`Patent No. 8,074,115
`
`
`IN THE
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_____________
`
`SYMANTEC CORPORATION,
`
`Petitioner
`
`- vs. -
`
`THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY
`IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK,
`
`
`Patent Owner
`
`_____________
`
`Patent No. 8,074,115
`Issued: December 6, 2011
`Inventors: Salvatore J. Stolfo, Angelos D. Kermytis, and Stelios Sidiroglou
`
`Title: METHODS, MEDIA AND SYSTEMS FOR
`DETECTING ANOMALOUS PROGRAM EXECUTION
`
`Inter Partes Review No. 2015-00375
`
`PETITIONER’S OBJECTIONS TO EVIDENCE
`SERVED WITH PATENT OWNER’S RESPONSE
`_____________
`
`Mail Stop Patent Board
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2015-00375
`Patent No. 8,074,115
`
`
`
`Petitioner, Symantec Corporation (“Symantec”), hereby objects to the
`
`admissibility of certain evidence submitted in support of Patent Owner’s Response,
`
`filed October 8, 2015.
`
`Evidence Submitted by Patent Owner
`Exhibit 2025
`
`Exhibit 2026
`
`Exhibit 2027
`
`Exhibit 2039
`
`Exhibit 2040
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Objections
`Relevance
`(Fed. R. Evid. 401),
`including insofar as the Exhibit is not
`cited in the Patent Owner’s Response or
`supporting expert declaration
`
`(Fed. R. Evid. 401),
`Relevance
`including insofar as the Exhibit is not
`cited in the Patent Owner’s Response or
`supporting expert declaration
`
`(Fed. R. Evid. 401),
`Relevance
`including insofar as the Exhibit post-
`dates the claimed priority date of the
`’115 patent
`
`(Fed. R. Evid. 401),
`Relevance
`including insofar as the Exhibit post-
`dates the claimed priority date of the
`’115 patent
`
`(Fed. R. Evid. 401),
`Relevance
`including insofar as the Exhibit post-
`dates the claimed priority date of the
`’115 patent
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`(Fed. R. Evid. 401),
`Relevance
`including insofar as the Exhibit post-
`dates the claimed priority date of the
`’115 patent
`
`(Fed. R. Evid. 401),
`Relevance
`including insofar as the Exhibit post-
`dates the claimed priority date of the
`’115 patent
`
`Authentication (Fed. R. Evid. 901, 902),
`including insofar as the Exhibit provides
`insufficient evidence
`to support a
`finding that the Exhibit is what Patent
`Owner claims it is
`
`(Fed. R. Evid. 401),
`Relevance
`including insofar as the Exhibit post-
`dates the claimed priority date of the
`’115 patent
`
`(Fed. R. Evid. 401),
`Relevance
`including insofar as the Exhibit post-
`dates the claimed priority date of the
`’115 patent
`
`(Fed. R. Evid. 401),
`Relevance
`including insofar as the Exhibit post-
`dates the claimed priority date of the
`’115 patent
`
`(Fed. R. Evid. 401),
`Relevance
`including insofar as the Exhibit post-
`dates the claimed priority date of the
`’115 patent
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`IPR2015-00375
`Patent No. 8,074,115
`
`
`Exhibit 2041
`
`Exhibit 2043
`
`Exhibit 2044
`
`Exhibit 2045
`
`Exhibit 2047
`
`Exhibit 2049
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2015-00375
`Patent No. 8,074,115
`
`Dated: October 13, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`/s/ Brian M. Hoffman
`Brian M. Hoffman
`FENWICK & WEST LLP
`555 California Street, 12th Floor
`San Francisco, CA 94104
`Tel: (415) 875-2300
`Fax: (415) 281-1350
`Email: bhoffman@fenwick.com
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2015-00375
`Patent No. 8,074,115
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6, the undersigned certifies that on October 13,
`
`2015, a copy of the foregoing document PETITIONER’S OBJECTIONS TO
`
`EVIDENCE SERVED WITH PATENT OWNER’S RESPONSE was served by
`
`electronic mail, as agreed to by the parties, upon the following:
`
`Hong Zhong
`Michael Fleming
`IRELL & MANELLA LLP
`1800 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 900
`Los Angeles, CA 90067
`hzhong@irell.com
`mfleming@irell.com
`
`
`
`/s/ Brian M. Hoffman
`Brian M. Hoffman
`FENWICK & WEST LLP
`555 California Street, 12th Floor
`San Francisco, CA 94104
`Tel: (415) 875-2300
`Fax: (415) 281-1350
`Email: bhoffman@fenwick.com
`
`4
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
