`
`MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION
`
`I, Matthias Kamber, being duly sworn and upon oath, hereby attest to the
`
`following: .
`
`l.
`
`I am a member in good standing ofthe Bars of California,
`
`Massachusetts, New York, and Washington DC, as well as the US. District
`
`Courts for the Northern, Eastern, and Southern Districts of California, the US.
`
`District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, the US. District Court for the
`
`Southern District of New York, and the US. Courts of Appeals for the Ninth and
`
`Federal Circuit.
`
`2.
`
`II have not been suspended or disbarred from practice before any court
`
`or administrative body. ~
`
`3.
`
`I have never had an application for admission to practice before any
`
`court or administrative body denied.
`
`4.
`
`No sanction or contempt citation has been imposed against me by any
`
`court or administrative body.
`
`5.
`
`I have read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice
`
`Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of 37 C.F.R.
`
`896480.01
`
`Page 1 of 4
`
`LG Electronics Exhibit 1033
`LGE, et al. v. Straight Path IP
`IPR2015-00198
`
`
`
`6.
`
`I will be subject to theUSPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set
`
`forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 1 1.101, et seq., and disciplinaryjurisdiction under 37 CPR.
`
`§ 11.19(a).
`
`7.
`
`I have not applied to appear pro hac vice in any proceedings before
`
`the Office in the last three (3) years.
`
`8.
`
`I am an experienced litigation attorney, with experience with complex
`
`litigation in both state and federal court. I am familiar with the subject matter at
`
`issue in this proceeding, including the prior art on which Petitioners rely in this
`
`request and US. Patent No. 6,009,469 (“the ’469 Patent”). 1 also participated in
`
`the drafting and revision of the Petition already filed in this proceeding. I have
`
`reviewed the pertinent issues of claim construction that have been briefed in this
`
`proceeding.
`
`9.
`
`I represent Hulu, LLC as an intervenor in the civil action Straight
`
`Path [F Group, Inc. v. VIZIO, Inc, et at, No. 1:13—cv—00934 (E.D.V.A. 2013) in
`
`which the ’469 Patent has been asserted. I also served as counsel for Petitioner
`
`Toshiba and third-party Netflix, Inc. in an International Trade Commission action
`
`involving the same patent, Certain Point-to-Point Network Communication
`
`Devices and Products Containing Same, No. 337-TA—892 (U.S.I.T.C. 2013).
`
`//
`
`//
`
`Page 2 of 4
`
`
`
`WM
`
`Matthias Kamber
`
`Keker & Van Nest LLP
`
`633 Battery Street
`San Francisco, CA 941 1 1
`Tel:
`415—391—5400
`
`Fax:
`
`415—397-7188
`
`Email: mkamber@kvn.com
`
`
`
`Page 3 of 4
`
`
`
`
`
`Subscribed and sworn to before me on this 16th
`day of
`January,
`2015
`by MATTHIAS
`KAMBER, proved to me on the basis of
`satisfactory evidence to be the person who
`
`appeared beforeme.
`
`_
`Slgnature:
`
`,
`ll//(
`)
`
`,
`f
`V
`Signature of Notary Public
`
`
`
`(X gM/ [/L
`
`) )
`
`State of California
`
`City & County of San Francisco)
`,
`
`
`COMM.#2056597
`-
`
`'
`"s ‘
`NOTARYPUBLIC-CALIFORNIA Q
`
`‘2, SAN FRANCISCO COUNTYG
`_ -_4 -;-‘..........
`
`
`Affidavit of Matthias Kamber in Support of
`Motion For Pro Hac Vice Admission
`
`Document Date: January 16, 2015
`
`Page 4 of 4
`
`