Trials@uspto.gov
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`Paper 40
`Entered: January 28, 2016
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`WESTERNGECO, L.L.C.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`PGS GEOPHYSICAL AS,
`Patent Owner.
`Cases1
`IPR2015-00309 (Patent 6,906,981 B2)
`IPR2015-00310 (Patent 6,906,981 B2)
`IPR2015-00311 (Patent 6,906,981 B2)
`
`
`
`
`Before JUSTIN BUSCH, MITCHELL G. WEATHERLY, and
`BEVERLY M. BUNTING, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`BUSCH, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Trial Hearing
` 35 U.S.C. § 316(a)(10) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`
`1 This Decision applies to each of the listed cases. We exercise our
`discretion to issue one Order to be entered in each case. The parties,
`however, are not authorized to use this caption for any subsequent papers.
`References to documents are those filed in IPR2015-00309 unless otherwise
`noted.
`
`
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`Paper 40
`Entered: January 28, 2016
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`WESTERNGECO, L.L.C.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`PGS GEOPHYSICAL AS,
`Patent Owner.
`Cases1
`IPR2015-00309 (Patent 6,906,981 B2)
`IPR2015-00310 (Patent 6,906,981 B2)
`IPR2015-00311 (Patent 6,906,981 B2)
`
`
`
`
`Before JUSTIN BUSCH, MITCHELL G. WEATHERLY, and
`BEVERLY M. BUNTING, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`BUSCH, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Trial Hearing
` 35 U.S.C. § 316(a)(10) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`
`1 This Decision applies to each of the listed cases. We exercise our
`discretion to issue one Order to be entered in each case. The parties,
`however, are not authorized to use this caption for any subsequent papers.
`References to documents are those filed in IPR2015-00309 unless otherwise
`noted.
`
`
`
`IPR2015-00309 (Patent 6,906,981 B2)
`IPR2015-00310 (Patent 6,906,981 B2)
`IPR2015-00311 (Patent 6,906,981 B2)
`
`The Scheduling Order for these cases set the date for oral argument on
`February 10, 2016. Paper 16, 6. Both parties request a hearing in this case
`pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70. Papers 38, 39. Upon inquiry from the Board
`regarding potentially changing the hearing date, both parties indicated that
`they are available on March 2, 2016. The requests are granted.
`Both parties also requested that the hearing for IPR2015-00309,
`IPR2015-00310, IPR2015-00311, and IPR2015-00313 be consolidated.
`Paper 38, 1; Paper 39, 1. We grant the request with respect to IPR2015-
`00309, IPR2015-00310, and IPR2015-00311. The consolidated hearing,
`however, will not include argument with respect to IPR2015-00313, and a
`separate hearing will be conducted for that matter.
`Each party will have sixty (60) minutes total time to present
`arguments with respect to all three matters. Petitioner bears the ultimate
`burden of proof that Patent Owner’s claims are unpatentable. Therefore, at
`oral hearing, Petitioner will proceed first to present its case regarding the
`challenged claims and grounds for which the Board instituted trial.
`Thereafter, Patent Owner will respond to Petitioner’s presentation.
`Petitioner may reserve rebuttal time to respond to Patent Owner’s
`presentation.
`The oral argument will commence at 1:00 PM Eastern Time, on
`March 2, 2016, and will be open to the public for in-person attendance, on
`the ninth floor of Madison Building East, 600 Dulany Street, Alexandria,
`Virginia. In-person attendance will be accommodated on a first-come, first-
`served basis. The Board will provide a court reporter for the hearing and the
`reporter’s transcript will constitute the official record of the hearing.
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2015-00309 (Patent 6,906,981 B2)
`IPR2015-00310 (Patent 6,906,981 B2)
`IPR2015-00311 (Patent 6,906,981 B2)
`
`Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b), demonstrative exhibits must be served
`five business days prior to the hearing. The parties also shall provide a
`courtesy copy of any demonstrative exhibits to the Board at least five
`business days prior to the hearing by emailing them to Trials@uspto.gov.
`The parties shall not file any demonstrative exhibits in this proceeding
`without prior authorization from the Board. The parties are directed to CBS
`Interactive Inc. v. Helferich Patent Licensing, LLC, IPR2013-00033, Paper
`118 (October 23, 2013), regarding the appropriate content of demonstrative
`exhibits. No live testimony from any witness will be taken at the oral
`argument.
`Questions regarding specific audio-visual equipment should be
`directed to the Board at (571) 272-9797. Requests for audio-visual
`equipment are to be made 5 days in advance of the hearing date. The
`request is to be sent to Trials@uspto.gov. If the request is not received
`timely, the equipment may not be available on the day of the hearing.
`The parties are reminded that the presenter must identify clearly and
`
`specifically each demonstrative exhibit (e.g., by slide or screen number)
`referenced during the hearing to ensure the clarity and accuracy of the
`reporter’s transcript.
`Some members of the panel will be attending the oral argument
`remotely via electronic audio/visual communication equipment. The remote
`judges will have access only to the courtesy copy of the demonstrative
`exhibits previously submitted by email, as discussed above. The Board
`expects lead counsel for each party to be present at hearing, although any
`backup counsel may make the actual presentation, in whole or in part. If any
`lead counsel will not be in attendance at hearing, the Board should be
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2015-00309 (Patent 6,906,981 B2)
`IPR2015-00310 (Patent 6,906,981 B2)
`IPR2015-00311 (Patent 6,906,981 B2)
`
`notified via a joint telephone conference call no later than two days prior to
`the hearing to discuss the matter.
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Michael L. Kiklis
`Scott McKeown
`Kevin Laurence
`Christopher Ricciuti
`Katherine Cappaert
`OBLON SPIVAK
`CPDocketKiklis@oblon.com
`CPDocketMcKeown@oblon.com
`CPDocketLaurence@oblon.com
`CPDocketCappaert@oblon.com
`CPDocketRicciuti@oblon.com
`
`
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`David Berl
`Jessamyn Berniker
`David M. Krinsky
`Thomas S. Fletcher
`Christopher Suarez
`WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY, LLP
`dberl@wc.com
`jberniker@wc.com
`dkrinsky@wc.com
`tfletcher@wc.com
`csuarez@sc.com
`
`4
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
