throbber
IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`GOOGLE LLC,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`NETWORK-1 TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`Case IPR2015-00345
`U.S. Patent No. 8,205,237
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`JOINT MOTION TO TERMINATE PROCEEDINGS
`UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 317(a)
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(a), 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.72 and 42.74, and the
`
`Board’s authorizing order, Petitioner Google LLC and Patent Owner Network-1
`
`Technologies, Inc., jointly request termination of this proceeding with respect to
`
`claims 25-27, 29, and 30 (the “Remaining Claims”).
`
`The parties have resolved their dispute as described in the Joint Stipulation
`
`by the parties filed herewith as Exhibit 1022. Other than as indicated in the Joint
`
`Stipulation, there are no written or oral agreements or understandings, including
`
`any collateral agreements, between the parties, including but not limited to
`
`

`

`licenses, covenants not to sue, confidentiality agreements, or other agreements of
`
`any kind, that are made in connection with, or in contemplation of, the termination
`
`of this proceeding. See, e.g., General Growth Properties, Inc. et al. v. Peschke,
`
`IPR2013-00400, Paper 35 at 2-3 (Apr. 9, 2014).
`
`Termination of this proceeding is proper under 35 U.S.C. § 317(a). Pursuant
`
`to the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Google LLC
`
`v. Network-1 Techs., Inc., 726 F. App’x 779, 786 (Fed. Cir. 2018), the decision of
`
`the Board in this proceeding has been vacated with respect to the Remaining
`
`Claims and, with respect to those claims, has been “remanded to the Board for
`
`consideration of patentability based upon the [Federal Circuit’s] claim
`
`construction.” In light of the Federal Circuit’s vacatur, the USPTO has not, with
`
`respect to the Remaining Claims, “decided the merits of the proceeding before
`
`[this] request for termination [was] filed.” 35 U.S.C. § 317(a). Therefore, this
`
`request for termination is proper. The only related proceedings in the USPTO are
`
`IPR2015-00343, IPR2015-00347, and IPR2015-00348, which involve U.S. Patent
`
`Nos. 8,640,179, 8,010,988, and 8,656,441, respectively. The parties are
`
`concurrently requesting termination of those three proceedings with respect to their
`
`remanded, remaining claims as well. Thus, other than proceedings the parties seek
`
`to terminate, there are no related inter partes review proceedings or other
`
`proceedings before the USPTO involving the ‘237 patent. Accordingly, the parties
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`respectfully request termination of this proceeding. For the avoidance of doubt,
`
`the United States Patent and Trademark Office issued an Inter Partes Review
`
`Certificate on February 16, 2018 cancelling claims 9-16, 23, and 24 of U.S. Patent
`
`No. 8,205,237 (the “Cancelled Claims”), and the parties agree that this joint
`
`motion shall have no effect on the legal status of those Cancelled Claims.
`
`The Patent Trial and Appeal Board is hereby authorized to charge any fees
`
`associated with the filing to Deposit Account 501710 (Customer ID No. 27160).
`
`
`Dated: December 21, 2018
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`/David M. Krinsky/
`David M. Krinsky (Reg. No. 72,339)
`Christopher A. Suarez (Reg. No.
`72,553)
`WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP
`725 Twelfth Street, N.W.
`Washington, DC 20005
`(202) 434-5000
`
`Attorneys for Petitioner
`
`/Charles R. Macedo/
`Charles R. Macedo (Reg. No. 32,781)
`AMSTER, ROTHSTEIN &
`EBENSTEIN LLP
`90 Park Avenue
`New York, NY 10016
`(212) 336-8000
`
`Attorneys for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that the above-captioned Joint Motion to
`
`Terminate Proceedings Under 35 U.S.C. § 317(a), along with Exhibit 1022, was
`
`served on December 21, 2018 by filing this document through the Patent Review
`
`Processing System as well as delivering a copy via electronic mail upon the
`
`following attorneys of record for the Petitioner and Patent Owner:
`
`Charles R. Macedo
`Reg. No. 32,781
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`AMSTER, ROTHSTEIN
`& EBENSTEIN LLP
`90 Park Avenue
`
`New York, NY 10016
`
`cmacedo@arelaw.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: December 21, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`David M. Krinsky
`Reg. No. 72,338
`Christopher A. Suarez
`Reg. No. 72,553
`
`
`
`
`WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP
`725 Twelfth Street, NW
`Washington, D.C. 20005
`
`dkrinsky@wc.com
`csuarez@wc.com
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/David M. Krinsky/
`David M. Krinsky (Reg. No. 72,339)
`Christopher A. Suarez (Reg. No. 72,553)
`WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP
`725 Twelfth Street, N.W.
`Washington, DC 20005
`(202) 434-5000
`
`Attorneys for Petitioner
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket