throbber
UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`WASHINGTON DC
`
`
`
`Before the Honorable David P. Shaw
`Administrative Law Judge
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`Investigation No. 337-TA-892
`
`
`
`
`
`In the Matter of
`
`CERTAIN POINT-TO-POINT NETWORK
`COMMUNICATION DEVICES AND
`PRODUCTS CONTAINING SAME
`
`
`
`JOINT SUBMISSION OF DISPUTED CLAIM TERMS
`
`Pursuant to the Procedural Schedule established in Order No. 9 in this Investigation,
`
`Complainant Straight Path IP Group, Inc., Respondents, Panasonic Corporation; Panasonic
`
`Corporation of North America; Toshiba Corporation; Toshiba America, Inc., Toshiba America
`
`Information Systems, Inc., VIZIO, Inc., AmTRAN Technology Co., Ltd., AmTRAN Logistics,
`
`Inc., LG Electronics, Inc., LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., LG Electronics MobileComm U.S.A.,
`
`Inc., Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation Of America, Sony Electronics Inc., Sony Mobile
`
`Communications AB, Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc., Sony Computer Entertainment,
`
`Inc., Sony Computer Entertainment America LLC, Sharp Corporation and Sharp Electronics
`
`Corporation (“the Parties”) and Commission OUII Staff (“Staff”) hereby submits the following
`
`list of disputed claim terms to be construed and list of claim to be construed that are not disputed.
`
`See Exhibits A and B. The Parties and Staff reserve all rights to supplement, revise, correct
`
`and/or clarify this list at the time and in the manner allowed under the Commission Rules and the
`
`Ground Rules of the Administrative Law Judge. See Order No. 4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00209
`Straight Path - Ex. 2016 - Page 1
`
`

`
`January 7, 2014
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`Smith R. Brittingham IV
`Smith R. Brittingham IV
`Rajeev Gupta
`Michael E. Kudravetz
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW
`GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`901 New York Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20001-4413
`Telephone: (202) 408-4000
`Facsimile: (202) 408-4400
`Andrew C. Sonu
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW
`GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`Two Freedom Square
`11955 Freedom Drive
`Reston, VA 20190-5675
`Telephone: (571) 203-2700
`Facsimile: (202) 408-4400
`
`Counsel for Respondents LG
`Electronics, Inc., LG Electronics U.S.A.,
`Inc., and LG Electronics MobileComm
`U.S.A., Inc.
`
`
`
`
`Christopher P. Broderick
`Steven J. Routh
`Sten A. Jensen
`T. Vann Pearce, Jr.
`Diana M. Szego
`Jordan L. Coyle
`Christopher J. Higgins
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON &
`SUTCLIFFE, L.L.P.
`1152 15th Street, NW
`Washington, D.C. 20005
`Telephone: 202-339-8400
`Facsimile: 202-339-8500
`
`William H. Wright
`Christopher P. Broderick
`Andrew Y. Yen
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON &
`SUTCLIFFE, L.L.P.
`777 South Figueroa Street
`
`
`
`Michael T. Renaud
`Michael T. Renaud
`James M. Wodarski
`Michael J. McNamara
`Aarti Shah
`Michael C. Newman
`Sandra J. Badin
`Stephen P. Cole
`Robert J. L. Moore
`Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky
` and Popeo, P.C.
`One Financial Center
`Boston, MA 02110
`Phone: (617) 542-6000
`Fax: (617) 542-2241
`
`
`Counsel for Complainant
`Straight Path IP Group, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`Charles T. Steenburg
`James B. Altman
`Barbara A. Murphy
`Kandis C. Gibson
`FOSTER, MURPHY,
`ALTMAN & NICKEL, P.C.
`1899 L Street, NW, Suite 1150
`Washington, DC 20036
`Telephone: 202-822-4100
`Facsimile: 202-822-4199
`
`Michael N. Rader
`Allen S. Rugg
`Charles T. Steenburg
`D. Alexander Ewing
`Eric G.J. Kaviar
`WOLF GREENFIELD &
`SACKS, P.C.
`600 Atlantic Avenue
`Boston, MA 02210
`
`2
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00209
`Straight Path - Ex. 2016 - Page 2
`
`

`
`Los Angeles, CA 90017
`Telephone: 213-629-2020
`Facsimile: 213-612-2499
`
`Counsel for Respondents Panasonic
`Corporation and Panasonic
`Corporation of North America
`
`
`
`
`
`Paul T. Meiklejohn
`Paul T. Meiklejohn
`David Tseng
`Lukas Dudkowski
`Mudit Kakar
`William Perry
`Emily Lawson
`Jennifer Spaith
`DORSEY & WHITNEY L.L.P.
`701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 6100
`Seattle, WA 98104
`Telephone: 206-903-8800
`Facsimile: 206-903-8820
`
`Paul Ackerman
`Gary Abelev
`DORSEY & WHITNEY L.L.P.
`51 West 52nd Street
`New York, NY 10019-6119
`Telephone: 212-415-9200
`Facsimile: 212-953-7201
`
`Counsel for Respondents Toshiba
`Corporation, Toshiba America, Inc.,
`and Toshiba America Information
`Systems, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`Benjamin Hershkowitz
`Josh A. Krevitt
`Benjamin Hershkowitz
`R. Scott Roe
`Eric T. Syu
`Joshua E. Dubin
`
`Telephone: 617-646-8000
`Facsimile: 617-646-8646
`
`Counsel for Respondents Sony
`Corporation, Sony Corporation of
`America, Sony Electronics Inc., Sony
`Mobile Communications AB, Sony
`Mobile Communications (USA) Inc.,
`Sony Computer Entertainment, Inc.,
`and Sony Computer Entertainment
`America LLC
`
`
`
`
`Kevin J. Patariu
`John P. Schnurer
`Jack Ko
`Kevin J. Patariu
`PERKINS COIE L.L.P.
`11988 El Camino Real, Suite 200
`San Diego, CA 92130
`Telephone: 858-720-5700
`Facsimile: 858-720-5799
`James B. Coughlan
`PERKINS COIE L.L.P. 700
`Thirteenth Street, N.W., Suite 600
`Washington, DC 20005
`Telephone: 202-654-6200
`Facsimile: 202-654-6211
`
`Counsel for Respondents AmTRAN
`Technology Co., Ltd. and AmTRAN
`Logistics, Inc.
`
`
`
`Kevin M. O’Brien
`Kevin M. O’Brien
`Richard V. Wells
`Matt S. Dushek
`BAKER & MCKENZIE L.L.P.
`815 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00209
`Straight Path - Ex. 2016 - Page 3
`
`

`
`Won Joon Lee
`GIBSON DUNN &
`CRUTCHER L.L.P.
`200 Park Avenue
`New York, NY 10166
`Telephone: 212-351-4000
`Facsimile: 212-351-4035
`
`Sarah J. Sladic
`Jill M. McCormack
`GIBSON DUNN
`& CRUTCHER L.L.P.
`1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, DC 20036-5306
`Telephone: 202-955-8500
`Facsimile: 202-467-0539
`
`Counsel for Respondents Sharp
`Corporation and Sharp Electronics
`Corporation
`
`
`
`Washington, DC 20006
`Telephone: 202-452-7000
`Facsimile: 202-452-7074
`
`D. James Pak
`BAKER & MCKENZIE L.L.P.
`Two Embarcadero Center, 11th Floor
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Telephone: 415-592-3209
`Facsimile: 415-416-7033
`Edward K. Runyan
`BAKER & MCKENZIE L.L.P.
`300 E. Randolph St.
`Chicago, IL 60601
`Telephone: 312-861-8000
`Facsimile: 312-861-2829
`
`Counsel for Respondent Vizio, Inc.
`
`4
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00209
`Straight Path - Ex. 2016 - Page 4
`
`

`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00209
`Straight Path - Ex. 2016 - Page 5
`
`

`
`List of Disputed Claim Terms To Be Construed
`
`Straight Path’s
`Proposed Constructions
`Plain and ordinary meaning,
`except to the extent that
`“point-to-point” requires
`construction. See Straight
`Path’s proposed construction
`of “point-to-point.”
`“communications between
`two processes over a
`computer network that are
`not intermediated by the
`server process”
`
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning
`
`Staff’s Proposed
`Constructions
`Plain and ordinary meaning,
`except to the extent that
`“point-to-point” requires
`construction. See Staff’s
`proposed construction of
`“point-to-point.”
`“communications between
`two processes over a
`computer network that are
`not intermediated by the
`connection or address
`server”
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning
`
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning,
`except to the extent that
`“dynamically assigned”
`requires construction.
`See Straight Path’s proposed
`construction of “dynamically
`assigned.”
`“assigned for a limited
`period of time, or until
`explicitly relinquished”
`
`
`“network protocol address
`assigned to a host for a
`limited period of time (or
`until the host explicitly
`relinquishes the address)”
`
`“assigned to a host for a
`limited period of time (or
`until explicitly relinquished
`by the host).
`
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning
`
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning
`
`Respondents’
`Proposed Constructions
`“establish[ing] a
`communication between two
`user processes that is not
`intermediated by any server”
`
`
`
`Construe in context of phrases
`above. Alternatively,
`“between two user processes,
`not intermediated by any
`server.”
`
`
`“address assigned according
`to a network-layer protocol,
`such as an IP address”
`
`“network protocol address
`assigned to a host for a
`limited period of time (or
`until the host explicitly
`relinquishes the address)”
`
`Construe in context of phrases
`above. Alternatively,
`“assigned to a host for a
`limited period of time (or
`until explicitly relinquished
`by the host).”
`
`“an identifier that serves to
`distinguish the first process
`from all other processes
`registered with the server”
`
`
`
`Terms
`
`“establishing a point-to-
`point communication[s]”
`“establishing a point-to-
`point communication link”
`“establish a point-to-point
`communication link”
`“point to point”
`
`’469
`claims
`
`1
`
`
`
`’704
`claims
`
`’121
`claims
`13
`
`2, 3, 9
`
`1, 11, 22
`
`13
`
`
`
`
`
`1, 2, 3, 9
`
`1, 11, 22
`
`6
`
`
`
`
`“network protocol
`address”
`
`
`“dynamically assigned
`network protocol address”
`
`“dynamically assigned”
`
`
`“a unique identifier of the
`first process”
`
`
`1, 2, 3, 9
`
`
`1, 11, 22
`
`
`6, 13
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`6
`
`
`
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00209
`Straight Path - Ex. 2016 - Page 6
`
`

`
`List of Disputed Claim Terms To Be Construed
`
`Straight Path’s
`Proposed Constructions
`
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning
`
`Staff’s Proposed
`Constructions
`
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning
`
`
`
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning
`
`
`
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning,
`except to the extent that “on-
`line” requires construction.
`Straight Path proposes the
`following construction for
`“on-line”: “available for
`communication.”
`
`“on-line and available for
`
`registered with the server
`and not subsequently un-
`registered
`“whether the first
`callee/called process has
`registered with the server
`and not been subsequently
`un-registered”
`
`
`“on-line and available for
`
`Respondents’
`Proposed Constructions
`
`
`“process that places a call for
`real-time audio and/or video
`conversations”
`“process that receives a call
`for real-time audio and/or
`video conversations”
`
`
`
`“a device or computer system
`that is dedicated to providing
`specific facilities to other
`devices attached to the
`network, contrast with client”
`“a process performed by a
`server”
`“a server that stores and
`provides the network protocol
`address of a process that has
`been registered and not
`subsequently un-registered”
` “registered with the server
`and not subsequently un-
`registered”
`“whether the first
`callee/called process has
`registered with the server and
`not subsequently un-
`registered”
`
`
`
`
`“registered with the server
`
`2
`
`Terms
`
`
`“caller process”
`
`’469
`claims
`
`9
`
`’704
`claims
`
`11, 19, 22
`
`’121
`claims
`
`
`
`“callee process”
`
`9
`
`11, 22
`
`
`
`
`
`
`“server”
`
`
`
`
`1, 3, 9
`
`
`
`
`1, 11, 22
`
`“server process”
`
`“address server”
`
`“connected to the
`computer network”
`
`“on-line status of the first
`callee process”
`“on-line status of the first
`called process”
`
`
`“accessible”
`
`1, 3, 9
`
`
`
`3
`
`9
`
`
`
`
`9
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`22
`
`11
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`6, 13
`
`6
`
`6, 13
`
`6, 13
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00209
`Straight Path - Ex. 2016 - Page 7
`
`

`
`List of Disputed Claim Terms To Be Construed
`
`Terms
`
`’469
`claims
`
`’704
`claims
`
`’121
`claims
`
`
`1
`
`
`13
`
`
`“a query as to whether the
`second process is
`connected to the computer
`network”
`
`“query the address server
`as to whether the second
`process is connected to the
`computer network”
`
`“querying the server
`process as to the on-line
`status of the first callee
`process”
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`9
`
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`
`
`“querying the server as to
`the on-line status of the
`first called process”
`
`
`
`11
`
`Respondents’
`Proposed Constructions
`and not subsequently un-
`registered or otherwise
`unavailable for connection”
`
`LG, Panasonic, Sharp,
`Sony, Toshiba, and Vizio:
`“a message requesting a
`response whether the
`specifically-identified second
`process is connected to the
`computer network”
`
`AmTRAN: Plain meaning
`LG, Panasonic, Sharp,
`Sony, Toshiba, and Vizio:
`“send a message to the
`address server requesting a
`response whether the
`specifically-identified second
`process is connected to the
`computer network”
`
`AmTRAN: Plain meaning
`LG, Panasonic, Sharp,
`Sony, Toshiba, and Vizio:
`“sending a message to the
`server process requesting a
`response as to the on-line
`status of the specifically-
`identified first callee process”
`
`AmTRAN: Plain meaning
`LG, Panasonic, Sharp,
`Sony, Toshiba, and Vizio:
`“sending a message to the
`
`3
`
`Straight Path’s
`Proposed Constructions
`communication with the first
`process”
`
`Staff’s Proposed
`Constructions
`communication”
`
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning
`
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning.
`See Staff’s construction of
`“on-line.”
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning,
`except to the extent that “on-
`line” requires construction.
`Straight Path proposes the
`following construction for
`“on-line”: “available for
`communication”
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning,
`except to the extent that “on-
`line” requires construction.
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning.
`See Staff’s construction of
`“on-line.”
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00209
`Straight Path - Ex. 2016 - Page 8
`
`

`
`List of Disputed Claim Terms To Be Construed
`
`Terms
`
`’469
`claims
`
`’704
`claims
`
`’121
`claims
`
`“querying the server
`process to determine if the
`first callee process is
`accessible”
`
`9
`
`
`
`“querying the server as to
`the on-line status of the
`first callee process”
`
`
`
`22
`
`
`“program code, responsive
`to”
`“program code responsive
`to”
`“in response to”
`
`“computer readable code
`means”
`
`
`1, 2
`
`1
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`1, 22
`
`
`
`11
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`13
`
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`Staff’s Proposed
`Constructions
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning.
`See Staff’s construction of
`“accessible.”
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning.
`See Staff’s construction of
`“on-line.”
`
`Straight Path’s
`Proposed Constructions
`Straight Path proposes the
`following construction for
`“on-line”: “available for
`communication”
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning,
`except to the extent that
`“accessible” requires
`construction. See Straight
`Path’s proposed construction
`of “accessible.”
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning,
`except to the extent that “on-
`line” requires construction.
`Straight Path proposes the
`following construction for
`“on-line”: “available for
`communication”
`
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning
`
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning
`
`Respondents’
`Proposed Constructions
`server process requesting a
`response as to the on-line
`status of the specifically-
`identified first called
`process”
`
`
`AmTRAN: Plain meaning
`LG, Panasonic, Sharp,
`Sony, Toshiba, and Vizio:
`“sending a message to the
`server process seeking a
`response whether the
`specifically-identified first
`callee process is accessible”
`
`AmTRAN: Plain meaning
`LG, Panasonic, Sharp,
`Sony, Toshiba, and Vizio:
`“sending a message to the
`server seeking a response as
`to the on-line status of the
`specifically-identified first
`callee process”
`
`AmTRAN: Plain meaning
`
`“program code, whose
`execution is caused by”
`
`“caused by”
`
`Subject to 35 U.S.C. §
`112(f):
` Function: “program
`
`4
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00209
`Straight Path - Ex. 2016 - Page 9
`
`

`
`List of Disputed Claim Terms To Be Construed
`
`Straight Path’s
`Proposed Constructions
`
`Staff’s Proposed
`Constructions
`
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning
`
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning
`
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning
`
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning
`
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning
`
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning
`
`Respondents’
`Proposed Constructions
`code” limitations
`following this term in
`each claim.
` Structure: none
`disclosed
`
`
`“channel of communication
`for connecting to a callee
`process”
`
`“a user dragging and dropping
`the user interface element
`representing the first callee
`process on the user interface
`element representing the first
`communication line, or vice
`versa”
`
`“creating a new user interface
`[element] on the device”
`
`
`
`Terms
`
`’469
`claims
`
`’704
`claims
`
`’121
`claims
`
`
`9, 10
`
`
`9
`
`
`11, 12, 22,
`23
`
`
`11, 22
`
`
`“communication line”
`
`
`“a user associating the
`element representing the
`first callee process with the
`element representing the
`first communication line”
`
`
`“generating a user-
`interface”
`“generating a user
`interface”
`“generating a user-
`interface element”
`“generating a user
`interface element”
`
`
`
`
`1, 9, 10
`
`9
`
`9, 10
`
`9
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00209
`Straight Path - Ex. 2016 - Page 10
`
`

`
`
`
`EXHIBIT B
`
`
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00209
`Straight Path - Ex. 2016 - Page 11
`
`

`
`
`
`Terms
`
`“process”
`
`
`
`List of Claim Terms To Be Construed (Not Disputed)
`
`’469
`claims
`1, 2, 3, 9
`
`’704
`claims
`1, 11, 19,
`22
`
`’121
`claims
`6, 13
`
`Respondents’
`Proposed Constructions
`“running instance of a
`computer program or
`application”
`
`Straight Path’s
`Proposed Constructions
`“running instance of a
`computer program or
`application”
`
`Staff’s Proposed
`Constructions
`“running instance of a
`computer program or
`application”
`
`
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00209
`Straight Path - Ex. 2016 - Page 12
`
`

`
`United States International Trade Commission
`Investigation No. 337-TA-892
`Certain Point-To-Point Network Communications Devices and Products Containing Same
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I, Megan A. De Renzis, hereby certify that on January 7, 2014, true and correct copies of the
`forgoing documents were served on the parties listed below:
`
` Via EDIS
` Via Fed Ex (2 Copies)
`
` Via Hand Delivery (2 copies)
` Via Federal Express (2 copies)
` Via Electronic Mail
`Patricia.Chow@usitc.gov
` Via First Class Mail
` Via Federal Express
` Via Electronic Mail
`James.Wiley@usitc.gov
` Via First Class Mail
` Via Federal Express
` Via Electronic Mail
`AmTran-ITC-Service@perkinscoie.com
`AmTRAN-892@alston.com
`
`The Honorable Lisa Barton
`Acting Secretary to the Commission
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`500 E Street SW
`Washington, DC 20436
`Administrative Law Judge David P. Shaw
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`500 E Street, S.W.
`Washington, DC 20436
`
`James Wiley, Esq.
`Office of Unfair Import Investigations
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`500 E Street SW, Suite 401
`Washington, D.C. 20436
`Counsel for Respondents AmTran Logistics, Inc.
`and AmTran Technology Co., Ltd.:
`
`John P. Schnurer
`Jack Ko
`Kevin J. Patariu
`Perkins Coie LLP
`11988 El Camino Real, Suite 200
`San Diego, California 92130
`Telephone: (858) 720-5700
`Facsimile: (858) 720-5799
`
`James B. Coughlan
`Perkins Coie LLP
`700 Thirteenth Street, NW, Suite 600
`Washington, DC 20005
`Telephone: (202) 654-6200
`Facsimile: (202) 654-6211
`
`Counsel for Respondents LG Electronics Inc., LG
`Electronics U.S.A., Inc. and LG Electronics
`MobileComm U.S.A, Inc.:
`
`Smith R. Brittingham IV
`Rajeev Gupta
`
` Via First Class Mail
` Via Federal Express
` Via Electronic Mail
`892ITC-LG@finnegan.com
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00209
`Straight Path - Ex. 2016 - Page 13
`
`

`
`United States International Trade Commission
`Investigation No. 337-TA-892
`Certain Point-To-Point Network Communications Devices and Products Containing Same
`
`Michael E. Kudravetz
`Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow,
`Garrett & Dunner L.L.P.
`901 New York Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, DC 20001-4413
`Telephone: (202) 408-4000
`Fax: (202) 408-4400
`
`Andrew C. Sonu
`Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow,
`Garrett & Dunner L.L.P.
`Two Freedom Square
`11955 Freedom Drive
`Reston, VA 20190-5675
`Telephone: (571) 203-2700
`Fax: (202) 408-4400
`Respondents Panasonic Corporation and
`Panasonic Corporation of North America:
`
`Steven J. Routh
`Sten A. Jensen
`William H. Wright
`Diana M. Szego
`T. Vann Pearce, Jr.
`Christopher J. Higgins
`Jordan L. Coyle
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE, LLP
`1152 15th Street, NW
`Washington, D.C. 20005
`Telephone: 202-339-8400
`Facsimile: 202-339-8500
`
`William H. Wright
`Christopher P. Broderick
`Andrew Y. Yen
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE, LLP
`777 South Figueroa Street
`Suite 3200
`Los Angeles, CA 90017
`Telephone: 213-629-2020
`Facsimile: 213-612-2499
`
`Counsel for Respondents Sharp Corporation and
`Sharp Electronics Corporation:
`
`Josh A. Krevitt
`
`2
`
` Via First Class Mail
` Via Federal Express
` Via Electronic Mail
`892-Panasonic@orrick.com
`
` Via First Class Mail
` Via Federal Express
` Via Electronic Mail
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00209
`Straight Path - Ex. 2016 - Page 14
`
`

`
`United States International Trade Commission
`Investigation No. 337-TA-892
`Certain Point-To-Point Network Communications Devices and Products Containing Same
`
`Sharp892-ServiceList@gibsondunn.com
`
` Via First Class Mail
` Via Federal Express
` Via Electronic Mail
`Sony-SP-ITC@WolfGreenfield.com
`fm-sony-892@fostermurphy.com
`
`Benjamin Hershkowitz
`R. Scott Roe
`Eric T. Syu
`Joshua E. Dubin
`Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP
`200 Park Avenue
`New York, NY 10166
`Telephone: 212.351.4000
`Facsimile: 212.351.4035
`
`Sarah J. Sladic
`Jill M. McCormack
`Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP
`1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, DC 20036-5306
`Telephone: 202.955.8500
`Facsimile: 202.467.0539
`Counsel for Respondents Sony Computer
`Entertainment, Inc., Sony Computer
`Entertainment America Inc., Sony Computer
`Entertainment America LLC, Sony Corporation,
`Sony Corporation of America, Sony Electronics
`Inc., Sony Mobile Communications AB, Sony
`Mobile Communications (USA) Inc. and Sony
`Ericsson Mobile Communications (USA) Inc.
`
`James B. Altman
`F. David Foster
`Barbara A. Murphy
`David F. Nickel
`Susan Koegel
`Kandis C. GibsonFoster, Murphy,
`Altman & Nickel, PC
`1899 L Street, NW, Suite 1150
`Washington, DC 20036
`202-822-4100
`
`Michael N. Rader
`Allen S. Rugg
`Charles Steenburg
`D. Alexander Ewing
`Eric G. J. Kaviar
`Turhan F. Sarwar
`Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
`600 Atlantic Avenue
`Boston, MA 02210-2206
`
`3
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00209
`Straight Path - Ex. 2016 - Page 15
`
`

`
`United States International Trade Commission
`Investigation No. 337-TA-892
`Certain Point-To-Point Network Communications Devices and Products Containing Same
`
` Via First Class Mail
` Via Federal Express
` Via Electronic Mail
`Tosh-SP-ITC@dorsey.com
`
` Via First Class Mail
` Via Federal Express
` Via Electronic Mail
`Vizio-SPIPG@bakermckenzie.com
`
`Counsel for Respondents Toshiba Corporation,
`Toshiba America Inc. and Toshiba America
`Information Systems, Inc.:
`
`Paul T. Meiklejohn
`David Tseng
`Lukas Dudkowski
`Mudit Kakar
`William Perry
`Emily Lawson
`DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP
`701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 6100
`Seattle, WA 98104
`Telephone: 206-903-8800
`Facsimile: 206-903-8820
`
`Respondents VIZIO, Inc.:
`
`Kevin M. O'Brien
`Richard V. Wells
`MattS. Dushek
`Baker & McKenzie LLP
`815 Connecticut Ave., N.W.
`Washington, DC 20006
`Tel: 202 452 7000
`Fax: 202 452 7074
`
`Edward K. Runyan
`Baker & McKenzie LLP
`300 E. Randolph St.
`Chicago, lllinois 60601
`Ph. 312 861-8000
`Fax. 312 861 2829
`
`D. James Pak
`Baker & McKenzie LLP
`Two Embarcadero Center, 11th Floor
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Tel: 415 592 3209
`Fax: 202 416 7033
`
`4
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00209
`Straight Path - Ex. 2016 - Page 16
`
`

`
`United States International Trade Commission
`Investigation No. 337-TA-892
`Certain Point-To-Point Network Communications Devices and Products Containing Same
`
`Megan A. De Renzis
`Legal Specialist
`Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris,
`Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
`One Financial Center
`Boston, MA 02111
`Direct: (617) 348-4893
`Fax: (617) 542-2241
`
`5
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00209
`Straight Path - Ex. 2016 - Page 17

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket