throbber
Page 1
`
` UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
` PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
` FRESENIUS KABI USA LLC, )
`
` ) Case No.
`
` Petitioner, ) IPR2015-00223
`
` ) (Patent 6,852,689
`
` vs. ) B2)
`
` )
`
` CUBIST PHARMACEUTICALS, ) Case No.
`
` INC., ) IPR2015-00227
`
` ) (Patent 6,464,967
`
` Patent Owner. ) B1)
`
` ------------------------- )
`
` November 24, 2015
`
` 9:15 a.m.
`
` Deposition of JAMES S. HALL, held at
`
` the offices of Wilmer Cutler Pickering
`
` Hale and Dorr LLP, 7 World Trade Center, New
`
` York, New York, before Laurie A. Collins, a
`
` Registered Professional Reporter and Notary
`
` Public of the State of New York.
`
`1 2
`
`3
`
`4 5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`
`
`Fresenius Kabi, Substitute Exhibit 1035
`IPR2015-00223
`
`

`
`Page 2
`
`Page 4
`
`1 Hall
`2 in the room and everyone attending please
`3 voice identify themselves and the parties they
`4 represent.
`5 MR. HSU: John Hsu from Schiff Hardin
`6 representing Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC.
`7 MS. PIROZZOLO: Lisa Pirozzolo from
`8 WilmerHale for Cubist Pharmaceuticals and the
`9 witness.
`10 MS. NEELY: Stephanie Neely from
`11 WilmerHale for Cubist Pharmaceuticals and the
`12 witness.
`13 J A M E S S. H A L L ,
`14 called as a witness, having been duly sworn
`15 by the notary public, was examined and
`16 testified as follows:
`17 EXAMINATION BY
`18 MR. HSU:
`19 Q. Good morning, Mr. Hall.
`20 A. Good morning.
`21 Q. Have you ever been deposed before?
`22 A. Once before.
`23 Q. Okay. So you might know the procedure
`24 a little bit, but let me just explain it a little
`25 bit more for you.
`
` A P P E A R A N C E S:
`
`1 2
`
`3 4
`
` SCHIFF HARDIN LLP
`5 Attorneys for Petitioner
`6 233 South Wacker Drive
`7 Suite 6600
`8 Chicago, Illinois 60606
`9 BY: JOHN K. HSU, Ph.D., ESQ.
`10 jhsu@schiffhardin.com
`11
`12 WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP
`13 Attorneys for Patent Owner
`14 60 State Street
`15 Boston, Massachusetts 02109
`16 BY: LISA J. PIROZZOLO, ESQ.
`17 lisa.pirozzolo@wilmerhale.com
`18 STEPHANIE NEELY, ESQ.
`19 stephanie.neely@wilmerhale.com
`20
`21 ALSO PRESENT:
`22 LISA JACOBS, ESQ. (Merck)
`23 JONATHAN POPHAM, Videographer
`24
`25
`
`Page 3
`
`Page 5
`
`1 Hall
`2 Right now there's a court reporter
`3 that's going to take down your responses after I
`4 ask a question. If you could give a verbal
`5 response, that would be helpful. Okay? Do you
`6 understand that?
`7 A. Yes.
`8 Q. All right. Because she can't take both
`9 people down at the same time, if you could let me
`10 get my question out first before you answer, that
`11 would be helpful, and I will do my best to let you
`12 answer without interrupting. Do you understand
`13 that?
`14 A. Yes.
`15 Q. I'm going to be asking questions. If
`16 you don't hear a question that I ask, please tell
`17 me and I'll be happy to repeat it. Do you
`18 understand that?
`19 A. Yes.
`20 Q. And if you don't understand the
`21 question I ask, let me know and I'll see what you
`22 don't understand and I'll try to clarify it and
`23 we'll move on from there. Do you understand that?
`24 A. Yes.
`25 Q. So if you answer a question, is it fair
`
`1 2
`
` THE VIDEOGRAPHER: We're now on the
`3 record.
`4 Please note that the microphones are
`5 sensitive and may pick up whispering and
`6 private conversations.
`7 Please turn off all cell phones or
`8 place them away from the microphones, as they
`9 can interfere with the deposition audio.
`10 Recording will continue until all
`11 parties agree to go off the record.
`12 My name is Jonathan Popham,
`13 representing Veritext. The date today is
`14 November 24th, 2015, and the time is
`15 approximately 9:15 a.m. This deposition is
`16 being held at WilmerHale, located at 7 World
`17 Trade Center, New York, New York.
`18 The caption of this case is Fresenius
`19 Kabi USA, LLC, versus Cubist Pharmaceuticals.
`20 This case is being held in the United States
`21 Patent and Trademark Office before the Patent
`22 Trial and Appeal Board, Case Numbers
`23 IPR2015--00223 and IPR2015--00227. The name
`24 of the witness is James Hall.
`25 At this time will the attorneys present
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`2 (Pages 2 - 5)
`
`888-391-3376
`
`

`
`Page 6
`
`Page 8
`
`1 Hall
`2 that I'm going to -- I'm going to understand that
`3 you heard it and that you understood it. Is that
`4 fair?
`5 A. Yes.
`6 Q. All right. Any reasons today why you
`7 can't give full and truthful answers?
`8 A. No.
`9 Q. I want to talk about your background a
`10 little bit. Did you get an undergraduate degree?
`11 A. Yes.
`12 Q. Okay. Where did you get your
`13 undergraduate degree?
`14 A. Hamilton College.
`15 Q. Where is that?
`16 A. Clinton, New York.
`17 Q. And what was the degree in?
`18 A. Economics.
`19 Q. And did you go on to any post-
`20 undergraduate education?
`21 A. Post-undergraduate?
`22 Q. Yes. After your getting an
`23 undergraduate degree, did you get more schooling?
`24 A. Graduate school.
`25 Q. Okay. Where did you get a graduate
`
`1 Hall
`2 history. After your undergraduate degree in 1989,
`3 did you start at a job?
`4 A. Yes.
`5 Q. Okay. What job did you start at?
`6 A. Worked at the Boston Company.
`7 Q. What is the Boston Company? What does
`8 that company do?
`9 A. It's a retail bank, an investment bank.
`10 Q. What years did you work there?
`11 A. From 1989 to 1992.
`12 Q. What was your title?
`13 A. Account specialist.
`14 Q. Generally what did your job duties
`15 entail?
`16 A. It was the operational management of
`17 pension fund accounting.
`18 Q. As part of your work at the Boston
`19 Company, did you work with anything dealing with
`20 pharmaceutical products?
`21 A. No.
`22 Q. After the Boston Company, did you move
`23 to another job?
`24 A. After the Boston Company, I went to
`25 graduate school at Duke University.
`
`Page 7
`
`Page 9
`
`1 Hall
`2 school?
`3 A. MBA from Duke University.
`4 Q. When did you get your undergraduate
`5 degree from Hamilton College?
`6 A. Graduated in 1989.
`7 Q. When did you get your MBA from Duke?
`8 A. 1994.
`9 Q. And after getting an MBA from Duke,
`10 have you done any other educational training?
`11 A. No.
`12 Q. So no other degrees other than your
`13 undergraduate and your MBA from Duke; correct?
`14 A. That's correct.
`15 Q. I just want to make sure -- I just want
`16 to make sure the record is clear. You don't have
`17 a medical degree; is that correct?
`18 A. Correct.
`19 Q. Do you have any training -- do you have
`20 any medical training?
`21 A. No.
`22 Q. And you've never treated patients
`23 before; correct?
`24 A. No, correct.
`25 Q. I just want to go through your work
`
`1 Hall
`2 Q. And so that was from '92 to '94?
`3 A. Correct.
`4 Q. And while you were at graduate school,
`5 were you working at a job?
`6 A. No.
`7 Q. After graduate school what job did you
`8 take then?
`9 A. So from graduate school I went to
`10 Merck & Co. and went into internal audit.
`11 Q. Generally what did your job duties
`12 entail in internal audit?
`13 A. General responsibility was reviewing
`14 operational controls across multiple divisions
`15 within Merck.
`16 Q. Okay. And that you started in 1994;
`17 correct?
`18 A. Correct.
`19 Q. Now, since 1994 to the present, have
`20 you always been working at Merck?
`21 A. Yes.
`22 Q. When you started in audit -- internal
`23 audit in 1994, what was your job title?
`24 A. Senior internal auditor.
`25 Q. Now, how long at Merck, from 1994 till
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`3 (Pages 6 - 9)
`
`888-391-3376
`
`

`
`Page 10
`
`Page 12
`
`1 Hall
`2 when, did you hold that job as senior internal
`3 auditor?
`4 A. Approximately 1996.
`5 Q. Okay. In 1996 what changed?
`6 A. Then I went to a new job supporting
`7 Merck manufacturing from a financial controls
`8 standpoint.
`9 Q. When you say "from a financial controls
`10 standpoint," what do you mean?
`11 A. Helped track the cost of manufacturing
`12 products within the vaccine business.
`13 Q. And were you solely in the vaccine
`14 business area or did you work in other different
`15 products?
`16 A. No, just vaccines.
`17 Q. And what was your title? I don't think
`18 I asked this. What was your title at that point?
`19 A. Senior financial specialist.
`20 Q. Now, from 19 -- I'm sorry, how long
`21 were you in that job, senior financial specialist?
`22 From 1996 till when?
`23 A. To mid 1998.
`24 Q. Okay. And what changed?
`25 A. Then I became manager with the same
`
`1 Hall
`2 for capital approvals.
`3 Q. Generally what did that entail?
`4 A. The review of capital requests made by
`5 manufacturing, the review of that and the writing
`6 of a business case for the capital request.
`7 Q. Now, as part of your job duty during
`8 that period, did you deal with antibacterial
`9 products?
`10 A. I don't recall.
`11 Q. Okay. From -- you were doing that job
`12 from 2001 till when?
`13 A. 2003.
`14 Q. What happened in 2003? How did your
`15 job duties change?
`16 A. Then I went into a new role as a
`17 financial controller of the Fosamax brand team.
`18 Q. And what type of drug is Fosamax?
`19 A. It's a bisphosphonate for osteoporosis.
`20 Q. I didn't catch the first part.
`21 A. A bisphosphonate.
`22 Q. That's a type of compound; right?
`23 A. Yes.
`24 Q. And that's for osteoporosis?
`25 A. Correct.
`
`Page 11
`
`Page 13
`
`1 Hall
`2 accountability, just now people reporting to me.
`3 Q. Still in the vaccine product area;
`4 right?
`5 A. Correct.
`6 Q. All right. 1998 to how long until that
`7 changed?
`8 A. Still about the end of 1999.
`9 Q. Okay. And how did your duties change
`10 at the end of 1999?
`11 A. Then I went to work in a financial
`12 evaluation and analytics group, still supporting
`13 manufacturing.
`14 Q. Okay. Were you still dealing with just
`15 vaccine products or did that expand also?
`16 A. It expanded.
`17 Q. All right. What did it expand into?
`18 A. Various. Cardiovascular comes to mind.
`19 Q. Any antibacterial products?
`20 A. No.
`21 Q. So that started in 1999. From 1999
`22 till when were you in that role at Merck?
`23 A. Till 2001, approximately.
`24 Q. What changed? I'm sorry.
`25 A. Then I took over the capital planning
`
`1 Hall
`2 Q. It's not an antibacterial; correct?
`3 A. Correct.
`4 Q. How long did your job duties, from 2003
`5 till when?
`6 A. That was from 2003 till 2005.
`7 Q. In 2005 how did your job duties change?
`8 A. Became the financial controller of a
`9 business unit within the U.S. market.
`10 Q. What business unit was that?
`11 A. Referred to as business unit 2.
`12 Q. What type of drugs did business unit 2
`13 cover?
`14 A. Examples are Singulair, Maxalt,
`15 Fosamax.
`16 Q. So was business unit 2 responsible for
`17 a certain drug portfolio at Merck?
`18 A. Correct.
`19 Q. Did any of those drugs include
`20 antibacterials?
`21 A. No.
`22 Q. And that job in business unit 2 went
`23 from 2005 till when?
`24 A. Till 2007.
`25 Q. And in 2007 what was your job duty?
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`4 (Pages 10 - 13)
`
`888-391-3376
`
`

`
`Page 14
`
`Page 16
`
`1 Hall
`2 A. Then I became the financial controller
`3 of BU 3.
`4 Q. Is that -- sorry, I didn't want -- are
`5 you finished?
`6 A. (Nods head.)
`7 Q. Is that business unit 3?
`8 A. Yes. I also was the global controller
`9 for cardiovascular franchise.
`10 Q. When you say "cardiovascular
`11 franchise," are you talking about different
`12 cardiovascular drugs at Merck?
`13 A. Yes.
`14 Q. And as far as the business unit 3, what
`15 drugs did that cover?
`16 A. For diabetes, cardiovascular.
`17 Q. Any other?
`18 A. No.
`19 Q. So at this stage you were not involved
`20 with antibacterial drugs at Merck; correct?
`21 A. Correct.
`22 Q. Your role in that position was from
`23 2007 till when?
`24 A. 2008.
`25 Q. And what was your job -- how did your
`
`1 Hall
`2 Q. So how long? 2008 till what time?
`3 A. 2009.
`4 Q. In 2009 what was your job role at
`5 Merck?
`6 A. I assumed financial controller of
`7 emerging markets.
`8 Q. Generally what was your job
`9 responsibilities?
`10 A. Generally my responsibility was to
`11 bring together, postmerger with Schering-Plough, a
`12 consolidation of the business in emerging markets.
`13 Q. That was from 2009 till when?
`14 A. Mid 2010.
`15 Q. And as your role as financial
`16 controller of emerging markets, did you deal with
`17 antibacterial drugs that Merck had?
`18 A. Not directly.
`19 Q. Now, after 2010 what was your job at
`20 Merck?
`21 A. So 2010 I then assumed a role in the
`22 vaccine division, financial controller of the U.S.
`23 market for vaccines as well as a global financial
`24 controller for global vaccines.
`25 Q. As a financial controller, generally
`
`Page 15
`
`Page 17
`
`1 Hall
`2 job duties switch in 2008?
`3 A. 2008 I assumed a role in the global
`4 reporting COE, center of excellence, supporting
`5 global human health.
`6 Q. Generally what did your job duties
`7 entail when you were in that position?
`8 A. Generally it was to consolidate global
`9 results of the global human health division as
`10 well as dictate planning process guidance.
`11 Q. Was there any particular drugs that you
`12 were dealing with as part of your job duties?
`13 A. Not directly.
`14 Q. Were you responsibility for any of
`15 Merck's antibacterial drugs in the role that you
`16 had in 2008?
`17 A. Not directly.
`18 Q. When you say "not directly," why is it
`19 "not directly"? Can you explain?
`20 A. The results of antibiotic products were
`21 consolidated into global human health results.
`22 Q. But as far as actually directly dealing
`23 with manufacturing or sales of antibacterials,
`24 that wasn't part of your job duties there?
`25 A. Correct.
`
`1 Hall
`2 what's your job duties at Merck?
`3 A. So for the U.S. role it is basic
`4 controllership of the market and assurance of the
`5 integrity of the data of the profit-and-loss
`6 statement.
`7 Q. So you were overseeing the financial
`8 information, and you're checking the numbers? Is
`9 that sort of fair?
`10 A. Yes.
`11 Q. From 2010 -- oh, and as part of your
`12 duties did you deal with Merck's antibacterial
`13 drugs at all?
`14 A. No.
`15 Q. And that was from 2010 till when?
`16 A. Till June of 2015.
`17 Q. And June of 2015 how did your job
`18 duties change?
`19 A. To recently assume the financial
`20 controller of the U.S. market for pharmaceuticals.
`21 Q. Generally what do your job duties
`22 entail?
`23 A. Generally responsible for the
`24 controllership and the financials of the U.S.
`25 market and planning and reporting for the U.S.
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`5 (Pages 14 - 17)
`
`888-391-3376
`
`

`
`Page 18
`
`Page 20
`
`1 Hall
`2 market.
`3 Q. Is that for all of Merck's drugs?
`4 A. For all the pharmaceutical drugs.
`5 Q. Does that include drugs that are
`6 marketed by Merck subsidiaries?
`7 A. Can you please explain?
`8 Q. Sure. Does Merck have different
`9 subsidiary pharmaceutical companies that they have
`10 ownership in? Are you aware of that?
`11 A. Not in the U.S.
`12 Q. Okay, not in the U.S.
`13 Well, let me -- I'll ask some different
`14 questions, and maybe it will make it more clear.
`15 So June 2015. Is that your job now at
`16 Merck?
`17 A. Yes.
`18 Q. And, again, I asked this for your
`19 previous job at Merck, but as controllership of
`20 financial markets of the U.S., generally what does
`21 that job entail?
`22 A. Generally entails the responsibility
`23 for the financial planning and reporting of the
`24 U.S. market business.
`25 Q. Now, I've gone through your history --
`
`1 Hall
`2 Q. When was that?
`3 A. December of 2014.
`4 Q. Now -- and this goes back to my
`5 question before -- is Merck -- is Cubist a
`6 subsidiary of Merck, to your understanding?
`7 A. Not to my understanding.
`8 Q. Okay. What's your understanding?
`9 A. My understanding is Merck has Cubist
`10 in -- the product portfolio within Cubist falls
`11 within the U.S. market purview.
`12 Q. Okay. Is it fair to say for your
`13 understanding drugs that Cubist markets, that's
`14 within Merck's U.S. purview; correct?
`15 A. Correct.
`16 Q. And as far as the corporate
`17 relationship, whether they're subsidiaries or
`18 whether there's some other entity relationship
`19 between Merck and Cubist, are you aware of
`20 anything like that?
`21 A. I'm not --
`22 MS. PIROZZOLO: Objection.
`23 A. I'm not familiar.
`24 Q. Now, in your different roles at Merck,
`25 were you involved with any aspect of the
`
`Page 19
`
`Page 21
`
`1 Hall
`2 your job history at Merck since you started to
`3 present; correct?
`4 A. Correct.
`5 Q. Okay. I just want to confirm some
`6 things. I think I know what the answer is but...
`7 As your work at Merck and your job
`8 responsibilities or duties, have you ever been
`9 involved with the medical research of drugs at
`10 Merck?
`11 A. No.
`12 Q. As far as this IPR petition, you
`13 submitted a declaration for this IPR petition.
`14 Are you aware of that?
`15 A. Yes.
`16 Q. And the IPR petition involves a company
`17 named Cubist Pharmaceuticals. Are you aware of
`18 that?
`19 A. Yes.
`20 Q. Now, is it your understanding that
`21 Merck acquired Cubist Pharmaceuticals at some
`22 point?
`23 A. Yes.
`24 Q. Do you know when?
`25 A. Yes.
`
`1 Hall
`2 acquisition of Cubist by Merck?
`3 A. No.
`4 Q. And for this IPR, you're aware that the
`5 drug at issue is Cubicin; is that right?
`6 A. Yes.
`7 Q. Before Merck acquired Cubist, did you
`8 have any involvement in the development of
`9 Cubicin?
`10 A. No.
`11 Q. Did you have any involvement whatsoever
`12 with Cubicin before Merck acquired Cubist?
`13 A. No.
`14 Q. Do you know whether Merck had a
`15 financial interest in Cubist before Merck acquired
`16 Cubist?
`17 A. No.
`18 Q. "No" meaning you don't know?
`19 A. I was not involved or aware.
`20 Q. Okay. So I just want to clarify the
`21 record.
`22 A. Sorry.
`23 Q. When you say "no," you mean you have no
`24 understanding or awareness of anything --
`25 A. Correct.
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`6 (Pages 18 - 21)
`
`888-391-3376
`
`

`
`Page 22
`
`Page 24
`
`1 Hall
`2 Q. -- with respect to my question;
`3 correct?
`4 A. Correct.
`5 Q. Okay. And before Merck acquired
`6 Cubist, do you know whether Merck had any
`7 financial interest in the drug Cubicin?
`8 A. No.
`9 Q. "No" meaning you don't know; correct?
`10 A. I don't know.
`11 Q. So you're not aware of any licensing
`12 agreements Merck had with regard to Cubicin before
`13 they acquired Cubist; correct?
`14 A. Correct.
`15 Q. Or any royalties, for example; correct?
`16 You're not aware of that; correct?
`17 A. Correct.
`18 Q. Now, we discussed your different job
`19 duties at Merck since you started there in 1994 to
`20 the present. Has any one of those job duties
`21 involved your involvement in marketing a
`22 particular drug?
`23 A. Indirectly.
`24 Q. Okay. And what do you mean by
`25 "indirectly"?
`
`1 Hall
`2 A. I'm aware of the marketing but no
`3 direct.
`4 Q. No direct involvement?
`5 A. No direct involvement in marketing.
`6 (Discussion off the record.)
`7 Q. What I'm going to hand you is a
`8 document that has the title declaration of
`9 James S. Hall on the front of it. It's been
`10 marked on the right-hand bottom as Cubist 2032 in
`11 Fresenius versus Cubist and has an IPR number.
`12 Do you have that in front of you?
`13 A. Yes.
`14 Q. I want you to take a look at it, but
`15 does this look familiar to you as the declaration
`16 that you submitted for the IPRs that are at issue?
`17 A. Yes.
`18 Q. Okay. The last page is page 3. I just
`19 want to confirm that's your signature; correct?
`20 A. Correct.
`21 Q. And you signed it on or about August
`22 12th, 2015; correct?
`23 A. Correct.
`24 Q. I want to talk to you about how you got
`25 the declaration together. So as far as drafting
`
`Page 23
`
`Page 25
`
`1 Hall
`2 A. When I was supporting the Fosamax brand
`3 team as the financial controller, I was part of
`4 the brand team, meaning I was in marketing.
`5 Q. Setting aside Fosamax, did you have any
`6 involvement with the marketing of any Merck drug
`7 in the duties that you had at Merck?
`8 A. No.
`9 Q. Now when it comes to Fosamax, when you
`10 say you were part of the brand team, meaning
`11 marketing, how were you involved with marketing
`12 with respect to Fosamax?
`13 A. So this was a developmental position
`14 for financial professionals to come into
`15 marketing. Essentially I participated in brand
`16 team meetings, strategy meetings.
`17 Q. Did you make any decisions as far as
`18 how to market Fosamax?
`19 A. No.
`20 Q. I'm pretty sure I know the answer to
`21 this. Before Merck acquired Cubist, did you have
`22 any involvement in the marketing of Cubicin?
`23 A. No.
`24 Q. After Merck acquired Cubist, have you
`25 had any involvement in the marketing of Cubicin?
`
`1 Hall
`2 the declaration, how did you start? What was the
`3 first thing that you did?
`4 MS. PIROZZOLO: I'm just going to
`5 caution you not to reveal privileged
`6 communications. But you can describe
`7 generally.
`8 A. An attorney provided a draft.
`9 Q. Just to follow up, your attorney --
`10 what she indicated -- let me just -- I'm sure she
`11 explained this, but let me explain a little
`12 better -- more.
`13 There's something called privilege.
`14 It's a communication between you and your
`15 attorneys. I'm not asking for that. I don't want
`16 to know what you talked about with your attorneys.
`17 I'm not -- so whenever I ask that question, I'm
`18 not asking that information, and that's why she's
`19 objecting. Please don't give it to me. All
`20 right?
`21 Okay. So you said -- let me try to
`22 break it down a little bit more.
`23 For your declaration were you contacted
`24 by anyone to start the process of getting a
`25 declaration together?
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`7 (Pages 22 - 25)
`
`888-391-3376
`
`

`
`Page 26
`
`Page 28
`
`1 Hall
`2 A. Yes.
`3 Q. Okay. Who?
`4 A. Emily. I don't remember her last name.
`5 Q. Whelan?
`6 A. Yes, I believe so. I can't confirm. I
`7 just know it's Emily.
`8 Q. Attorney at WilmerHale?
`9 A. Yeah.
`10 Q. When was that, about?
`11 A. August.
`12 Q. August of this year?
`13 A. Correct.
`14 Q. And you signed it August of this year
`15 too, also?
`16 A. Correct.
`17 Q. So it was August sometime before the
`18 12th; correct?
`19 A. August, July. I don't recollect the
`20 exact timing.
`21 Q. Sometime in that time frame?
`22 A. Yes.
`23 Q. During the process of getting your
`24 declaration together, did you speak to anyone
`25 other than Emily?
`
`1 Hall
`2 A. There was another draft.
`3 Q. Was there any additional drafts other
`4 than the two drafts that we're talking about?
`5 A. I don't believe so.
`6 Q. Now, to get together the information
`7 that's in your declaration, did you talk to anyone
`8 at Merck?
`9 A. Yes.
`10 Q. Okay. Who did you talk to?
`11 A. One of my direct reports.
`12 Q. One of your direct reports? Who is
`13 that?
`14 A. Phil Rinnander.
`15 Q. Could you spell the last name?
`16 A. R-I-N-N-A-N-D-E-R.
`17 Q. And what's Phil Rinnander's job title?
`18 A. Director, financial planning.
`19 Q. Does he report to you as part of his
`20 job title -- as part of his job responsibilities?
`21 A. Yes.
`22 Q. Are you his direct supervisor?
`23 A. Yes.
`24 Q. Why did you speak with Phil Rinnander
`25 to get together the information that's in your
`
`Page 27
`
`Page 29
`
`1 Hall
`2 A. No.
`3 Q. Now, as far as getting the document
`4 together, I believe you said a draft was given to
`5 you. Did you receive a draft of your declaration
`6 from attorneys?
`7 A. Yes.
`8 Q. Emily specifically?
`9 A. I believe so.
`10 Q. Okay. Somebody, Emily, maybe another
`11 attorney, but that's your best understanding?
`12 A. Correct.
`13 Q. As far as getting it together -- again,
`14 I'm not asking you about the conversations that
`15 you actually had, but did you give her information
`16 so that she could put together the information in
`17 your declaration?
`18 A. Correct.
`19 Q. Now, as far as you receiving a draft,
`20 were there subsequent drafts of your declaration?
`21 A. Maybe one.
`22 Q. To the best of your recollection, there
`23 might have been another draft after the first
`24 draft, but you just don't specifically recall;
`25 correct?
`
`1 Hall
`2 declaration?
`3 A. I asked for him to help pull together
`4 information regarding sales.
`5 Q. And information regarding sales of
`6 Cubicin; correct?
`7 A. Correct.
`8 Q. And what he get you?
`9 A. Please repeat that.
`10 Q. Sorry. What did he get you? What
`11 information did he get you?
`12 A. He pulled net revenue information.
`13 Q. Net revenue information for Cubicin.
`14 Was it of a particular territory or what?
`15 A. For U.S.
`16 Q. And what years were those?
`17 A. Specifically 2006 to 2013.
`18 Q. And did he get you that information?
`19 A. Yes.
`20 Q. If you look at paragraph 4 of your
`21 declaration, you cite some numbers there -- do you
`22 see that? -- sales numbers?
`23 A. Yes.
`24 Q. And you have dates -- you have years of
`25 2013, 2012, and 2011. Do you see that?
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`8 (Pages 26 - 29)
`
`888-391-3376
`
`

`
`Page 30
`
`Page 32
`
`1 Hall
`2 A. Yes.
`3 Q. Any reason why you didn't include the
`4 previous years that you had sales information for?
`5 A. This was per the 10-K.
`6 Q. Do I understand correctly the 10-K that
`7 you cite inside your declaration, those are the
`8 years the 10-K had; correct?
`9 A. Correct.
`10 Q. Again, the question actually was a
`11 little different. Was there a reason why you
`12 didn't include the other years' information that
`13 you received from Phil Rinnander?
`14 MS. PIROZZOLO: Objection.
`15 A. No particular reason.
`16 Q. Okay. Other than Phil Rinnander, did
`17 you speak with anyone else at Merck to help you
`18 get together -- help give you information that you
`19 wanted to get for your declaration?
`20 A. No.
`21 Q. Just to close the loop, you didn't
`22 speak with anyone at Cubist to help you get
`23 information for your declaration; correct?
`24 A. Correct.
`25 Q. Let me ask you about some of the
`
`1 Hall
`2 In paragraph 4 on page 2, you cite the
`3 10-K from Cubist. Do you see that?
`4 A. Yes.
`5 Q. Okay. Before you got together your
`6 information for your declaration, were you aware
`7 of the information that was in the Cubist 2014
`8 10-K?
`9 A. No.
`10 Q. Did Phil Rinnander give you the Cubist
`11 2014 10-K?
`12 A. No.
`13 Q. Without revealing any privileged
`14 information, can you tell me where you got the
`15 10-K -- Cubist 2014 10-K?
`16 MS. PIROZZOLO: Objection.
`17 If you can answer.
`18 A. I can't.
`19 Q. All right. And then in paragraph 3 it
`20 discusses a Cubicin label. It kind of goes on to
`21 page 2. It straddles page 2. Do you see that?
`22 A. Yes.
`23 Q. Now, before you got together your
`24 information for your declaration, were you aware
`25 of what the Cubicin label said?
`
`Page 31
`
`Page 33
`
`1 Hall
`2 documents that you cite inside your declaration.
`3 So I'm looking at paragraph 2 of your declaration.
`4 Do you have it in front of you?
`5 A. Yes.
`6 Q. You have a reference, "arbeit," down at
`7 the bottom of that paragraph. Do you see that?
`8 A. Yes.
`9 Q. Before you started the process of
`10 getting your declaration together, were you aware
`11 of that reference?
`12 A. No.
`13 Q. And again, not revealing any kind of
`14 discussions you had with attorneys, how did you
`15 become aware of that reference?
`16 MS. PIROZZOLO: Objection.
`17 If you can answer that without
`18 revealing attorney-client privileged
`19 communications, go ahead. But I think it
`20 might call for privileged communications.
`21 MR. HSU: Okay.
`22 Q. No, I mean, if you can, you can; if you
`23 can't, just say you can't.
`24 A. I can't.
`25 Q. All right.
`
`1 Hall
`2 A. Yes.
`3 Q. You did. How did you know that?
`4 A. Just I'm aware -- because of working
`5 with marketing, I'm aware of the label that
`6 marketing and sales uses.
`7 Q. Is that for all the drugs at Merck that
`8 you handle?
`9 A. For many drugs, yes.
`10 Q. And Cubicin was one of those drugs?
`11 A. Yes.
`12 Q. Before

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket