throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper 94
`Entered: March 1, 2016
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`NESTLÉ USA, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`STEUBEN FOODS, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2015-00195 (Patent 6,475,435)
`Case IPR2015-00249 (Patent 6,481,468)1
`____________
`
`
`
`Before MICHAEL P. TIERNEY, PHILLIP J. KAUFFMAN,
`RAMA G. ELLURU, BEVERLY M. BUNTING, and
`CHRISTOPHER G. PAULRAJ, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`PAULRAJ, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`ORDER
`
`37 C.F.R. § 42.14
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 This order addresses issues that are the same in both cases. We exercise our
`discretion to issue one order to be filed in each case. The parties, however,
`are not authorized to use this style heading in subsequent papers.
`
`

`
`Case IPR2015-00195 (Patent 6,475,435)
`Case IPR2015-00249 (Patent 6,481,468)
`
`
`During the joint oral hearing for these proceedings, counsel indicated
`that they would discuss certain confidential information as part of their
`presentation. See Paper 92, 76–77. We accordingly designated the oral
`hearing transcript as “For Board and Parties Only.” Id. The parties are
`hereby ordered to file jointly a proposed redacted version of the transcript by
`March 28, 2016.
`We refer the parties to the guidance previously provided in the
`Board’s orders on motions to seal. See, e.g., GEA Process Eng., Inc. v.
`Steuben Foods, Inc., IPR2014-00041, Decision on Motion to Seal (PTAB
`Nov. 24, 2014) (Paper 134). There is a strong public policy for making all
`information filed in a quasi-judicial administrative proceeding open to the
`public. See Garmin International, Inc. v. Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC,
`Case IPR2012-00001, slip op. at 1-2 (PTAB March 14, 2013) (Paper 34); 37
`C.F.R. § 42.14. Furthermore, in light of the public’s interest in maintaining
`a complete and understandable file history, there is an expectation that
`confidential information relied upon in a subsequent decision will be made
`public. See Office Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48756, 48760–61
`(Aug. 14, 2012). The parties’ proposed redactions to the oral hearing
`transcript shall be informed by this guidance. We will not be bound by the
`parties’ proposed redactions. The parties may request a conference call with
`the panel if further guidance is necessary.
`In consideration of the foregoing, it is:
`ORDERED that the parties are ordered to jointly file a proposed
`redacted version of the oral hearing transcript by March 28, 2016.
`
`2
`
`
`
`

`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Thomas H. Jenkins
`tom.jenkins@finnegan.com
`
`Virginia L. Carron
`virginia.carron@finnegan.com
`
`Tyler M. Akagi
`tyler.akagi@finnegan.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Greg H. Gardella
`cpdocketgardella@oblon.com
`
`Scott A. McKewon
`cpdocketmckeown@oblon.com
`
`Ruby J. Natnithithadha
`cpdocketrjn@oblon.com
`
`Case IPR2015-00195 (Patent 6,475,435)
`Case IPR2015-00249 (Patent 6,481,468)
`
`
`
`
`3

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket