throbber
September 2002
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/532r0
`
`High Throughput Study Group
`WG Report and Meeting Slides
`
`Jon Rosdahl
`jrosdahl@ieee.org
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 1
`
`Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear
`
`HUAWEI EXHIBIT 1004
`HUAWEI VS. SPH
`
`000001
`
`

`

`September 2002
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/532r0
`
`Report to the 802.11WG
`
`• HT-SG had its Inaugural Meeting where a
`starting point was begun.
`• HT-SG was able to answer the following
`Questions:
`– What: Scope
`– Why: Purpose
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 2
`
`Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear
`
`HUAWEI EXHIBIT 1004
`HUAWEI VS. SPH
`
`000002
`
`

`

`September 2002
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/532r0
`
`Report to the 802.11WG (cont)
`
`• Current Scope of the project:
`
`• To define standardized modifications to the
`802.11 MAC and PHY layers that achieve a
`minimum increase (xx) in throughput as
`measured at the MAC data SAP.
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 3
`
`Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear
`
`HUAWEI EXHIBIT 1004
`HUAWEI VS. SPH
`
`000003
`
`

`

`September 2002
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/532r0
`
`Report to the 802.11WG (cont)
`
`• Current Purpose of the Project:
`• To improve the 802.11 wireless LAN user
`experience by providing significantly higher
`throughput for current applications and to
`enable new applications and market
`segments.
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 4
`
`Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear
`
`HUAWEI EXHIBIT 1004
`HUAWEI VS. SPH
`
`000004
`
`

`

`September 2002
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/532r0
`
`Objectives for November 2002
`
`• Finalize the wording of the PAR.
`• Create the response to 5 Criteria.
`
`• Request that members of the SG come
`prepared to enjoy the creation of a PAR and
`the response to 5 Criteria (and the 6th one
`too)
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 5
`
`Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear
`
`HUAWEI EXHIBIT 1004
`HUAWEI VS. SPH
`
`000005
`
`

`

`September 2002
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/532r0
`
`HT-SG
`
`Welcome to
`High Throughput Study Group
`
`Wednesday
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 6
`
`Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear
`
`HUAWEI EXHIBIT 1004
`HUAWEI VS. SPH
`
`000006
`
`

`

`September 2002
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/532r0
`
`Meeting Tone
`
`• PLEASE Bring your Engineer
`Mentality and Technologist Attitude
`
`• Please keep a Positive Attitude
`
`• Please check your Ego and Politics at
`the door.
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 7
`
`Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear
`
`HUAWEI EXHIBIT 1004
`HUAWEI VS. SPH
`
`000007
`
`

`

`September 2002
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/532r0
`
`Inaugural Meeting Slides
`
`Inaugural Meeting held Wednesday
`Sept. 11, 2002 in Monterey, CA.
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 8
`
`Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear
`
`HUAWEI EXHIBIT 1004
`HUAWEI VS. SPH
`
`000008
`
`

`

`September 2002
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/532r0
`
`Confirmation of Secretary
`
`• Garth Hillman has volunteered to be the
`HT-SG Secretary.
`• Others? no
`
`• Affirmed by acclamation
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 9
`
`Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear
`
`HUAWEI EXHIBIT 1004
`HUAWEI VS. SPH
`
`000009
`
`

`

`September 2002
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/532r0
`
`3. Review IEEE/802 & 802.11 Policies and
`Rules
`
`• Study Group: Everyone Votes.
`• All 802 policies apply
`• All 802.11 policies apply
`• Submissions must meet document format
`criteria
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 10
`
`Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear
`
`HUAWEI EXHIBIT 1004
`HUAWEI VS. SPH
`
`000010
`
`

`

`September 2002
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/532r0
`
`Agenda Wednesday
`• 1 Meeting Call to Order
`• 2 Elect/Confirm Secretary
`• 3 REVIEW IEEE/802 & 802.11 POLICIES
`and RULES
`• 4 APPROVE/MODIFY AGENDA
`• 5 Set/Review Objectives
`• 6 Discuss/Revise PAR and 5 Criteria
`• 7 Recess for the Day
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 11
`
`Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear
`
`HUAWEI EXHIBIT 1004
`HUAWEI VS. SPH
`
`000011
`
`

`

`September 2002
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/532r0
`
`Agenda Thursday
`
`• 8. Discuss/Revise PAR and 5 Criteria
`• 9. Develop plan for future HT SG Work
`• 11. Adjourn for the session
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 12
`
`Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear
`
`HUAWEI EXHIBIT 1004
`HUAWEI VS. SPH
`
`000012
`
`

`

`September 2002
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/532r0
`
`Sept. 2002 Objectives
`
`• Generate PAR
`
`• Generate response to LMSC 802 Criteria
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 13
`
`Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear
`
`HUAWEI EXHIBIT 1004
`HUAWEI VS. SPH
`
`000013
`
`

`

`September 2002
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/532r0
`
`Review PAR
`
`• 4. Project Title
`• 8. Fill in Projected Completion Date for
`Submittal to RevCom: (July 2004?)
`• 9. Scope of Proposed Project
`• 10. Purpose of Proposed Project
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 14
`
`Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear
`
`HUAWEI EXHIBIT 1004
`HUAWEI VS. SPH
`
`000014
`
`

`

`September 2002
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/532r0
`
`Possible Proposed Title
`• Amendment to STANDARD [FOR]
`Information Technology-
`Telecommunications and information
`exchange between systems-Local and
`Metropolitan networks-Specific
`requirements-Part 11: Wireless LAN
`Medium Access Control (MAC) and
`Physical Layer (PHY)
`specifications:Enhancements for Higher
`Effective Throughput
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 15
`
`Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear
`
`HUAWEI EXHIBIT 1004
`HUAWEI VS. SPH
`
`000015
`
`

`

`September 2002
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/532r0
`
`Target Schedule for a SG
`
`• Sept. 2002 – 5 Criteria and PAR started
`
`• Nov 2002 – Request for creation of Task
`Group to be sent to ExCom with 5 Criteria
`and PAR
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 16
`
`Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear
`
`HUAWEI EXHIBIT 1004
`HUAWEI VS. SPH
`
`000016
`
`

`

`September 2002
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/532r0
`
`Target Schedule (cont.)
`
`• Jan 2003 – Technology solutions presented in
`earnest – Requirements doc complete.
`• Mar 2003 – Technology Solutions presented
`• May 2003 – Selection of Solution and start writing
`Draft
`• July 2003 – Complete initial draft and send out 1st
`WG Letter Ballot.
`• Sept. 2003 –process comments and send 2nd WG
`Letter Ballot
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 17
`
`Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear
`
`HUAWEI EXHIBIT 1004
`HUAWEI VS. SPH
`
`000017
`
`

`

`September 2002
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/532r0
`
`Target Schedule (cont.)
`
`• Nov 2003 – Comment resolution and start
`recirculation LB
`• Jan 2004 – final resolution of comments
`• Mar 2004 – Send to Sponsor Ballot
`• May 2004 – Resolve comments
`• July 2004 – Send to Revcom
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 18
`
`Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear
`
`HUAWEI EXHIBIT 1004
`HUAWEI VS. SPH
`
`000018
`
`

`

`September 2002
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/532r0
`
`Scope for consideration
`Solutions in achieving High
`Throughput
`shall be considered which provide
`enhancement to existing .11 MAC and
`PHY layers through standardized
`mechanism or interface.
`
`A view submitted to the Chair Sept.2002
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 19
`
`Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear
`
`HUAWEI EXHIBIT 1004
`HUAWEI VS. SPH
`
`000019
`
`

`

`September 2002
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/532r0
`
`A View on Criteria
`
`• Study group should emphasize high
`performance (throughput/rate) WLANs in
`general
`• SG should emphasize overall performance
`• Backwards compatibility is vital
`• SG should have broad scope and the
`authorization to recommend all necessary
`changes
`
`A view presented Mar 2002
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 20
`
`Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear
`
`HUAWEI EXHIBIT 1004
`HUAWEI VS. SPH
`
`000020
`
`

`

`September 2002
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/532r0
`
`802.11 Five Criteria
`
`1. Broad Market Potential
`2. Compatibility
`3. Distinct Identity
`4. Technical Feasibility
`5. Economic Feasibility
`6.
`Interference Considerations (tentative)
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 21
`
`Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear
`
`HUAWEI EXHIBIT 1004
`HUAWEI VS. SPH
`
`000021
`
`

`

`September 2002
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/532r0
`
`Straw Poll
`
`• Would you like to enhance the 11b
`throughput? 34-23-27
`• 11a? 96-0-4
`• 11g? 72-8-14
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 22
`
`Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear
`
`HUAWEI EXHIBIT 1004
`HUAWEI VS. SPH
`
`000022
`
`

`

`September 2002
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/532r0
`
`Another Proposed Scope
`Statement
`• To define standardized modifications to the
`.11MAC and OFDM PHY layers that
`achieve an increase in throughput measured
`at the MAC data SAP. 67-8-25
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 23
`
`Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear
`
`HUAWEI EXHIBIT 1004
`HUAWEI VS. SPH
`
`000023
`
`

`

`September 2002
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/532r0
`
`Straw Poll
`
`• Should we consider only existing
`.11standards as the baseline from which this
`group operates?
`• 6-62-10
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 24
`
`Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear
`
`HUAWEI EXHIBIT 1004
`HUAWEI VS. SPH
`
`000024
`
`

`

`September 2002
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/532r0
`
`Straw Poll
`
`• Quantify Minimum Increase at
`the MAC SAP Interface in the
`Scope or not?
`• 55-29-15
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 25
`
`Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear
`
`HUAWEI EXHIBIT 1004
`HUAWEI VS. SPH
`
`000025
`
`

`

`September 2002
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/532r0
`
`Update to the Scope Paragraph
`
`• To define standardized modifications to the
`.11MAC and OFDM PHY layers that
`achieve a minimum increase (xx) in
`throughput measured at the MAC data SAP
`• 55-29-15
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 26
`
`Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear
`
`HUAWEI EXHIBIT 1004
`HUAWEI VS. SPH
`
`000026
`
`

`

`September 2002
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/532r0
`
`Update to the Scope Paragraph
`
`• To define standardized modifications to the
`.11 MAC and PHY layers that achieve a
`minimum increase (xx) in throughput
`measured at the MAC data SAP
`• 66-25-6
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 27
`
`Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear
`
`HUAWEI EXHIBIT 1004
`HUAWEI VS. SPH
`
`000027
`
`

`

`September 2002
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/532r0
`
`Thursday Evening Meeting
`
`Slides for Thursday, Sept. 12, 2002 at
`Monterey, CA
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 28
`
`Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear
`
`HUAWEI EXHIBIT 1004
`HUAWEI VS. SPH
`
`000028
`
`

`

`September 2002
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/532r0
`
`Meeting Tone
`
`• PLEASE Bring your Engineer
`Mentality and Technologist Attitude
`
`• Please keep a Positive Attitude
`
`• Please check your Ego and Politics at
`the door.
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 29
`
`Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear
`
`HUAWEI EXHIBIT 1004
`HUAWEI VS. SPH
`
`000029
`
`

`

`September 2002
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/532r0
`
`Agenda Thursday
`
`• 8. Discuss/Revise PAR and 5 Criteria
`• 9. Develop plan for future HT SG Work
`• 11. Adjourn for the session
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 30
`
`Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear
`
`HUAWEI EXHIBIT 1004
`HUAWEI VS. SPH
`
`000030
`
`

`

`September 2002
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/532r0
`
`Current Scope Paragraph
`
`• To define standardized modifications to the
`.11 MAC and PHY layers that achieve a
`minimum increase (xx) in throughput
`measured at the MAC data SAP.
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 31
`
`Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear
`
`HUAWEI EXHIBIT 1004
`HUAWEI VS. SPH
`
`000031
`
`

`

`September 2002
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/532r0
`
`Questions to answer on PAR
`
`• 4. Project Title
`• 8. Fill in Projected Completion Date for
`Submittal to RevCom: (July 2004?)
`• 9. Scope of Proposed Project
`• 10. Purpose of Proposed Project
`• 16. Other Details
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 32
`
`Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear
`
`HUAWEI EXHIBIT 1004
`HUAWEI VS. SPH
`
`000032
`
`

`

`September 2002
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/532r0
`
`Criteria
`
`• The current rules have the following 5
`Criteria listed.
`• See http://ieee802.org/rules.pdf
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 33
`
`Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear
`
`HUAWEI EXHIBIT 1004
`HUAWEI VS. SPH
`
`000033
`
`

`

`September 2002
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/532r0
`
`Criteria
`6.1. Broad Market Potential
`A standards project authorized by IEEE 802
`shall have a broad market potential.
`Specifically, it shall have the potential for:
`a) Broad sets of applicability.
`b) Multiple vendors and numerous users.
`c) Balanced costs
`(LAN versus attached stations).
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 34
`
`Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear
`
`HUAWEI EXHIBIT 1004
`HUAWEI VS. SPH
`
`000034
`
`

`

`September 2002
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/532r0
`
`Criteria
`6.2 Compatibility
`IEEE 802 defines a family of standards. All
`standards shall be in conformance with the
`IEEE 802.1 Architecture, Management and
`Interworking documents as follows: 802.
`Overview and Architecture, 802.1D,
`802.1Q and parts of 802.1f. If any variances
`in conformance emerge, they shall be
`thoroughly disclosed and reviewed with
`802.
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 35
`
`Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear
`
`HUAWEI EXHIBIT 1004
`HUAWEI VS. SPH
`
`000035
`
`

`

`September 2002
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/532r0
`
`Criteria
`6.2 Compatibility (cont)
`Each standard in the IEEE 802 family of
`standards shall include a definition of
`managed objects which are compatible with
`systems management standards.
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 36
`
`Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear
`
`HUAWEI EXHIBIT 1004
`HUAWEI VS. SPH
`
`000036
`
`

`

`September 2002
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/532r0
`
`Criteria
`6.3 Distinct Identity
`• Each IEEE 802 standard shall have a distinct
`identity. To achieve this, each authorized project
`shall be:
`a) Substantially different from other IEEE 802
`standards.
`b) One unique solution per problem (not two
`solutions to a problem).
`c) Easy for the document reader to select the
`relevant specification.
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 37
`
`Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear
`
`HUAWEI EXHIBIT 1004
`HUAWEI VS. SPH
`
`000037
`
`

`

`September 2002
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/532r0
`
`Criteria
`6.4 Technical Feasibility
`• For a project to be authorized, it shall be
`able to show its technical feasibility. At a
`minimum, the proposed project shall show:
`a) Demonstrated system feasibility.
`b) Proven technology, reasonable testing.
`c) Confidence in reliability.
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 38
`
`Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear
`
`HUAWEI EXHIBIT 1004
`HUAWEI VS. SPH
`
`000038
`
`

`

`September 2002
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/532r0
`
`Criteria
`6.5 Economic Feasibility
`• For a project to be authorized, it shall be
`able to show economic feasibility (so far as
`can reasonably be estimated), for its
`intended applications. At a minimum, the
`proposed project shall show:
`a) Known cost factors, reliable data.
`b) Reasonable cost for performance.
`c) Consideration of installation costs.
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 39
`
`Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear
`
`HUAWEI EXHIBIT 1004
`HUAWEI VS. SPH
`
`000039
`
`

`

`September 2002
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/532r0
`
`10.Purpose of the Proposed
`Project
`• Ideas from the Group on WHY?
`– Looking for a Good Technology solution that
`has the right balance of Wow and Value.
`– Market Spaces:
`• Wireless LANs in the Home
`• Hot Spot Deployment
`• Corporate LAN Deployment
`– Higher Data Rate – Real Simple (>200 Mbps)
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 40
`
`Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear
`
`HUAWEI EXHIBIT 1004
`HUAWEI VS. SPH
`
`000040
`
`

`

`September 2002
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/532r0
`
`Purpose of the Proposed Project
`
`(Cont)
`
`• Remember to think Latterly
`– Both MAC and PHY – Improve End-to-End
`• Make Concert of Changes
`– Scalability -- Higher Data Rates
`• Provide Wireless Support for High Speed
`Application
`• Video – file service – etc.
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 41
`
`Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear
`
`HUAWEI EXHIBIT 1004
`HUAWEI VS. SPH
`
`000041
`
`

`

`September 2002
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/532r0
`
`Purpose of the Proposed Project
`
`(Cont)
`
`• High Speed delivery of advanced services to Hand
`Held Devices
`• Video, interactive pictures etc.
`• Increase the size of Market via Standardize
`leading Edge “WOW” solutions.
`• Improved Spectrum Efficiency
`• Extended Range
`• Provide a Value to the End User
`– User Experience
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 42
`
`Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear
`
`HUAWEI EXHIBIT 1004
`HUAWEI VS. SPH
`
`000042
`
`

`

`September 2002
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/532r0
`
`Purpose of the Proposed Project
`
`(Cont)
`
`• Keep in Perspective Range vs Rate and the trade
`offs.
`• Smooth Transition from one Technology to
`another
`• Provide to prevent the effective range from being
`reduced significantly.
`• Scalable Solution for Range, Rate, and Power
`Consumption trade-offs
`• Hit Moore’s Law
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 43
`
`Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear
`
`HUAWEI EXHIBIT 1004
`HUAWEI VS. SPH
`
`000043
`
`

`

`September 2002
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/532r0
`
`Area 16: Other Items
`
`• Bits/sec/Hz/user
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 44
`
`Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear
`
`HUAWEI EXHIBIT 1004
`HUAWEI VS. SPH
`
`000044
`
`

`

`September 2002
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/532r0
`
`Purpose (WHY)
`
`Initial Words to include
`
`• To make Wireless LANS better than they
`are right now.
`• Higher Throughput to improve the End-
`User experience.
`• Market Spaces including but not limited to:
`• Wireless LANs in the Home
`• Hot Spot Deployment
`• Corporate LAN Deployment (75-6-3)
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 45
`
`Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear
`
`HUAWEI EXHIBIT 1004
`HUAWEI VS. SPH
`
`000045
`
`

`

`September 2002
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/532r0
`
`Proposed purpose
`
`To improve the 802.11 wireless LAN user
`experience by providing significantly higher
`throughput for Applications including but
`not limited to those in the Home, Hot-spot
`and Enterprise Markets.
`(65-1-1) (original paragraph)
`(65-0-8) (add: including but not limited to)
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 46
`
`Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear
`
`HUAWEI EXHIBIT 1004
`HUAWEI VS. SPH
`
`000046
`
`

`

`September 2002
`
`doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/532r0
`
`Final Proposed Purpose.
`
`To improve the 802.11 wireless LAN user
`experience by providing significantly higher
`throughput for current applications and to
`enable new applications and market
`segments.
`39-26-3
`
`Submission
`
`Slide 47
`
`Jon Rosdahl, Micro Linear
`
`HUAWEI EXHIBIT 1004
`HUAWEI VS. SPH
`
`000047
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket