||||||||l|||||IIIIllllIllllIlllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
`
`.
`Umted States Patent
`
`[191
`
`USOOS303322A
`[11] Patent Number:
`
`5,303,322
`
`Winston et al.
`[45] Date of Patent:
`Apr. 12, 1994
`
`
`[54] TAPERED MULTILAYER LUMINAIRE
`DEVICES
`
`[75]
`
`Inventors: Roland Winston; Benjamin A.
`Jacobson, both of Chicago; Robert L.
`Holman, Naperville; Neil A. Gitkind,
`Chicago, all of 111.
`
`.
`[73] Asmgnee: NiOptics Corporation, Evanston, Ill.
`.
`..
`,
`[21] Appl No . 29 883
`[22] Filed:
`Mar. 11, 1993
`
`4,649,462
`3/1987 Dobrowolski ct al.
`................ 362/2
`
`4,706,173 11/1987 Hamada ct a].
`. 362/341
`3/1988 Ohe .................... 362/31
`4,729,068
`
`4,735,495 4/1988 Henkes .................... 362/310
`
`4,737,896 4/1988 Mochizulki et a1.
`362/301
`
`5/1988 Bonds ........................ 40/219
`4,747,223
`
`4,765,718
`8/1988 chkes
`....... 359/49
`
`
`.
`4,799,050
`1/ 1989 Prine ct al.
`..... 340/765
`1/1989 Abo ................. 362/309
`4,799,137
`4,832,458
`5/1989 Fcrgason ............................. 350/338
`(List continued on next page.)
`
`Related US. Application Data
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`’ [63]
`
`Continuation-impart of Ser- No, 855,838, Mar. 23.
`1992’ Pat. NO- 5337,641-
`Int. Cl.5 ................................................ 00213 6/26
`[51]
`[52] US. Cl. ...................................... 385/146; 385/43;
`385/901; 385“29; 385/1 31
`[58] Field of Search ................. 385/43, 129, 130, 131,
`385/140, 146, 147, 901, 31; 359/599, 833, 834
`
`“Flat Panel Backlight Reflecting Device,” R. L. Gar-
`win and R. T. Hodgson, IBM Technical Disclosure Bul-
`It’ll", VOl- 31’ NO- 2: Jul,- 1988’ PP. 190-191-
`“Dielectn'c Totally Internally Reflecting Concentra-
`tors” Xisohui, Ming, Roland Winston and Joseph 0’-
`Gallagher. Applied Optics. vol- 26, Jan. 15, 1987. pp-
`300—305-
`
`[56]
`
`References Cited
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`,
`2,347,665 5/ 1944 Chnstensen et a].
`................. 362/31
`7/1955 Merchant .................
`2,712,593
`.362/27
`
`3,617,109 11/1971 Tlen .....
`. 385/43
`3,752,974
`8/1973 Baker et
`240/1
`.
`
`3,832,028
`8/1974 Kapron ........
`385/43
`3,980,392 9/1976 Aunacher ..............‘. 385/43
`
`4,059,916 11/1977 Tachihara et a1.
`...... 40/130
`
`4,111,538' 9/1978 Sheridon ..........
`353/122
`
`41114’592 9/1973 wmsw“
`126/270
`
`4,161,015
`7/1979 Dey et al.
`362/263
`
`4,176,908 ”/1979 Wagner .......
`' 350/96.15
`
`4,212,048
`7/1980 Castleberry .
`.......... 362/19
`
`4,240,692 12/1930 Winston .......
`_ 350/96.10
`
`4,257,084
`3/1981 Reynolds .
`,,,,,, 362/31
`
`4,277,817
`7/1981 Hehr .............. 362/31
`
`
`4,323,951
`4/1932 P3590
`------ 362/27
`
`4,373,282 2/1983 Wragg .
`.. 40/546
`4,420,796 12/1983 Mori ............
`.. 362/32
`4,453,200 6/1984 Troka et a1.
`...... 362/31
`4,528,617 7/1935 Blackington
`.. 362/32
`
`4,547,043 10/1985 Penz ........................
`.. 362/32
`
`4,573,766
`3/1986 Boumsy, Jr. ct al.
`..
`350/345
`
`4,618,216 10/1986 Suzawa ......................... 359/49
`4,648,690 3/1987 Obe ..................................... 350/321
`
`Primary Examiner—John D. Lee
`Assistant Examiner—Phan Thi Heartney
`Attorney, Agent, or Firm—Reinhart, Boerner, Van
`Deuren’ Noms‘g‘ meselb‘mh
`[57]
`ABSTRACT
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`An optlcal dev1ce for collectlng llght and selectlvely
`outputting 0r concentrating the light- A wedge layer
`has an Optical index of refraction m. and tOp, bottom
`and side surfaces intersecting to define an angle of incli-
`nation (1. A back surface spans the top, bottom and side
`-
`h
`0
`rf
`of
`surface. A first layer 15 coupled tot e bott m su ace
`the layer and has an index. °f refraction “2' The fir“
`layer 1ndex 112 causes llght 1nput through the back sur-
`:face of the layer to be preferentially output into the first
`layer. A second layer is coupled to the bottom of the
`first layer and selectively causes output of light into
`-
`-
`5
`-
`amb1ent. Addltional layers, such as an air gap, can be
`PTOVided adjacent
`to the wedge shaped layer. The
`wedge shaped layer can also have a variable index of
`refraction n (Xe/.2)-
`
`69 Claims, 23 Drawing Sheets
`
`
`
`MBI_OO161O
`
`Mercedes-Benz Ex. 1014
`
`Mercedes-Benz Ex. 1014
`
`MBI_001610
`
`

`

`Page 2M
`
`5,303,322
`
`US PATENT DOCUMENTS
`6/1989
`4,838,661
`6/1989
`4,842,378
`3/1990
`4,907,044
`3/1990
`4,907,132
`4/1990
`4,914,553
`4/1990
`4,915,479
`6/l990
`4,936,659
`8/1990
`4,950,059
`9/1990
`4,958,915
`10/1990
`4,965,876
`11/1990
`4,974,122
`12/1990
`4,974,353
`1/1991
`4,985,809
`2/1991
`4,989,933
`2/1991
`4,992,916
`3/1991
`4,998,188
`5/1991
`5,01 9,808
`8/1991
`5,039,207
`8/1991
`5,040,098
`8/1991
`5,040,878
`9/1991
`5,044,734
`9/1991
`5,046,805
`
`McKee et a1.
`...................... 350/345
`Flasck et a].
`........
`.. 350/345
`
`Schellbom et al.
`357/17
`Parker .................
`362/32
`
`.. 362/321
`Hamada et al.
`.
`Clarke .................
`. 358/345
`
`Anderson et a1.
`359/49
`Roberts .....
`362/32
`
`. 350/345
`Okada et a].
`
`..
`.. 362/247
`Foldi et a1.
`Shaw ........
`362/31
`
`Norfolk
`40/447
`
`Matsui et al.
`....... 362/31
`
`.. 350/96.10
`Duguay
`
`Henkes .......... 362/255
`Degelmann ..
`..... 362/ 147
`
`.
`. 340/765
`Prince et a1.
`Green ..............
`359/49
`
`Tanaka et a1.
`362/31
`. 350/345
`Eichenlaub ..
`
`Sperl et al.
`359/49
`Simon ................................... 385/31
`
`5,046,829
`5,050,946
`5,051,551
`5,053,765
`5,083,120
`5,101,325
`5,128,783
`5,128,787
`5,128,846
`
`9/1991
`9/1991
`9/1991
`10/1991
`1/1992
`3/1992
`7/1992
`7/1992
`7/1992
`
`Worp .................................... 359/49
`Hathaway et a].
`................... 385/33
`Doyle ....................... 250/341
`
`. 340/815.31
`Sonehara et al.
`
`Nelson ..................... 340/784
`Davenport et a1.
`....... 362/31
`
`Abileah et a].
`.
`359/49
`
`Blonder .......
`359/70
`.......................... 362/224
`Mills et a].
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`“Optics of Two—Stage Photovaltaic Concentrators
`with Dielectric Second Stages”, Xisohul, Ning, Roland
`Winston and Joseph O’Gallagher, Applied Optics, vol.
`26, Apr. 1, 1987, pp. 1207—1212.
`“New Backlighting Technologies for LCDs”, Hatha-
`way et al., Societyfor Infiirmation Display Digest, vol. 22,
`May 1991, pp. 751—754. “Parts that Glow”, A. Bhurnen-
`feld and S. Jones, Machine Design, Jul. 1985, pp. 1—11.
`“Directional Diffuser Lens Array for Backlit LCDs”,
`R.
`I. McCartney and D. Syroid, Japan Display, pp.
`259-262 (1992).
`
`MBI_001611
`
`MBI_001611
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Apr. 12, 1994
`
`Sheet 1 of 23
`
`5,303,322
`
`.9‘
`
`7—:g;R ART—"\
`
`9c
`
`
`
`SHADOWED
`
`ILLUMINATED
`
`MBI_OO1612
`
`MBI_001612
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Apr. 12, 1994
`
`Sheet 2 of 23
`
`5,303,322
`
`
`
`.MBI_OO1613
`
`MBI_001613
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Apr. 12, 1994
`
`3 Sheet 3 of 23
`
`5,303,322
`
`/10
`
`W 5% 25’
`/2
`29
`
`»
`
`949. 2J6
`
`MBI_OO1614
`
`MBI_001614
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`. Apr. 12, 1994
`
`Sheet 4 of 23
`
`5,303,322
`
`
`
`
`/////
`
`ZONE
`
`MBI_OO1615
`
`MBI_001615
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Apr. 12, 1994
`
`Sheet 5 of 23
`
`5,303,322
`
`
`
`MBI_OO1616
`
`MBI_001616
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Apr. 12, 1994
`
`Sheet 6 of 23
`
`5,303,322
`
`
`
`95?. 4d.
`
`BRIGHTNESS
`
`8
`
`-5 T0 30
`
`-90
`
`—60
`
`~30 060 90
`VIEWING ANGLE (DEGREES)
`
`MBI_OO1617
`
`MBI_001617
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Apr. 12,1994
`
`Sheet 7 of 23
`
`5,303,322
`
`BRIGHTNESS
`8
`
`
`
`
`-18 T0 18
`
`959/. 4%
`
`-18 T0 30
`
`
`
`—90
`
`~60
`
`30
`O
`'
`-30
`VIEWING ANGLE (DEGREES)
`
`60
`
`90
`
`BRIGHTNESS
`
`8
`
`
`
`—90
`
`' —60
`
`so
`0
`'-3o
`VIEWING ANGLE (DEGREES)
`
`so
`
`90
`
`MBI_OO1618
`
`MBI_001618
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Apr. 12, 1994
`
`Sheet 8 of 23
`
`5,303,322
`
`BRIGHTNESS (fL.)
`5.4
`
`4 3.5
`
`3
`
`2.5
`
`2
`
`1.5
`
`1
`
`0.5
`
`97;? 42
`
`~22
`-18
`-24
`-20
`
`-14
`-16
`
`-12
`
`10
`
`-8
`
`-4
`
`0
`
`4 6
`
`8
`
`121 161
`ANGLE
`
`700
`
`BRIGHTNESS}
`600
`
`200
`
`500
`
`400
`
`_300
`
`-50--25 -14 —7 —2
`
`4
`
`11
`
`15
`
`20 25 29
`ANGLE
`
`41
`
`MBI_OO1619
`
`MBI_001619
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Apr.12, 1994
`
`Sheet 9 of 23
`
`‘ 5,303,322
`
`BRIGHTNESS
`
`
`
`.9‘? 49
`
`260
`
`220
`
`200
`
`180
`
`160
`
`140
`
`120
`
`100
`
`
`-44.4-;933393-4323322-5212-22918-94-140
`-2
`I
`
`ANGLE
`
`‘S;Z€§Z6
`
`‘GZEfg
`
`80
`
`60
`
`40
`
`20
`
`
`
`BRIGHTNESS
`320
`
`300
`
`280
`
`260
`
`240
`
`220
`200
`
`180
`
`160
`
`140
`
`120
`
`100
`
`80
`
`60
`
`40
`
`20
`
`0
`
`—46-38-34 -3o-24 —18
`
`2
`
`1o
`
`24
`
`42 ANGLE
`
`MBI_OO1620
`
`MBI_001620
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`.Apr. 12, 1994
`
`Sheet 10 of 23
`
`5,303,322
`
`BRIGHTNESS
`500
`
`
`
`
`gym
`
`450
`
`400
`
`350
`
`300
`
`250
`
`200
`
`150
`
`100
`
`50
`
`LUMINANCE (fLJ
`
`500
`
`400
`
`300
`
`
`
`o
`-56 -48-—40 32 —24 —16 —8
`-60 -52 -44-—36-28 -2o —12 -4 4
`ANGLE
`
`8
`
`16
`
`12
`
`200
`
`100
`
`—90
`
`0
`-30
`—60
`VERTICAL ANGLE(DEGREES)
`
`30
`
`60
`
`90
`
`MBI_OO1621
`
`MBI_001621
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Apr. 12,1994
`
`Sheet 11 of 23
`
`5,303,322
`
`
`
`MBI_OO1622
`
`MBI_001622
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Apr. 12, 1994
`
`Sheet 12 of 23
`
`5,303,322
`
`
`
`— PRIOR ART —
`
`959.7
`
`MBI_OO1623
`
`MBI_001623
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Apr. 12,1994
`
`Sheet 13 of 23
`
`5,303,322
`
`
`,
`BOTTOM 0F
`/ ’ ’ SCREEN CUTS OFF
`PROGRESSIVELY
`(u-> b *c)
`
`
`
`V
`
`EFFECTIVE
`VIEWING
`AREA
`
`
`
`TOP OF
`SCREEN CUTS OFF
`
`\ ‘
`PROGRESSIVELY
`(d->e->f)
`
`
` \
`
`e
`
`0:500 MM————————————4 ““
`
`
`
`‘Saz2§;“ ‘SEZSZS’
`
`GRACEFUL
`
`‘ S¥3§¥fi£
`
`150MM
`
`89
`
`L
`D=500 MM
`
`MBI_OO1624
`
`MBI_001624
`
`

`

`
`
`MBI_001625
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Apr. 12, 1994
`
`Sheet 15 of 23
`
`5,303,322
`
`.
`
`
`
`MBI_OO1626
`
`MBI_001626
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`.Apr. 12, 1994
`
`Sheet 16 of 23
`
`5,303,322
`
`
`
`
`FOCUS
`
`MBI_OO1627
`
`>
`
`MBI_001627
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Apr. 12,1994
`
`Sheet 17 of 23
`
`5,303,322
`
`I,
`
`EFFECTIVE
`
`VIEWING
`AREA
`
`‘———
`——
`'—
`
`_—
`.—.—
`———
`
` EFFECTIVE
`
`/ VIEWING
`V // I ARIEAI II
`
`MBI_OO1628
`
`MBI_001628
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`' Apr. 12, 1994
`
`Sheet 18 of 23
`
`5,303,322
`
`
`
`MBI_OO1629
`
`MBI_001629
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Apr. 12, 1994
`
`Sheet 19 of 23
`
`5,303,322
`
`
`
`MBI_OO163O
`
`MBI_001630
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Apr. 12,1994
`
`Sheet 20 of 23
`
`5,303,322
`
`
`
`AREA
`
`
`
`MBI_OO1631
`
`MBI_001631
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Apr. 12, 1994
`
`Sheet 21 of 23
`
`5,303,322
`
`
`
`MBI_OO1632
`
`MBI_001632
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`.Apr. 12,1994
`
`Sheet 22 of 23
`
`5,303,322
`
`
`
`MBI_001633
`
`MBI_001633
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Apr. 12, 1994
`
`Sheet 23 of 23
`
`5,303,322
`
`
`AMBIENT
`
`\ \\
`
`
`
`
`V1: 35°-(o.133 DEG/MIN)-x
`101
`$2 = 35°+(o.133 DEG/MIN)-X
`
`$1 =45° 6% 25° g5? 78%
`2
`hfi‘i‘I
`'25 fl ‘5 v1 =25
`
`°
`
`0
`
`‘W =25°
`
`0
`
`
`
`MBI_OO1634
`
`MBI_001634
`
`

`

`1
`
`5,303,322
`
`2
`
`TAPERED MULTILAYER LUMINAIRE DEVICES
`
`This is a continuation-in-part of copending applica-
`tion Ser. No. 07/855,838 filed on Mar. 23, 1992, US.
`Pat. No. 5,237,641.
`The present invention is concerned generally with a
`luminaire device for providing selected illumination.
`More particularly, the invention is concerned with ta-
`pered luminaires, such as a wedge or disc shape, for
`backlighting and control of angular range of illumina-
`tion and light concentration generally.
`A variety of applications exist for luminaire devices,
`such as, for liquid crystal displays. For flat panel liquid
`crystal displays,
`it is important to provide adequate
`backlighting while maintaining a compact
`lighting
`source. It is known to use wedge shaped optical devices
`for general illumination purposes. Light is input to such
`devices at the larger end; and light is then internally
`reflected off the wedge surfaces until the critical angle
`of the reflecting interface is reached, after which light is
`output from the wedge device. Such devices, however,
`have only been used to generally deliver an uncol-
`limated lighting output and often have undesirable spa-
`tial and angular output distributions. For example, some
`of these devices use white painted layers as diffuse re-
`flectors to generate uncollimated output light.
`It is therefore an object of the invention to provide an
`improved optical device and method of manufacture.
`It is another object of the invention to provide a
`novel three dimensional luminaire.
`It is a further object of the invention to provide an
`improved multilayer tapered luminaire for optical pur-
`poses, such as for controlled angular output backlight-
`mg.
`It is still another object of the invention to provide a
`novel tapered luminaire device for controlled transmis-
`sion or concentration of light.
`It is an additional object of the invention to provide a
`novel optical device for providing collimated illumina-
`tion from the device.
`_
`It is yet a further object of the invention to provide an
`improved tapered luminaire having an intervening air
`gap layer.
`It is still another object of the invention to provide a
`novel luminaire allowing controlled and focused output
`illumination, or controlled angular input for concentra-
`tion.
`It is yet a further object of the invention to provide an
`improved illumination system wherein a light source,
`such as a compound parabolic concentrator, a fluroes-
`cent tubular light source, or variable parametric func-
`tional source is coupled to a multilayer optical device
`for generating an output.
`It is still a further object of the invention to provide a
`novel luminaire optical device having a variable index
`of refraction over the spatial parameters of a luminaire.
`It is yet an additional object of the invention to pro-
`vide an improved luminaire wedge device having non-
`linear thickness variation and variable wedge angle 11>
`along selected spatial parameters enabling compensa-
`tion for light output irregularities.
`Other objects, features and advantages of the present
`invention will be readily apparent from the following
`description of the preferred embodiments thereof, taken
`in conjunction with the accompanying drawings de-
`scribed below.
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`65
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`FIG. 1 shows a prior art wedge shaped device;
`FIG. 2A illustrates a multilayer tapered luminaire
`device constructed in accordance with the invention;
`FIG. 2B is a magnified partial view of the junction of
`the wedge layer, the first layer and the second faceted
`layer; FIG. 2C is an exaggerated form of FIG. 2A
`showing a greatly enlarged second faceted layer; FIG.
`2D is a partial view of the junction of the three layers
`illustrating the geometry for brightness determinations;
`FIG. 2E is a multilayer wedge device with a light redi-
`recting,
`internally transmitting layer on the bottom;
`FIG. 2F shows a wedge device with a lower surface
`translucent layer; FIG. 2G shows a wedge layer with a
`lower surface refracting faceted layer; FIG. 2H shows a
`wedge layer with a lower surface refracting layer and
`curved facets thereon;
`FIG. 21 shows a wedge layer with a refracting layer
`of facets having variable facet angles; FIG. 23 shows a
`single refracting prism coupled to a wedge layer; FIG.
`2K shows a single refracting prism coupled to a wedge
`layer and with an integral lens; FIG. 2L shows a reflect-
`ing faceted layer coupled to a wedge device; FIG. 2M
`shows a reflecting faceted layer with curved facet an-
`gles and coupled to a wedge device; FIG. 2N shows a
`flat reflecting facet on a wedge layer and FIG. 20
`shows a curved reflecting facet on a wedge layer;
`FIG. 3 shows the angular output light due to the facet
`geometry.
`FIG. 3A illustrates a multilayer wedge device with
`curved facets on the ambient side of the second layer
`and FIG. 3B- shows a magnified partial view of the
`junction of the various layers of the device;
`FIG. 4A shows calculated brightness performance
`over angle for an asymmetric range of angles of illumi-
`nation; FIG. 4B shows calculated brightness distribu-
`tion performance over angle for a more symmetric
`angle range; FIG. 4C illustrates calculated brightness
`performance over angle for the symmetry of FIG. 4B
`and adding an external diffuser element; FIG. 4D illus-
`trates an output using flat reflecting facets, no parallel
`diffuser;
`full-width
`at
`half-maximum brightness
`(FWHM): 7 degrees; FIG. 4E illustrates an example of
`nearly symmetrical output distribution; measured using
`flat facets with parallel lenticular diffuser; FWHM: 34
`degrees; FIG. 4F illustrates an example of asymmetrical
`output distribution, measured using curved facets;
`FWHM=32 degrees; FIG. 4G illustrates an example
`asymmetrical output distribution, measured using
`curved facets; FWHM =26 degrees; FIG. 4H illustrates
`an example of a bimodal output distribution, measured
`using one faceted reflecting layer and one faceted re-
`fractive layer; and FIG. 41 illustrates an example Of an
`output distribution with large “tails”, measured using a
`diffuse reflective bottom redirecting layer and a refrac-
`ting/internally-reflecting top redirecting layer;
`FIG. 5A shows a top view of a disc shaped light
`guide and FIG. 5B illustrates a cross section taken along
`SB—SB in FIG. 5A;
`FIG. 6A shows a cross sectional view of a multilayer
`tapered luminaire device with an air gap layer included;
`FIG. 6B shows another tapered luminaire in cross sec-
`tion with a compound parabolic light source/concen-
`trator; FIG. 6C illustrates another tapered luminaire in
`cross section with a variable parametric profile light
`source and a lenticular diffuser; and FIG. 6D shows
`
`MBI_OO1635
`
`MBI_001635
`
`

`

`5,303,322
`
`4
`FIG. 17 shows a luminaire operative in ambient and
`active modes with a faceted redirecting layer and a
`lenticular diffuser; and
`FIGS. 18A & 18B illustrate a luminaire with an array
`of micro-prisms for a faceted surface disposed over a
`diffuse backlight.
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`65
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED
`EMBODIMENTS
`
`A multilayer luminaire device constructed in accor-
`dance with one form of the invention is illustrated in
`FIG. 2 and indicated generally at 10. A prior art wedge
`11 is shown generally in FIG. 1. In this wedge 11 the
`light rays within the wedge 11 reflect from the surfaces
`until the angle of incidence is less than the critical angle
`(sin—ll/n) where n is the index of refraction of the
`wedge 11'. The light can exit equally from both top and
`bottom surfaces of the wedge 11, as well as exiting at
`grazing angles.
`The multilayer luminaire device 10 (hereinafter “de-
`vice 10”) shown in FIG. 2A includes a wedge layer 12
`which has a characteristic optical index of refraction of
`n}. The term “wedge layer” shall be used herein to
`include all geometries having converging top and bot-
`tom surfaces with wedge shaped cross sectional areas.
`The x, y and z axes are indicated within FIGS. 2A and
`2C with the “y” axis perpendicular to the paper. Typi-
`cal useful materials for the wedge layer 12 include al-
`most any transparent material, such as glass, polymethyl
`methacrylate, polystyrene, polycarbonate, polyvinyl
`chloride, methyl methacrylate/styrene
`copolymer
`(NAS) and sytrene/acrylonitrile. The wedge layer 12 in
`FIG. 2A further includes a top surface 14, a bottom
`surface 16, side surfaces 18, edge 26 and a back surface
`20 of thickness to spanning the top, bottom and side
`surfaces. A light source, such as a tubular fluorescent
`light 22, injects light 24 through the back surface 20 into
`the wedge layer 12. The light 24 is internally reflected
`from the various wedge layer surfaces and is directed
`along the wedge layer 12 toward the edge 26. Other
`possible light sources can be usedand will be described
`hereinafter. Generally, conventional light sources pro-
`vide substantially incoherent, uncollimated light; but
`coherent, collimated light can also be processed by the
`inventions herein.
`For the case where the surfaces 14 and 16 are flat, a
`single angle of inclination 4) for a linear wedge is de-
`fined by the top surface 14 and the bottom surface 16. In
`the case of nonlinear wedges, a continuum of angles 4)
`are definable; and the nonlinear wedge can be designed
`to provide the desired control of light output or concen-
`tration. Such a nonlinear wedge will be described in
`more detail later.
`In the embodiment of FIG. 2A a first layer 28 is
`coupled to the wedge layer 12 without any intervening
`air gap, and the first layer 28 has an optical index of
`refraction n2 and is optically coupled to the bottom
`surface 16. The first layer 28 can range in thickness
`from a few light wavelengths to much greater thick-
`nesses and accomplish the desired functionality. The
`resulting dielectric interface between the wedge layer
`12 and the first layer 28 has a higher critical angle than
`at the interface between the wedge layer 12 and ambi-
`ent. As will be apparent hereinafter, this feature can
`enable preferential angular output and collimation of
`the light 24 from the device 10.
`Coupled to the first layer 28 is a second layer 30 (best
`seen in FIG. 2B) having an optical index of refraction
`
`3
`another tapered luminaire in cross section with non-
`monotonic wedge layer thickness;
`FIG. 7 illustrates a reflective element disposed con-
`centrically about a light source;
`FIG. 8 illustrates a reflective element disposed about
`a light source with maximum displacement between the
`reflector center of curvature and the center of the light
`source;
`FIG. 9A illustrates use of a redirecting layer to pro-
`vide a substantially similar angular distribution emanat-
`ing from all portions of the device and FIG. 9B illus-
`trates use of a redirecting layer to a vary angular distri-
`bution emanating from different portions of the device,
`and specifically to focus the various angular distribu-
`tions to enhance their overlap at a selected target dis-
`tance;
`FIG. 10 illustrates one form of pair of lenticular ar-
`rays of a luminaire; and
`FIG. 11 illustrates a lenticular diffuser array and
`curved facet layer of a luminaire;
`FIG. 12A illustrates a wedge shaped luminaire hav-
`ing a pair of diffraction gratings or hologram layers;
`FIG. 12B shows a wedge shaped luminaire with a pair
`of refracting facet layers and diffusers; FIG. 12C illus-
`trates a wedge shaped luminaire with a pair of faceted
`layers; FIG. 12D shows a wedge shaped luminaire with
`two refracting single facet layers; FIG. 12E illustrates a
`wedge shaped luminaire with a refracting single facet
`layer and a bottom surface redirecting layer; FIG. 12F
`shows a luminaire with a top surface redirecting layer
`of a refracting faceted layer and a bottom surface re-
`fracting and internally reflecting layer; FIG. 12G illus-
`trates a luminaire with a top surface refracting/inter-
`nally reflecting faceted layer and a bottom surface re-
`fracting/intemally reflecting faceted layer; FIG. 12H
`shows a luminaire with a top surface refracting faceted
`layer and a bottom surface refracting/internally reflect-
`ing faceted layer; FIG. 121 illustrates a luminaire with a
`bottom surface specular reflector and a top layer trans-
`mission diffraction grating or transmission hologram;
`FIG. 12] shows a luminaire with a bottom surface spec-
`ular reflector and a top surface refracting faceted layer
`and diffuser; FIG. 12K illustrates a luminaire with a
`bottom layer specular reflector and a top layer refrac-
`ting/internally reflecting faceted layer; FIG. 12L shows
`a luminaire with a bottom specular reflector and a top
`layer
`refracting/intemally reflecting. faceted layer;
`FIG. 12M illustrates a luminaire with an initial reflector
`section including an integral lenticular diffuser; FIG.
`12N shows a luminaire with a roughened initial reflec-
`tor section of a layer; FIG. 12O illustrates a luminaire
`with an eccentric light coupler and converging to the
`wedge shaped section; FIG. 12P shows a luminaire with
`an eccentric light coupler and a diffuser and roughened
`or lenticular reflector; FIG. 12Q illustrates a luminaire
`with a bottom specular or diffusely reflecting layer and
`a top refracting layer and FIG. 12R shows a luminaire
`for generating a “bat wing" light output;
`FIG. 13 illustrates a combination of two wedge
`shaped sections formed integrally and using two light
`sources;
`FIG. 14 shows a tapered disk luminaire including a
`faceted redirecting layer;
`FIG. 15 illustrates a luminaire operating to provide a
`collimated light output distribution;
`FIG. 16A shows a prior art ambient mode LCD and
`FIG. 16B illustrates a prior art transflective LCD unit;
`
`MBI_OO1636
`
`MBI_001636
`
`

`

`6
`reflected back through the wedge layer 12. For exam-
`ple, in FIG. 2F the device 10 can include a translucent
`layer 37. In anOther form of this embodiment shown in
`FIG. 26, a refracting layer 38 is shown. The refracting
`layer 38 can include flat facets 39 for providing a colli-
`mated output. Also shown in phantom in FIG. 26 is a
`transverse lenticular diffuser 83 which will be described
`in more detail hereinafter. The diffuser layer 83 can be
`used with any of the invention geometries, including
`above the wedge layer 12 as in FIG. 6A.
`In yet another example shown in FIG. 21-1, the re-
`fracting layer 38 can include curved facts 41 for provid-
`ing a smoothly broadened output over a desired angular
`distribution. In a further example shown in FIG. 21, the
`refracting layer 38 includes variable angle facets 42.
`These facets 42 have facet angles and/or curvature
`which are varied with position across the facet array to
`focus output light in a desired manner. Curved facets
`would enable producing a softly focused region within
`which the entire viewing screen appears to be illumi-
`nated. Examples of the application to compute screen
`illumination will be described hereinafter. In FIGS. 21
`and 2K are shown, respectively, a single refracting
`prism element 43 and the prism element 43 with an
`integral lens 44 to focus the output light. FIGS. 2L and
`M show the faceted surface 34 with the facets angularly
`disposed to control the output distribution of light. In
`FIGS. 2K and 2L the light is output to a focal point
`“F”, while in FIG. 2M the output is over an approxi-
`mate viewing range 45. FIGS. 2N and 20 illustrate flat
`reflecting facets 48 and curved reflecting facet 49 for
`providing a collimated light output or focused light
`output, respectively.
`As shown in FIGS. 2A and C the faceted surface 34
`optically reflects and redirects light 29 through the
`second layer 30, the first layer 28 and then through the
`wedge layer 12 into ambient. Only a fraction of each
`facet is illuminated, causing the output to appear alter-
`nately light and dark when viewed on a sufficiently
`small scale. Since this pattern is typically undesirable,
`for the preferred embodiment shown in FIG. 2B the
`period of spacing between each of the faceted surfaces
`34 is preferably large enough to avoid diffraction ef-
`fects, but small enough that the individual facets are not
`detected by the intended observing means. The spacing
`is also chosen to avoid forming Moiré interference pat-
`terns with any features of the device to be illuminated,
`such as a liquid crystal display or CCD (charge coupled
`device) arrays. Some irregularity in the spacing can
`mitigate undesirable diffraction Moire effects. For typi-
`cal backlighting displays, a spacing period of roughly
`0.001—0.003 inches can accomplish the desired purpose.
`The faceted surface 34 in FIGS. 2B and 2C, for exam-
`ple, can be generally prepared to control the angular
`range over which the redirected light 29 is output from
`the device 10. The minimum distribution of output
`angle in the layer 30 has a width which is approximately
`equal to:
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`5,303,322
`
`5
`n3 which is greater than n2, and in some embodiments
`preferably greater than m. This configuration then al-
`lows the light 24 to leave the first layer 28 and enter the
`second layer 30. In the embodiment of FIG. 2A there
`are substantially no intervening air gaps between the
`first layer 28 and the second layer 30. In the preferred
`form of the invention illustrated in FIG. 2A, In is about
`1.5, n2<1.5 and n3§n1. Most preferably, n1=1.5,
`n2<l.5 (such as about one) and n3§n1.
`In such a multilayer configuration for the device 10
`shown in FIG. 2, the wedge layer 12 causes the angle of
`incidence for each cyclic time of reflection from the top
`surface 14 to decrease by the angle of inclination 2d)
`(relative to the normal to the plane of the bottom sur-
`face 16). When the angle of incidence with the bottom
`surface 16 is less than the critical angle characteristic of
`the interface between the wedge layer 12 and the first
`layer 28, the light 24 is coupled into the first layer 28.
