywhere in the world.
`Regarding claims 24, 32 Atcheson further discloses the communication link is a wireless link (see fig. 1, col.3, lines
`
`24-38).
`
`new CITATIONS
`
`us 5,915,001 A (UPPALURU) 22 JUNE 1999, ALL
`US 5,884,262 A (WISE ET AL) 16 MARCH 1999, ALL
`
`15
`
`
`
`15
`
`

`

`
`
`WHMWWWm.mmmm,mu,mmmwww.mwmnmmmWax“mmnmxwmmwmmmmmm—nw
`
`
`
`
`
`\VBITfEN OPINION
`
`International application No.
`PCT/USDO/32920
`
`VI. Certain documents cited
`
`1. Certain published documents (Rule 70.10)
`
`Application No.
`Patent. No.
`
`US, A. 5.915.001
`
`Publication Date
`(day/manM/yemj
`
`22 JUNE 1999
`
`Filing Date
`(day/monfll/year)
`
`Priority dale (valid claim)
`(day/mutil/year)
`
`14 NOVEMBER 1996
`
`NONE
`
`US, A, 5,884,262
`
`16 MARCH 1999
`
`28 MARCH 1996
`
`NONE
`
`(ng/monih/year)
`
`2. Non-written disclosurm (Rule 70.9)
`
`Kind of non-Written disclosule
`
`Date of non—written disclosure
`
`(day/1710723320901)
`
`Date of written disclosure
`referring to non-“Timon disclosure
`
`
`
`
`
`16
`
`

`

`International application No.
`WBI'ITEN OPINION
`PCT/U500/3292o
`
`
`
`Supplemental Box
`
`
`(To be. used when the spam in {my 01' the preceding boxes is not sufficient)
`
`
`Continuation of: Boxes I - VIII
`
`Sheet. 11
`
`US 5,952,918 A (OHAYON) 14 SEPTEMBER 1999, ALL
`
`US 5,583,763 A (ATCHESON ET AL.) 10 DECEMBER 1996, ALL
`
`
`
`
`
`17
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`17
`
`

`

`Electronic Acknowledgement Receipt
`
`16374833
`
`Application Number:
`
`13316203
`
`International Application Number:
`
`Confirmation Number:
`
`T't'e °f Inventwn‘
`
`METHODS AND APPARATUSES FOR PROGRAMMING USER-DEFINED
`INFORMATION INTO ELECTRONIC DEVICES
`
`
`
`First Named Inventor/Applicant Name:
`
`Michael E. Shanahan
`
`Customer Number:
`
`20995
`
`John R. King/Caroline Wright
`
`Filer Authorized By:
`
`John R. King
`
`Attorney Docket Number:
`
`SOLME.001A2C8
`
`Receipt Date:
`
`22-JUL-2013
`
`Filing Date:
`
`09-DEC-2011
`
`Time Stamp:
`
`13:33:08
`
`Application Type:
`
`Utility under 35 USC111(a)
`
`Payment information:
`
`Submitted with Payment
`
`File Listing:
`
`Document
`Number
`
`Document Descri
`
`tion
`
`p
`
`4157C
`
`File Size(Bytes)/
`Message Digest
`100785
`
`Pages
`Multi
`Part /.zip (if appl.)
`
`SOLME_OOlA2C8_|DS.pdf
`
`882472C5d81d817b95781fbcdf3493e45dd
`
`18
`
`18
`
`

`

`Multipart Description/PDF files in .zip description
`
`Transmittal Letter
`
`Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) Form (SBOS)
`
`Information:
`
`Information:
`
`Information:
`
`Non Patent Literature
`
`.
`.
`.
`WrItten_OpInIon_ISA_Nov_21.
`pdf
`
`282028
`
`838dde07bb2b5fdaSbSdbb8c20f721aa3fa
`ba2b7
`
`Non Patent Literature
`
`Takeishi.pdf
`
`923704
`
`ff9d5cd0a4a60f0e685c84c4fa3dc65b48db
`aec4
`
`
`
`New Inter

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket