throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`APPLE, INC.
`Petitioner
`v.
`VANTAGE POINT TECHNOLOGY.
`Patent Owner
`____________
`Case IPR2015-00191
`Patent 5,463,750
`____________
`
`PATENT OWNER MANDATORY NOTICES
`37 C.F.R. 42.8(a)(2)
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(a)(2) Patent Owner submits the following
`mandatory notices:
`
`(1) Real party-in-interest.
`The real party-in-interest is Vantage Point Technology, Inc., a Texas
`corporation, with a place of business at 719 W. Front St., Suite 244, Tyler, TX
`75702.
`
`
`
`  
`
`1  
`
`

`

`(2) Related matters.
`U.S. Patent No. 5,463,750 is the subject of IPR2014-01105, IPR2015-00175
`
`and IPR2015-00192, each before the USPTO PTAB and is also asserted in the
`
`following pending litigation:
`
`Vantage Point Technology, Inc. v. Acer America Corp., 2:13-cv-00908-
`
`JRG (TXED);
`
`Vantage Point Technology, Inc. v. Amazon.com Inc., 2:13-cv-00909-JRG
`
`(TXED);
`
`Vantage Point Technology, Inc. v. ASUS Computer International et al.,
`
`2:13-cv-00910-JRG (TXED);
`
`Vantage Point Technology, Inc. v. Barnes & Noble, Inc., 2:13-cv-00911-
`
`JRG (TXED);
`
`Vantage Point Technology, Inc. v. Broadcom Corp., 2:13-cv-00912-JRG
`
`(TXED);
`
`Vantage Point Technology, Inc. v. Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., 2:13-cv-
`
`00913-JRG (TXED);
`
`Vantage Point Technology, Inc. v. Hisense USA Corp., 2:13-cv-00914-JRG
`
`(TXED);
`
`Vantage Point Technology, Inc. v. HTC America, Inc., 2:13-cv-00915-
`
`JRG (TXED);
`
`  
`
`2  
`
`

`

`Vantage Point Technology, Inc. v. Huawei Device USA, Inc. et al., 2:13-cv-
`
`00916-JRG (TXED);
`
`Vantage Point Technology, Inc. v. Kyocera International, Inc., 2:13-cv-
`
`00917-JRG (TXED);
`
`Vantage Point Technology, Inc. v. Lenovo (United States) Inc., 2:13-cv-
`
`00918-JRG (TXED);
`
`Vantage Point Technology, Inc. v. LG Electronics USA Inc., 2:13-cv-
`
`00920-JRG (TXED);
`
`Vantage Point Technology, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp., 2:13-cv-00921-JRG
`
`(TXED);
`
`Vantage Point Technology, Inc. v. NEC Corp. of America, 2:13-cv-00923-
`
`JRG (TXED);
`
`Vantage Point Technology, Inc. v. NVIDIA Corp., 2:13-cv-00924-JRG
`
`(TXED);
`
`Vantage Point Technology, Inc. v. Pantech Wireless, Inc., 2:13-cv 00925-
`
`JRG (TXED);
`
`Vantage Point Technology, Inc. v. Qualcomm Inc. et al., 2:13-cv-00926-
`
`JRG (TXED);
`
`Vantage Point Technology, Inc. v. Renesas Electronics Corp., 2:13-cv-
`
`3  
`
`  
`
`

`

`00927-JRG (TXED);
`
`Vantage Point Technology, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al., 2:13-
`
`cv-00928-JRG (TXED);
`
`Vantage Point Technology, Inc. v. Texas Instruments, Inc., 2:13-cv-00929-
`
`JRG (TXED);
`
`Vantage Point Technology, Inc. v. ViewSonic Corp., 2:13-cv-
`
`00930-JRG (TXED);
`
`Vantage Point Technology, Inc. v. Wacom Technology Corp., 2:13-cv-
`
`00931-JRG (TXED);
`
`Vantage Point Technology, Inc. v. Apple Inc., 2:13-cv-00989-JRG
`
`(TXED);
`
`Vantage Point Technology, Inc. v. LSI Corp., 2:13-cv-00990-JRG
`
`(TXED);
`
`Vantage Point Technology, Inc. v. MediaTek USA, Inc., 2:13-cv-00991-
`
`JRG (TXED);
`
`Vantage Point Technology, Inc. v. Panasonic Corp. of North America, 2:13-
`
`cv-00992-JRG (TXED);
`
`Vantage Point Technology, Inc. v. Sharp Electronics Corp., 2:13-cv-00993-
`
`JRG (TXED).
`
`  
`
`4  
`
`

`

`
`
`(3) Lead and back-up counsel.
`
`Lead Counsel:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Tarek N. Fahmi
`USPTO Reg. No. 41,402
`Ascenda Law Group, PC
`84 W. Santa Clara St., Suite 550, San Jose, CA 95113
`Tel: 866-877-4883
`Fax: 408-773-6177
`Email: tarek.fahmi@ascendalaw.com
`
`Back-up Counsel: Michael A. Davitz
`
`
`
`USPTO Reg. No. 47,519
`
`
`
`Ascenda Law Group, PC
`84 W. Santa Clara St., Suite 550, San Jose, CA 95113
`Tel: 866-877-4883
`Fax: 408-773-6177
`Email: michael.davitz@ascendalaw.com
`
`
`(4) Address for Service.
`
`
`
`Ascenda Law Group, PC
`84 W. Santa Clara St., Suite 550, San Jose, CA 95113
`Tel: 866-877-4883
`Fax: 408-773-6177
`Email: patents@ascendalaw.com
`
`  
`
`5  
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Tarek N. Fahmi/
`Tarek N. Fahmi
`Reg. No. 41,402
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Patent Owner consents to service by email at the above address.
`
`
`
`Dated: December 2, 2014
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Ascenda Law Group, PC
`84 W. Santa Clara St.
`Suite 550, San Jose, CA 95113
`
`Tel: 866-877-4883
`Fax: 408-773-6177
`Email: patents@ascendalaw.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`  
`
`6  
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing
`PATENT OWNER MANDATORY NOTICES
`was served on December 2, 2014, by filing this document though the Patent
`Review Processing System as well as by delivering a copy via email directed to
`the attorneys of record for the Petitioner at the following address:
`
`
`W. Karl Renner
`Roberto Devoto
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`3200 RBC Plaza
`60 South Sixth Street
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`
`IPR39521-0009IP1@fr.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Tarek N. Fahmi/
`Tarek N. Fahmi
`Reg. No. 41,402
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: December 2, 2014
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Ascenda Law Group, PC
`84 W. Santa Clara St.
`Suite 550, San Jose, CA 95113
`
`Tel: 866-877-4883
`Fax: 408-773-6177
`Email: patents@ascendalaw.com
`
`
`  
`
`7  
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket