`571-272-7822
`
`Paper 21
` Entered: May 15, 2015
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`LG ELECTRONICS, INC., TOSHIBA CORP., VIZIO, INC., and
`HULU, LLC,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`STRAIGHT PATH IP GROUP, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Cases
`IPR2015-00196 (Patent 6,131,121 C1)
`IPR2015-00198 (Patent 6,009,469 C1)
`IPR2015-00209 (Patent 6,108,704 C1)
`____________
`
`
`
`
`
`Before KALYAN K. DESHPANDE, TRENTON A. WARD, and
`BART A. GERSTENBLITH, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`
`DESHPANDE, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`SCHEDULING ORDER
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2015-00196 (Patent 6,131,121 C1)
`IPR2015-00198 (Patent 6,009,469 C1)
`IPR2015-00209 (Patent 6,108,704 C1)
`
`
`
`
`This Order sets a schedule for trial, including due dates for the parties
`
`to take action in this proceeding. See Appendix. The trial will be
`
`administered in a just, speedy and inexpensive manner such that pendency
`
`before the Board is no more than one year after institution. 37 C.F.R.
`
`§§ 42.1(b) and 42.100(c).
`
`A.
`
`INITIAL CONFERENCE
`
`
`
`The Appendix does not specify a date for an initial conference call.
`
`An initial conference call will be scheduled if either party requests it within
`
`21 days after entry of this Order. If an initial conference call is scheduled,
`
`the parties are directed to the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed.
`
`Reg. 48,756, 48,765–66 (Aug. 14, 2012) for guidance in preparing for the
`
`call, and should be prepared to discuss any proposed changes to the schedule
`
`and any motions the parties anticipate filing during the trial.
`
`B. MEET AND CONFER REQUIREMENT
`
`
`
`The parties are encouraged to engage in meaningful discussion before
`
`seeking authorization under 37 C.F.R. § 42.20(b) to file a motion for relief
`
`with the Board. At a minimum, before requesting authorization, the parties
`
`shall confer with each other in a good-faith effort to resolve the issue for
`
`which relief is to be sought. Only if the parties cannot resolve the issue on
`
`their own may a party request a conference call with the Board in order to
`
`seek authorization to move for relief.1 In any request for a conference call
`
`
`
`1 Patent Owner may file a motion to amend without prior authorization, but
`only after conferring with the Board. 37 C.F.R. § 42.121(a).
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2015-00196 (Patent 6,131,121 C1)
`IPR2015-00198 (Patent 6,009,469 C1)
`IPR2015-00209 (Patent 6,108,704 C1)
`
`
`with the Board, the requesting party shall: (1) certify that it has in good-
`
`faith conferred (or attempted to confer) with the other parties in an effort to
`
`resolve the issue; (2) identify with specificity the issue for which agreement
`
`has not been reached; (3) state the precise relief to be sought; and
`
`(4) propose specific dates and times at which both parties are available for
`
`the conference call.
`
`C. DUE DATES
`
`
`
`The Appendix specifies due dates for the parties to take action in this
`
`trial. The parties may stipulate to different dates for DUE DATES 1 through
`
`5 (earlier or later, but no later than DUE DATE 6). A notice of any
`
`stipulation, specifically identifying the changed due dates, must be filed
`
`promptly with the Board. The parties may not stipulate to an extension of
`
`DUE DATES 6 and 7.
`
`
`
`In stipulating to different times, the parties should consider the effect
`
`of the stipulation on times to object to evidence (37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(1)), to
`
`supplement evidence (37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(2)), to conduct cross-
`
`examination (37 C.F.R. § 42.53(d)(2)), and to draft papers depending on the
`
`evidence and cross-examination testimony.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1. DUE DATE 1
`
`The patent owner may file—
`
`a. A response to the petition (37 C.F.R. § 42.120), and
`
`b. A motion to amend the patent (37 C.F.R. § 42.121).
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2015-00196 (Patent 6,131,121 C1)
`IPR2015-00198 (Patent 6,009,469 C1)
`IPR2015-00209 (Patent 6,108,704 C1)
`
`
`
`
`The patent owner must file any such response or motion to amend by
`
`DUE DATE 1. If the patent owner elects not to file anything, the patent
`
`owner must arrange a conference call with the parties and the Board. The
`
`patent owner is cautioned that any arguments for patentability not raised and
`
`fully briefed in the response will be deemed waived.
`
`
`
`
`
`2. DUE DATE 2
`
`The petitioner must file any reply to the patent owner’s response and
`
`opposition to the motion to amend by DUE DATE 2.
`
`
`
`
`
`3. DUE DATE 3
`
`The patent owner must file any reply to the petitioner’s opposition to
`
`patent owner’s motion to amend by DUE DATE 3.
`
`
`
`
`
`4. DUE DATE 4
`
`a. Each party must file any motion for an observation on the cross-
`
`examination testimony of a reply witness (see section D) by DUE DATE 4.
`
`
`
`b. Each party must file any motion to exclude evidence (37 C.F.R
`
`§ 42.64(c)) and any request for oral argument (37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a)) by
`
`DUE DATE 4.
`
`
`
`
`
`5. DUE DATE 5
`
`a. Each party must file any response to an observation on cross-
`
`examination testimony by DUE DATE 5.
`
`
`
`b. Each party must file any opposition to a motion to exclude
`
`evidence by DUE DATE 5.
`
`4
`
`
`
`IPR2015-00196 (Patent 6,131,121 C1)
`IPR2015-00198 (Patent 6,009,469 C1)
`IPR2015-00209 (Patent 6,108,704 C1)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`6. DUE DATE 6
`
`Each party must file any reply for a motion to exclude evidence by
`
`DUE DATE 6.
`
`
`
`
`
`7. DUE DATE 7
`
`Oral argument (if requested by either party) is set for DUE DATE 7.
`
`D.
`
`CROSS-EXAMINATION
`
`
`
`
`
`Except as the parties might otherwise agree, for each due date—
`
`1. Cross-examination begins after any supplemental evidence is due.
`
`37 C.F.R. § 42.53(d)(2).
`
`
`
`2. Cross-examination ends no later than a week before the filing date
`
`for any paper in which the cross-examination testimony is expected to be
`
`used. Id.
`
`
`
`The parties are reminded that the Testimony Guidelines appended to
`
`the Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. at 48,772 (App. D), apply to this
`
`proceeding. Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.12, the Board may impose an
`
`appropriate sanction on any party who fails to adhere to the Testimony
`
`Guidelines, including reasonable expenses and attorney fees incurred by a
`
`party affected by another party’s misconduct.
`
`E. MOTION FOR OBSERVATION ON CROSS-EXAMINATION
`
`
`
`A motion for observation on cross-examination provides the parties
`
`with a mechanism to draw the Board’s attention to relevant cross-
`
`examination testimony of a reply witness, since no further substantive paper
`
`is permitted after the reply. See Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed.
`
`5
`
`
`
`IPR2015-00196 (Patent 6,131,121 C1)
`IPR2015-00198 (Patent 6,009,469 C1)
`IPR2015-00209 (Patent 6,108,704 C1)
`
`
`Reg. at 48,768 . The observation must be a concise statement of the
`
`relevance of precisely identified testimony to a precisely identified argument
`
`or portion of an exhibit. Each observation should not exceed a single, short
`
`paragraph. The opposing party may respond to the observation. Any
`
`response must be equally concise and specific.
`
`F. MOTION TO AMEND
`
`Notwithstanding the page limits set forth in 37 C.F.R. § 42.24, we
`
`hereby expand those limits for the following papers: a motion to amend, if
`
`filed in this proceeding, as well as the petitioner’s opposition to the motion
`
`to amend, each are limited to twenty-five (25) pages; the patent owner’s
`
`reply to the opposition to the motion to amend is limited to twelve (12)
`
`pages; and the claim listing may be contained in an appendix to the motion
`
`to amend, and does not count toward the page limit of the motion. See
`
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5(b).
`
`G.
`
`PETITIONER’S REPLY
`
`Notwithstanding the page limit set forth in 37 C.F.R. § 42.24(c), the
`
`petitioner’s reply to the patent owner’s response to the petition is limited to
`
`twenty-five (25) pages. See 37 C.F.R. § 42.5(b).
`
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`IPR2015-00196 (Patent 6,131,121 C1)
`IPR2015-00198 (Patent 6,009,469 C1)
`IPR2015-00209 (Patent 6,108,704 C1)
`
`
`APPENDIX
`
`
`
`INITIAL CONFERENCE CALL……….…..…..…..…..…......Upon Request
`
`DUE DATE 1………………………………………...…......August 17, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`Patent owner’s response to the petition
`
`Patent owner’s motion to amend the patent
`
`
`
`DUE DATE 2……………………………………………November 16, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s reply to patent owner’s response to the petition
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s opposition to motion to amend
`
`
`
`DUE DATE 3………………………………….......……..December 15, 2015
`
`
`
`Patent owner’s reply to petitioner’s opposition to motion to amend
`
`DUE DATE 4………………………………….….………….January 5, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Motion for observation regarding cross-examination of reply witness
`
`Motion to exclude evidence
`
`Request for oral argument
`
`DUE DATE 5………………………………….....……..…..January 19, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`Response to observation
`
`Opposition to motion to exclude
`
`
`
`DUE DATE 6…………………………………….………....January 26, 2016
`
`
`
`Reply to opposition to motion to exclude
`
`DUE DATE 7……………………………………….………February 9, 2016
`
`Oral argument (if requested)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`7
`
`
`
`IPR2015-00196 (Patent 6,131,121 C1)
`IPR2015-00198 (Patent 6,009,469 C1)
`IPR2015-00209 (Patent 6,108,704 C1)
`
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Darren Jiron
`darren.jiron@finnegan.com
`
`Rajeev Gupta
`Raj.Gupta@finnegan.com
`
`Kevin O’Brien
`Kevin.O'Brien@bakermckenzie.com
`
`Clint Conner
`clint@dorsey.com
`
`Stacy Chen
`schen@kvn.com
`
`
`
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`William Meunier
`WAMeunier@mintz.com
`
`
`Matthew Durrell
`MDurell@mintz.com
`
`
`
`
`
`8
`
`