throbber
(19)
`
`:::::f::t°=
`European
`Patent Offke
`
`Office eurapéen (11)
`
`EP 1 737 808 B1
`
`(12)
`
`EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION
`
`(45) Date of publication and mention
`of the grant of the patent:
`04.06.2008 Bulletin 2008/23
`
`(51) Int CI.:
`C07C 51/48 (“"5-"V
`
`C07C 53/08 (“"5-”"
`
`(86) International application number:
`
`(21) Application number: 05723599.6
`
`PCT/U32005/005785
`
`(22) Date of filing: 24.02.2005
`
`(87) International publication number:
`WO 2005/087699 (22.09.2005 Gazette 2005/38)
`
`(54) REMOVAL OF PERMANGANATE REDUCING COMPOUNDS FROM METHANOL
`CARBONYLATION PROCESS STREAM
`
`ENTFERNUNG VON PERMANGANATREDUZIERENDEN VERBINDUNGEN AUS EINEM
`METHANOLCARBONYLIERUNGSVERFAHRENSSTROM
`
`ENLEVEMENT DE COMPOSES REDUCTEURS DU PERMANGANATE DU CIRCUIT DE
`CARBONYLATION DE METHANOL
`
`(84) Designated Contracting States:
`AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR
`HU IE IS IT LI LT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SKTR
`
`(30) Priority: 02.03.2004 US 708421
`
`(43) Date of publication of application:
`03.01.2007 Bulletin 2007/01
`
`0 SCATES, Mark, 0.
`Houston, TX 77058 (US)
`0 TALANCON, Jose, J., Arturo
`Av. Universidad Km 7.5
`
`Mexico 96539 (MX)
`0 TRUEBA, David, A.
`Houston, TX 77062 (US)
`0 ZINOBILE, Raymond, J.
`Houston, TX 77058 (US)
`
`(73) Proprietor: Celanese International Corporation
`Dallas, TX 75234 (US)
`
`(72) Inventors:
`0 PICARD, Wayne, D.
`Houston, TX 77006 (US)
`
`(74) Representative: Kador & Partner
`Corneliusstrasse 15
`
`80469 Miinchen (DE)
`
`(56) References cited:
`WO-A-98/17619
`
`US-A- 6 143 930
`
`EP1737808B1
`
`Note: Within nine months of the publication of the mention of the grant of the European patent in the European Patent
`Bulletin, any person may give notice to the European Patent Office of opposition to that patent, in accordance with the
`Implementing Regulations. Notice of opposition shall not be deemed to have been filed until the opposition fee has been
`paid. (Art. 99(1) European Patent Convention).
`
`Printed by Jouve, 75001 PARIS (FR)
`
`000001
`
`Exh. 1023
`
`000001
`
`Exh. 1023
`
`

`

`1
`
`EP 1 737 808 B1
`
`2
`
`Description
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`1. Field of the Invention
`
`[0001] This invention relates to an improved process
`for the removal of permanganate reducing compounds
`and alkyl iodidesformed bythe carbonylation of methanol
`in the presence of a Group VIII metal carbonylation cat-
`alyst. More specifically, this invention relates to an im-
`proved process for reducing and/or removing precursors
`of permanganate reducing compounds and alkyl iodides
`from intermediate streams during the formation of acetic
`acid by said carbonylation processes.
`
`2. Technical Background
`
`[0002] Among currently employed processes for syn-
`thesizing acetic acid, one ofthe most useful commercially
`is the catalyzed carbonylation of methanol with carbon
`monoxide as taught in U.S. Pat. No. 3,769,329 issued to
`Paulik et al on Oct. 30, 1973. The carbonylation catalyst
`comprises rhodium, either dissolved or othenNise dis-
`persed in a liquid reaction medium or supported on an
`inert solid, along with a ha|ogen—containing catalyst pro-
`moter as exemplified by methyl iodide. The rhodium can
`be introduced into the reaction system in any of many
`forms, and the exact nature ofthe rhodium moiety within
`the active catalyst complex is uncertain. Likewise, the
`nature ofthe halide promoteris notcritical. The patentees
`disclose avery large number of suitable promoters, most
`of which are organic iodides. Most typically and usefully,
`the reaction is conducted by continuously bubbling car-
`bon monoxide gas through a liquid reaction medium in
`which the catalyst is dissolved.
`[0003] WO 98/17619 disclosesthe removal of perman-
`ganate compounds from a carbonylation process stream.
`[0004] An improvement in the prior art process for the
`carbonylation of an alcohol to produce the carboxylic acid
`having one carbon atom more than the alcohol in the
`presence of a rhodium catalyst is disclosed in commonly
`assigned U.S. Patent Nos. 5,001,259, issued Mar. 19,
`1991; 5,026,908, issued Jun. 25, 1991; and 5,144,068,
`issued Sep. 1, 1992; and European Patent No. EP 0161
`874 B2, published Jul. 1,1992. As disclosed therein, ace-
`tic acid is produced from methanol in a reaction medium
`containing methyl acetate, methyl halide, especially me-
`thyl iodide, and rhodium present in acatalytically effective
`concentration. These patents disclose that catalyst sta-
`bility and the productivity ofthe carbonylation reactor can
`be maintained at surprisingly high levels, even at very
`low water concentrations, i.e. 4 weight percent or less,
`in the reaction medium (despite the general industrial
`practice of maintaining approximately 14-15 wt % water)
`by maintaining in the reaction medium, along with a cat-
`alytically effective amount of rhodium and at least afinite
`concentration of water, a specified concentration of io-
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`dide ions over and above the iodide content which is
`
`present as methyl iodide or other organic iodide. The
`iodide ion is present as a simple salt, with lithium iodide
`being preferred. The patents teach thatthe concentration
`of methyl acetate and iodide salts are significant param-
`eters in affecting the rate of carbonylation of methanol to
`produce acetic acid, especially at low reactor water con-
`centrations. By using relatively high concentrations ofthe
`methyl acetate and iodide salt, one obtains a surprising
`degree of catalyst stability and reactor productivity even
`when the liquid reaction medium contains water in con-
`centrations as low as about 0.1 wt %, so low that it can
`broadly be defined simply as "a finite concentration" of
`water. Furthermore, the reaction medium employed im-
`proves the stability ofthe rhodium catalyst, i.e. resistance
`to catalyst precipitation, especially during the product re-
`covery steps of the process.
`In these steps, distillation
`for the purpose of recovering the acetic acid product
`tends to remove from the catalyst the carbon monoxide
`which in the environment maintained in the reaction ves-
`
`sel, is a ligand with stabilizing effect on the rhodium.
`[0005]
`It has been found that although a low water car-
`bonylation process for producing acetic acid reduces
`such by—products as carbon dioxide, hydrogen, and pro-
`pionic acid, the amount of other impurities, present gen-
`erally in trace amounts, is also increased, and the quality
`of acetic acid sometimes suffers when attempts are made
`to increase the production rate by improving catalysts,
`or modifying reaction conditions.
`[0006] These trace impurities affect quality of acetic
`acid, especially when they are recirculated through the
`reaction process. The impurities that decrease the per-
`manganate time of the acetic acid include carbonyl com-
`pounds and unsaturated carbonyl compounds. As used
`herein, the phrase "carbony|" is intended to mean com-
`pounds that contain aldehyde or ketone functional
`groups, which compounds may or may not possess un-
`saturation. See Catalysis of Organic Reaction, 75,
`369-380 (1998), forfurther discussion on impurities in a
`carbonylation process.
`[0007] The present invention is directed to reducing
`and/or removing permanganate reducing compounds
`(PRC’s) such as acetaldehyde, acetone, methyl ethyl ke-
`tone, butyraldehyde, crotonaldehyde, 2—ethyl crotonal-
`dehyde, and 2—ethyl butyraldehyde and the like, and the
`aldol condensation products thereof. The present inven-
`tion also leads to reduction of propionic acid.
