`
`
`
`
`31MB
`
`3255
`
`
`
`
`
`THE JOURNAL
`OF THE KOREAN INSTITUTE
`OF COMMUNICATION SCIENCES
`
`VOL. 20 N072
`DECEMBER. 1995
`
`
`C O N T E N T 8
`
`
`
`
`REGULAR PAPERS
`
`Performance Analysis of ATM Switching Fabric with Hybrid Shared and Dedicated Output Buffers ----------------Youn Chan Jung. Chong Kwnn Un
`
`Development of Expert System for Automation of Steam Generator Tube Inspection in Nuclear Power Plants
`---------------------------------Bmdae Choi. Soon Ju Kang. Seong‘Su Choi. IleeCon Woo
`A study on the improvement of Cell Level Traffic Monitoring Control Algorithm in an A’Dvl Network
`3267
`----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Myung Chul Choi. Jae Jo Lee. Won 'I‘ae Lee. Kwan Ho Kim. Young Chul Lee
`3277
`IP Address Reuse Through Transparent Port-Address Translator --------------------------------------------------------Il Hwan Kim, Heon Young Yeom
`3288
`Design of TMN-DCN for Integrated Network ManagementYoung M. Kim. Young H. Cho. Myeong K. Song. Wang C. Song. Dong C, Kim. Chang E. Kong
`
`
`3300
`Class Library Implementation for Concurrency of CH----------------------------Joon Lee. Sung Keun Kim. Chae Woo Yoo. Hoe Bong Song
`33l 0
`A Distributed Error Control Scheme for Multicasting Data
`MyongiLyol Song, JurrHo Lee. Jai~Yong Lee. Sang-Bae Lee
`
`Protocols and Signalling Traffic Analysis of Wireless Personal Communication Networks for High Speed Communications
`
`~~Chung Ho Cho. I-Iyeong Seol: Lim
`“Dong Yong Kwak. Hong Shik Park
`A Connection Admission Control Algorithm Using CDV Measurement ------------------------------------------
`Design Si Implementation of an Image Retrieval System Supporting Browsing and Full-Text Search ------TaeAJin Park. Young-Ken Ko. Yoon—Chul Choy
`A Study on the Receiver Performance Degradation due to the Intermodulation Spurious and the Design of the 3rd order Intercept Point
` NamsSco Kim
`The Design of the Circular Polarized Antenna using the Quarterwave Plate --------Seung Hyeub Oh. Kyoung Il Mm. Young Lee Choi. Sang Chnl Han
`‘A Wideband Channel Simulation Algorithm for the Suzuki Fading Channel with the Spatial Correlation
`
`................................................................................................Jin Weon Chang. Yang Soc Park. Ku Yong Ha. Hyung Myung Kim
`A Study on the Information Leakage Criterion and the Design of S-boxes
`W'Ju Ho Lee. Hyung Myung Kim
`
`Analysis of the Relative intensity Noise at the Output of a Dispersive Fiber ~
`------------------------------BooCyoun Kim
`A Bimry Error Control Line Code with the Property of Minimum Bandwidth 4-
`------ deong Goo Kim. See In Lee, Chang Ki Jeong. Eon Kyeong Joo
`A Study on Broadband Design and Fabrication of Power Dividing Circuits for CATV System.
`'Dong ll Kim. Tae Gyun Kim. Do Hoon Ha. Se—Mo Chung
`Fast Rayleigh Fading Compensation for Mary QAM using PSAM --------------------------------------------------------Tae Byeong Chae. Sung 11 Bang
`
`Conversion of the range data into the CAD format --------------------------------------------------------------------------Hack Joon Shim. Sang Uk Lee
`A Non-iterative Fractal Image Coding Technique Using Novel Codeboolcs ------------------------Chang Su Kim. Hoon Faek. Sang Uk Lee
`
`Implementation of C/A code correlator and development of position information extraction algorithm in GPS System
`""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""ll‘Jin Lee. Jong‘Yong Park. Joon-Tae Kim. HeungCyoon RYU
`A Design and Fabrication of the GaAs FEI‘ Active Single Microstrip Patch Antenna with Injection locking technique -
`---- Du Han 113e, Ui Seek Hung
`
`An adaptive image sequence coding scheme employing the entropy constrained lattice vector quantizer
`~Jong Seek Lee. Sang Uk Lee
`New Approaches to Robust Corner Point Detection Using Constrained Regidarimtion and Mean Field Annefling techniques
`-----------Kwanghoon Soho
`AN UNBIASED IIR LMS ALGORITHM ..............................................................................................................Seung Hyon Nam
`An Application of Zero Crossings in Nonparametric Detection of Signals
`-------------------------------------------------------------------------Jinsoo Bae, Hong Gil Kim. Min Sou Lee. Youngkwon Ryu, Taejoo Chang. lickho Song
`An Effective Test Case Generation Method with Fault Detection Capability----------------------------------------------Gwang-hyun Kim. Dong‘ho Lee
`A Study on the Improvement of the Learning Speed of EP Algorithm using Fuzzy Logic and the Control of Nonlinear Dynamic System
`....................................................................................................Hyeon-Seob Cho. Sang-Dong Na. Chul~Soo Bai. Seong—thm Jung
`
`Performance Degradation Analysis of a DS’CDMA Mobile Station using the Non‘linear Power Amplifier
`................................................................................................thong—[10hr Nam Kim. Nam-300 Kim. Jacseok Kim '
`Generation Method of Control Flow Graph Accounting Conditional Context Variable in Protocol Conformance Testing
`............................................................................................
`Byeong I-lo Oh. Sung Hoe Woo. Sang Ho Lee
`-----------Su-ll Boo. Cheoi-Sung Kim
`On the performance analysis and the capacity of a broadband CDMA system in forward link
`
`A-Kwang-Hyeon Park. Won‘Sup Chung
`implementation of Modulation and Demodulation Circuits of Chaos Frequency Shift Keying -
`-------------------Jae~Bong Lira. Jun-Seek Park. Chuleong Kim
`Design of Narrow—band Waveguide Bandpass Filters for the MDR System -
`Receiver Performance Improvement by Signal Oversampling in Intensity Modulation/Direct Detection Digital Fiber Optic Communication Systems
`..............................................................................................................................Soo-Jeong Eon. Yoan Shin. BooGyoun Kim
`
`
`Ultra'high Speed Photodetector using aCei H Thin Film Photoconductor for Picosecond Optical Signal at 0.8km Wavelength """""""""" Kyoo N31“ Chm
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3320
`3334
`3344
`
`3357
`33 77
`
`3375
`339 l
`3406
`3413
`3423
`3480
`3440
`3457
`
`3471
`3486
`3495
`3509
`3519
`
`3532
`3540
`
`
`
`Google Ex. 1403, pg. 1
`
`Google Ex. 1403, pg. 1
`
`

`

`
`
`Hi
`
`
`
`
`
`$2096? $1202?
`
`199
`
`5
`
`
`$7;
`
`ng Eon Kang 295
`
`4.mfifiifi.‘
`. (fly?!
`
`
`
`>r19,4::amr-‘m
`
`
`
`3243
`3255
`3267
`3277
`3288
`3300
`3310
`3320
`3334
`3344
`3357
`3367
`3375
`3391
`3406
`3413
`3423
`3430
`3440
`3457
`3471
`3486
`3495
`3509
`3519
`3532
`3540
`3552
`3562
`3570
`3580
`3590
`3600
`3612
`3627
`
`longiSeo] Son 297
`
`Kuhn II Lee
`
`ng 8an Kim
`
`
`
`
`
`A. LfiT’E%
`,4
`$33"
`\_, 00L.
`71ii-01
`a.”
`
`€33
`7'
`
`Mat.
`,CH
`2% 2?
`7 éififg
`
`9—;
`’73 $
`a Yeong Yim
`
`,WW}
`ig Hwan Cho ,
`5|.
`5H]
`
`.5mm;
`Lg SupKwak ,
`'
`‘
`i Hi
`
`. $4072."
`0%
`0%?
`4-117
`
`. WEE
`210374134. L}; H4 )3; ...................................
`3%“)!
`
`[VonDonLee
`‘le‘i Ami.
`7 ft. 354494 £527] 54104::
`144a? *IC’FAIOifl Gama};
`A
`-
`- ~
`$0115}!
`KwonHahm .
`743er 74:04} EH7} 1321.7 3, (HQ A3744 ......................................................
`
`
`
`........
`fEE‘ilq
`
`
`
`
`
`1445:4440
`11440445 33.23449 % 90447494 gnu/GEL 2Lgoil 4451314
`g-Shianak
`..........................
`o
`ififlfi
`
`
` x 343501051 ;rig-Bong Suk ' 4.: 04,3 751%0101‘iiri .......................... ng Jae Moon
`
`'
`.
`fifififéé‘i
`-
`c
`CA’I‘V‘AL 01.3—91qu Jamie; @741 =. xillaioi 93L
`
`
`
`. 75018
`MM“
`SAW 01% mi QALiaI fastRayleighmi1%
`
`
`
`
`t’é‘k. 357567
`7-7;]
` [440154 04 iii‘j $154319} BifiL ............................................................
`
`Myung Kim
`’
`V
`E! E)
`751%»
`7&9;3:“‘i 0195! ”J” ”4530]“ail“ t “
`
`
`GPs AiwiscA awn/L $8337 $12!?
`
`,7
`.7 .
`‘
`_
`7
`_
`42
`Hoon Myung 3
`‘0
`
`
`IHJECMOH 1%le 7i%‘% 01%”;L Ga A5 PEP %% Er": “PIE—£5593 3117‘! “081497 ’3’” ‘3! 103} """""""""""""""" 341% *‘
`lig‘i’iYOVSiim 3
`
`
`‘ai Yuri Kim 3 4
`07:quAim Lattice unE4 cot/11,7];é} 04%? 11,334 5:40:44} ¥§§1 74a: ................................................ 33455444
`
`
`
`'
`Constrained Regniaiizationi‘r Mean Field Annealing $2493:
`"
`
` a}a‘oi/x7}m“A: “R LViSoFifi—4% ....................................
`
`”$329.3 ”11$ 734071111 °3F:}91
`kyung Moon 3181'
`
`Sang Uk Lee
`
`3
`
`3am Uk Lee 3
`
`
`
`
` ....................... 1'23: $11705:
`
`,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
`4
`,,
`-
`V_
`,
`'eongGi Lee 391
`-
`L
` Lo} 1i1011§4ggl 133—5...................................................
`iSenk Hang 399
`1 Lilli?“
`
`
`
`You Ze Cho 3207
`. fit???
`MDRx10% 5.13103 EijLai EM 1534 04347494L744 .....................................
`
`
`mg Sik Choi
`3219
`,4 iiif}
`
`
`253131 i/yflfl..14 547424 ELEAqficqu Alisa] qj‘iig'ia]
`‘
`"
`Youngix’im 32%
`
`
`T5373] 11‘Ln1L N163; 04%51-0 0' 8m ”4% 34::it} %L)‘A‘|§_g_ i1...
`4 .....................
`
`Google Ex. 1403, pg. 2
`
`Google Ex. 1403, pg. 2
`
`

`

`
`
`
`_,
`vi
`r gag-:mzam‘g:
`Elf
`"Mfiffi‘i
`figk
`a?
`u1,
`JJ
`
`WEE
`' 4Uj‘t:
`Iflfiififi
`vi:
`7‘1
`i-alw‘fUIEIGWW‘é‘I High? "
`
`fiE‘FE-J‘EM
`1% @1 $4
`
`
`
`( ( ( (
`
`<$i§§§j REE 181$.)
`
`lfi
`
`- fifififi’g)
`3% (fifi‘ 3% (MU
`[E
`3.n
`ffififii)
`,f—i (QE 5%
`
`Google Ex. 1403, pg. 3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`fififikfifififikfiifiAm
`
`Mfi$§fl§§fi¥flfifi
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`"‘17: 1 M1 WEE-l Blfiffififif
`gE
`fig?“
`
`‘m‘fifii I WM
`
`mzxmmmmmmB
`
`
`
`‘ 1I-
`
`§@%aa
`
`u
`an
`
`Wfifi‘ifif
`
`n}o]3_
`
`S
`
`WEE)?
`
`n
`{w
`
`fifimm
`
`3%
`
`Google Ex. 1403, pg. 3
`
`
`

`

` $2045? $123)?»
`
`fiflfifigfi
`19955::— 12F!
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`»»»»
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`355351335 3243
`(910199991 9: 99m
`
`9—9991 999999 9991 91499 99999919 ATM 9.9991 9991 9%
`,
`9423 €7l
`931371 72M #3992: $19} X91147} 91193 7H“; ------------------------------
`9
`. ggfi. $29999 3255
`'-
`
`ATM‘Q‘HHEI Cell'i’fi E34393 73413103 Qflfl'? 71W?“ 33?} ‘3'? """""""""""'
`9
`'
`, --
`a
`9 $393.55? $1M? 3267
`_
`
`$337.5} Era-$5: ‘31931-71-3 gig 1? 51:99 319,214;...............................................................fiM‘. Efi‘fi'fié 3277
`
`91229 TMN—DCN 97:1 -----------------------79°99.
`'
`,
`:99 99 9
`2 9999. 29:929. 79-290; 3288
`CH9] 9:899 — 91219 9999: 9901999991 9-91 --------------------------------------9
`. 992999, 9999999, $99199 3300
`
`99949959 91019999 9199 999191 59992901 7w; ------------------------------------------229999, 9:99:92 999991. 2999999 3310
`3;: {5:4ng— gfi} $151 PCN 351;}; 5,1 2:133; gap; 33.1519.
`................................................£3533$ ”911% 3320
`
`9.999: 9901 2.99909 2199 299 999 9101 93992.9 -------------------------------------------------------------------99939. 999999 3334
`9.9999199 91999—3 299199»:- 019311 799 919.99% 929 9: 99; -----------------------------------------999299. 9999999. 99999:; 3344
`
`«99999»
`{310193391 7335 @4212] %§} ..............................................................................:4:
`z
`‘
`$337111“ 3,140
`73a]
`
`m -
`. 99999 3457
`9999 am:— 09999 9999— 91901 9999::— 299 «7999 99:99 7199 --------------------------
`
`
`09599.9 2929 Lattice 999 9929719 91999 99929 9939 999:9 7199 ---------------------------------
`992999 3495
`
`33 Mean Field Anneaiing ‘Q‘figz °1%’"€} A11332-3: 3‘3 79371 “MN? 3137?} “El""""""
`3?:7‘tfii 3509
`$33333???) 3532
`Constrained Regularimtion
`3:9! 919.4? 993909199 99mm! 9%»----------------------------------------------929m, @9999, 9999925, 9.9mm,
`9* 91999 2—99 4:91 2910991 9999 99%
`9.99999 99.91919 9929: 929999 3552
`
`
`9 1w? 2?]0‘ £575: ”‘3’9 719:; ...............................................................58W??? $12339, 35mg 3570
`“91 %33i3a\>
`63%:
`up 01557} $145 HR LMS 0333/15.;...........................................................................................WIT/”31%: 3519
`(919-9 9: $31193)
`CDMA 0193-99 39917199 9392919 ¢~¥Crilo3b°il 91191 M999 29999 913199999921 92909 999190399 ----------------------397,99; 3357
`.............................
`.fifilfifi‘.
`{121133393 339?
`
`7319—5 7&0“ 91% .2931} S—boxfll
`€741
`PSAMS: 01%?! ME QAMBI fast Rayleigh SIMCJ £1}; .........
`-%¥fit¥_ ")ifii El 3430
`GPS 91599391 C/A 55%?371 $3119 992199999: €393»?
`7999:
`29999999301 94 , 999.9192! 999 --------------------
`(99199 9-: 99—29)
`999 9999719 «9919 9195992991199" 979 ---------------------------------------------------------- “9999. 199299 99:99: 4999999 3367
`Injection 100m
`: 01999 GaAs FET 99% 99°! “inlaicéfl 9991 9991992; 9229 9—: 29% ------------------$99-99, 999999 3486
`= W 999999. 9:99: 3600
`
`
`(33*;
`fife 9999999. :99sz 9:99:99 3375
`3‘73
`
`014-11: 799971, $0173 3413
`M
`
`99999. {91999 3562
`"”5
`.333
`(339%)
`$95.52;] {mag}; 33.; 19,9] iqggowg] 935997;; 3939011 13?} 31W .........................................................fig”) 3406
`
`CATV‘g' ”ii—Emfilf’nal Sgfllofi,
`311211 g3 313330“ 5&{5} gira- .........................................fifi_' $91999), WW].
`5113195}! 3423
`7JE‘Ei/Z37d7é3} T3353. “NE-”L! *1 9290991 ”#1193 331313301] 93?} $1373 33% 80113“? 3.33} 93? """"""135333351. 939%? fifizf‘] 3612
`i31.1.}. $3J¢z¥ ................................................... “ESE 3627
`4-9999: 9999 G99— «9 929 0 9m 91-29 99991 999399 .2
`37-29739: 94.21% 79.» 3,3749! 43333133 333% “3‘33 ....................................................................£31335 gfifi 3540
`“01 ”SHE- 199465 fig‘i’réflngflgi X33303? 913304 935191—21
`
`
`
`Google Ex. 1403, pg. 4
`
`
`
`Google Ex. 1403, pg. 4
`
`

`

`3%? 95-12'12-4
`
`$45”: Era—$3: signal 15-1 1P 3&9] 2H*l%
`
`1’95 éifiifi‘
`
`figéy
`
`IP Address Reuse Through Transparent Port—Address Translator
`
`ll Hwan Kim*, Heon Young Yeom** Regular Members
`
`3
`
`#1
`
`eT-rt—g‘zh‘i‘ was: ensue em a
`QlEiLil EB:— er° 2r: inn—tie 1122i
`not 0131 an. zienizi suitors ens steal—sot Elltll so see as Texas! 7&2] Zi%t3$}°ll are rrv
`we: ers- All/WP] use 52::ng its as air/mat 21ers} urea] a ,
`s
`s
`e seam—e ziei era‘s 11AM one more Ur°l7l. neat 2104
`new si es Eieé’e urea»:— Aixiaiz. : an E! wear «3- teen are use statute as. ¢d=91
`1l% error are lP—‘r-fiefil nits-soil not. owe 4 ate- eaten meat rJlSH flew.
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`The address space of IP. a standard lntcmet Protocol. is being exhausted by explosively increasing number of demands and the
`inefficient address allocation scheme based on the network class partitions. Among the short term solutions that have been sug-
`gested so far. IP address reuse through automatic translation between local and global addresses is considered as an appropriate
`solution prior to a new protocol is adapted.
`in this paper. we suggest a port-address translator which improves the one-to—one translation of local-global address translator
`by enabling several
`local nodes to share a globally unique address, and discuss various problems and their solutions we have
`encountered in designing turd implementing the translator: Also, the problems and the effectiveness of address reuse by automatiA
`oaddress—address or ponAaddress translator is investigated.
`
`“finish—n newline Hitl§7il mi
`mm : 95139—0407
`fifi’afi‘fi: 1995s: 4H 73
`
`3277
`
`Google Ex. 1403, pg. 5
`
`Google Ex. 1403, pg. 5
`
`

`

`36
`22.121211122111112 '95-12 Vol.20 No.12
`
`1.7H 9.
`
`52" SURE [P #5:
`‘flfl‘ilf’ll/flfil 71% E E-Hl’t‘i
`o12
`T370114. 4 111101.12 720191 P 55¢? 211111151
`ED111172} 313-1? (Inter-Domain routing191 ”1%:
`U11T “11:1: 11311191 211010“
`“121- 21.111491
`011% °1§1£
`E “21111
`511511131 ‘EJE1ETE93101111 53111514113174 1?
`
`H11511 k:7311’12’191 IPT“i 121%
`5:5- 2112121" 13171011
`"11% 11% 1: 61210111221113 2’42 32/21
`, 11115182“010121 122151 551211 31121.
`71101 35.24011, 7217172111 6122122111 1P2 DH]?
`1122 221112121 717221 21811212 21211112 2121111
`91 3221.
`4114-31111
`311721 42112011 K13 $243111 4:312:12
`e1 2712
`22 222 2122101012 22
`21 212 212221210011 21717112121121.2121 21221
`123113101 415301 €31
`3121112879.: 71% 11131131011
`111
`91% 51‘ fil‘é 122717191 (17131 111175111101 211711211 31111.
`$122111 2 22°11 *1 1P #5: Ei‘fl 3134101 E1111}
`1
`11 71?:‘31 T5: Z11*1%%
`13711 5112211122 27116121 x11
`3 72°11”? £21131 REE—3‘ 1??) Ti 437191 111111431
`cr11 E11811??? 0171*1111’153 SEE-T:— ”12171:“: 111
`11111112? Ti”? +2801 212251310111 114 @01111’51
`711
`“2‘ +18%91 E11531 1 811721111011
`E11811 44.932111.
`“111913?— 7‘11 5 @011“. 0171/11 ENE “#1191 E1%‘JF1
`23721% 3‘11 ”112???
`
`11.
`
`IP 222221 211117.221 271751 21127212
`
`1P 22»:- 4u1o122 21201 122 01221 27112 11
`2 212 22712122 2 21.22121 01222212
`031912 7332101 31E}.
`
`% ~11 1> 0H r; r10
`
`N111 212 2212 222121 212121
`).
`1121 A/B/C 2112 21 222
`71221. 112 :12 1211101 22 21222 22
`212 22 2121.
`2, 2 710121 11191 22 2 9122121 27101 211212
`22 2 71212121 27121 111211 11212122 22.
`
`011 1111 E01,
`3278
`
`'11 C 3E1): 11‘51‘11 L1191 2557113155:
`
`11*
`
`1507114 Tit/1 A1%511’1 J {r 5071191Tfit”}°1 91T
`“J §1+1% 2.211 3121.612 735% 015111 319011 31510111
`1‘31.
`01
`7~1‘31‘i101l‘121 711101 251“; IP Ti? 50711011 2
`211511 430111. 91¥91 17.118112 “£01 311: 10071191 3153‘.
`
`2".—9W] 1 1191111 11101*1'21 $22171 41201 712-81211
`.011111
`255711 ? 1507117? “£4713. ‘38- 100011711
`5’1 5552;: 51-3 2P11110111 A1%%-1’:?1’113’111111-E“’11 27%
`36M] L01151511“:
`21101
`'21‘4.
`011112 3311*‘31—1 ‘21T51 1:21:11 %%§l{121§1“¢
`E15013-
`11) $5371 ”H191 2111 ficflfii
`(1;:g, )1:
`511:1.
`
`2 Ti: KHA1%01| E11°1 121
`2101M
`712111 767 A12 TOP/1P z1°'—1'117°2 1122:1011
`1191111011
`211211 71121222 226M 212 2—11—21. 2
`(31
`322 2121611:
`"0121101 111112 15121121.
`[RM941 0111:
`‘31 212101111
`215111—11. H191 2101 EH1
`z121111 11101111
`911191 1.1201 213121. 1122122 1‘12
`21711 22210101 612. 22 271 11212122 21:12 21
`2 2141812 21:1.
`01 211011212 1112 TCP/IP 111 11
`21121 71222 212 221122 1121 IP 2271 21
`E12 1.1217122122121221 2:1 212122101 2122»
`A1812 9111,
`
`1711
`A Class 10.0.0.0 7' 10.255.255.255,
`B Class 17216.00
`172.111.255.255,
`16111
`C Class 192.16800 7192168255255. 255711
`
`E [FLYV931 o1*151‘1
`
`151 2212 591102121
`
`3151-1?
`
`(ClDR Classless Inter-Domain Routing)% ”$1.151.
`111°?“ EEH’HJ.
`‘1} E§l°11°1§1 "Fit-3W1” ‘61“12‘}
`v12 2 2122 21111271212
`
`3. Proxv $151
`“3%“!
`3119113 *1’EUJ91 %%*l
`502101 E12131
`(firewall)% 514113101 21”?”15191 113% 3731102
`F1 #511312“: oT71 3151-, D117115 Packet Filtering
`Gateway§ %‘511
`111-?- 1113191 %<‘l% 511137311231.
`011% 3117191 1.151111“ @1173? “5‘31 01%‘3171‘151.
`01141 *1
`"'1‘11 L11191 *1%Z1§°‘131 911' Mali-E51 C’JEWJ
`1111122 112222 6122. 11122221 212221 22
`
`Google Ex. 1403, pg. 6
`
`Google Ex. 1403, pg. 6
`
`

`

`fiX/%‘§Q Eli-$31“. QQfl-E'
`
`i—Q 1? 515.4191 KIM-EL
`
`37
`
`1111a»;— 111E111; 11% 2121;111:1121 1111—21 711211115 7;
`c1110; 1:19.121 110L101 111:1.
`
`Imemul Network“~._
`
`Outer Network
`
`Internal Clients
`,A
`‘2
`“mum.“ w
`lclne'1\uucrnnl1
`/fi\llp(exlcmal]
`/‘\
`‘3 \
`G
`1
`\
`/
`1
`rfl“
`“ ’ w
`\‘ Proxy /
`/
` Sener ~'~**\\
`lelncl"nlcrna|1
`{1mm 1111.1111
`1.31 “emu...”
`
`huh-111w 1 ll'
`
`3% “I. Proxy *1”1% %—Q 91%“ 11%
`
`fig.E Proxy A131% Q3101 911‘
`Q‘l’v‘c—A 0131 Q 1‘ 9.191.111Q01
`3151331 111% 31: 311‘? Frroxy A1H1°11 Q‘Ell'r}i% Q
`1313..
`“7‘01 913%} JéT-Ol QRQ 73124.21 Proxy *1
`“1% 71511531 51L “11% O(1‘11 1% 17114.,
`
`3&73101731’o Q1513} *1 E7113 7~1’1‘l°1 *1%51x: 11‘4“ng
`75131217121° Q°1°1 6131 Proxy *1‘511: L11??? Hug-11
`2:511$1Q 71132—2— 93161101 Q1311 E. Proxy *1B11EL11
`QQ‘QH 91-‘Qi 11% “131 a??? 3131. 715E131 ”11%
`1191 Q%Q% 01/181711 QC}.
`
`4. m 11111
`11171131 UNIX wwwm %% 2:11.121 111.1;
`
`21 11301 51% 12111 o1ao1z1u1 01 ~11:— 5% j
`11 $11101 $61211:- 151221 111101 1211121111.
`£111.01 111401 111151:— M19; @221 1111171 1311/
`2112111231111 11114011111 111511 211—11 mama 111%
`6113 1111101 05—111. 11 21:1.
`[KK92]°11*1E, Q 119111 1110111 21-121 3123 X135:—
`01 711161 1:521 a 711: 21111211 731 11711
`£911.91
`11
`11% %11 9111110321 11% 11111: ML 11115
`é31111 am 91121 1211121_. 12 we: E1 91
`:1
`11‘? £111 11111111111 Rconnect()% W
`
`3173 7Q§°l Q71”??? 1'11"} i5%t°:
`Q‘QQQ"? 6‘1"‘1
`01‘1751711 Q‘Q‘Q—E‘ 91?- 4:31;: QQH‘Q 91311-91 “xi—$51711
`Q51“. ii ”"113 Z1 A’fl Client°11711 314191 1? £5
`131.1%?! Q3“ ‘1‘”1
`°1% Q1311 31141 1111‘ 1115 2191
`E]
`(1%?W1 I51.
`°1
`517}! ”51% °1%31‘E UDP/TCP% 913-313. z]
`9‘1‘1111' Q91“J*1°191 it1131?}1171 71153151“.
`53711 A1‘51
`“J‘QQ A1‘8-110119'111‘5 535?} {173% z114313111 Client
`gill-Q91 ¢7§°1 Q7131Q°1 UNIX'E‘QQ171171 °1Q
`73-?— 751‘3‘°1 °lQE1E QQ°1 3151'.
`
`Dal-1“" ”1.1371(Network Address Translator)
`:1‘1 Q91 1? “191' Q°1 ?%Q 3151’:% *1-8~61‘€-
`fig!
`“3011*1E.
`€341} Q‘QQ £511 941% Q Q‘Eluégifl
`’11
`
`$1311
`£01 QQ‘E—QQ 1351:0391 Qi% $142-$171
`X11148 $14 “11‘21%%Q ““4 01% 019% Q°11%
`% 114%?! 1
`fi‘dtQ 76191742; “‘QQ Qfit
`(Globally unique): “1Q. 31E Q11% £31751°§11
`QQQ.”
`Bellcorefl P, Francis¥§ DNS(Domain Name
`
`SYstom)91 QQQ Q3114 Q‘EQ QQQ ”c1 #55 QQ
`71% Q1511
`IP-T— ”£4 KPH-11 “1 %i1l¢Qr1 31-?5115?
`QQQ-‘E ‘Q‘fl‘fll Q1311 {—Q “1' 2151'1TE9311EF94].
`"’2‘
`Q8 -’r“i§% 71111:— x1‘3"<1%°1 $3 QQ71°11 91311 Q
`‘ElQQ QQQE 7111373191
`“:1
`:1“2§€- 1% 201W 311%
`“191' QQ.
`53‘5— %i% *1%31x‘3 7193‘331 73.91qu 737110111:
`‘£ 71131
`11191 #i% “1191311111 7171.11 9111‘:— #5934517]
`(NATi Network Address Translatorfil 3,151.
`01
`QiQQflx“: 114101 331431“:- ch—‘1Q L1191 5:571 911*-
`9—1 141% $1311 QEl/figi fi—‘QQ €551};- Qfii Q V11
`“1E1 Q91 -‘?-i% %31°i Q‘Qfill
`71:51. Q‘Q QQQ
`#511: :1 1:591 9—1“ 1151-341 51% %3Q “MRI 4%-
`
`E131 Q$°l 1111511: %-°1 ‘f’iflQfl‘r‘E‘ 11%7‘1°i :1
`c51 3153:9111? TiQ—l ”“Q'” iV3751?“ 851°?”
`1°: 91-?”1111191
`73211% QQQE EQ- £11214 TCP/IP
`31151 QEQ Q’QQ 3L Q91 $5191 1191 $521191 “11%
`E“NE-‘2; Q§31°1 311E1% $QQ-‘ii5‘1 °1%°1Qt1.
`
`114/319 E‘filQQ 31—11%:° 7‘5“- QQQI 91311 Q’QQQ. 31T1Q°11 111% Ethernet interface-155.41..
`
`5&3an ii}.
`
`Google Ex. 1403, pg. 7
`
`Google Ex. 1403, pg. 7
`
`

`

`38
`flifififlfil‘dfi '95-12 Vol.20 No. 12
`
`
`172.16.0.0
`
`Border between normal
`network and stub network
`\
`
`172. 16.0.0
`
`
`
`
`N t
`Addreessw'Ic'llrnslator
`
`0
`
`Global Network
`
`
`/
`
`Inner network using
`6
`
`’g
`
`Network
`Address Translator 1r
`
`Reused addresses
`
`1% 2, #17} %¥r%i Lflifl $55
`
`Global Network
`,,,-«-»———-~'~—~.\
`\
`
`l
`
`,,—/"
`
`/
`
`7
`
`/
`
`l
`
`x
`J/
`"/1/
`
`
`I72. I 6.00
`Address POOI
`(Reused Address) ///
`
`(
`13435771) ,
`
`\X
`l34.35.77.50
`z’l \\\
`/
`3
`‘
`r
`
`3) P3435775
`,’
`’
`
`2) Search
`“
`
`
`
`,_
`______
`\.\
`4) CONNECT
`from 13435775 WW‘\
`
`CD ’
`’
`l72.l(1l().l
`
`
`3%] 3. $‘E7fl €55: QEM—V-Wl SEW-i9) fié)
`
`3280
`
`Google Ex. 1403, pg. 8
`
`Google Ex. 1403, pg. 8
`
`

`

`39
`Fit/5‘5?!- iE-EF‘d“. 6371‘ *0 IP $5.9! IMPE-
`
`1% 30M 1%: HM €01 ékflWlE DNS ‘34 E
`anew} al%El/7l°léfil°lsl 211.1%} we mac}.
`C11
`1%% $311 as/iaszpm Sex—l il@% en 511}.
`EWEPJ we fish“: 1:5 I7}31121% 94%; 4132'.
`mm} is}?! 12:31:}th 0! Whg #1211 94%" 45¢
`E:— WM en} 1% awe #éMHIE 712% 2|
`T94 Lil-r191 we W10] %—3+§ “1111M #firwfle
`:5 194 21914522} am we aa¢¢ael "39%
`63%}; cl $§8 1111745; ewe. E. 94¥°M 0] X1
`GI";
`L11 3:5 @942! Knew 31:2 7.5% “M
`DNS71 Mil-é #mww 9231 esteem 1% 1H
`811 flgfihig Ewing; '11:}. new $9121 w}?
`nai‘aim 01%0111711 at}. 0W, 191°“ 9W9} 2.1%
`0] 7}er new :59] $1154: $4~¥ae7l°fl
`51B]
`0111118 defies! diatom.
`01 we aha—:4 ae— we 7m: 91¢}.
`
`c
`
`DNS§ 51—8-3171 (‘QE —8—%v?: 3—8-5111 QED}.
`UDP-‘E-PJ connectionless §¢1011E 11%5171 01
`EW.
`771* x1193%} 141011111 filé 525719134]- ‘dég $5?-
`flgl¢i71 3-?“ é-r 31C}.
`31171 41°11 lP 3F¢§ iflil'r‘: %%°11 1311?} “5591
`13171 Efisi'QJF‘TP, ICMP'E')
`
`°1 “o“flé’: 11%“:1 Lll—flr 5:54] 1311?} ‘5‘??? $73 31°]
`“Ml 737141 ?r*“1¥}71% ’SfliHE’fi 543?} #Jimt.
`—- 7110151711 {it}. E. DNSQBI ail-.3: $311 WTE
`fl 37$ (inbound request) 3‘le5 flag-”F 9151
`01 EE% 41°11 915191 Bari} “(5)411 RFC 3315122
`CH1 @KEWUEFEM],
`
`Ill. $3331 £5.31:—ifiiwl
`
`°l awhile Ange “MEI 1% ¢¢ warmed 3;“?—
`i gene 018511 4% 2114—” um granny $1
`EEMM €444] an; e}? ial any] am;
`in“
`UDP TCP§£E *7} 9335-31
`fiH—L— 31°11 4°1fil‘5 :413
`71191
`11%;
`i’flflocal socket)% 81149]
`1191
`31:39.2}
`“14% £5 63:: away] e 2:21 Ta err
`91 FL191 $qu Ell-“Ml ’54:"3- ill-Eli} $3M.
`
`fifii 11 Er—E°11*‘191 35%?
`
`(IP address. TCP port number)
`
`i £71817]: €th E, 51% TOP nflflfir
`
`(srcIP. srcPORT, dstIP. dstPORT)
`
`i new: fill}.
`3113M 1147143 EE- EE 111°! 11:“:- IP éié 7111}:— 5—.
`E7} 3113131— 71781€F€1i
`11 k—El11°11
`€11!le %‘1 #4145
`(5rd? srcPORTH "93141
`4311 E91 Xlgl‘illwlki—IP
`Tigl $591 $1.31 $463.11! 915191 L11°11*1—-fi-?J_3‘r711
`’51
`gfi-r 91111 11131/11((rJrcIP.s'rcPORT).
`(dstIP.
`dstPORT))4 *8! 52h“: $0119} $4115 {@3171} ”4%?
`=F ‘RMI
`311 %‘3HTCP811.
`
`1, proxy A151 AlgAIEI ‘Htflfl “ll?! 751%
`-°r’}_1 Proxy ”14% 01%?1' TCP connectionfil
`peer entity {.1 ”1131 ”13478101131131.8111 315:11%|
`7.53171 7&1117‘1 en: 51.11.
`
` destination IP = D .
`
`(G, 3000) —> (D, 23)
`
`destination port = 23'
`
`telnet client port = 3000
`
`Proxy Server
`Proxy Server IP = G
`
`
`
`telnetd server port: 23
`
`source IP = S
`l
`source port = 1000 '
`(s, 1000)
`S
`
`(S, 1000) —> (G, 23)
`
`11§¢5t§ 713R? 8°11” telnet GE‘ 4%?“ GE. $13 31?] ‘11.-
`¥ 131‘] G°lV~i telnet D 31°! S9} D2191 231174?! telnet con-
`nection°1 flack SE 7391142.; 1‘19}? 45¢! 71*17‘1 $15—
`3!" 41.91%?” 75$“ 8 ‘JFHNEL,
`911-5531 754131?! 5:5. D91- 5?-
`E‘Qx‘i “117,11?- proxy Hui Gi‘ *8“ %7115LT1_ 9.113}.
`
`21%| 4. proxy ”131i ~14} telnet session
`
`Google Ex. 1403, pg. 9
`
`Google Ex. 1403, pg. 9
`
`

`

`4O
`
`fiaifimtfi 195-12 Vol.20 No.12
`
`(S. 1000)°11*1 (D, 23)}? 71-
`511?}.
`1% 4-37 $131
`\f r1115117517 G71 “3113101
`(G‘ 3000)? 1511101
`(D,
`231$ 31451.
`(D, 23)°11*1
`(G, 300012: 1111101751
`”131% G71 (S. 1000): Effiflgfii’fl SE1 D *1019-1
`921E119! 417$°1 71%31711 $375: 9.1 7’? 911:1.
`
`°1 T170727 *1%§1:1Q1 lug—“01% “5.115131 €111 71 014270111
`711 5115 7101 EE- 47" 11139154 91%”1141.
`
`2 EE-¥¢I1%EJE01|°IE1§741
`21 @0114 $151114? E191 Q°1 D71“(:1: 51% 031%
`G71 (3 1000. G. 2313‘? 31131—3“ (0. 3000‘ D,
`231i 1114101
`1111111 @0191, $71111”: 31% 1111—:— G
`011
`91511
`(D, 23, G, 300011414 (0, 23, S, 1000131.
`13113101
`11 23°1F1.
`01 ”Si“: 11%1171 “E11132;
`
`111:5131X1 1:
`"WE—151113
`€111°1131
`Proxy 11111173.; 01%?)
`221" 91/11 $117??? 11117511 7121111017111 ”1%721‘11711 917910
`$793 ”13% 311101611 4791*1 715:7 ”11331191 «61551191 47%}.
`$4179: 331;; L1171 9131/44“: G717 9191 $131737 11772
`81141;"101173; 47161101§11>1E 217°: $17? $151
`1
`7.1121451; 0913M 91" “5242111513117:- 11911‘01
`:5/1951141— E117” 111El1171§ 061% 73% 41011
`%;t% #5: 1153;171 03-13—st 0531121 9&1?! 4%.
`E 11.101 4% 172.1721?,
`01 U1
`1TE931011111 15°18 U121
`51'
`1
`.
`01111
`1107119014 11079191 73711010111
`”EL/1115111,
`{119-1
`41“
`1
`«1» rr r:
`» 3.9 l 49.
`_,
`‘EQQL 71
`131% 111.1131
`L1101111
`((151.11) L1sLPORT1‘é101
`44311319.;
`11721511‘4
`2391101711
`01111
`”117191-41‘1‘31—3: ‘er617711—1QQ 7’1- 3171147151.
`TIN—151151191 £5 151x;
`161115331;
`017310131
`511351
`E.
`ii} 1P iE°11 21171191 Hi 111% ”‘3101 (41.771113
`71"
`wqmmjawmIPEEWXMEflE famq2”
`
`311 $3717774‘71 15% E11°17§91 011
`
`
`STATUS
`GPORT
`(I,1Faddress,I.PORT1
`SYN-SENT
`30000
`(17216101 12341
`ESTABLISHED
`30001
`(172.16.101 , 34871
`CLOSE-WAIT
`30002
`(17216.3027. 12039)
`CLOSED
`30003
`( NULL 1 NULL 1
`CLOSED
`30004
`( NULL 1 NULL 1
`I
`(
`5
`1
`E
`1
`40000
`(1721668139. 3465)
`
`ESTABLISI IED
`
`3282
`
`0% @2249.1" 71° 9111111131 11% 78-78-015 *1-
`£151:
`451791 well known 2E1:— 10000‘3‘1, 0175153.
`o1191711101
`9.1.3
`{1 5:541“ A1%51x: BEE—91 wa—f
`211E515 E’fl 11% 7379-717 3M7. “11411.
`”11178701 ‘E
`E011
`1i1": 121391
`4‘71‘737 11117341213110 111.91
`7175:773—
`
`71x14: iL71x1°1 51—52% 71711“? 5:591. 914719111}
`9.191 “111% E114i
`41%‘311 47E “o1
`9.19.
`1R:— 172.16.0.0 $51§ 71X1E
`°1
`K 1% 51.117.
`stub B c1ass network L1191 ‘zE 1(1nner nodes)°11
`1‘1 111/08 5:711 (IPaddr. PORT)?“ Ric—‘1 #3:; 71
`1115‘; G(Gateway node)91 BEE 13133:} D11%§1€7
`3.1
`% $319115}.
`°1 1’711%%
`
`1 [TE931°11*191?=.1°1 DNS%%7311
`2 TC? 2711131 151i?— SYN7$011 fié'27 %-b‘11
`
`§1%1(allocate15131, STATUS71
`55"} £31
`C1USED; 31651121 3‘5 91 Q”'1'%1i4i§}‘31(d0a110*
`cate).
`
`01
`‘8Q1'01 Q3111 r11171% Q6? “11“17131
`G1? 21-5—91
`E3737
`i11.455131”D11”1°1 511C1Xc1i§ 4-721711'
`417 %711‘?}C1.
`01
`7357113 111453— E15113 j1131(111bound packet131 91
`#51 “£131“? flflmutbound packet)% $143101 01
`$440.
`-§"1X131115'1L 15%5 E151
`9147?“ 11011514: 3113191
`E11°15‘011
`“-131
`(I,Addr. LPORT) °11*1
`(G.Addr,
`G.PORT1£ 47251371
`31; 971% HQQSE 4372-1136114.
`5‘";
`91u°11*‘1 Gi $419 31171:? (G Addr G.POHT1°11
`*1
`(I. Addr LPOR'DE 441117511L1/17 +7051°1 L11
`7‘4 ”7191‘1105'1 “QED/1.
`91? .7191 TCP filfl—E E4717 21111721211“: IP% 71%:
`2,1--51 T7g 3101: 113%} 2’12: :EEM $311711
`811
`01 {b1 «12111.2, 21%91 no“ 111% %*—1 271nm
`.6315100 1172-811sz M w ~17ao1121s1w
`91 4+, My: 4‘771171 713-s1n1,
`
`3:55: ”4-3911 SEX—3'3
`3
`5E5";15i §¥171C 1P
`{541 479.111711 @111.
`C11% (“£01 739151231 A173-71‘—o“‘111 B Class “J
`
`Tiifll-ET Kira—9377 11%
`
`'11“
`
`Google Ex. 1403, pg. 10
`
`Google Ex. 1403, pg. 10
`
`

`

`ifiifii‘fi'fl REES—~45:
`
`'flfiflfi §¢l 1P 45:91 1H*}-%
`
`41
`
`{I} 3‘1
`% 7MP. C Class 11%?“a‘55i fiFfifiiflE 73%.
`‘3‘? LINN} %’\1°fl ERLEHE 73.91 51’qu 7,3?7}
`10,00071131-31 7VS‘SH311}.
`(°] $45: $151 {.137} ‘u’l
`E 751?: °}L1t}. C ClassLHC’IRE 3““ 2557H94 5:57}
`#73211?! 4‘- 319—‘4 54-519} fiéé’z 7PM? £591 417} 55‘
`‘10“ 507H% L374 3% 51°13} 1‘11 *3} 3:5? 54‘“
`2007H91
`94%19} fié‘? 523101 %*1°1]
`€111?
`‘F ‘31
`{9.
`5%.”) Q 5250“” TCP Portx‘f 2167117} 4%? "‘r“
`223. ‘3 3N'9l
`fifiZF-ié- 7MP. 31% $1951
`5231*3‘
`i194? 5:“ 31‘1" “Far/‘1 [RMQ4101W H148 1H*}% 2.1
`$5112;
`‘Q‘fl' £25417“ $1???“ 915?.
`7—} C Class 74°41
`“J% 81¢er 21‘5“ $i‘fl% Q‘fi‘z‘sfl $6 at}.
`°1fl€
`$51—91 7‘H*}%% 1P $i'3’41'9'
`‘6’“13 5°]
`3L 1? #5. $é~é 0“: 7§E alibi} fl“ 315}.°1“1| 1
`2—155: 9&711‘5 ”1H" 34% “1%EE. 71% %%°I"} “J
`:fiigl $79 31°I *H‘ZMW *Er‘fi‘i’l $131353 141%fi71
`$4751] 4%% {F Silt}.
`
`9’1“?“ 111*]?! BEE-3:55“- ‘EEl'flE IBM PC 1&7]
`%1’]- packet driver’z}°fl*1 $139315}. LEE] 4%QE
`PC bridged] “13“ #242 ‘53—'39]
`5"?”1‘751 71:64]
`‘31 a
`5131293.
`‘Q‘E‘IZ‘HI bridgelAFHE 3% fiifilo‘ W’Hé‘
`3'7'i‘qu'. 3868X7I%°“*1 @1131}
`{L EFEE 71%
`bridged] ”H“ E‘iqé *FS‘X‘WFE‘ ‘QEQ’ 4“ 3121.94.
`XMW} "3% 397%? 71H: flflli’fi $3330“? Q 731°]
`‘3}.
`
`3”?in 31°] 71".} "WWW 5H5- I‘WJES—E E}%E} Q
`% 751%“ 31E}.
`
`request %741% 5H?“ EEE] 313V} Efififi}.
`' FTP.
`ICMP-g %‘§‘
`731%011A1 1P it"iE ELEV—F}
`Iflilé- ‘2‘3/‘17IE 73-?- %% 211%d11191
`jaw}
`%7}543}F¥.
`
`01am {ixflfiirx‘i— ail Eli—EFL: $32717} 311119.;
`$51 flfl‘é 4“— filE 785171- ?l’éim flqE‘fi] 7191?}
`
`°IE 1?} 7&§}% 94511 Packet Filtering
`‘4,
`Gatewayei— :r‘éti‘q‘g] E‘W’SEE} 1°r"}§1'fil[CBQ4]‘
`2!)“ Qufil
`i911 HEW—3* ‘4’}? fllEHKKSJZJBI 72%
`Rbind()°fl 913“ "Mam 73513! 211%“ °1$=°VIEE11
`“13H 1?ch 3F?— QEWHE 3117)!
`311139} W‘S‘Ql'gi
`25‘
`fig 4-3381!» $23. ”3%?3 012a%01 $15}.
`3“
`TCP/IP checksumgl
`flléh":
`“11—?- ?h’ffi-l—li.
`E-l checksumgl 4-7519: 13PM} "4’99! éflé- 5—8" I.
`353495 43.3% 4 ‘11‘4[EF94][’I‘E93]. % £9.43:
`EQUIE [TEBSMIH W48 QEEJ-E—é‘ *T‘Efld
`checksum-Erlfi% SflfifiH’iq
`
`1, EE-%‘—fi: 31% HIOIEBI first/7?”. AI’S
`iii QQ/Efli A1130}! [WINE ‘3 7E°1W $7M ‘2}
`‘3"! ‘dfiflfiifl.
`
`1’55: §%“o”1-% ifiglifli
`31‘3541 DNS°1WSI %74
`EH: $1? 14291 “533111194 WEE-£94 liflléé Zil-E‘El
`¢ am; “JEN 312%, 9% 3H] "Vd €7§% $4311
`session% $147471"? “5475121 Elsi—E ‘flQfix‘E 5}
`9!
`“(Hi—$- ‘QEE E‘ilflmi file-i "J‘fifi g—flsflflt}.
`E1? °1 “Hi9: 3% 5:57} DNS°fl
`“1E1
`55712-5401
`31
`°1°¥ fill DNS queryéflg caching%°fl "4% 01%
`j $55.9? $342113" °F71§ 3? 21233 916°] 7414.
`$313k? “H721 $113 ‘3 LHfi-g— @Hfih‘f “(Hi—3* *H}
`E} 73% ’41"? 1‘3 $573131 TCP STATE 4’75 ‘l—fliq
`’39! 1’L‘E‘fl *0”sz 0131-3— 4— 31‘3}.
`°I Eli—E SYN.
`FIN-'39! TCP 751M %fl% %-i1l %% -’F 314‘
`51M
`3.4431 713%‘41
`53m? TCP STATE%§% "JEN SEE}:
`drama 2% 59} an}.
`:‘e Eli-5F}. M71 W314]
`4%8 Q1fl§91 91*} i3. (pseudo codeh‘f 3—3:“
`A.°ll
`5615115101 11‘}
`
`- TOP/1P 31mg $2.30“ “M- checksumfl 51%
`'5} $7M] €513}?
`‘41-?- 7‘191
`ifll% $4? £5 Q's”! AVE-T4 1 E!
`“2} 34519! ”$11": °1¥7fl 373% 5? $0357}.
`- UDP§ 113E514: @-‘u’-. E: Q‘%/%Ii ”€31
`‘34 “flfiq.
`1191
`fiz—i‘fl—é‘ 7M;
`
`7.3.
`
`”Kiwi—Q]
`
`inbound
`
`'
`
`'
`
`2) "$352 iiiflflqlé game; 74919} iEEBI 94353551“! “1% 7836‘1‘1‘31 E410] Elf—J] 41'2El°1°k fit}.
`
`Google Ex. 1403, pg. 11
`
`Google Ex. 1403, pg. 11
`
`

`

`42
`fi'ififimgfiifi '95 12 Vol.20 No.12
`
`OPENING —
`
`Incommmg ACK/SYN and
`
`outgoing ACK deigcled
`.fi ESTABLISHED
`/
`
`Outgoing SVN
`detecled
`
`/////
`Openlng menu: on
`///
`1 RST aeiemed
`//’ R51- detected
`//
`
`FIN delecled
`
`1 //1CLOSED <~T— vvvvv CLOSING
`
`Omev ACK/FIN detected OR
`RST delecled
`
`1E1 5.
`
`311:1 §a111 73%:‘1 1115:- TCP STATE Lransi
`tion diagram
`
`2. UD391 X153
`
`O
`
`UDPE‘ 115215171 191511 £33924: 1L’l§_171% i1/2131‘?
`7351’- ?rai/fli A17551:". 3731611: 41.? “1‘0qu H1611
`11
`*1 01%,: UDPE T0139} 13a} stateless 31.12301
`1. sequence number—- 712 *1
`0L71
`“111‘.011 7351”}
`sessionil
`2153101 2‘71‘661C1. 0173cT F11 717.191 5‘
`751011
`‘3131
`917211161§°Ll 11% ”£101 E11611 %*1‘1°1 19%
`017‘1 "LP‘H UDP 3655101191 %fi.f€
`.113.
`€333
`31.4:
`1731‘ A1?} 7113.1 (idle time threshold based) “3:1
`131%: A1’8"?
`3:: 9.19%. Emiluhresholdlgl
`"1
`-1°1 “VF—'11
`"131511 €01
`$553111} UDP 8953101191 FT
`"3% TCP91 Q3 $131111} %*'?19c 7111151 ‘1"- 311%
`taxi}
`1112-11}! §t_E_ 2.} r1131;1\: 5.121218 2:19:14?
`1231171. $117147} 71111: 9131311“:% 1%??1F1-
`‘71 £19
`NIS(l\etwork
`Informatinn
`System)
`3% 711%01111
`\IFS(Netwr>rk File Systirifly} 3101
`7. % @1291
`time
`4111191
`timrr nut—3‘
`71.31% 761—?
`01
`
`7x101C1
`71711 6191?.
`out 53E1i11-1V1f‘r {ii—El
`
`Limo out-9
`% X151157171
`91611-111: ‘55:” 3.3117119.9.651?
`
`3
`InboundinrequestBl 1131,
`{1 2;;
`7191 $1757.";
`I312} 51101137131131 23.1111
`1 732% 5:11 {13-11332
`§L1/a‘—13‘E1‘1 FEE°11
`5%}
`6“’5"1~1
`Ti‘a- 5M 1211:0811
`A 11.1w new;
`2:111
`jK1151155101 X19191 [115% "11111011
`131?}
`inbound conneci
`Lion requestli i1£1§1 4‘— 511711 61-1 21:1.
`01 $131 §“o1% ‘EE-Tfi:
`t313317171 T363111 125151
`
`31 19-11931 WWW A1.);Eél
`711%1’11 2101 01
`-“r31 33317191