throbber
Page 1 of 5
`
`Mylan Ex. 1019
`Mylan v. Novartis
`IPR2015-00268
`
`

`
`President
`
`T, Kawasaki
`
`Editor-in-Chief
`
`Vice-President
`K. Tsuda
`
`K. Morita, M. Hirobe,
`
`S. Tejima
`
`A. Tsuji
`U. Sankawa,
`Associate Editors
`K. lnoue,
`A. lchikawa,
`K. Fuji,
`K. Achiwa,
`Editorial Board
`Y. Kawashima, T. Kinoshita,
`H. Kaneto,
`H. Itokawa,
`M. ltoh.
`N. Nanbu,
`H. Ogalaa
`M. Mochizuki. S. Muranishi,
`M. Kurata,
`T. Sato,
`S. Shimomura,
`j_ Okuda,
`'1‘_ Sang,
`Y, Okada,
`T. Tsuruo,
`K. Watanabe. M. Yoshioka
`T. Tsuchiya,
`Y. Takase,
`T. Asami,
`M. Shimada,
`M. Shindo,
`Staff
`N. Anraku,
`Y. Enomoto,
`H. Watanabe,
`E. Sato,
`T. lmai,
`S. Shirnizu
`K. Yokoyama, T. Kato,
`T. Sakamoto,
`R. Harada,
`Ofiice of Secretary Pharmaceutical Society of Japan,
`l2~l5—50l, Shibttya 2—chome. Shibuya-ku, Tokyo
`150, Japan
`
`‘
`H. lrie,
`T. Komortr
`T- Ohmoms
`S. Takano,
`
`Y- Nagaia
`Y. lkegamla
`
`Secretary T. Imai
`Stafl' of Editorial and Publication Department
`T. Kuroiwa
`
`Y_ Maru (Chief), M. Fujita. M. Sato. K. Kubonoya,
`
`The publication of this Journal was supported in part by a Gt'ant—in-Aid for Publication of Scientitic Research Result from the
`Ministry of Education, Science and Culture. which is grtttcfully acknowledge.
`FOREIGN INDIVIDUAL, DOMESTIC MEMBER, AND DOMESTIC BODY SUBSCRIPTIONS FOR I989
`including postage:
`
`[Foreign]
`lndtvidual*
`
`I Yukuguku Z(l.)‘.'i‘III (J. P/zarm. Sat‘. Ju/run) (monthly)
`I C‘/itlmical & P/mrtnuc'et41t'cu/ Bu//Mitt (monthly)
`
`Besides
`membership fee,
`Ordinary
`Student
`’F23.100
`‘$6,300
`‘£54,800
`US$69.00
`’f‘40,000
`’i‘lU.0()0
`’t‘7.900
`US$99.00
`*The foreign individual subscriber is enrolled as it mem-
`ber of the Society.
`_
`Foreign individual, domestic member, and domestic body subscriptions should be addressed to the Plrzirmncetttical Society of
`Jdpan, 12—15 501. Shibuya 2—chome, Shibl.I)"¢l-l(1.1. Tokyo 150, JAPAN.
`DOMESTIC NON-MEMBER RATES FOR 1989 including postage:
`Yakttgaku Zaxr/ii (J. P/mrm. Sana Japan) tmomhty)
`('lwmit'u/ & Pliztrnmcetmcal Bu//elm (monthly)
`FOREIGN NON—MEMBER RATES:
`inquire directly to the unclermentioncd agencies.
`DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN l\'ON-MEMBER SUBSCRIPTIONS of the Journal and Bulletin are handled solely by:
`Japan Publication Trading Co., tU.S.A) lnc., I255 Howard St., San Francisco, Calif. 94l03, U.S.A. and I75 Fifth Avenue. New
`York, NY. 10010, U.S.A.
`
`[Domestic]
`
`30d)’
`
`[ICF COPY
`per copy
`
`’i‘2.300
`¥4.l')O0
`
`Japan Publications Trading Co.. Ltd., Central PO. Box 5030 Tokyo lntcrnationztl. Tokyo, JAPAN.
`Kyowtt Book Co.. Inc, Aktmoto Bldg.. 38. Jimb0~cho l—chome. Kztnda. Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo. JAPAN.
`Maruzen Co., Ltd., P.O. Box 5050. Tokyo lnternzttional
`l()0—3l, JAPAN.
`NOTICES TO AUTHORS
`
`Page charges Regular Articles and Notes: ¥4.000/printed page. Communications to the Editor: ¥5.l00/‘printed page. Language
`correction charge: ’t‘700/printed page. Photographic Plates and Blocks: cu. ‘H.700/50 (;m2_
`Reprints
`50 reprints: free of charge. Over 50 reprints: ‘F60/copy.
`See CONTRIBUTION RULES, printed in I“urtmtm'/1/‘u, 19 (1), 81 (1983). 21 (8). 797 (I985). 24 (5). 510 (I988), or C/tent. P/turm.
`Bull_, 37 (1), I (1989), before writing :1 paper for C/IEIII. P/mrm. Bull. The RULES collected together into a pamphlet: ‘F950 (including
`postage)/copy.
`
`Page 2 of 5
`
`Page 2 of 5
`
`

`
`308
`
`Chem. Pharm. Bull. 37(2) 303-310 (1989)
`
`Vol. 37, No. 2
`
`Photochemical Iron(III)-Mediated Autoxidation of Dextromethoi-phan
`
`Giovanni BOCCARDI,*‘” Piergiorgio MEZZANZANICA,” Umberto Guzzi,“ Giordano LESM.A,b and Giovanni PALM1sANo*”’
`Certtro Ricerche Midy $,p.A.," SANOFI Recherche, I 20137 Milano, Italy and Dipzzrtimento di C/iimica Organica e Industriale, Facaltti di Scienze,
`Universitd degli Studi,” I 20133 Mz'lano,,Ita!y. Received August I, 1988
`
`~
`
`The photochemical reaction of dextromethorphan 1, a widely used anti-tnssive drug, in hydrochloric acid and in the
`presence of iron(III) salts leads to the 10]}-hydroxyderivative 3 as a major product in a,dfi® EiY9 2-
`The product composition of this reaction is strongly dependent on the experimental conditions and the elfects of solvents
`are presented.
`
`Keywords
`
`pholoclrernjstry; heavy metal catalysis; autoxidation; stability; dextromethorphan
`‘i
`
`Dextromethorphan [3-methoxy-1 7—methyl-(901, l 3a,l4oc)-
`morphinan, 1) is a valuable non-narcotic anti-tussive drug
`in oral pharmaceutical form and its hydrobromide (la) is
`described in several official Pharmacopeias. It has been
`known since 1956' that (la) is moderately stable when
`exposed (3d) in aqueous solution to direct sunlight, fur-
`nishing in a remarkably regioselective reaction the cor-
`responding l0-ketoderivative (2)”; however, in our hands,
`we observed a fast photochemical reaction which was hard
`to reproduce. In accordance with the results of Brossi er
`411.," Proska et al. have also recently reported the isolation
`of the l0—ketocompound from the oxygenated solutions of
`morphine.”
`'
`i
`A
`On the basis of some evidence, in particular the finding of
`traces of iron in glassware, we assumed that the reaction
`required catalysis by suitable inorganic ions. It
`is well
`known that Fe(III) ions and other higher valence metals act
`as efficient one-electron photo-oxidants in hydrochloric
`solutions, whereas‘ photolysis of aqueous s_olutions of
`Fe(III) bromide produces bromine?’ Here an interesting
`example has been reported by Barbier, who found that
`Fe(III)—induced photo-oxidation of benzylic methylenes in
`aqueous acetone occurs to yield the corresponding ketc-
`compounds.“
`In an effort to define the role of trace metals in these
`reactions, we have examined and report here the photo-
`chemical behavior of (la) in the presence of Fe(III) in acidic
`solutions,
`and a
`plausible mechanistic
`sequence
`is
`proposed.
`
`Results and Discussion
`The irradiation of an aqueous or acidic solution of (la) in
`the absence of Fe(III) ions did not induce any decom-
`position, irrespective of the presence or absence of molec-
`ular oxygen. By comparison,
`the irradiation (22h) of a
`2.68 mM solution of (la) in 1M hydrochloric acid in the
`presence of 6.2 mM Fe(IlI) chloride produced (at 85%
`conversion; high performance liquid chromatography
`(HPLC) analysis) a mixture of l0[i-hydroxydextromethor-
`phan (3) (61%) and the_ known 10‘-oxoderivative (2) (26°/,,).
