throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`Paper No. 34
`Entered: March 2, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`APPLE INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`DSS TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Cases IPR2015-00369 and IPR2015-003731
`Patent 6,128,290
`____________
`
`Before JAMESON LEE, MATTHEW R. CLEMENTS, and
`CHARLES J. BOUDREAU, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`BOUDREAU, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Trial Hearing
`35 U.S.C. § 316(a)(10)
`
`
`
`1 This order addresses issues pertaining to both IPR2015-00369 and
`IPR2015-00373. We exercise our discretion to issue a single order to be
`filed in each case. The parties, however, are not authorized to use this style
`heading in subsequent papers.
`
`

`
`IPR2015-00369 and IPR2015-00373
`Patent 6,128,290
`
`
`The two instant proceedings pertain to the same challenged patent. In
`each proceeding, Petitioner and Patent Owner requested a hearing pursuant
`to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a). See IPR2015-00369, Papers 28, 30; IPR2015-
`00373, Papers 27, 29. The requests are granted.
`A single, combined hearing for the two proceedings will take place on
`March 15, 2016, at 1:00 PM Eastern Time. Petitioner and Patent Owner
`will each have sixty minutes to present arguments. Petitioner bears the
`ultimate burden of proof that the challenged claims are unpatentable.
`Therefore, Petitioner will proceed first to present its case as to the
`challenged claims and may reserve rebuttal time. Patent Owner then will
`respond to Petitioner’s case. After that, Petitioner may use the rest of its
`time to respond to Patent Owner’s presentation. The parties should note that
`statements made in the combined hearing will have application in whichever
`underlying proceeding the record of which supports the statement.
`The hearing will be open to the public for in-person attendance on the
`ninth floor of Madison Building East, 600 Dulany Street, Alexandria,
`Virginia. In-person attendance will be accommodated on a first come, first
`served basis. The Board will provide a court reporter for the hearing, and
`the reporter’s transcripts will constitute the official record of the hearing.
`Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b), demonstrative exhibits must be served
`five business days prior to the hearing. The parties shall confer with each
`other regarding any objections to demonstrative exhibits and file
`demonstrative exhibits with the Board at least two business days prior to the
`hearing. For any issue that cannot be resolved after conferring with the
`opposing party, the parties may file jointly a one-page list of objections and
`
` 2
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`IPR2015-00369 and IPR2015-00373
`Patent 6,128,290
`
`shall request a conference call with the Board at least two business days
`prior to the hearing. The list should identify with particularity which
`demonstrative exhibits are subject to objection and include a short statement
`(no more than one sentence) of the reason for each objection. No argument
`or further explanation is permitted. Any objection to demonstrative exhibits
`that is not presented timely will be considered waived. Each party also shall
`provide a hard copy of its demonstrative exhibits to the court reporter at the
`hearing.
`The parties are directed to CBS Interactive Inc. v. Helferich Patent
`Licensing, LLC, Case IPR2013-00033, slip op. at 2–5 (PTAB Oct. 23, 2013)
`(Paper 118), regarding the appropriate content of demonstrative exhibits.
`The parties are reminded that the presenter must identify clearly and
`specifically each demonstrative exhibit (e.g., by slide or screen number)
`referenced during the hearing to ensure the clarity and accuracy of the
`reporter’s transcripts. The parties also should note that two members of the
`panel will be attending the hearing electronically from a remote location and
`that if a demonstrative exhibit is not filed or otherwise made fully available
`or visible to the judges presiding over the hearing remotely, that
`demonstrative exhibit will not be considered.
`For each proceeding, the Board expects lead counsel for Petitioner
`and Patent Owner to be present at the hearing, although any back-up counsel
`may make the actual presentation, in whole or in part. If lead counsel for
`any party will not be in attendance at the hearing, the Board should be
`notified via a joint conference call no later than two business days prior to
`the hearing to discuss the matter.
`
` 3
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`IPR2015-00369 and IPR2015-00373
`Patent 6,128,290
`
`
`Requests for audio-visual equipment at the hearing are to be made
`five business days in advance of the hearing date. The requests must be sent
`to Trials@uspto.gov. If the requests are not received timely, equipment may
`not be available on the days of the hearing. Further, if the parties have
`questions as to whether demonstrative exhibits would be sufficiently visible
`and available to all of the judges, the parties are invited to contact the Board
`at 571-272-9797.
`
`
` 4
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`IPR2015-00369 and IPR2015-00373
`Patent 6,128,290
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`David K.S. Cornwell
`Mark W. Rygiel
`Jason A. Fitzsimmons
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C.
`davidc-PTAB@skgf.com
`mrygiel-PTAB@skgf.com
`jfitzsimmons-PTAB@skgf.com
`
`
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`Andriy Lytvyn
`Anton J. Hopen
`Nicholas Pfeifer
`SMITH HOPEN PA
`andriy.lytvyn@smithhopen.com
`anton.hopen@smithhopen.com
`nicholas.pfeifer@smithhopen.com
`
`
` 5

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket