`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper 30
`Date: November 17, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`GOOGLE INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`SIMPLEAIR, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2015-00180
`Patent 8,601,154 B2
`____________
`
`Before JAMES P. CALVE, JUSTIN T. ARBES, and TINA E. HULSE,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`CALVE, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Oral Argument
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2015-00180
`Patent 8,601,154 B2
`
`
`
`
`
`I. INTRODUCTION
`
`The Scheduling Order in this proceeding set December 15, 2015, as the date
`for oral argument, if requested by the parties and granted by the Board. Paper 12.
`The parties have since filed requests for oral argument. Papers 27, 28. Oral
`argument is granted. A hearing will commence at 1:00 PM Eastern Time, on
`December 15, 2015. It will be open to the public for in-person attendance on the
`ninth floor of Madison Building East, 600 Dulany Street, Alexandria, Virginia. In-
`person attendance will be accommodated on a first-come, first-served basis. One
`or more judges of the panel may attend remotely.
`Each party will have sixty (60) minutes of total time to present arguments.
`Petitioner, Google Inc., will proceed first. Thereafter, Patent Owner, SimpleAir,
`Inc., will respond. Petitioner may reserve rebuttal time.
`The Board will provide a court reporter for the hearing, and the reporter’s
`transcript will constitute the official record of the hearing.
`At least five (5) business days prior to the hearing, each party shall serve on
`the other party any demonstrative exhibit(s) it intends to use during the hearing.
`See 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b). The parties should attempt to work out any objections to
`demonstratives prior to involving the Board. At least two (2) business days prior
`to the hearing, the parties shall file the demonstrative exhibits with the Board. See
`id. The parties are directed to St. Jude Medical, Cardiology Division, Inc. v. The
`Board of Regents of the University of Michigan, Case IPR2013-00041 (PTAB Jan.
`27, 2014) (Paper 65) for guidance regarding appropriate content of demonstrative
`exhibits.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2015-00180
`Patent 8,601,154 B2
`
`
`
`
`
`The Board expects lead counsel for each party to be present at the hearing,
`although any backup counsel may make the actual presentation, in whole or in part.
`If any lead counsel will not be in attendance at the hearing, the Board should be
`notified via a joint telephone conference call no later than two days prior to the
`hearing to discuss the matter.
`Any special requests for audio visual equipment should be directed to
`Trials@uspto.gov.
`
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Michael V. Messinger
`Joseph E. Mutschelknaus
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C.
`mikem-PTAB@skgf.com
`jmutsche-PTAB@skgf.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Charles F. Wieland, III
`Robert G. Mukai
`BUCHANAN INGERSOLL & ROONEY PC
`charles.wieland@bipc.com
`robert.mukai@bipc.com
`
`
`
`3
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
