`Attorney Docket No. 10-531-US-P4 (235000)
`Page 10 of 11
`
`REMARKS
`
`Claims 2-8, 10, 14-20, 22, 27-33, 35, 40-42 and 49-59 were pending in this application
`
`prior to the Final Office Action. Claims 40-42 are amended herein, and claims 52-54 are
`
`canceled. Thus, claims 2-8, 10, 14-20, 22, 27-33, 35, 40-42, 49-51, and 55-59 remain pending in
`
`this application.
`
`Interview Summary
`
`Applicants discussed the amendments presented herein with the Examiner on November
`
`10, 2010. During this interview, the Examiner agreed to enter amendments after-final that
`
`specified that the claimed meta-right (1) is enforceable by a repository and (2) allows one or
`
`more users or devices to create new rights. Applicants have amended claims 40-42 in this
`
`manner because of the Examiner’s indication that these amendments overcame the rejections
`
`based on the prior art of record.
`
`Applicants submit that this amendment presents no new matter and requires no filrther
`
`search or consideration. Thus, Applicants submit that entry of this amendment would be proper
`
`at this time. In addition, the amendments presented herein necessitated the cancellation of claims
`
`52-54 to maintain clarity and consistency in view of the amendments made to claims 40-42.
`
`The Examiner further indicated that this case would be in condition for allowance upon
`
`entry of the above amendments and submission of a Terminal Disclaimer over US. Patent No.
`
`7,774,279. Applicants will file a Terminal Disclaimer in this application upon an indication
`
`from the Examiner that the amendments presented herein will be entered, and that this case is
`
`otherwise in condition for immediate allowance. The Examiner is encouraged to contact the
`
`undersigned directly regarding submission of a Terminal Disclaimer.
`
`Rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 102
`
`Claims 2-10, 14-22, 25, 27-35, and 40-54 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) over
`
`Downs (US. Patent No. 6,226,618). However, as discussed with the Examiner during the
`
`interview, Downs fails to disclose, suggest, or render obvious the concept of meta-rights as set
`
`forth in the claims as amended herein. Specifically, Downs fails to disclose meta-rights that (1)
`
`US_ACT|VE-1 04921888.1 -MSKAUFMA
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Ex. 1059, p. 1
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Ex. 1059, p. 1
`
`
`
`Application Serial No. 10/956,070
`Attorney Docket No. 10-531-US-P4 (235000)
`Page 11 of 11
`
`are enforceable by a repository and (2) allow one or more users or devices to create new rights.
`
`Accordingly, Applicants respectfully request reconsideration and withdrawal of the outstanding
`
`rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 102 in view of Downs.
`
`Conclusion
`
`In view of the foregoing, Applicant respectfully submits that the present application
`
`is in condition for allowance and notice to that effect is respectfully requested.
`
`If,
`
`however, the Examiner deems that any issue remains after considering this response, the
`
`Examiner is invited to contact the undersigned attorney/agent to expedite the prosecution
`
`and engage in a joint effort to work out a mutually satisfactory solution.
`
`Except for issue fees payable under 37 C.F.R. § 1.18, the Commissioner is hereby
`
`authorized by this paper to charge any additional fees during the entire pendency of this
`
`application, including fees due under 37 C.F.R. § 1.16 and 1.17, which may be required,
`
`including any required extension of time fees, or credit any overpayment, to Deposit Account
`
`No. 50-1529. This paragraph is intended to be a CONSTRUCTIVE PETITION FOR
`
`EXTENSION OF TIME in accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(3).
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Stephen M. Hertzler= Reg. No. 58,247/
`Stephen M. Hertzler
`Reg. No. 58,247
`
`Date: November 22, 2010
`
`REED SMITH LLP
`
`CUSTOMER NO.: 98804
`
`1301 K Street NW.
`
`Suite 1100 — East Tower
`
`Washington, DC. 20005
`
`US_ACT|VE-1 04921888.1 -MSKAUFMA
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Ex. 1059, p. 2
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Ex. 1059, p. 2
`
`