`Filed: November 21, 2014
`
`Naveen Modi
`Paul Hastings LLP
`875 15th Street NW
`Washington, DC 20005
`Telephone: (202) 551-1990
`Facsimile: (202) 551-0490
`E-mail: naveenmodi@paulhastings.com
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`APPLE INC.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`VIRNETX INC.
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2015-00187
`Patent 7,490,151
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S MANDATORY NOTICES
`PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.8
`
`
`Filed on behalf of: VirnetX Inc.
`By:
`
`Joseph E. Palys
`Paul Hastings LLP
`875 15th Street NW
`Washington, DC 20005
`Telephone: (202) 551-1996
`Facsimile: (202) 551-0496
`E-mail: josephpalys@paulhastings.com
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2015-00187
`Patent 7,490,151
`
`VirnetX Inc., the Patent Owner, provides the following mandatory notices
`
`pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.8.
`
`I.
`
`Real Party-in-Interest
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(b)(1), the real party-in-interest is VirnetX Inc.,
`
`the assignee of record for U.S. Patent No. 7,490,151 (“the ’151 patent”).
`
`II. Related Matters
`Patent Owner identifies the following matters that may be deemed related
`
`pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(b)(2).
`
`Proceedings Before the USPTO Involving the Patent-at-Issue
`
`A.
`The ’151 patent, which is the subject of this proceeding, is also at issue in
`
`the following inter partes review and inter partes reexamination proceedings:
`
`Case IPR2013-003541
`
`Case IPR2013-003762
`
`Case IPR2014-001733
`
`Case IPR2014-00610
`
`
`1 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on December 13, 2013, and
`
`denied rehearing on February 12, 2014.
`
`2 The Board terminated this proceeding on November 12, 2013.
`
`3 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on June 5, 2014.
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case IPR2015-00187
`Patent 7,490,151
`
`
`Control No. 95/001,697
`
`Control No. 95/001,714
`
`
`
`Proceedings Before the USPTO Involving Related Patents
`
`B.
`Several patents stemming from the same applications that led to the ’151
`
`patent are or were at issue in the following inter partes review and inter partes
`
`reexamination proceedings:
`
`Matter
`
`Case IPR2013-003484
`
`Case IPR2013-003495
`
`Patent
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,502,135
`
`Case IPR2013-003756
`
`Case IPR2014-001717
`
`Case IPR2014-001728
`
`
`
`
`4 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on December 13, 2013, and
`
`denied rehearing on February 12, 2014.
`
`5 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on December 13, 2013, and
`
`denied rehearing on February 12, 2014.
`
`6 The Board terminated this proceeding on November 12, 2013.
`
`7 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on June 5, 2014.
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case IPR2015-00187
`Patent 7,490,151
`
`
`Matter
`
`Case IPR2014-005589
`
`Patent
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,502,135
`
`Control No. 95/001,26910
`
`(cont.)
`
`Control No. 95/001,679
`
`
`
`Control No. 95/001,682
`
`Case IPR2013-0037711
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,418,504
`
`Case IPR2013-0039312
`
`
`
`Case IPR2013-0039413
`
`
`(…continued)
`8 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on June 5, 2014.
`
`9 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on July 23, 2014, and
`
`denied rehearing on September 5, 2014.
`
`10 The PTO issued a Reexamination Certificate confirming all challenged
`
`claims on June 7, 2011.
`
`11 The Board terminated this proceeding on November 12, 2013.
`
`12 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on December 18, 2013,
`
`and denied rehearing on February 12, 2014.
`
`13 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on December 18, 2013,
`
`and denied rehearing on February 12, 2014.
`
`4
`
`
`
`Patent
`
`Matter
`
`Case IPR2015-00187
`Patent 7,490,151
`
`
`Case IPR2014-0017614
`
`Case IPR2014-0017715
`
`Case IPR2014-0061216
`
`Case IPR2014-0061317
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,418,504
`
`Case IPR2014-00614
`
`(cont.)
`
`Case IPR2015-00188
`
`Case IPR2015-00189
`
`Control No. 95/001,788
`
`Control No. 95/001,851
`
`
`14 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on June 5, 2014.
`
`15 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on June 5, 2014.
`
`16 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on October 15, 2014.
`
`17 On October 15, 2014, the Board consolidated this proceeding with
`
`IPR2014-00614 and then administratively terminated IPR2014-00613.
`
`5
`
`
`
`Patent
`
`Matter
`
`Case IPR2015-00187
`Patent 7,490,151
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,188,180
`
`Case IPR2014-0040118
`
`Case IPR2014-0040519
`
`Case IPR2014-00481
`
`Case IPR2014-00482
`
`Case IPR2014-01418
`
`Case IPR2014-01421
`
`Control No. 95/001,27020
`
`Control No. 95/001,792
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,839,759
`
`Control No. 95/001,746
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,921,211
`
`Case IPR2013-0037821
`
`
`18 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on July 23, 2014, and
`
`denied rehearing on September 5, 2014.
`
`19 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on July 23, 2014, and
`
`denied rehearing on September 5, 2014.
`
`20 The PTO issued a Reexamination Certificate confirming all challenged
`
`claims on June 7, 2011.
`
`6
`
`
`
`Patent
`
`Matter
`
`Case IPR2015-00187
`Patent 7,490,151
`
`
`Case IPR2013-0039722
`
`Case IPR2013-0039823
`
`Case IPR2014-0017424
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,921,211
`
`Case IPR2014-0017525
`
`(cont.)
`
`Case IPR2014-00615
`
`Case IPR2014-0061626
`
`Case IPR2014-0061827
`
`
`
`
`(…continued)
`21 The Board terminated this proceeding on November 12, 2013.
`
`22 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on December 18, 2013,
`
`and denied rehearing on February 12, 2014.
`
`23 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on December 18, 2013,
`
`and denied rehearing on February 12, 2014.
`
`24 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on June 5, 2014.
`
`25 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on June 5, 2014.
`
`26 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on October 15, 2014.
`
`27 On October 15, 2014, the Board consolidated this proceeding with
`
`IPR2014-00615 and then administratively terminated IPR2014-00618.
`
`7
`
`
`
`Case IPR2015-00187
`Patent 7,490,151
`
`
`Matter
`
`Case IPR2015-00185
`
`Patent
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,921,211
`
`Case IPR2015-00186
`
`(cont.)
`
`Control No. 95/001,856
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,987,274
`
`Control No. 95/001,789
`
`Case IPR2014-00403
`
`Case IPR2014-00404
`
`Case IPR2014-0048328
`
`Case IPR2014-0048429
`
`Case IPR2014-0048530
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,051,181
`
`Case IPR2014-0048631
`
`Control No. 95/001,949
`
`
`28 On September 15, 2014, the Board joined this proceeding with
`
`IPR2014-00403.
`
`29 On September 15, 2014, the Board joined this proceeding with
`
`IPR2014-00404.
`
`30 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on September 16, 2014.
`
`31 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on September 16, 2014.
`
`8
`
`
`
`Patent
`
`Matter
`
`Case IPR2015-00187
`Patent 7,490,151
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,504,697
`
`Case IPR2014-00237
`
`Case IPR2014-00238
`
`
`C. U.S. Patent Applications Related to the Patent-at-Issue
`The following applications, which stem from the same applications that led
`
`to the ’151 patent, are currently pending before the Office:
`
`13/080,680
`
`13/181,041
`
`13/285,962
`
`13/475,637
`
`13/615,536
`
`
`
`13/617,375
`
`13/617,446
`
`13/620,534
`
`13/890,206
`
`13/903,788
`
`
`
`13/911,813
`
`13/950,877
`
`13/615,528
`
`13/620,550
`
`13/950,897
`
`14/482,956
`
`14/526,669
`
`--
`
`--
`
`--
`
`9
`
`
`
`D. Litigations Involving the Patent-at-Issue and/or Related Patents
`The ’151 patent and/or other patents that stem from the same applications
`
`Case IPR2015-00187
`Patent 7,490,151
`
`
`that led to the ’151 patent are at issue in the following cases:
`
`VirnetX Inc. and Science Applications Int’l Corp. v.
`
`Cisco Systems, Inc., Apple Inc., Aastra USA, Inc.,
`
`Aastra Technologies Ltd., NEC Corp., and NEC Corp.
`
`of America, No. 6:10-cv-00417 (E.D. Tex.)32
`
`VirnetX Inc. and Science Applications Int’l Corp. v.
`
`Apple Inc., No. 6:12-cv-00855 (E.D. Tex.)
`
`VirnetX Inc. v. Apple Inc., No. 6:11-cv-00563 (E.D.
`
`Tex.; consolidated with case No. 6:12-cv-00855)
`
`
`32 NEC and Aastra have entered into a license agreement with VirnetX and
`
`have been dismissed from this case. The Cisco portion of the case has concluded
`
`with a final judgment. The only remaining defendant in this case is Apple. The
`
`district court entered judgment in favor of VirnetX against Apple. On September
`
`16, 2014, the Federal Circuit affirmed-in-part, reversed-in-part, vacated-in-part,
`
`and remanded for further proceedings in the district court. On October 16, 2014,
`
`VirnetX petitioned for rehearing of the Federal Circuit’s decision.
`
`10
`
`
`
`Case IPR20l5-00187
`
`Patent 7,490,15 1
`
`VirnetXInc. and Science Applications Int’l Corp. v.
`
`Apple Inc., No. 6: 13—cV—0021 1 (ED. Tex.)
`
`Microsofi‘ Co1p., No. 6: l3—cv—0035l (E.D. Tex.)
`
`VirnetX Inc. and Science Applications Int ’l Corp. v.
`
`III. Lead and Back—Up Counsel and Service Information
`
`In accordance with 37 C.F.R. §42.8(b)(3) and (b)(4), Patent Owner
`
`identifies the following lead and back—up counsel and service information:
`
`Lead Counsel
`
`Back—Up Counsel
`
`Joseph E. Palys (Reg. No. 46,508)
`
`Naveen Modi (Reg. No. 46,224)
`
`Paul Hastings LLP
`
`Paul Hastings LLP
`
`875 15”‘ Street NW
`
`875 15”‘ Street NW
`
`Washington, DC 20005
`
`Washington, DC 20005
`
`Telephone: (202) 551-1996
`
`Telephone: (202) 551-1990
`
`Facsimile: (202) 551-0496
`
`Facsimile: (202) 551-0490
`
`E-mail: josephpalys@paulhastings.com E-mail: naveenmodi@paulhastings.com
`
`ll
`
`
`
`Case IPR20l5-00187
`
`Patent 7,490, l 5 1
`
`— J
`
`ason E. Stach (Reg. No. 54,464)
`
`Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow,
`
`Garrett & Durmer, L.L.P.
`
`303 Peachtree St., NE, Suite 3500
`
`Atlanta, GA 30308
`
`Telephone: (404) 653-6428
`
`Facsimile: (404) 653-6444
`
`E-mail: jason.stach@finnegan.com
`
`Dated: November 21, 2014
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Joseph E. Palysl
`By:
`Joseph E. Palys
`Reg. No. 46,508
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`Certificate of Service
`
`Case IPR2015-00187
`Patent 7,490,151
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), I certify that I caused to be served on the
`
`counsel for Petitioner a true and correct copy of the foregoing Patent Owner’s
`
`Mandatory Notices Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.8 by electronic means on the date
`
`below at the following address of record:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Jeffrey P. Kushan (jkushan@sidley.com)
`Joseph A. Micallef (jmicallef@sidley.com)
`Sidley Austin LLP
`1501 K Street NW
`Washington, DC 20005
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /Joseph E. Palys/
`Joseph E. Palys
`Reg. No. 46,508
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`Dated: November 21, 2014