`
`571-272-7822
`IPR2015-00322 Paper 14
`Date Entered: March 16, 2015
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`LG ELECTRONICS, INC.,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`ATI TECHNOLOGIES ULC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2015-00322
`Patent 6,784,879
`Case IPR2015-0321
` Patent 7,095,945 B11
`____________
`
`
`
`Before RAMA G. ELLURU, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER AUTHORIZING FILING OF MOTION TO WITHDRAW AND
`SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`37C.F.R. § 42.10(e)
`
`
`
`1 This Order addresses issues that are identical in related cases. Therefore,
`we exercise our discretion to issue one order to be filed in each case. The
`parties, however, are not authorized to use this style heading in any
`subsequent papers.
`
`
`
`IPR2015-00322; IPR2015-00321
`Patent 6,784,879; 7,095,945 B1
`
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner, ATI Technologies ULC (“ATI Technologies”),
`
`has requested authorization to file a motion to withdraw as counsel in this
`
`proceeding. Counsel may not withdraw from a proceeding unless the Board
`
`authorizes such withdrawal. 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(e). Counsel’s request, which was
`
`received by e-mail on March 4, 2015, indicates that its motion will include a
`
`motion to substitute new counsel. Counsel requesting authorization to withdraw
`
`indicates that opposing counsel has been consulted and that opposing counsel will
`
`not oppose requesting counsel’s motion to withdraw. We remind counsel
`
`requesting authorization to file a motion to withdraw that such withdrawal is not
`
`effective until the motion to withdraw is granted. We further remind counsel
`
`requesting authorization to file a motion to withdraw to comply with all provisions
`
`of 37 C.F.R. § 11.116 concerning withdrawal and protection of the client’s
`
`interests.
`
`Counsel is authorized to file a motion to withdraw and substitute new
`
`counsel. Unless ATI Technologies opposes withdrawal of its current counsel, ATI
`
`Technologies is reminded to file a revised requisite mandatory notice identifying
`
`substitute counsel and substitute power of attorney, as appropriate. If ATI
`
`Technologies opposes withdrawal of its current counsel, ATI Technologies should
`
`notify the Board within 5 business days and request a conference.
`
`In consideration of the above, it is
`
`ORDERED that counsel for ATI Technologies is authorized to file a motion
`
`to withdraw from this proceeding and substitute new counsel;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that no such withdrawal is effective until the motion
`
`is granted;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that counsel requesting authorization to withdraw
`
`comply with all provisions of 37 C.F.R. § 11.116; and
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2015-00322; IPR2015-00321
`Patent 6,784,879; 7,095,945 B1
`
`
`FURTHER ORDRED that ATI Technologies request a conference with the
`
`Board within 5 business days, if ATI Technologies opposes counsel’s motion to
`
`withdraw;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that ATI Technologies file a revised Mandatory
`
`Notice identifying new counsel and a substitute Power of Attorney, as appropriate,
`
`within 5 business days of our granting the motion to withdraw.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2015-00322; IPR2015-00321
`Patent 6,784,879; 7,095,945 B1
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Robert G. Pluta
`Amanda Streff
`MAYER BROWN LLP
`rpluta@mayerbrown.com
`astreff@mayerbrown.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Cyrus A. Morton
`J. Scott Culpepper
`ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P.
`CAMorton@rkmc.com
`JSCulpepper@rkmc.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`IPR2015-00322; IPR2015-00321
`Patent 6,784,879; 7,095,945 B1
`
`PETITIONER
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER
`
`
`
`
`
`5
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