`Compound 3 gave a molecular peak at m/: 287 by
`”e'lectr’o'n impact mass spectrum (El-MS) andithis value is in
`agreement with the molecular formula C18H25NOZ, indi-
`cating the presence of an additional oxygen atom. An
`inspection of the MS of 3 in comparison with thatof 1
`showed that the new oxygenated function cannot be -located
`
`in the C— and D-rings since these are encompassed by
`fragment m/z 150 which remains undisplaced in the MS,
`whereas the peak at m/z 230 is displaced by 16 amu as
`compared to m/z 214 for 1.5’ Accordingly, the infrared (IR)
`spectrum was devoid of any carbonyl absorption but had a
`discrete hydroxyl band at 3400cm".
`In the 200-MHz
`proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H—NMR) spectrum of
`3, the methine proton at C-9 was centered at 2.90ppm
`(sharp doublet, J :2.5 Hz) whereas the. signal of H-10
`appeared as a singlet at 4.72 ppm. The remarkable low-field
`chemical shift position for this proton provided evidence
`for oxygen substitution at this site. The stereochemistry at
`C-10 as depicted in 3 was assigned by application of
`Karplus analysis“ and the lack of any coupling for H—10
`(dihedral angle of approximately 90°) indicated that the
`newly introduced OH group and aminomethylene bridge
`are trans to one another.
`When we carried out the reaction on la under the above
`conditions, no other hydrcxy compound could be detected
`by ‘H—NMR spectroscopy, suggesting that 3 was being
`produced with complete control over
`the regio- and
`stereochemistry.
`Evidence in support of the structure of the minor photo-
`prcduct (2) was secured by comparison with an authentic
`sample prepared according to Brossi et al,“
`Additionally, we confirmed that the presence of exter-
`nally added chloride ions (as hydrochloric acid) affected the
`etficiency of the photo degradation of la induced by Fe(Ill)
`chloride in neutral or acidic solution. In the light of these
`results, the mechanism of the formation of 2 and 3 can b6
`interpreted in terms of an initial benzylic hydrogen abstrac-
`tion by Cl' (Eq. 1) to generate the carbon-centered radical
`(5) (Eq. 2). Although the role of Cl‘ as a radical initiator in
`photo-oxidation of organic compounds has been somewhat
`controversial,” the lack of reactivity in sulfuric acid SO-
`luticns indicated that at least the‘ formation of an Fe(IIl)~-
`chloro complex is necessary for the reaction to take place
`(Eq. 1). Subsequent reaction of 5 with molecular oxygen
`leadsto the secondary hydroperoxide (6) (Eqs. 3, 4) and thi5
`reactive transient species has ‘several options of being
`transformed into final products. Thus, 6 can undergo
`dehydration,
`through 0-0 bond cleavage, to give-the
`oxoderivative (2) (Eq. 5). However, this mechanism ma)’
`only count for a minor part of the observed photodegradatifln
`and the formation of 3 _could be rationalizedzby an alter‘
`native mechanism. The common intermediate (6) can under-
`
`© 1989 Pharmaceutical Society of Japan
`
`—-ev-———-s—-é
`
`g,.
`
`Page 3 of 5
`
`Page 3 of 5
`
`

`
`.M
`
`Februafl 1989
`
`'4 tFex.-.<H.o>,-.P""+x' '
`[FeX,.(H20)s 4.1‘
`1,131: ——»5+HC1
`’5'-1902 ’‘*'G
`1+6 -—5+7
`7-a 2+H,o T
`7+H* ——>8+H202
`s+Hz0 —»3.+H*
`s+MeOH —»4+H+
`
`Chart
`
`1
`
`'
`
`(1)
`(2)
`(3)
`(4)
`(5)
`(6)
`(7)
`(8)
`
`MeO
`
`
`
`"IN-We
`
`3R1, R2, Ra:H
`3Ri:H; R2,R3:0
`IR1, R3‘=H; R2=0H
`IR1, Ra=H? R2=OME
`
`»Awtu»-
`
`6:
`7:
`9‘.
`10:
`
`\
`
`R1, R3=H; R2=00‘
`R1, R3=H; R::=OOH
`R1, Rz=H; R3=OH
`R1=Br; R2, R3=H
`Fig.
`l
`
`*
`. H"’nz,N—Me
`
`5*=-
`8*=+
`
`go ionic decomposition via attack at the B-oxygen atom of
`the hydroperoxide function (C-0 bond fission) with loss of
`a molecule of hydrogen peroxide (Eq. 6). This reaction
`predominates,
`in that the stability of the resulting car-
`benium ion (8) provides the driving force for this reaction,
`and subsequent quenching by a suitable nucleophilic sol-
`vent (é.g., water) leads to 3. Finally, carbocation trapping
`experiments were performed under the above conditions in
`the presence of 0.6 mM Fe(III)'chloride in 1 : 1 methanol—2M
`hydrochloric acid mixture and the corresponding methyl
`ether (4) was isolated in good yield (Eq. 8).
`It is quite reasonable that the introduction of OH or
`OMe groups proceeded by entry from the sterically more
`accessible top face and a similar stereochemical outcome
`has
`recently been reported on morphinandienones.”
`Bottomside oxygen entry would be rather restricted es-
`pecially because of the aminomethylene bridge. An un-
`ambiguous stereochernical assignment for 3 was ‘accom-
`plished by reduction of 2 with LiAlH4 in refluxing tetrahy-
`drofuran (THF). The sole isomer formed in this process is‘
`assigned the ac-hydroxyl stereochemistry depicted in 9 since
`this is the expected resul_t of hydride delivery from the least
`encumbered face of the carbonyl function in 2.1’ Ac-
`cordingly, the methine hydrogen at C-10 in 9 appears at
`4.88 ppm [ vs. 4.72 ppm in 3] as a doublet (J; 6.0 Hz) (i.e.,.
`H-9 and-=I:I.:—l—0.are—cis=orien.ted)-and this assignment agrees
`with the generalization that an equatorial proton resonates
`at lower field than its axial epimer.”
`.
`By exposure of . 1a to sunlight
`in 1 M aqueous hy-
`drobromic acid in the presence of Fe(III) ions we observ-
`ed a rapid and clean transformation to 2-bromo-dextro-
`Inethorphan (10) in 62% yield as the sole product. Com-
`Pound 10 [M + ' 351 /349(31Br/79Br)] was identified by spec-
`tral methods and unambiguous synthesis. In particular,
`the two aromatic protons appeared as singlets at 7.28 ppm
`(H-1) and 6.85 ppm (H-4) in the ‘H-NMR, thus confirming
`
`
`
` r?""”‘"‘"""'.“'"——'”—T“i2
`
`309
`
`that substitution had occurred at the 2-position.
`The difference in reactions between‘ Cl' and Br’ may be
`explained on the basis of frontier orbital theory; in the‘
`hydrogen-abstraction reactions, generally S'OMO"(sin’gly '
`occupied molecular orbital)/HOMO interaction—control-
`led,
`the SOMO energy of ‘X" lies between that of the
`HOMO (0 orbital of C_—H bond) and the radical with the
`higher-energy SOMO will be less reactive than the one with
`the lower-energy SOMO.1°‘ This explains why the elec-
`trophilic Cl'
`radical
`(SOMO energy: —13eV)‘“ reacts
`faster in hydrogen abstraction of the benzylic methylene
`than the Br ' radical (SOMO energy: — 11.8 eV). In the light
`of these arguments, two bromine radicals would recombine
`to yield bromine and the expected electrophilic substitution
`at the A-ring of dextromethorphan would be cleanly ob-
`served as the exclusive reaction channel.
`
`Experimental
`Melting points were determined on a Ruechi 510 apparatus and are
`uncorrected. The ‘H-NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker WP-80 CW
`or on a Varian XL-200 spectrometer in CDC], solutions with tetramethy1-
`silane as an internal standard. Chemical shifts are reported in ppm (6) and
`signal described as s (singlet), d (doublet),
`in, (multiplet) or br (broad).
`Ultraviolet (UV) absorption spectra were recorded on a Beckman DU 6
`spectrophotometer. EI-MS were measured on a Varian MAT 112 spectro-
`meter. Silica gel chromatography (thin layer chromatography, TLC) was
`carried out on Merck .pre-coated 60F25,, plates. Preparative silica gel
`chromatography was performed on Merck pre-coated 60F254 (thickness:
`1 mm, 20 x 20). HPLC analysis was performed on a Varian M 6000 pump,
`M 440 UV detector and 840 integrator system with l0,11m micro
`Bondapack C-18 column (i.d. 3.9x 300 mm, Waters). The mobile phase
`was prepared by dissolving 5.8 g of dioctyl sulfosuccinate in water, MeOH,
`THF and concentrated I-ISPO4 330:630:37:l and adjusting the pH to
`3.30 with concentrated ammonia?“
`Irradiation of la in HCl in the Presence of FeCl3 Dextromethorphan
`hydrobromide (1a) (1.0 g, 2.68 mmol) was dissolved in l M HCl (1000 ml)
`containing FeCl3 (1.0 g, 6.2mmol) in ten different borosilicate vessels and
`irradiated with tungsten light (500 W, Philips PF 308 E/21) at 50 cm from
`the reaction vessels after saturation with oxygen. After 22 h, disodium
`ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) was added and the mixture was
`made alkaline with 10% ammonia and extracted with EtOAc (500 ml). The
`organic layer was washed with water (200 ml), dried and concentrated in
`vacuo; Preparative TLC (benzene-EtOH—l0°/L, ammonia, 89: 10: 1, one
`development, recovery with acetone) afforded the known 10-ketoderiv-
`ativc (2)1) (Rf 0.45; 212mg, 26%),
`the starting material (1) (Rf 0.29;
`125 mg) and the amorphous 105-hydroxydextromethorphan (3) (Rf 0.16;
`500 mg, 61%). 10-Keto-3-methoxy-17-methyl-(9oc,13a,14a)-morphinan (2):
`mp 188-189 ‘C (MeOH). UV »',§j’,‘,‘§“°Lnm (loge): 287" (4.18), 231.(4.05).
`[zx],23° -139 ° (c=3, CHC13). IR (KBr): 2930, 2850, 1665 cm“. ll-I-NMR:
`1.0—2.s (131-1, m), 2.34 (3H, s, CH,—N), 2.97 (1H, d, ./'=3.0 Hz, H-9), 3.88
`(3H, s, CH3—O), 6.90 (2H, in), 8.00 (1H, m). Anal. Calcd. for C,3H23NO2:
`C, 75.76; H, 8.12: N, 4.91. Found: C, 75.54; H, 8.19; N, 4.85.
`10/3-Hydroxy-3-methoxy—l7—methyl—(9oc,l3o:,l4a)—morphinan (3): UV
`Af,j;‘:"°1 rim (loge): 284 (3.20), 277 (3.22), 234 (3.92). IR (KBr): 3400, 2929,
`2830cm". 1H-NMR: l.l—-2.5 (13H, m), 2.49 (3H, s, N-Cl-I3), 2.90 (1H,
`d, J=2.5 Hz, H-9), 3.81 (3H, s, CI-I3—O), 4.72 (1H, s_. l-I-10), 6.80 (2H, m,
`H-2 and H-4),
`7.42 (1H, m, H-1). MS m/z 287
`(M+'),
`230
`(M*" —CzN4NCH3), 150, 143.5 (M“).
`.
`1609,
`(-9)»- Hydrochloride: mp 184 °C (MeOH-).—-IR (KBr): 3200,
`1023 cm”. ‘H-NMR: 0.8-2.9 (14H, m), 2.96 (3H, s, CH3—N), 3.5 (1H, m,
`H-9), 3.72 (3H, s, 0—CH3), 4.88 (1H, br d, J:6.0 Hz, H-10), 6.54 (1H, d,
`J=2.0 Hz, H-4), 6.88 (1 H, dd, J=8.0, 2.0 Hz, H-2), 7.49 (1 H, d, J: 8.0 Hz,
`H-1). Anal. Calcd’ for C,5HZ5NO-I-ICl-1/2H,0: C, 65.02; H, 8.19;N, 4.21.
`Found: C, 65.10; H, 8.22; N, 4.16.
`1a (1.5 g,
`Irradiation of la in HCl and MeOH in the Presence of FeCl3
`4rnmol) in a 1 : 1 mixture of MeOH and 2M HCl (30 ml) containing FeCl:,
`(3.2 mg, 0.02 mmol)
`in a borosilicate vessel
`.was set aside at
`room
`temperature under direct sunlight for 24 h. After evaporation of half of the
`solvent, water (100 ml) was added and the mixture was made alkaline with
`10% ammonia at 0°C and extracted with dichloromethane (50 ml). The
`extract was washed with aqueous sodium potassium tartrate solution
`
`Page 4 of 5
`
`Page 4 of 5
`
`

`
`
`
`310
`
`Vol. 37, Ng_ 2
`
`(50 ml) and water (50 ml) and dried. Filtration and‘ evaporation afforded ‘a
`syrup (1.08 g), which \vas shown by TLC (benzene—EtOH—lO°/0 amrr1onia,.
`89: 10: 1) to contain the starting material, the 10-lcetoderivative (2) and 3,
`together with a new compound (Rf 0.38). Separation of this was achieved
`by careful preparative TLC using the same eluant and 250mg (20 %; 42%
`based on the recovered starting_ material) of pure 10B-methoxydextro-
`methorphan (4) was isolated as an amorphous glass. UV /l,°,§‘,‘,f"°‘nm (loge):
`284 (3.23), 277 (3.25). ‘H—N.\/IR: l.8#2.8 (131-I, m), 2.49 (3H, s, Cl-I3AN),
`3.51 (3H, s, O—CH3), 3.78 (3H, s, O—CH3), 4.12 (1H, s, H-10), 6.8 (21-Lm),
`7.3 (1H, in). MS m,z 301 (M*'), 271 (M*‘—0cH,), 150.5 (M“), 150
`(M*‘—151).
`..
`.
`Photochemical Synthesis of 2-Bmmo-3-methoxy-17-methyl-(9a,1391,1441)-
`morphinan (10)
`1a (150 mg, 0.4mmo1) in 1M HBr (100 ml) containing
`FeC13 (65 mg, 0.4 mmol) in a borosilicate vessel was exposed to direc:
`sunlight for 4h. The mixture was made alkaline with 10% ammonia and
`extracted with dichloromethane (50 ml). The extract was washed with 2%
`aqueous sodium EDTA solution (50m1) and water (50 ml), dried and
`evaporated. The solid obtained was subjected to ‘preparative TLC
`(C1-1ZCl2—Me0H—l0% ammonia, 85: 15:01) to give 93 mg (62%) of pure
`title compound (10). mp 130 “C (MeOH—H2 :1. IR (KBr): 2906, 2855,
`1595, 727, 712cm". ‘H—NMR: 1,043.0 (14H, m), 2.48 (3H, s, CH3—N),
`3.90 (3H, S, O—CH3), 6.85 (1H, 5, H14), 7.26 (lH,_s, H-1). Amzl. Calcd for
`C,sHz4BrNO: C, 61.72; H, 6.90: N, 4.00. Found: C, 61.56; H, 6.88; N,
`3.92.
`.
`The same compound was obtained in 38‘‘/, yield aocording to the
`following procedure: 1a (2.1 g, 5.6 mmol) was dissolved in 1 M HBr (50 ml)
`and water (200 ml) and bromine (2 g, 12 mmol) were added dropwise under
`stirring. After 4 h the solution was filtered and sodium bisulfite was added
`
`until the color disappeared. The solution was extracted with ethyl acetate
`(2 x 300 ml), dried and evaporated. The solid was dissolved in MeOH
`(40 ml) and precipitated with water (40 ml) giving 750 mg of a colorless
`crystalline solid (38 °/;). This compound was identical with that obtained by
`the photochemical procedure.
`
`References and Notes
`
`1) Q. Haefiger, A. Brossi, L. H. Chopard—dit-Jean, M. Walter and Q_
`Schnider, Helv. Chim. Acta, 39, 2053 (1956).
`
`2)
`13- Proskaa 2. V0t.ic.ky,_L. Mo1anarfl11tiaadrM._S_t_e.f_e1,c, Chem.
`Zvestii, 32, 710 (1978).
`3) S.,N. Chen, N. N. Lichtinand and G. Stein, Science, 190, 879 (1975)_
`4) M. Barbier, Helv. Chim. Acta. 67, 866 (1984).
`S) C. Koeppel, J. Tenczer and K. Ibe, Arzneim. Forsclz, 37, 1304 (1987).
`6) M. Karplus, J. Chem. Phys., 30, 11 (1959); M. Karpltis, J. Am. Chem,
`Soc., 85, 2870 (1963); S. Stemhell, Quart. Rev. (London), 23, 236
`(1969).
`,
`7) A. Cox and T. J. Kemp, J. Chem. Soc, Faraday Trans. 1, 71, 2490
`(1975).
`'
`3) T. W. Bentley and S. J. Morris, J. Org. Chem., 51, 5005 (1987).
`9) L. M. Jaclcman, “Application of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
`Spectroscopy in Organic Chemistry,” Pergamon Press, rI11c., New
`York, 1959.
`V
`j
`’
`I. Fleming, “Frontier Orbitals and Organic Chemical Reactions,”
`10)
`Wiley, New York, 1976.
`~'
`11) R. W. Henderson, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 97, 213 (1975).
`12) G. W. Halstead, J. Pharm. Sci., 71, 1108 (1982).
`
`11;.
`1.
`k‘A
`
`Page 5 of 5
`
`Page 5 of 5

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket