`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`Paper 30
`Entered: October 6, 2015
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`
`DAICEL CORPORATION,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`CELANESE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION,
`Patent Owner.
`_______________
`
`Case IPRs 2015-00170, -00171, -00173
`Patent 8,076,507 B2
`_______________
`
`
`
`
`Before LINDA M. GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`ORDER AND REVISED SCHEDULING ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPRs 2015-00170, -00171, -00173
`Patent 8,076,507 B2
`
`
`Pursuant to our October 1, 2015 Order (Paper 34),1 counsel for
`
`Petitioner sent an email communication to the Board on October 2, 2015,
`
`advising that the parties had reached an agreement to conduct the deposition
`
`of Petitioner’s new expert, Mr. Jones, during the dates of October 21–23,
`
`and had reached a tentative agreement on a new trial schedule. A proposed
`
`new trial schedule was included in the email communication. Petitioner
`
`further advised that the parties had agreed to conduct the deposition of
`
`Petitioner’s witness, Mr. Miura, on November 3–4, subject to final
`
`confirmation from Mr. Miura.
`
`On October 5, 2015, the Board sent an email communication to the
`
`parties advising that the proposed new trial schedule was acceptable.
`
`In consideration of the foregoing, it is
`
`ORDER
`
`ORDERED that Due Dates 1–5, are changed to the dates agreed upon
`
`by the parties, as reflected in the Revised Due Date Appendix below;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the parties’ request to extend Due Dates 6
`
`and 7 by three weeks is granted; and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the parties may stipulate to different
`
`dates for Due Dates 1–5 as set in the Revised Due Date Appendix.
`
`.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1For convenience, this Order references the paper filed in IPR2015-00170.
`
` 2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPRs 2015-00170, -00171, -00173
`Patent 8,076,507 B2
`
`
`REVISED DUE DATE APPENDIX
`
`DUE DATE 1 .................................................................. November 11, 2015
`
`Patent owner’s response to the petition
`
`Patent owner’s motion to amend the patent
`
`DUE DATE 2 ....................................................................... January 19, 2016
`
`Petitioner’s reply to patent owner’s response to petition
`
`Petitioner’s opposition to motion to amend
`
`DUE DATE 3 ....................................................................... February 9, 2016
`
`Patent owner’s reply to petitioner’s opposition to motion to amend
`
`DUE DATE 4 ..................................................................... February 25, 2016
`
`Motion for observation regarding cross-examination of reply witness
`
`Motion to exclude evidence
`
`Request for oral argument
`
`DUE DATE 5 ........................................................................... March 8, 2016
`
`Response to observation
`
`Opposition to motion to exclude
`
`DUE DATE 6 ......................................................................... March 14, 2016
`
`Reply to opposition to motion to exclude
`
`DUE DATE 7 ......................................................................... March 29, 2016
`
`Oral argument (if requested)
`
` 3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPRs 2015-00170, -00171, -00173
`Patent 8,076,507 B2
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Jeffrey R. Lomprey
`George C. Beck
`FOLEY & LARDNER LLP
`DAICEL_IPR@FOLEY.COM
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Justin L. Krieger
`Joshua B. Pond
`Troy A. Peterson
`KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
`jkrieger@kilpatricktownsend.com
`
`
` 4
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
