throbber
United States Patent [19]
`Edingtou
`
`[11] Patent Number:
`[45] Date of Patent:
`
`4,953,657
`Sep. 4, 1990
`
`[54] TIME DELAY SOURCE CODING
`.
`[75] Inventor: Bruce L. Edmgton, Houston, Tex.
`[73] Assignee: Halliburtou Geophysical Services,
`Inc., Houston, Tex.
`
`[21] APPI- No-t 312,360
`[22] Filed:
`Feb. 14’ 1989
`
`[63]
`
`.
`.
`'
`7
`Related U's' Apphcahon Data
`Continuation of Ser. No. 126,346, Nov. 30, 1987, aban-
`d°n¢¢
`‘
`[51] Int. Cl.5 ............................................. .. G01V 1/00
`[52] US. Cl. ..................................... .. 181/111; 367/50
`[58] Field of swell .................. .. 181/111; 367/50, 55,
`367/47
`
`[55]
`
`References Cited
`U_S_ PATENT DOCUMENTS
`V
`183511)!“ ...............................
`2,322,332 1(5);
`4’159’463 6/1979 s?zzm
`" 367/59
`4:17o:oo2 10/1979 Strange
`All
`4,242,740 12/1980 111161116 ..
`367/36
`4,467,459 8/1984 Curn'e ........ ..
`. 367/23
`4,715,020 12/1987 Landrum, Jr. ...................... .. 367/38
`
`I
`
`Primary Examiner-Thomas H. Tarcza
`Assistant Examiner-Ian J. Lobo
`Attorney, Agent’ or Firm_Andrew J‘ Dillon
`[57]
`ABSTRACT
`
`In seismic exploration, a survey may be conducted
`using multiple seismic energy sources activated substan
`tially simultaneously. A series of shots is made at each
`shot point, with a determinable time delay between the
`activation of each source for each shot. There must be
`at least two different determinable time delays in each
`series of shots, The Seismic signals are recorded, A
`method of processing the signals to separate signals
`from each source is Provided" For each Signal receiver’
`the amplitudes “the Signals fmth each §h°t in the “ties
`‘5 Summed- The Signals are the“ tim Shtfted, 3° that tht
`signals from the second source to be activated are re
`ceived at the same time, and the amplitudes for the
`series are summed. This step is repeated for each subse
`quently activated source. Time domain operators are
`derived, the operators and the summations Fourier
`v transformed to the frequency domain’ in which the
`signals received from‘ each source are readily calcu
`lated. The separated signals may then be inverse Fou
`tier tmhsfmhed t° th't time. dQmahI'
`'
`10 Claims, 2 Drawing Sheets
`
`WesternGeco Ex. 1006, pg. 1
`
`

`
`US. Patent Sep.4, 1990
`8%]
`
`Sheet 1 of2
`
`4,953,657
`
`A 12
`$13. 1
`
`2
`
`A
`
`Z2
`
`“EM 5
`
`\I E n in m
`
`WesternGeco Ex. 1006, pg. 2
`
`

`
`US. Patent Sep. 4, 1990
`
`Sheet 2 of 2
`
`4,953,657
`
`46
`
`44
`
`1:13. 5
`
`WesternGeco Ex. 1006, pg. 3
`
`

`
`1
`
`TIIVIE DELAY SOURCE CODING
`
`5
`
`10
`
`This application is a continuation of application Ser.
`No. 126,346, ?led 11/30/87, now abandoned.
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`The present invention relates to a method of separat
`ing for analysis seismic signals received from multiple
`seismic sources which are activated substantially simul
`taneously.
`A common seismic survey method employs a single
`seismic source in conjunction with multiple geophone
`detector arrays arranged equally spaced along a line
`from the source. A number of shots are made, in order
`to improve the signal to noise ratio, and then the source
`and detector arrays are moved along the same line a
`short distance and the shooting procedure repeated.
`This procedure is repeated along the predetermined
`length of the survey line and other designated survey
`lines in the area to be surveyed. The recorded data from
`each shot is then processed, usually by a digital com
`puter at a headquarters processing department.
`When only one seismic source is used, the survey
`procedure can be very time-consuming. With modern
`signal processing methods, the most expensive part of
`25
`the seismic survey process has become the ?eld survey
`period. This period could be shortened if more than one
`seismic source could be used simultaneously. However,
`multiple sources can only be used if some means for
`distinguishing between signals emanating from the dif
`ferent sources can be provided.
`us. Pat. No. 3,885,225 to Anstey et a1 proposes a
`method to distinguish between multiple sources. This
`involves a frequency segmentation technique, applied
`to use of a pulse-compression system of seismic pros
`pecting (generally referred to in the art by the trade
`mark “Vibroseis”). Vibroseis involves the use of vibra
`tors emitting long, swept-frequency signals in the seis
`mic frequency range, the detection of emitted signals
`after re?ection and refraction within the earth by detec
`tors located on the earth’s surface in the survey area,
`and the cross correlation of the detected signals against
`the emitted signals. Anstey et al is directed to a method
`and apparatus for broad-line seismic pro?ling, using
`several vibrators simultaneously emitting signals. The
`45
`normal emission frequency bandwidth is divided into
`several parts which are allocated to individual vibrators
`in a sequence of separate emissions, in such a way that
`mutually exclusive frequencies are radiated by the sev
`eral vibrators at any one time. The detected signals are
`separated‘ on the basis of frequency to represent the
`individual signals from each vibrator. Apart from the
`fact that this technique is limited to one method of seis
`mic surveying, Vibroseis, the frequency limitation on
`each individual vibrator reduces sensitivity. Further,
`the ‘225 patent admits that harmonic distortion in the
`vibrators or their coupling with the ground can impair
`the capacity of the correlation process to separate the
`signals from different generators.
`
`4,953,657
`2
`In. particular, the method of obtaining the seismic
`data for a geophysical survey comprises shooting at
`least two seismic energy sources substantially simulta
`neously with a determinable time delay between the
`activation of each source, shooting the sources at least a
`second time substantially simultaneously with a differ
`ent determinable time delay between the activation of
`each source from the determinable time delay used in at
`least one previous shooting and, for each shooting,
`recording as a function of time the amplitude of the
`seismic signals must be received at at least one point in
`the survey area spaced apart from the seismic energy
`sources.
`In one embodiment, the seismic energy sources used
`are surface types of energy source. Preferably, at least
`one of the determinable time delays is preselected, and
`is selected so that the difference in time delay between
`any two shootings enables the signal received from the
`?rst activated source to be distinguished from the signal
`received from the second activated source. Preferably,
`the difference in time delay between any two shootings
`is selected to be not equal to an integral multiple of the
`period of a frequency component the seismic signals,
`most preferably being not less than about one-quarter
`and not more than about three-quarters of such period.
`In the preferred embodiment, the amplitude of the
`size of the signals is recorded in digital form.
`There is also provided a method of obtaining seismic
`data for a geophysical survey which comprises shooting
`at least two seismic energy sources substantially simul
`taneously with a determinable time delay between the
`activation of each source, shooting the sources at least a
`second time substantially simultaneously with a differ
`ent determinable time delay between the activation of
`each source from the determinable time delay used in at
`least one previous shooting, for each shooting record
`ing as a function of time the amplitude of the seismic
`signals received at at least one point in the survey area
`spaced apart from the seismic energy sources and ana
`lyzing the recorded seismic signals to separate signals
`originating from each seismic source.
`In the preferred embodiment, the seismic energy
`source is a surface energy source, and at least one of the
`determinable time delays is preselected. Preferably, the
`difference in time delay between any two shootings is
`selected so as to enable the signal received from the ?rst
`activated source to be distinguished from the signal
`received from the second activated source, preferably
`not being equal to an integral multiple of the period of
`a frequency component of the seismic signals. Most
`preferably, the difference in time delay between any
`two shootings is selected to be not less than about one
`quarter and not more than about three-quarters of the
`period of a frequency component of the seismic signals.
`In one embodiment, the amplitude of the seismic
`signals is recorded in digital form.
`In the preferred embodiment, the recorded signals are
`analyzed by a method comprising summing the ampli
`tude of the seismic signals from each shooting as a func
`tion of time for each point for which received seismic
`signals are recorded, then time shifting the seismic sig
`nals from each shooting so that the signal received from
`the second source to be activated is received at the same
`time for each shooting and then summing the amplitude
`of the time shifted seismic signals as a function of time.
`This time shifting step is repeated for each subsequently
`activated source, and for each summation derived from
`the above steps, and an appropriate time domain opera
`
`40
`
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`In accordance with the present invention there is
`provided a method of obtaining seismic data for a geo
`physical su'rvey in which two or more seismic energy
`sources are activated"substantially simultaneously for
`each shot, and a method of processing the data obtained
`in the survey so as to separate out the signals received
`from each seismic energy source.
`
`65
`
`WesternGeco Ex. 1006, pg. 4
`
`

`
`0
`
`4,953,657
`3
`tor is derived from the determinable time delays. The
`Fourier transform to the frequency domain of each time
`domain operator and to the frequency domain of each
`summation are then derived, the signals received from
`each energy source in the frequency domain for each
`frequency are calculated and the inverse Fourier trans
`form to the time domain of the signals received from
`each energy source is derived.
`The present invention also provides a method of
`analyzing seismic signals from two or more shootings of
`at least two seismic energy sources activated substan
`tially simultaneously with a determinable delay between
`the activation of each source so as to separate the sig
`nals originating from each seismic source. This method
`comprises, for each point for which received seismic
`signals are recorded, summing the amplitudes of the
`seismic signals from each shooting as a function of time
`and time shifting the seismic signals from each shooting
`so that the signal received from the second source to be
`activated is received at the same time for each shooting,
`then summing the amplitudes of the time shifted seismic
`signals as a function of time. The time shifting step is
`repeated’ for each subsequently activated source. An
`appropriate time domain operator is derived from the
`determinable delays for each summation derived from
`the above steps, and the Fourier transform to the fre
`quency domain of each such time domain operator and
`of each summation is derived. The signals received
`from each energy source in the frequency domain for
`each frequency are calculated, and then the inverse
`Fourier transform to the time domain of the signals
`received from each energy source is derived.
`
`4
`sources. Referring to FIG. 3, two seismic energy
`sources, 24 and 26 are shown, located on the earth’s
`surface 28. For simplicity, a single detector 30 is shown,
`but it will be readily understood that this can be re
`placed by a geophone group conventional in the art. In
`FIG. 3 the reflection paths of seismic waves originating
`from energy sources 24 and 26 and re?ected off geolog
`ical stratum 32 after passage through a homogenous
`layer bounded by the surface 28 and stratum 32 to de
`tector 30 are shown.
`Seismic energy sources 24 and 26 are preferably sur
`face energy sources, such as weight drop or Vibroseis,
`well known in the art. In the preferred embodiment,
`activation of sources 24 and 26 is controlled by a com
`puter in the survey control truck by way of radio signals
`or by cable.
`It is conventional to perform a number of shots at
`each shotpoint in order to build up the signal-to-ambient
`noise ratio. vPreferably, the seismic sources are in the
`same position for each of these shots. The decision as to
`how any shots at each shotpoint depends on the circum
`stances, and is readily made by persons of ordinary skill
`in the art. The present invention can be used with two
`or more shots, but for the purposes of this description it
`will be assumed that eight shots are made at each shot
`point.
`In the method of the present invention, seismic en
`ergy sources 24 and 26 are activated with a short time
`delay between the activation of 24 and of 26. This time
`delay must be measured and recorded, which may be
`done by any conventional means.
`Preferably, seismic energy sources 24 and 26 are
`activated at certain variable times relative to time zero
`on the recording system. The activation time relative to
`time zero of the recorder may be repeated at a speci?ed
`shot point from shot to shot for either source. However,
`for each shot point there must be some variation in the
`activation time delay between sources 24 and 26 for
`different shots, and this delay is preferably different for
`each shot made at one shot point.
`In the preferred embodiment, the times of activation
`of the sources are predetermined, and the sources oper
`ate with suf?cient accuracy to allow these predeter
`mined times to be used in the separation calculations
`made according to the method of the present invention.
`However, for sources which exhibit considerable ran
`dom variation in operation from the selected activation
`time, the true time of activation should be measured and
`recorded to improve the accuracy of the separation
`process.
`In order to satisfactorily detect the difference be
`tween the signals from sources 24 and 26 at the detector
`30 for each frequency in the desired seismic frequency
`band, for any two shots in the series the relative activa
`tion time delays should differ by a non-integral fraction
`of the period of that frequency. It is most preferred that
`this difference should be between one quarter and three
`quarters of the period of the frequency concerned.
`However, the actual fraction of the period needed to
`compute the signal separation to the required accuracy
`for a particular frequency is a function of the signal to
`noise ratio, and determining the optimum difference in
`activation time delays for each pair of shots may readily
`be performed by a person of ordinary skill in the art.