`[0008] The carbonyl impurities described above, such
`as acetaldehyde, may react with iodide catalyst promot-
`ers to form multi—carbon alkyl iodides, e.g., ethyl iodide,
`propyl iodide, butyl iodide, pentyl iodide, hexyl iodide and
`the like.
`It is desirable to remove alkyl iodides from the
`reaction product because even small amounts of these
`impurities in the acetic acid product tend to poison the
`catalyst used in the production of vinyl acetate, the prod-
`uct most commonly produced from acetic acid. The
`present invention is thus also directed to removal of alkyl
`iodides, in particular C242 alkyl iodide compounds. Ac-
`
`2
`
`000002
`
`Exh. 1023
`
`000002
`
`Exh. 1023
`
`

`

`3
`
`EP 1 737 808 B1
`
`4
`
`cordingly, because many impurities originate with acetal-
`dehyde, it is a primary objective to remove or reduce the
`acetaldehyde and alkyl iodide content in the process.
`[0009] Conventional techniques to remove impurities
`include treating the acetic acid product with oxidizers,
`ozone, water, methanol, activated—carbon, amines, and
`the like, which treatment may or may not be combined
`with distillation of the acetic acid. The most typical puri-
`fication treatment involves a series of distillations of the
`
`final product. It is known, for example, from U.S. Patent
`No. 5,783,731 to remove carbonyl impurities from organ-
`ic streams by treating the organic streams with an amine
`compound such as hydroxylamine, which reacts with the
`carbonyl compounds to form oximes, followed by distil-
`lation to separate the purified organic product from the
`oxime reaction products. However, the additional treat-
`ment of the final product adds cost to the process, and
`distillation of the treated acetic acid product can result in
`additional impurities being formed.
`[0010] While it is possible to obtain acetic acid of rel-
`atively high purity, the acetic acid product formed by the
`|ow—water carbonylation process and purification treat-
`ment described above frequently remains somewhat de-
`ficient with respect to the permanganate time due to the
`presence of small proportions of residual
`impurities.
`Since a sufficient permanganate time is an important
`commercial test, which the acid product must meet to be
`suitable for many uses, the presence of impurities that
`decrease permanganate time is objectionable. Moreo-
`ver, it is not economically or commercially feasible to re-
`move minute quantities ofthese impurities from the acetic
`acid by distillation because some of the impurities have
`boiling points close to that of the acetic acid product.
`[0011]
`It has thus become important to identify eco-
`nomically viable methods of removing impurities else-
`where in the carbonylation process without contaminat-
`ing the final product or adding unnecessary costs. U.S.
`Patent No. 5,756,836, incorporated herein by reference,
`discloses a method for manufacturing high purity acetic
`acid by adjusting the acetaldehyde concentration of the
`reaction solution below 1500 ppm.
`It is stated that by
`maintaining the acetaldehyde concentration below this
`threshold, it is possible to suppress the formation of im-
`purities such that one need only distill the crude acetic
`acid product to obtain high purity acetic acid.
`[0012] European Patent No. EP 0 487 284 B1, pub-
`lished April 12, 1995, discloses that carbonyl impurities
`present in the acetic acid product generally concentrate
`in the overhead from the light ends column. Accordingly,
`the light ends column overhead is treated with an amine
`compound (such as hydroxylamine), which reacts with
`the carbonyl compounds to form oxime derivatives that
`can be separated from the remaining overhead by distil-
`lation, resulting in an acetic acid product with improved
`permanganate time.
`[0013]
`European Patent Application No. EP 0 687 662
`A2 and U.S. Patent No. 5,625,095, describe a process
`for producing high purity acetic acid in which an acetal-
`
`dehyde concentration of 400 ppm or less is maintained
`in the reactor by using a single or multi—stage distillation
`process to remove acetaldehyde. Streams suggested for
`processing to remove acetaldehyde include a light phase
`containing primarily water, acetic acid and methyl ace-
`tate; a heavy phase containing primarily methyl iodide,
`methyl acetate and acetic acid; an overhead stream con-
`taining primarily methyl iodide and methyl acetate; or a
`recirculating stream formed by combining the light and
`heavy phase. These references do not identify which of
`these streams possesses the greatest concentration of
`acetaldehyde.
`[0014]
`EP 0 687 662 A2 and U.S. Patent No. 5,625,095
`also disclose management of reaction conditions to con-
`trol the formation of acetaldehyde in the reactor. Although
`it is stated that formation of by—products such as croton—
`aldehyde, 2—ethylcrotonaldehyde, and alkyl iodides is re-
`duced by controlling the formation of acetaldehyde, it is
`also pointed out that management of reaction conditions
`as proposed increases the formation of propionic acid,
`an undesirable byproduct.
`[0015] More recently,
`it has been disclosed in com-
`monly assigned U.S. Patent Nos. 6,143,930 and
`6,339,171 that it is possible to significantly reduce the
`undesirable impurities in the acetic acid product by per-
`forming a multi—stage purification on the light ends col-
`umn overhead. These patents disclose a purification
`process in which the light ends overhead is distilled twice,
`in each case taking the acetaldehyde overhead and re-
`turning a methyl iodide rich residuum to the reactor. The
`acetaldehyde—rich distillate is extracted with waterto re-
`move the majority ofthe acetaldehyde for disposal, leav-
`ing a significantly lower acetaldehyde concentration in
`the raffinate that is recycled to the reactor.
`[0016] While the above—described processes have
`been successful in removing carbonyl impurities from the
`carbonylation system and for the most part controlling
`acetaldehyde levels and permanganate time problems
`in the final acetic acid product, further improvements can
`still be made. Accordingly, there remains a need for al-
`ternative processes to improve the efficiency of acetal-
`dehyde removal. The present invention provides one
`such alternative solution.
`
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`In one aspect, the present invention provides a
`[0017]
`process for producing acetic acid that includes the fol-
`lowing steps:
`
`(a) reacting methanol and carbon dioxide in a suita-
`ble reaction medium that includes a catalyst and an
`organic iodide;
`(b) separating the products of the reaction into avol—
`atile product phase that contains acetic acid, organic
`iodide, and at least one permanganate reducing
`compound (PRC), and a less volatile phase contain-
`ing the catalyst and acetic acid;
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`3
`
`000003
`
`Exh. 1023
`
`000003
`
`Exh. 1023
`
`

`

`5
`
`EP 1 737 808 B1
`
`6
`
`(c) distilling the volatile product phase to yield a pu-
`rified product and a first overhead that contains or-
`ganic iodide, water, acetic acid, and unreacted meth-
`anol;
`(d) distilling at least a portion of the first overhead to
`produce a PRC enriched second overhead;
`(e) extracting the second overhead with water and
`separating therefrom an aqueous extract containing
`concentrated PRC’s for disposal; and
`(f) distilling at least a portion ofthe extracted second
`overhead together with the first overhead portion.
`
`Preferably, another portion of the extracted second over-
`head is recycled to the reactor.
`[0018]
`In another aspect, the present invention pro-
`vides an improved method for separating a mixture con-
`taining water, acetic acid, methyl iodide, methyl acetate,
`methanol, at least one C242 alkyl iodide and at least one
`permanganate reducing compound (PRC). The im-
`proved method includes the following steps: (a) distilling
`the mixture to form a PRC enriched overhead stream;
`(b) extracting the PRC enriched overhead stream with
`water and separating therefrom an aqueous stream con-
`taining at leastone PRC; and (c) distilling at least a portion
`of the extracted PRC enriched overhead together with
`the mixture.
`
`In still another aspect, the present invention pro-
`[0019]
`vides an improved method for reduction and/or removal
`of permanganate—reducing compounds (PRC’s) and
`C242 alkyl iodide compoundsformed in the carbonylation
`of methanol to a product of acetic acid. In the improved
`method, the methanol is carbonylated in a reaction me-
`dium containing a catalyst, and an organic iodide; the
`products ofthe carbonylation reaction are separated into
`(1) a volatile phase containing acetic acid product, or-
`ganic iodide, water, and at least one PRC, and (2) a less
`volatile phase containing the catalyst; the volatile phase
`is distilled to yield a purified product and a first overhead
`containing organic iodide, water, acetic acid, and PRC.
`The improvement includes the steps of (a) distilling the
`first overhead to form a PRC enriched second overhead
`
`stream; (b) extracting the second overhead stream with
`water and separating therefrom an aqueous stream con-
`taining PRC’s; and (c) distilling at least a portion of the
`extracted second overhead together with the first over-
`head.
`
`In particularly preferred embodiments ofthe in-
`[0020]
`vention, the second overhead or PRC enriched overhead
`contains dimethyl ether in an amount effective to reduce
`the solubility of methyl
`iodide in the aqueous extract
`stream.
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`[0021]
`
`FIG. 1 illustrates the prior art process, as disclosed
`in U.S. Patent No. 6,339,171, forthe removal of car-
`
`bonyl impurities from an intermediate stream of the
`carbonylation process for the production of acetic
`acid by a carbonylation reaction.
`
`FIG. 2 illustrates a preferred embodiment of the
`present invention.
`
`[0022] While the invention is susceptible to various
`modifications and alternative forms, specific embodi-
`ments have been shown by way of example in the draw-
`ings and will be described in detail herein.
`It should be
`understood, however, that the invention is not intended
`to be limited to the particular forms disclosed. Rather,
`the invention is intendedto cover all modifications, equiv-
`alents and alternatives falling within the scope of the in-
`vention as defined by the appended claims.
`
`DESCRIPTION OF ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENTS
`
`Illustrative embodiments of the invention are
`[0023]
`described below. In the interest of clarity, not all features
`of an actual implementation are described in this speci-
`fication. ltwill of course be appreciated that in the devel-
`opment of any such actual embodiment, numerous im-
`plementation—specific decisions must be made to
`achieve the developers’ specific goals, such as compli-
`ance with system—related and business—related con-
`straints, which will vary from one implementation to an-
`other. Moreover, it will be appreciated that such a devel-
`opment effort might be complex and time—consuming, but
`would nevertheless be a routine undertaking forthose of
`ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of this disclo-
`sure.
`
`[0024] The purification process of the present inven-
`tion is useful in any process usedto carbonylate methanol
`(or another carbonylatable reactant such as methyl ac-
`etate, methyl formate, or dimethyl ether) to acetic acid in
`the presence of a Group VIII metal catalyst such as rho-
`dium and an iodide promoter. A particularly useful proc-
`ess is the low water rhodium—catalyzed carbonylation of
`methanol to acetic acid as exemplified in U.S. Patent No.
`5,001 ,259. Generally, the rhodium component ofthe cat-
`alyst system is believed to be present in the form of a
`coordination compound of rhodium with a halogen com-
`ponent providing at least one of the ligands of such co-
`ordination compound. In addition to the coordination of
`rhodium and halogen, it is also believed that carbon mon-
`oxide coordinates with rhodium. The rhodium component
`of the catalyst system may be provided by introducing
`into the reaction zone rhodium in the form of rhodium
`
`metal, rhodium salts such as the oxides, acetates, io-
`dides, etc., or other coordination compounds of rhodium,
`and the like.
`
`[0025] The halogen—promoting component of the cat-
`alyst system consists of a halogen compound comprising
`an organic halide. Thus, alkyl, aryl, and substituted alkyl
`or aryl halides can be used. Preferably, the halide pro-
`moter is present in the form of an alkyl halide in which
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`4
`
`000004
`
`Exh. 1023
`
`000004
`
`Exh. 1023
`
`

`

`7
`
`EP 1 737 808 B1
`
`8
`
`the alkyl radical corresponds to the alkyl radical of the
`feed alcohol, which is carbonylated. Thus, in the carbo-
`nylation of methanol to acetic acid, the halide promoter
`will contain methyl halide, and more preferably methyl
`iodide.
`
`[0026] The liquid reaction medium employed may in-
`clude any solvent compatible with the catalyst system
`and may include pure alcohols, or mixtures ofthe alcohol
`feedstock and/or the desired carboxylic acid and/or es-
`ters of these two compounds. The preferred solvent and
`liquid reaction medium for the low water carbonylation
`process is the carboxylic acid product. Thus, in the car-
`bonylation of methanol to acetic acid, the preferred sol-
`vent is acetic acid.
`
`[0027] Water is contained in the reaction medium but
`at concentrations well below that which has heretofore
`
`been thought practical for achieving sufficient reaction
`rates. It has previously been taught that in rhodium—cat—
`alyzed carbonylation reactions ofthe type set forth in this
`invention, the addition of water exerts a beneficial effect
`upon the reaction rate (U.S. Patent No. 3,769,329). Thus
`most commercial operations run at water concentrations
`of at least about 14 wt %. Accordingly, it is quite unex-
`pected that reaction rates substantially equal to and
`above reaction rates obtained with such high levels of
`water concentration can be achieved with water concen-
`trations below 14 wt % and as low as about 0.1 1 wt %.
`
`In accordance with the carbonylation process
`[0028]
`most useful to manufacture acetic acid according to the
`present invention, the desired reaction rates are obtained
`even at low water concentrations by including in the re-
`action medium methyl acetate and an additional iodide
`ion which is over and above the iodide which is present
`as a catalyst promoter such as methyl iodide or other
`organic iodide. The additional iodide promoter is an io-
`dide salt, with Iithium iodide being preferred. It has been
`found that under low water concentrations, methyl ace-
`tate and lithium iodide act as rate promoters only when
`relatively high concentrations of each of these compo-
`nents are present and that the promotion is higher when
`both of these components are present simultaneously
`(U.S. PatentNo. 5,001 ,259). The concentration of lithium
`iodide used in the reaction medium of the preferred car-
`bonylation reaction system is believed to be quite high
`as compared with what little prior art there is dealing with
`the use of halide salts in reaction systems of this sort.
`The absolute concentration of iodide ion content is not a
`
`limitation on the usefulness of the present invention.
`[0029] The carbonylation reaction of methanol to ace-
`tic acid product may be carried out by contacting the
`methanol feed, which is in the liquid phase, with gaseous
`carbon monoxide bubbled through a liquid acetic acid
`solvent reaction medium containing the rhodium catalyst,
`methyl iodide promoter, methyl acetate, and additional
`soluble iodide salt, atconditions of temperature and pres-
`sure suitable to form the carbonylation product. It will be
`generally recognized that it is the concentration of iodide
`ion in the catalyst system that is important and not the
`
`cation associated with the iodide, and that at a given mo-
`lar concentration of iodide the nature of the cation is not
`
`as significant as the effect of the iodide concentration.
`Any metal iodide salt, or any iodide salt of any organic
`cation, or quaternary cation such as a quaternary amine
`or phosphine or inorganic cation can be used provided
`that the salt is sufficiently soluble in the reaction medium
`to provide the desired level ofthe iodide. When the iodide
`is added as a metal salt, preferably it is an iodide salt of
`a member of the group consisting ofthe metals of Group
`IA and Group IIA of the periodic table as set forth in the
`"Handbook of Chemistry and Physics" published by CRC
`Press, Cleveland, Ohio, 1975-76 (56th edition).
`In par-
`ticular, alkali metal iodides are useful, with lithium iodide
`being preferred. In the low water carbonylation process
`most useful in this invention, the additional iodide over
`and above the organic iodide promoter is present in the
`catalyst solution in amounts of from about 2 to about 20
`wt %, the methyl acetate is present in amounts of from
`about 0.5 to about 30 wt %, and the lithium iodide is
`present in amounts of from about 5 to about 20 wt %.
`The rhodium catalyst is present in amounts offrom about
`200 to about 2000 parts per million (ppm).
`[0030] Typical reaction temperatures for carbonylation
`will be approximately 150 to about 250°C, with the tem-
`perature range of about 180 to about 220°C being the
`preferred range. The carbon monoxide partial pressure
`in the reactor can vary widely but is typically about 2 to
`about 30 atmospheres, and preferably, about 3 to about
`10 atmospheres. Because of the partial pressure of by-
`products and the vapor pressure ofthe contained liquids,
`the total reactor pressure will range from about 15 to
`about 40 atmospheres.
`[0031] A typical reaction and acetic acid recovery sys-
`tem that is used for the iodide—promoted rhodium cata-
`lyzed carbonylation of methanol to acetic acid is shown
`in FIG. 1 and includes a liquid phase carbonylation reac-
`tor, flasher, and a methyl iodide acetic acid light ends
`column 14which has an acetic acid side stream 17 which
`
`proceeds to further purification. The reactor and flasher
`are not shown in FIG. 1. These are considered standard
`
`equipment now well known in the carbonylation process
`art. The carbonylation reactor is typically either a stirred
`vessel or a bubble column reactor, within which the re-
`acting Iiquid or slurry contents are maintained automat-
`ically at a constant level. Into this reactorthere are con-
`tinuously introduced fresh methanol, carbon monoxide,
`sufficient water as needed to maintain at least a finite
`
`concentration of water in the reaction medium, recycled
`catalyst solution from the flasher base, a recycled methyl
`iodide and methyl acetate phase, and a recycled aque-
`ous acetic acid phase from an overhead receiver decant-
`er of the methyl iodide acetic acid light ends or splitter
`column 14. Distillation systems are employed that pro-
`vide means for recovering the crude acetic acid and re-
`cycling catalyst solution, methyl iodide, and methyl ace-
`tate to the reactor. In a preferred process, carbon mon-
`oxide is continuously introduced into the carbonylation
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`5
`
`000005
`
`Exh. 1023
`
`000005
`
`Exh. 1023
`
`

`

`9
`
`EP 1 737 808 B1
`
`10
`
`reactorjust below the agitator, which is used to stir the
`contents. The gaseous feed is thoroughly dispersed
`through the reacting liquid by this stirring means. A gas-
`eous purge stream is vented from the reactor to prevent
`buildup of gaseous by—products and to maintain a set
`carbon monoxide partial pressure at a given total reactor
`pressure. The temperature of the reactor is controlled
`and the carbon monoxide feed is introduced at a rate
`
`sufficient to maintain the desired total reactor pressure.
`[0032]
`Liquid product is drawn off from the carbonyla—
`tion reactor at a rate sufficientto maintain a constant level
`therein and is introduced to the flasher. In the flasherthe
`
`catalyst solution is withdrawn as a base stream (predom-
`inantly acetic acid containing the rhodium and the iodide
`salt along with lesser quantities of methyl acetate, methyl
`iodide, and water), while the vapor overhead stream of
`the flasher contains largely the product acetic acid along
`with methyl iodide, methyl acetate, and water. Dissolved
`gases exiting the reactor and entering the flasher consist
`of a portion of the carbon monoxide along with gaseous
`by products such as methane, hydrogen, and carbon di-
`oxide and exit the flasher as part of the overhead stream.
`The overhead stream is directed to the light ends or split-
`ter column 14 as stream 26.
`
`It has been disclosed in U.S. Patent Nos.
`[0033]
`6,143,930 and 6,339,171 that there is a higher concen-
`tration, about 3 times, of the PRC’s and in particular
`acetaldehyde content in the light phase than in the heavy
`phase stream exiting column 14. Thus, in accordance
`with the present invention, PRC—containing stream 28 is
`directed to an overhead receiver decanter 16 whence
`
`the light ends phase, stream 30, is directed to distillation
`column 18.
`
`[0034] The present invention may broadly be consid-
`ered as an improved process for distilling PRC’s, prima-
`rily aldehydes and alkyl iodides, from avapor phase ace-
`tic acid stream. The vapor phase stream is distilled and
`extracted to remove PRC’s. An especially preferred
`method of removing aldehydes and alkyl iodides from a
`first vapor phase acetic acid stream and reducing levels
`of propionic acid in the acetic acid product, includes the
`following steps:
`
`a) condensing the first vapor phase acetic acid
`stream in a first condenser and biphasically separat-
`ing it to form a first heavy liquid phase product and
`a first light liquid phase product wherein said first
`heavy liquid phase contains the larger proportion of
`catalytic components than said first light liquid phase
`product;
`b) distilling the light liquid phase product in a first
`distillation column toform asecond vapor phase ace-
`tic acid product stream which is enriched with alde-
`hydes and alkyl iodides with respect to said first va-
`por phase acetic acid stream;
`c) condensing the second vapor phase stream in a
`second condenser to form a second liquid phase
`product;
`
`d) distilling the second liquid phase product in a sec-
`ond distillation column to form a third vapor phase
`stream;
`e) condensing the third vapor phase stream and ex-
`tracting the condensed stream with waterto remove
`residual acetaldehyde therefrom; and
`f) recycling at least a portion of the extracted third
`vapor phase stream to the second distillation col-
`umn.
`
`[0035] An embodiment of the prior art as disclosed in
`U.S. Patent No. 6,339,171 is shown in FIG. 1. Referring
`to FIG. 1, the first vapor phase acetic acid stream (28)
`contains methyl
`iodide, methyl acetate, acetaldehyde
`and other carbonyl components. This stream is then con-
`densed and separated (in vessel 16) to separate the
`heavy phase product containing the larger proportion of
`catalytic components——which is recirculated to the reactor
`(not shown in FIG. 1), and a light phase (30) containing
`acetaldehyde, water, and acetic acid.
`[0036]
`Either phase of the light ends overhead may be
`subsequently distilled to remove the PRC’s and primarily
`the acetaldehyde component of the stream, although it
`is preferred to remove PRC’s from the light phase (30)
`because it has been found that the concentration of
`
`acetaldehyde is somewhat greater in that phase. In the
`embodiment depicted and described herein, the distilla-
`tion is carried out in two stages; but it will be appreciated
`that the distillation may be performed in a single column
`as well.
`
`[0037] The light phase (30) is directed to column 18,
`which serves to form a second vapor phase (36) enriched
`in aldehydes and alkyl iodides with respect to stream 28.
`Steam 36 is condensed (vessel 20) and biphasically sep-
`arated to form a second heavy liquid phase product and
`a second light phase liquid product. This second heavy
`liquid phase contains a higher proportion ofcatalytic com-
`ponents than the second Iight liquid phase and is subse-
`quently recirculatedtothe reactor. The second liquid light
`phase (40) containing acetaldehyde, methyl
`iodide,
`methanol, and methyl acetate is directed to a second
`distillation column (22) wherein the acetaldehyde is sep-
`arated from the other components. This inventive proc-
`ess has been found to reduce and/or remove at least
`
`50% of the alkyl iodide impurities found in an acetic acid
`stream. It has also been shown that acetaldehyde and
`its derivatives is reduced and/or removed by at |east50%,
`most often greater than 60%. As a result, it is possible
`to keep the concentration of propionic acid in the acetic
`acid product below about 400 parts per million by weight,
`and preferably below 250 parts per million.
`[0038]
`From the top of the light ends or splitter column
`14, vapors are removed via stream 28, condensed, and
`directed to vessel 16. The vapors are chilled to a tem-
`perature sufficient to condense and separate the con-
`densable methyl iodide, methyl acetate, acetaldehyde
`and other carbonyl components, and waterintotwo phas-
`es. A portion of stream 28 contains noncondensable gas-
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`6
`
`000006
`
`Exh. 1023
`
`000006
`
`Exh. 1023
`
`

`

`11
`
`EP1 737 808 B1
`
`12
`
`es such as carbon dioxide, hydrogen, and the like and
`can be vented as shown in stream 29 on FIG. 1. Also
`
`leaving overhead receiver decanter 1 6, but not illustrated
`in FIG. 1 , is the heavy phase of stream 28. Ordinarily this
`heavy phase is recirculated to the reactor, but a slip
`stream, generally a small amount, e.g., 25 vol. %, pref-
`erably less than about20 vol. %, of the heavy phase may
`also be directed to a c

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket