`Demonstratives
`
`IPR2015‐00369
`IPR2015‐00373
`
`Patent No. 6,128,290
`
`Before Jameson Lee, Matthew R. Clements, and Charles J.
`Boudreau, Administrative Patent Judges
`
`March 15, 2016
`
`1
`
`
`
`Apple Exhibit 1001
`Carvey, U.S. Pat. No. 6,128,290
`Col. 11, line 62 to Col. 12, line 19
`
`1. A data network system for effecting coordinated operation of a plurality of electronic devices, said
`system comprising:
`
`a server microcomputer unit;
`
`a plurality of peripheral units which are battery powered and portable, which provide either input information
`from the user or output information to the user, and which are adapted to operate within short range of said
`server unit;
`
`said server microcomputer incorporating an RF transmitter for sending commands and synchronizing
`information to said peripheral units;
`
`said peripheral units each including an RF receiver for detecting said commands and synchronizing
`information and including also an RF transmitter for sending input information from the user to said server
`microcomputer;
`
`said server microcomputer including a receiver for receiving input information transmitted from said
`peripheral units;
`
`said server and peripheral transmitters being energized in low duty cycle RF bursts at intervals determined
`by a code sequence which is timed in relation to said synchronizing information.
`
`March 15, 2016
`
`2
`
`
`
`PTAB Paper 9
`Institution Decision pg. 14
`
`March 15, 2016
`
`3
`
`
`
`PTAB Paper 9
`Institution Decision, pg. 18, lines 10‐18
`
`March 15, 2016
`
`4
`
`
`
`PTAB Paper 9
`Institution Decision pg. 18‐19
`
`March 15, 2016
`
`5
`
`
`
`Apple Exhibit 1003
`Natarajan et al.
`U.S. Pat. No. 5,241,542
`Abstract
`
`March 15, 2016
`
`6
`
`
`
`Apple Exhibit 1003
`Natarajan et al.
`U.S. Pat. No. 5,241,542
`FIG. 2 and col 2:40‐47
`
`March 15, 2016
`
`7
`
`
`
`Apple Exhibit 1003
`Natarajan et al.
`U.S. Pat. No. 5,241,542
`Col. 3 line 59‐Col. 4 line 19
`
`March 15, 2016
`
`8
`
`
`
`Apple Exhibit 1003
`Natarajan et al.
`U.S. Pat. No. 5,241,542
`Col. 10 lines 16‐37
`
`March 15, 2016
`
`9
`
`
`
`Apple Exhibit 1003
`Natarajan et al.
`U.S. Pat. No. 5,241,542
`Col. 3 line 59‐Col. 4 line 19
`
`March 15, 2016
`
`10
`
`
`
`Apple Exhibit 1004
`Neve et al.
`U.S. Pat. No. 4,887,266
`Col. 4 lines 42‐50
`Col. 7 lines 14‐19
`
`March 15, 2016
`
`11
`
`
`
`DSS Exhibit 2015
`Dr. Grimes Cross‐Exam
`Pg. 42 lines 9‐22
`
`March 15, 2016
`
`12
`
`
`
`Apple Exhibit 1001
`‘290 Patent
`FIG. 6
`
`DSS Exhibit 2015
`Dr. Grimes Cross‐Exam
`Pg. 34 lines 2‐8
`
`March 15, 2016
`
`13
`
`
`
`Apple Exhibit 1003
`Natarajan et al.
`U.S. Pat. No. 5,241,542
`FIG. 4 & Col. 7 lines 59‐66
`
`March 15, 2016
`
`14
`
`
`
`DSS Exhibit 2018
`Dr. Hu’s Cross‐Exam
`Pg. 117 lines 17‐22 &
`Pg. 118 lines 1‐6
`
`March 15, 2016
`
`15
`
`
`
`Apple Exhibit 1003
`Natarajan et al.
`U.S. Pat. No. 5,241,542
`FIG. 4
`
`March 15, 2016
`
`16
`
`
`
`Patent Owner Response
`Pg. 16
`
`“Obviousness requires a court to
`walk a tightrope blindfolded (to
`avoid hindsight) – an enterprise
`best pursued with the safety net of
`objective evidence.”
`Mintz v. Dietz & Watson, Inc., 679 F. 3d 1372, 1379
`(Fed. Cir. 2012).
`
`March 15, 2016
`
`17