Case 3:13-cv-02323-CAB-KSC Document 43 Filed 08/18/14 Page 1 of 65
`
`JOSE L. PATIÑO, CA Bar No. 149568
`jpatino@foley.com
`NICOLA A. PISANO, CA Bar No. 151282
`npisano@foley.com
`CHRISTOPHER C. BOLTEN, CA Bar No. 268284
`cbolten@foley.com
`FOLEY & LARDNER LLP
`3579 VALLEY CENTRE DRIVE, SUITE 300
`SAN DIEGO, CA 92130-3302
`TELEPHONE: 858.847.6700
`FACSIMILE: 858.792.6773
`Attorneys for Defendants and Counter-
`Plaintiffs Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.,
`Futurewei Technologies, Inc. and Huawei
`Device USA, Inc.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SPH AMERICA, LLC,
`Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant,
`vs.
`HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES, CO.,
`LTD., FUTUREWEI
`TECHNOLOGIES, INC., HUAWEI
`DEVICE USA, INC.,
`Defendants and Counter-
`Plaintiffs.
`
`Case No. 3:13-cv-02323-CAB-NLS
`HUAWEI DEFENDANTS’ ANSWER,
`AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES, AND
`COUNTERCLAIMS TO PLAINTIFF SPH
`AMERICA’S SUPPLEMENTAL FIRST
`AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT
`INFRINGEMENT
`DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`
`Defendants Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., Futurewei Technologies, Inc., and
`Huawei Device USA, Inc. (collectively “Huawei”), by and through their undersigned
`attorneys, hereby answer the Supplemental First Amended Complaint for Patent
`Infringement and Jury Demand (the “Complaint”) filed by Plaintiff SPH America, LLC
`(“SPH”) as follows:
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`4828-1136-3612.2
`
`Case No. 3:13-cv-02323-CAB-NLS
`
`Exhibit 2006
`IPR2015-00221
`Page 1 of 2
`
`

`

`Case 3:13-cv-02323-CAB-KSC Document 43 Filed 08/18/14 Page 2 of 65
`
`I.
`
`PARTIES
`1.
`Huawei lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the
`truth of the allegations contained in Paragraph 1 of the Complaint, and on that basis,
`denies the allegations of this paragraph.
`2.
`Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. admits that it is a Chinese corporation with
`principal place of business in Shenzhen, China, and that it is an indirect subsidiary of
`Shenzhen Huawei Investment and Holding Co., Ltd. Futurewei Technologies, Inc.
`admits that it is a Delaware Corporation with its principal place of business at 5700
`Tennyson Parkway, Suite #500, Plano, Texas, 75024, and that it is an indirect subsidiary
`of Shenzhen Huawei Investment and Holding Co., Ltd. Huawei Device USA, Inc. admits
`that it is a Texas Corporation with principal place of business at 5700 Tennyson Parkway,
`Suite #600, Plano, Texas 75024, and that it is an indirect subsidiary of Shenzhen Huawei
`Investment and Holding Co., Ltd. Huawei denies the remaining allegations of Paragraph
`2 of the Complaint.
`II.
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`3.
`Huawei admits that SPH alleges in Paragraph 3 of the Complaint that this
`action arises under the patent laws of the United States, Title 35 of the United States
`Code. Because SPH alleges that this action arises under the patent laws of the United
`States, Title 35 of the United States Code, this Court has subject matter jurisdiction
`pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a).
`4.
`Huawei admits that this Court has specific and general personal jurisdiction
`over Huawei. Huawei denies the remaining allegations of Paragraph 4 of the Complaint.
`5.
`Huawei admits that venue is proper in the Southern District of California
`under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b), 1391(c), and 1400(b). Huawei denies the remaining
`allegations of Paragraph 5 of the Complaint, including the false allegation that Huawei
`sells infringing goods in this judicial district or elsewhere.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`-2-
`
`Case No. 3:13-cv-02323-CAB-KSC
`
`Exhibit 2006
`IPR2015-00221
`Page 2 of 2
`
`