`The seismic signals from the two sources 24 and 26
`are received by detector 30 and transmitted to a storage
`means. This storage means may be a recorder of a con
`ventional type, which may be either‘ analog or digital or
`
`35
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`FIG. 1 illustrates a ?eld layout for a seismic survey
`according to the present invention.
`FIG. 2 illustrates vertical seismic pro?ling.
`FIG. 3 illustrates a typical path for seismic waves in
`a survey as shown in FIG. 1.
`FIG. 4 shows schematically signals received by a
`detector from a series of seismic source shootings ac
`cording to the present invention.
`FIG. 5 shows the effect of time-shifting the signals of
`FIG. 4 according to the method of the present inven
`tion.
`
`40
`
`45
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION
`One application for which the present invention is
`particularly useful is three dimensional seismic survey
`ling. A ?eld layout for this type of survey is shown
`schematically in FIG. 1. Seismic detectors 2 are spaced
`along a survey line 4. These detectors are preferably
`clusters of geophones. Energy source 6 is located on the
`survey line 4 at a distance from the nearest detector 2,
`and seismic energy sources 8, 10 of the same type as
`source 6, are located on either side of line 4, spaced
`apart from the line.
`Another useful application for the present invention
`is vertical seismic pro?ling, shown schematically in
`FIG. 2. A tool 12 containing geophones is located in
`well bore 14, in contact with the geological stratum 16.
`Seismic energy sources 18 are located at the surface 20.
`Signals from the geophones are transmitted to the sur
`face through leads 22.
`For purposes of simpli?cation, the method of the
`present invention will be described for two seismic
`energy sources, but ‘those skilled in the art will readily
`recognize that the method can be used with multiple
`
`55
`
`WesternGeco Ex. 1006, pg. 5
`
`

`
`4,953,657
`5
`it may be any kind of data storage used in conjunction
`with a computer. In the preferred embodiment, a digital
`recording system is employed, with a two millisecond
`digital sampling period. The signal received by detector
`30 is shown schematically as the trace 34 which is num
`bered “1” in FIG. 4. Blip 36 corresponds to the signal
`from the ?rst activated source 24, while blip 38 corre
`sponds to that from source 26. For the purposes of
`simplifying this description it is assumed that these sig
`nals are received after passage through a homogenous
`layer bounded by 28 and 32 and after re?ection from a
`feature 32 parallel to the surface 28 and that detector 30
`is spaced equidistant from sources 24 and 26, so that the
`time delay between blips 36 and 38 is equal to the acti
`vation delay between sources 24 and 26. However, the
`invention is applicable to any type of subsurface struc
`ture and any placement of the detectors relative to the
`sources.
`For the second shot of the series, the time delay be
`tween the activation of the ?rst and second sources
`must differ from the activation delay of the ?rst shot,
`and must also be measured and recorded. It is preferred
`that this time delay be predetermined, and that it be
`greater than the ?rst activation delay by a determinable
`increment. This process is repeated for each of the shots
`in the series, with a different measured time delay for
`each shot. Preferably, the time delay between the acti
`vation of the ?rst and second sources is increased for
`each subsequent shot by a constant amount, k, so that
`the time delay t,, for the nth shot is given by the formula
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`where to is the activation time measured relative to the
`start of the recorder for the second source on the ?rst
`shot.
`It will be observed that, in this preferred embodi
`ment, when the traces for each shot are aligned with
`blips 36 on straight horizontal line 40, the blips 38 plot
`ted with respect to time lie on a straight line 42 which is
`at an angle to line 40.
`In general, this procedure is repeated at multiple
`locations in the survey area. In the preferred embodi
`ment, the analysis of the data gathered by the above
`procedure is performed after all the data has been ob
`tained, but the method of the present invention may also
`be used to analyze the data as it is gathered.
`The ?rst step in analyzing the data is to sum the traces
`in the series. This summation may be expressed by the
`equation
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`NXi+
`
`1
`0
`
`where N is the total number of shots in the series, x,- are
`the individual signals 36 from energy source 24 and Yi
`(P-1)K are the individual signals 38 from energy source
`26.
`The signals shown in FIG. 4. are then time shifted as
`shown in FIG. 5. so that the signals 38 are aligned on
`straight line 44 and signals 36 are on sloping line 46, and
`the‘ time shifted signals are summed. This summation
`may be represented by the equation
`
`55
`
`65
`
`6
`Appropriate operators H and K are derived from the
`time delays in summation (1) and (2) respectively, an
`operation well known to those of ordinary skill in the
`art of operational mathematics and Fourier analysis. H
`and K are such that
`
`K’xi+NY.-=NY?
`
`(4)
`
`Where “‘ represents convolution.
`The Fourier transform to the frequency domain of
`equation (3) and (4) yields
`
`MF(Io-F<{xi}>+NF{Y.})=NF({Ya>
`
`(6)
`
`where F represents the Fourier transform and M is the
`dimension of the Fourier transform.
`These two equations may be solved for the two un
`knowns F ({x,}) and F({Y,-}) for each frequency, which
`are then inverse Fourier transformed to the time do
`main.
`It will be obvious to those skilled in the art that these
`equations cannot be solved if any determinant on the
`left hand side is equal to zero, so the time delays should
`preferably be selected so that no determinant is equal to
`zero. In practice, it is generally possible to select the
`time delays in such a manner that all the determinants
`are non-zero for frequencies within the frequency band
`of most interest in seismic surveys. However, it may be
`necessary or desirable under certain conditions to allow
`some singularities within this seismic frequency band,
`for example, in order to reduce the number of shots
`needed at each shot point.
`These singularities, whether within, or outside the
`seismic frequency band, can be handled by known
`methods used in geophysical analysis for stabilization of
`inverse operators. Preferably, a “white noise” method is
`used. Essentially, in this method a matrix which is sin
`gular or close to singular is replaced by a matrix closer
`to the identity matrix by increasing the size of the ele
`ments on the main diagonal by adding a constant factor.
`In practice, it is preferred to produce an equivalent
`result by instead dividing each of the elements not on
`the main diagonal by 1 +0, where c is a small positive
`constant quantity. For frequencies outside the seismic
`frequency band, the application of a bandpass ?lter may
`also be used to prevent the buildup of noise by the sepa
`ration process. Another method is to set a minimum
`absolute value for the determinant. When the determi
`nant has a value smaller than the minimum absolute
`value, the actual value is replaced by this minimum
`value with the proper sign attached. This method is
`suitable for frequencies outside the seismic frequency
`band.
`The above analysis may be carried out by any con
`ventional method, although it is preferred to use a pro
`grammed digital computer. Programs for performing
`the summations, time-shifting and Fourier transforms
`may be readily obtained or prepared by those of ordi
`nary skill in the art of computer programming.
`The signals from the individual energy sources, once
`separated by the above method of analysis, may then be
`used in conventional methods of obtaining geophysical
`information from seismic data.
`
`WesternGeco Ex. 1006, pg. 6
`
`

`
`4,953,657
`7
`8
`It is an advantage of the present invention that the
`at least one point within said geophysical survey com
`prises digitally recording said amplitudes.
`?eld survey time can be substantially shorter using mul
`tiple shots ?red substantially simultaneously than with
`6. A method of obtaining seismic data for a geophysi
`cal survey, said method comprising the steps of:
`the conventional single shots, and this produces con
`activating a ?rst seismic energy source having a se
`comitant cost savings. In the case of vertical seismic
`lected frequency component;
`pro?ling, normal well operations can often be inter
`receiving seismic signals from said ?rst seismic en
`rupted for only a limited time, making it important to
`ergy source at at least one point within said geo
`complete the survey process as quickly as possible, so
`physical survey;
`the present invention is particularly advantageous.
`activating a second seismic energy source after a ?rst
`Additional advantages and modi?cations will be
`selected time delay from activation of said ?rst
`readily apparent to those skilled in the art. The inven
`seismic energy source and while said seismic sig
`tion in its broader aspects is therefore not limited to the
`nals from said ?rst seismic energy source are being
`speci?c details, representative apparatus or the illustra
`received, said ?rst selected time delay being a non
`tive example shown and described. Accordingly, depar
`integral multiple of the period of said selected fre
`tures may be made from the detail without departing
`quency component;
`from the spirit or scope of the disclosed general inven
`receiving seismic signals from said second seismic
`tive concept.
`'
`energy source at said at least one point within said
`What is claimed is:
`geophysical survey;
`1. A method of obtaining seismic data for a geophysi
`activating said ?rst seismic energy source a second
`cal survey, said method comprising the steps of:
`time;
`activating a first seismic energy source having a se
`receiving seismic signals from said second activation
`lected frequency component;
`of said ?rst seismic energy source at said at least
`receiving seismic signals from said ?rst seismic en
`one point within said geophysical survey;
`ergy source at at least one point within said geo
`activating said second seismic energy source after a
`physical survey;
`second selected time delay from said second activa
`activating a second seismic energy source after a ?rst
`tion of said ?rst seismic energy source and while
`selected time delay from activation of said ?rst
`said seismic signals from said second activation of
`seismic energy source and while said seismic sig
`said ?rst seismic energy source are being received;
`recording, as a function of time, the amplitudes of the
`nals from said ?rst seismic energy source are being
`seismic signals received at said at least one point
`received, said ?rst selected time delay being a non
`within said geophysical survey for each activation
`integral multiple of the period of said selected fre
`of said ?rst and second seismic energy source;
`quency component;
`summing the amplitudes of the received seismic sig
`receiving seismic signals from said second seismic
`nals from each activation as a function of time;
`energy source at said at least one point within said
`utilizing said selected time delays to time shift the
`geophysical survey;
`received seismic signals from each activation so
`activating said ?rst seismic energy source a second
`that the signals received from said second source
`time;
`are received at the same times for each activation;
`receiving seismic signals from said second activation
`summing the amplitudes of said time shifted seismic
`of said ?rst seismic energy source at said at least
`signals as a function of time;
`one point within said geophysical survey;
`utilizing said selected time delays to derive an appro
`activating said second seismic energy source after a
`priate time domain operator for each summation;
`second selected time delay from said second activa
`deriving the Fourier transform to the frequency do
`tion of said ?rst seismic energy source and while
`main of each time domain operator;
`said seismic signals from said second activation of
`deriving the Fourier transform to the frequency do
`said ?rst seismic energy source are being received;
`main of each summation;
`recording, as a function of time, the amplitudes of the
`calculating the signals received from each seismic
`seismic signals received at said at least one point
`energy source in the frequency domain for each
`frequency; and
`within said geophysical survey for each activation
`deriving the inverse Fourier transform to the time
`of said ?rst and second seismic energy source; and
`analyzing said recorded seismic signal amplitudes
`domain of the signals received from each seismic
`utilizing said selected time delays in order to sepa
`energy source.
`7. A method of obtaining seismic data for a geophysi
`rate signals originating from each of said seismic
`cal survey according to claim 6 wherein said ?rst and
`energy sources.
`second seismic energy‘ sources are surface energy
`2. A method of obtaining seismic data for a geophysi
`sources.
`cal survey according to claim 1 wherein said ?rst and
`8. A method of obtaining seismic data for geophysical
`second seismic energy sources are surface energy
`survey according to claim 6 wherein said second se
`sources.
`lected time delay comprises a non-integral multiple of
`3. A method of obtaining seismic data for geophysical
`the period of said selected frequency component.
`survey according to claim 1 wherein said second se
`9. A method of obtaining seismic data for geophysical
`lected time delay comprises a non-integral multiple of
`survey according to claim 6 wherein said ?rst selected
`the period of said selected frequency component.
`60
`time delay comprises not less than one-quarter and not
`4. A method of obtaining seismic data for geophysical
`more that three-quarters of the period of said selected
`survey according to claim 1 wherein said ?rst selected
`frequency component.
`time delay comprises not less than one-quarter and not
`10. A method of obtaining seismic data for geophysi
`more that three-quarters of the period of said selected
`cal survey according to claim 6 wherein the step of
`frequency component.
`“
`recording the amplitudes of the seismic signals received
`5. A method of obtaining seismic data for geophysical
`at said at least one point within said geophysical survey
`survey according to claim 1 wherein the step of record
`comprises digitally recording said amplitudes.
`ing the amplitudes of the seismic signals received at said
`
`50
`
`*
`
`i
`
`i
`
`i
`
`i
`
`5
`
`25
`
`45
`
`65
`
`WesternGeco Ex. 1006, pg. 7
`
`

`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION
`
`PATENT NO. : 4,953 , 657
`DATED
`: Septanber 4, 1990
`
`INVENTOR(S) : Bruce L. Eddington
`
`It is certified that error appears in the above-identi?ed patent and that said Letters Patent is hereby
`corrected as shown below:
`
`In Column 4, Line 21, the word "any" should read ——many——
`
`Signed and Sealed this
`
`Twenty-third Day of June, 1992
`
`Attest:
`
`Arresting O?icer
`
`Acting Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks
`
`DOUGLAS B. COMER
`
`WesternGeco Ex. 1006, pg. 8

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket