throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`
`Paper 48
`Entered: January 14, 2016
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`
`LG ELECTRONICS, INC., TOSHIBA CORP., VIZIO, INC.,
`HULU, LLC, CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., AVAYA, INC., VERIZON
`SERVICES CORP., and VERIZON BUSNESS NETWORK SERVICES
`INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`STRAIGHT PATH IP GROUP, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`_______________
`
`Case IPR2015-001961 (Patent 6,131,121)
` Case IPR2015-001982 (Patent 6,009,469)
` Case IPR2015-002093 (Patent 6,108,704)
`_______________
`
`Before KALYAN K. DESHPANDE, TRENTON A. WARD, and
`BART A. GERSTENBLITH, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`DESHPANDE, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Trial Hearing
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`
`
`
`1 IPR2015-01397 and IPR2015-01407 have been joined with this
`proceeding.
`2 IPR2015-01400 has been joined with this proceeding.
`3 IPR2015-01398 and IPR2015-01406 have been joined with this
`proceeding.
`
`

`
`IPR2015-00196 (Patent 6,131,121)
`IPR2015-00198 (Patent 6,009,469)
`IPR2015-00209 (Patent 6,108,704)
`
`
`In the Scheduling Order dated May 15, 2015 (Paper 214), oral
`
`argument was scheduled to be held on February 9, 2015, if requested by the
`
`parties. Petitioner has requested oral argument. Paper 47. The request is
`
`granted.
`
`Each party will have a total of 60 minutes of oral argument time for
`
`IPR2015-00196, IPR2015-00198, and IPR2015-00209, the 60 minutes to be
`
`divided among the three cases as desired. The oral argument will commence
`
`at 1:00 PM Eastern Time, on Tuesday, February 9, 2016. The Board will
`
`provide a court reporter for the oral argument and the reporter’s transcript
`
`will constitute the official record of the oral argument. The hearing
`
`transcript will be entered in the record of this proceeding.
`
`Petitioner bears the ultimate burden of proof that Patent Owner’s
`
`patent claims at issue are unpatentable. Therefore, at oral argument,
`
`Petitioner will proceed first to present its case with respect to the challenged
`
`patent claims and grounds with respect to which the Board instituted trial.
`
`Petitioner may reserve some of its argument time for use in further
`
`presentation after Patent Owner has responded to Petitioner’s initial
`
`presentation.
`
`Patent Owner will respond to Petitioner’s initial presentation, having
`
`available to it the entirety of its allotted argument time. Thereafter,
`
`Petitioner may make use of the time it has reserved, to rebut Patent Owner’s
`
`presentation.
`
`
`4 All citations are to IPR2015-00196 unless otherwise noted. Petitioner has
`filed similar papers in IPR2015-00198 and IPR2015-00209, and, therefore,
`we only provide citations to IPR2015-00196 unless otherwise noted.
`
` 2
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`IPR2015-00196 (Patent 6,131,121)
`IPR2015-00198 (Patent 6,009,469)
`IPR2015-00209 (Patent 6,108,704)
`
`
`The oral argument will be open to the public for in-person attendance,
`
`on the ninth floor of Madison Building East, 600 Dulany Street, Alexandria,
`
`Virginia 22314. In-person attendance will be accommodated on a first-
`
`come, first-served basis.
`
`Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b), demonstrative exhibits must be served
`
`five business days prior to the hearing. The parties also shall provide a
`
`courtesy copy of any demonstrative exhibits to the Board at least five
`
`business days prior to the hearing by emailing them to Trials@uspto.gov.
`
`The parties shall not file any demonstrative exhibits in these proceedings
`
`without prior authorization from the Board. The parties must initiate a
`
`conference call with the Board by two business days prior to the hearing to
`
`resolve any dispute over the propriety of each party’s demonstrative
`
`exhibits. Any dispute over the propriety of demonstrative exhibits that is not
`
`timely presented two business days prior to the hearing will be considered
`
`waived.
`
`The parties are reminded that the presenter must identify clearly and
`
`specifically each demonstrative exhibit (e.g., by slide or screen number)
`
`referenced during the hearing to ensure the clarity and accuracy of the
`
`reporter’s transcript. If the parties have questions as to whether
`
`demonstrative exhibits would be sufficiently visible and available to all of
`
`the judges, the parties are invited to contact the Board at 571-272-9797. The
`
`Board expects lead counsel for each party to be present at the hearing,
`
`although backup counsel may make the actual presentation, in whole or in
`
`part. Requests for audio-visual equipment are to be made at least 5 days in
`
`advance of the hearing date by emailing the request to Trials@uspto.gov. If
`
` 3
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`IPR2015-00196 (Patent 6,131,121)
`IPR2015-00198 (Patent 6,009,469)
`IPR2015-00209 (Patent 6,108,704)
`
`the request is not received timely, the equipment may not be available on the
`
` 4
`
`
`
`day of the hearing.
`
`
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Darren Jiron
`darren.jiron@finnegan.com
`
`Rajeev Gupta
`Raj.Gupta@finnegan.com
`
`Clint Conner
`conner.clint@dorsey.com
`
`Kevin O’Brien
`Kevin.O'Brien@bakermckenzie.com
`
`Leo Lam
`llam@kvn.com
`
`
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`William Meunier
`Michael Newman
`StraightPathIPRs@mintz.com

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket