`Entered: September 15, 2015
`
`Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`HUAWEI DEVICE USA, INC. and ZTE (USA), INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`SPH AMERICA, LLC and ELECTRONICS AND
`TELECOMMUNICATIONS
`RESEARCH INSTITUTE,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Cases IPR2015-00203 (Patent 8,532,231 B2)
`IPR2015-00221 (Patent 8,565,346 B2)
`____________
`
`
`
`Before PATRICK E. BAKER, Trial Paralegal.
`ERRATUM
`
`The August 27, 2015, Decision on Request for Rehearing (Paper 15;
`hereinafter “Decision”) is revised to correct the following error.
`On page 5 of the Decision, the last sentence reads thusly:
`For all of the above reasons, Patent Owner’s Requests for
`Rehearing are denied.
`
`This sentence incorrectly refers to the Patent Owner instead of the Petitioner.
`
`
`
`IPR2015-00203 (Patent 8,532,231 B2)
`IPR2015-00221 (Patent 8,565,346 B2)
`
`
`Therefore, “For all of the above reasons, Patent Owner’s Requests for
`Rehearing are denied” appearing at page 5 of the Decision is withdrawn and
`replaced with the following new sentence:
`For all of the above reasons, Petitioner’s Requests for
`Rehearing are denied.
`
`All other portions of the Decision remain unchanged. Any confusion
`caused by the above-noted error is regrettable.
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2015-00203 (Patent 8,532,231 B2)
`IPR2015-00221 (Patent 8,565,346 B2)
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Paul Hunter
`Christopher C. Bolten
`Troy D. Smith
`FOLEY & LARDNER LLP
`phunter@foley.com
`cbolten@foley.com
`tdsmith@foley.com
`
`Steven A. Moore
`Richard W. Thill
`PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP
`steve.moore@pillsburylaw.com
`richard.thill@pillsburylaw.com
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`SPH
`Wayne Helge
`Donald Jackson
`DAVIDSON BERQUIST JACKSON & GOWDEY L.L.P.
`whelge@dbjg.com
`djackson@dbjg.com
`
`ETRI
`HUNTON & WILLIAMS LLP
`INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DEPARTMENT
`sloftis@hunton.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
