`Patent No. 8,074,115
`
`
`IN THE
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_____________
`
`SYMANTEC CORPORATION,
`
`Petitioner
`
`- vs. -
`
`THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY
`IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK,
`
`
`Patent Owner
`
`_____________
`
`Patent No. 8,074,115
`Issued: December 6, 2011
`Inventors: Salvatore J. Stolfo, Angelos D. Kermytis, and Stelios Sidiroglou
`
`Title: METHODS, MEDIA AND SYSTEMS FOR
`DETECTING ANOMALOUS PROGRAM EXECUTION
`
`Inter Partes Review No. 2015-00375
`
`PETITIONER’S OBJECTIONS TO EVIDENCE
`SERVED WITH PATENT OWNER’S RESPONSE
`_____________
`
`Mail Stop Patent Board
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2015-00375
`Patent No. 8,074,115
`
`
`
`Petitioner, Symantec Corporation (“Symantec”), hereby objects to the
`
`admissibility of certain evidence submitted in support of Patent Owner’s Response,
`
`filed October 8, 2015.
`
`Evidence Submitted by Patent Owner
`Exhibit 2025
`
`Exhibit 2026
`
`Exhibit 2027
`
`Exhibit 2039
`
`Exhibit 2040
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Objections
`Relevance
`(Fed. R. Evid. 401),
`including insofar as the Exhibit is not
`cited in the Patent Owner’s Response or
`supporting expert declaration
`
`(Fed. R. Evid. 401),
`Relevance
`including insofar as the Exhibit is not
`cited in the Patent Owner’s Response or
`supporting expert declaration
`
`(Fed. R. Evid. 401),
`Relevance
`including insofar as the Exhibit post-
`dates the claimed priority date of the
`’115 patent
`
`(Fed. R. Evid. 401),
`Relevance
`including insofar as the Exhibit post-
`dates the claimed priority date of the
`’115 patent
`
`(Fed. R. Evid. 401),
`Relevance
`including insofar as the Exhibit post-
`dates the claimed priority date of the
`’115 patent
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`(Fed. R. Evid. 401),
`Relevance
`including insofar as the Exhibit post-
`dates the claimed priority date of the
`’115 patent
`
`(Fed. R. Evid. 401),
`Relevance
`including insofar as the Exhibit post-
`dates the claimed priority date of the
`’115 patent
`
`Authentication (Fed. R. Evid. 901, 902),
`including insofar as the Exhibit provides
`insufficient evidence
`to support a
`finding that the Exhibit is what Patent
`Owner claims it is
`
`(Fed. R. Evid. 401),
`Relevance
`including insofar as the Exhibit post-
`dates the claimed priority date of the
`’115 patent
`
`(Fed. R. Evid. 401),
`Relevance
`including insofar as the Exhibit post-
`dates the claimed priority date of the
`’115 patent
`
`(Fed. R. Evid. 401),
`Relevance
`including insofar as the Exhibit post-
`dates the claimed priority date of the
`’115 patent
`
`(Fed. R. Evid. 401),
`Relevance
`including insofar as the Exhibit post-
`dates the claimed priority date of the
`’115 patent
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`IPR2015-00375
`Patent No. 8,074,115
`
`
`Exhibit 2041
`
`Exhibit 2043
`
`Exhibit 2044
`
`Exhibit 2045
`
`Exhibit 2047
`
`Exhibit 2049
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2015-00375
`Patent No. 8,074,115
`
`Dated: October 13, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`/s/ Brian M. Hoffman
`Brian M. Hoffman
`FENWICK & WEST LLP
`555 California Street, 12th Floor
`San Francisco, CA 94104
`Tel: (415) 875-2300
`Fax: (415) 281-1350
`Email: bhoffman@fenwick.com
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2015-00375
`Patent No. 8,074,115
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6, the undersigned certifies that on October 13,
`
`2015, a copy of the foregoing document PETITIONER’S OBJECTIONS TO
`
`EVIDENCE SERVED WITH PATENT OWNER’S RESPONSE was served by
`
`electronic mail, as agreed to by the parties, upon the following:
`
`Hong Zhong
`Michael Fleming
`IRELL & MANELLA LLP
`1800 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 900
`Los Angeles, CA 90067
`hzhong@irell.com
`mfleming@irell.com
`
`
`
`/s/ Brian M. Hoffman
`Brian M. Hoffman
`FENWICK & WEST LLP
`555 California Street, 12th Floor
`San Francisco, CA 94104
`Tel: (415) 875-2300
`Fax: (415) 281-1350
`Email: bhoffman@fenwick.com
`
`4