`
`___________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`___________________
`
`
`
`SYMANTEC CORP.
`Petitioner
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY
` IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`___________________
`
`IPR2015-00375
`Patent No. 8,074,115
`___________________
`
`
`
` THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY
` IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK'S AMENDED UNOPPOSED MOTION
` FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION OF JASON S. SHEASBY
`UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(C)
`
`
`
`
`
`Mail Stop "PATENT BOARD"
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`3332273
`
`
`- 1 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2015-00375
`Patent 8,074,115
`
`
`
`I.
`
`RELIEF REQUESTED
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c) and the Board's "Order Authorizing Motion
`
`for Pro Hac Vice Admission – 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c)," in Case IPR2013-00639,
`
`Paper 7, entered October 15, 2013, incorporated by Paper 7 in the present case,
`
`Patent Owner The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York,
`
`("Columbia University"), by and through its attorneys, respectfully requests that the
`
`Board admit Jason G. Sheasby pro hac vice in this proceeding.
`
`II.
`
`GOVERNING LAW, RULES, AND PRECEDENT
`
`Section 42.10(c) states as follows:
`
`The Board may recognize counsel pro hac vice during a
`proceeding upon a showing of good cause, subject to the
`condition that lead counsel be a registered practitioner and
`to any other conditions as the Board may impose. For
`example, where the lead counsel is a registered
`practitioner, a motion to appear pro hac vice by counsel
`who is not a registered practitioner may be granted upon
`showing that counsel is an experienced litigating attorney
`and has an established familiarity with the subject matter
`at issue in the proceeding.
`
`III.
`
`STATEMENT OF FACTS
`
`Based on the following statement of facts, and supported by the Declaration
`
`of Jason G. Sheasby submitted herewith, Columbia University submits that a
`
`3332273
`
`
`- 2 -
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2015-00375
`Patent 8,074,115
`showing of good cause has been made and respectfully requests the pro hac vice
`
`
`
`
`
`admission of Jason G. Sheasby in this proceeding:
`
`1.
`
`Patent Owner’s lead counsel, Hong Zhong, is a registered practitioner
`
`(Reg. No. 66,530).
`
`2. Mr. Sheasby is a Partner at the law firm of Irell & Manella LLP.
`
`3. Mr. Sheasby is an experienced litigating attorney and has been
`
`litigating cases relating to patents for over 14 years.
`
`4. Mr. Sheasby is a member in good standing of the California State Bar.
`
`5. Mr. Sheasby has never been suspended or disbarred from practice
`
`before any court or administrative body.
`
`6.
`
`No application filed by Mr. Sheasby for admission to practice before
`
`any court or administrative body has ever been denied.
`
`7.
`
`No sanctions or contempt citations have been imposed against Mr.
`
`Sheasby by any court or administrative body.
`
`8. Mr. Sheasby has read and agrees to comply with the Office Patent Trial
`
`Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in
`
`part 42 of the C.F.R.
`
`3332273
`
`
`- 3 -
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2015-00375
`Patent 8,074,115
`9. Mr. Sheasby understands that he will be subject to the USPTO Rules of
`
`
`
`
`
`Professional Conduct 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq. and disciplinary
`
`jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a).
`
`10. Mr. Sheasby has appeared pro hac vice in two other proceedings before
`
`the United States Patent and Trademark Office in the last three (3)
`
`years.
`
`11. Mr. Sheasby has an established familiarity with the subject matter at
`
`issue in this proceeding. Mr. Sheasby has acquired substantial
`
`understanding of the underlying legal and technological issues at stake
`
`in related proceedings. Patent Owner has expended significant time and
`
`resources with Mr. Sheasby and wishes to continue using Mr. Sheasby
`
`as counsel in this proceeding as appropriate.
`
`IV.
`
`GOOD CAUSE EXISTS FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION OF
`JASON G. SHEASBY
`
`The facts outlined above in the Statement of Facts, and contained in the
`
`Declaration of Jason G. Sheasby (Ex. 2001), establish that there is good cause to
`
`admit Mr. Sheasby pro hac vice in this proceeding under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10. Patent
`
`Owner's lead counsel is a registered practitioner, Mr. Sheasby is an experienced
`
`litigating attorney, and Mr. Sheasby has an established familiarity with the subject
`
`matter at issue.
`
`
`
`3332273
`
`
`- 4 -
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2015-00375
`Patent 8,074,115
`
`V.
`NO OPPOSITION TO THEIR MOTION
`
`
`Patent Owner has conferred with Petitioner with regard to its Motion, and
`
`Petitioner confirmed on March 24, 2015 that it would not oppose the motion.
`
`VI.
`
`CONCLUSION
`
`In light of the foregoing, Patent Owner respectfully requests that the Board
`
`admit Jason G. Sheasby pro hac vice in their proceeding.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Hong Zhong
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IRELL & MANELLA LLP
`Hong Zhong, Reg. No. 66,530
`1800 Avenue of the Stars, Ste. 900
`Los Angeles CA 90067
`Tel: (310) 203-7183
`Fax: (310) 556-5385
`
`
`Attorney for Patent Owner,
`The Trustees of Columbia University
`
`
`
`Dated: March 24, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3332273
`
`
`- 5 -
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2015-00375
`Patent 8,074,115
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6, the undersigned certifies that on March 24,
`
`
`
`2015, a copy of the foregoing document "THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA
`
`UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK'S AMENDED UNOPPOSED
`
`MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION OF JASON G. SHEASBY
`
`UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(C)" was served by electronic mail, as agreed to by the
`
`parties, upon the following:
`
`
`David D. Schumann
`Brian M. Hoffman
`Fenwick & West LLP
`555 California Street
`12th Floor
`San Francisco, CA 94104
`
`dschumann@fenwick.com
`bhoffman@fenwick.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/Susan M. Langworthy/
`
`
`
`- 6 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3332273