`Therefore, the first layer 28 and the associated optical
`interface properties form an angular filter allowing the
`light 24 to pass when the condition is satisfied: 0<00
`=sin-1 (nz/m). That is, the described critical angle is
`higher than for the interface between air and the wedge
`layer 12. Therefore, if the two critical angles differ by
`more than 64), nearly all of the light 24 will cross into
`the interface between the wedge layer 12 and the first
`layer 28 before it can exit the wedge layer 12 through
`the top surface 14. Consequently, if the two critical
`angles differ by less than cl), a substantial fraction, but
`less than half, of the light can exit the top surface 14. If
`the two angles differ by more than cl) and less than 64),
`then substantially more than half but less than all the
`light will cross into the wedge layer 12 and the first
`layer 28 before it can exit the wedge layer 12 through
`the top surface 14. The device 10 can thus be con-
`structed such that the condition 0<Oc is satisfied first
`for the bottom surface 16. The escaping light 24 (light
`which has entered the layer 28) will then enter the
`second layer 30 as long as n3> n2, for example. The light
`24 then becomes a collimated light 25 in the second
`layer 30 provided by virtue of the first layer 28 being
`coupled to the wedge layer 12 and having the proper
`relationship between the indices of refraction.
`In order to generate an output of the light 24 from the
`device 10, the second layer 30 includes means for scat-
`tering light, such as a paint layer 33 shown in FIG. 2E
`or a faceted surface 34 shown in both FIGS. 2B and 2C.
`The paint layer 33 can be used to preferentially project
`an image or other visual information. The paint layer 33
`can comprise, for example, a controllable distribution of
`particles having characteristic indices of refraction.
`By appropriate choice, light can also be redirected
`back through the wedge layer 12 and into ambient (see
`light 29 in FIGS. 2A and 2C) or output directly into
`ambient from the second layer 30 (see light 29’ in FIG.
`2F).
`In other forms of the invention a further plurality of
`layers with associated “n” values can exist. In one pre-
`ferred form of the invention the index of the lowest
`index layer can replace n2 in equations for numerical
`aperture and output angle (to be provided hereinafter).
`Such further layers can, for example, by intervening
`between the wedge layer 12 and the first layer 28, inter-
`vening between the first layer 28 and the second layer
`30 or be overlayers of the wedge layer 12 or the second
`layer 30.
`In certain embodiments the preferred geometries
`result in output of light into ambient without being
`
`A0: 2.1>[(r112—-1122)/(1132--'I2'2)lI
`
`Thus, since 4) can be quite small, the device 10 can be
`quite an effective collimator. Therefore, for the linear
`faceted surface 34, the exiting redirected light 29 has a
`minimum angular width i air of approximately:
`
`65
`
`A0air=n3A0=2¢(n12—n22)/[1—(fl2/"3)zli-
`
`MBI_OO1637
`
`MBI_001637
`
`

`

`5,303,322
`
`.
`7
`As described hereinbefore, and as shown in FIGS. 2H,
`2], 2K, 2L, 2M, and FIG. 3 the facet geometry can be
`used to control angular output in excess of the minimum
`angle and also focus and control the direction of the
`output light.
`.
`Fresnel reflections from the various interfaces can
`also broaden the output angle beyond the values given
`above, but this effect can be reduced by applying an
`antireflection coating 31 on one or more of the internal
`interfaces, as shown in FIG. 2B.
`The brightness ratio (“BR”) for the illustrated em-
`bodiment can be determined by reference to FIG. 2D as
`well as by etendue match, and BR can be expressed as:
`
`_ output brightness
`B‘R' ' source brightness
`
`or,
`
`B.R. =illuminated area/total area
`
`RR. = [1 —(n2/n3)2]! =0.4—O.65 (for most transparent
`dielectric materials)
`
`the wedge layer 12 can be acrylic
`For example,
`(n1=l.49), the first layer 28 can be a fluoropolymer
`(n2=l.28-1.43) or Sol-gel (n2=l.05—l.35, fluoride salts
`(n2: 1.38—1.43) or silicone based polymer or adhesive
`(n2: 1.4-1.45); and the second layer 30 can be a faceted
`reflector such as polycarbonate (n3: 1.59), polystyrene
`(n3=1.59) epoxy (n3=l.5—l.55) or acrylic (n3=l.49)
`which have been metallized at the air interface.
`The flat, or linear, faceted surfaces 34 shown, for
`example, in FIGS. 2B and 2C can redirect the incident
`light 24 to control direction of light output and also
`substantially preserve the angular distribution of light
`A9 which is coupled into the second layer 30 by the
`angle-filtering effect (see, for example, FIG. 4D). For
`example, in one preferred embodiment shown in FIG.
`2L, the faceted surfaces 34 reflect light with the flat
`facet angles varied with position to focus the output
`light. In FIG. 2M the faceted surfaces 34 include curved
`facet angles which vary with position to produce a
`softly focused viewing zone 45 within which the entire
`screen appears to be illuminated (see also, for example
`FIGS. 4F and 4G). Also show in phantom in FIG. 2M
`is an exemplary liquid crystal display 47 usable in con-
`junction with the invention. As further shown in FIGS.
`3A and B, curved facets 36 also redirect the incident
`light 24, but the facet curvature increases the resulting
`range of angular output for the redirected light 29 (see
`for comparison for flat facets FIGS. 2D). For example,
`it is known that a concave trough can produce a rea