throbber
Européisches Patentamt
`
`(19) 0’» European PatentOffice
`
`Office européen des brevets
`
`(11) Ver6ffentlichungsnummer:
`
`(11) Publication number:
`
`(11) Numéro de publication:
`
`EP 1 720 821 A0
`
`Internationale Anmeldung veroffentlicht durch die
`
`Weltorganisation fUr geistiges Eigentum unter der Nummer:
`
`wo 2005/085166 (art. 158 des EPU).
`
`International application published by the World
`
`Intellectual Property Organisation under number:
`
`WO 2005/085166 (art. 158 Of the EPC).
`
`Demande internationale publiée par I’Organisation
`
`Mondiale de la Propriété sous |e numéro:
`
`WO 2005/085166 (art. 158 de la CBE).
`
`000001
`
`Exh. 1014
`
`000001
`
`Exh. 1014
`
`

`

`Document made
`
`available under
`
`the
`
`Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT)
`
`International application number: PCT/USOS/006092
`
`International filing date:
`
`24 February 2005 (24.02.2005)
`
`Document type:
`
`Certified copy of priority document
`
`Document details:
`
`Country/Office: US
`Number:
`10/708,420
`
`Filing date:
`
`02 March 2004 (02.03.2004)
`
`Date of receipt at the International Bureau:
`
`31 March 2005 (31.03.2005)
`
`Remark:
`
`Priority document submitted or transmitted to the International Bureau in
`compliance with Rule l7.l(a) or (b)
`
`
`
`World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) - Geneva, Switzerland
`Organisation Mondiale de la Propriété Intellectuelle (OMPI) - Geneve, Suisse
`000002
`Exh. 1014
`
`000002
`
`Exh. 1014
`
`

`

`
`
`(rt/44y”///////
`
`
`
`\\\wa
`
`
`
` \\\me\\\\\\\\
`
`\\:\\\\ \\\}Q“ §E§\§ \\‘§\‘\
`\W‘RW
`\\\\ \\\xxx \'<\\\\\\\\<\
`“3-. \\wé\\\“xv\\\“:m.
`\\\“$§\\\\\\\.\\\:~x'\\\“N\\\§\Q\\
`\\
`1:)
`
`
`,
`‘ § §\ *3 \\
`§fi\\
`
`\\\\\>\\\~\\Ҥ
`
`‘3'\&\\\\\\\N\mm§\fi\\i\\\\\\\mh\\\\\\\\®..\
`
`
`
`
`
`‘
`
`[E'NI’I' ED :‘H‘ES DIS {E‘AI :1 1% NT 0 I?" if 303‘! M. E RC}:
`
`United States Patent and "l'mdmnark Office
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`March 16, 2005
`
` THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT ANNEXED HERETO IS A TRUE COPY FROM
`THE RECORDS OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK
`OFFICE OF THOSE PAPERS OF THE BELOW IDENTIFIED PATENT
`
`APPLICATION THAT MET THE REQUIREMENTS TO BE GRANTED A
`FILING DATE.
`
`
`APPLICATION NUMBER: 10/708,420
`FILING DATE: March 02, 2004
`RELATED PCT APPLICATION NUMBER: PCT/U505/06092
`
`
`
`(Twfified by
`
`
`w.»I...-
`\
`
`“wwwb
`
`
`
`1.5 mlw Secretary {if {Timmwrce
`for Imeflcctmxl 'l’mpcrty
`
`
`and Dimmrr of the [Emmi Siat‘es
`Patel}! and ‘1‘mdermrk Office
`
`
`
`
`Wmmmmmmm\\\\\fix\\
`
`
`
`
`
`
`000003
`
`Exh. 1014
`
`

`

`TRANSMITTAL
`
`Electronic Version v1.1
`
`Stylesheet Version v1.1.0
`
`Title 9“
`lnventlon
`
`REMOVAL OF PERMANGANATE REDUCING COMPOUNDS FROM
`METHANOL CARBONYLATION PROCESS STREAM
`
`Registered Number: 44680
`
`Application Number :
`Date :
`
`First Named Applicant:
`Confirmation Number:
`
`Attorney Docket Number:
`
`Mr. Mark O. Scates
`
`I hereby certify that the use of this system is for OFFICIAL correspondence between patent
`applicants or their representatives and the USPTO. Fraudulent or other use besides the filing
`of official correspondence by authorized parties is strictly prohibited, and subject to a fine
`and/or imprisonment under applicable law.
`
`, the undersigned, certify that l have viewed a display of document(s) being electronically
`|
`submitted to the United States Patent and Trademark Office, using either the USPTO provided
`style sheet or software, and that this is the document(s) I intend for initiation or further
`prosecution of a patent application noted in the submission. This document(s) will become
`part of the official electronic record at the USPTO.
`
`Submitted By:
`lra D. Finkelstein
`
`Mr.
`
`Elec. Sign.
`
`/idf/
`
`Sign. Capacity
`Attorney
`
`000004
`
`Exh. 1014
`
`000004
`
`Exh. 1014
`
`

`

`Documents being submitted:
`
`Files
`
`us-fee-sheet
`
`us-request
`
`application-body
`
`Comments
`
`
`
`CELAO73-usfees.xml
`us-fee-sheet.xsl
`
`us-fee-sheet.dtd
`
`CELAO73-usrequ .me
`us—request.dtd
`
`us-request.xsl
`
`CELAO73-trans.xml
`us-application-body.xsl
`
`application-body.dtd
`
`wipo .ent
`mathm|2.dtd
`
`mathmI2-qname-1.mod
`isoamsa.ent
`
`isoamsbent
`
`isoamsc.ent
`
`isoamsnent
`
`isoamsoent
`
`isoamsr.ent
`
`isogrk3.ent
`isomfrk.ent
`
`isomopf.ent
`isomscr.ent
`
`isotech.ent
`
`isobox.ent
`
`isocyr1 .ent
`
`isocyr2.ent
`isodia.ent
`
`isolat1 .ent
`
`isolat2.ent
`
`isonum.ent
`
`isopubent
`mmlextra.ent
`
`mmlaliasent
`
`soextblx.dtd
`
`073fig1 .tif
`
`073fig2.tif
`
`000005
`
`Exh. 1014
`
`000005
`
`Exh. 1014
`
`

`

`APPLICATION DATA SHEET
`
`Electronic Version v14
`
`Stylesheet Version v14.0
`
`Title of Invention
`
`REMOVAL OF PERMANGANATE REDUCING COMPOUNDS FROM
`METHANOL CARBONYLATION PROCESS STREAM
`
`Application Type :
`
`regular, utility
`
`
`
`Correspondence address:
`
`Customer Number:
`
`Inventors Information:
`
`Inventor 1:
`
`Applicant Authority Type:
`
`Inventor
`
`Citizenship:
`
`Name prefix:
`
`Given Name:
`
`Middle Name:
`
`Family Name:
`
`Residence:
`
`City of Residence:
`
`State of Residence:
`
`Country of Residence:
`
`US
`
`Mr.
`
`0.
`
`TX
`
`US
`
`Address-1 of Mailing Address:
`
`Celanese Chemicals
`
`Address-2 of Mailing Address:
`
`PO. Box 58190
`
`City of Mailing Address:
`
`State of Mailing Address:
`
`Houston
`
`TX
`
`Postal Code of Mailing Address:
`
`77258-8190
`
`Country of Mailing Address:
`
`US
`
`Phone:
`
`Fax:
`
`E-mail:
`
`Inventor 2:
`
`Applicant Authority Type:
`
`Inventor
`
`Citizenship:
`
`Name prefix:
`
`Given Name:
`
`US
`
`Mr.
`
`000006
`
`Exh. 1014
`
`

`

`Middle Name:
`
`Family Name:
`
`Residence:
`
`City of Residence:
`
`State of Residence:
`
`Country of Residence:
`
`TX
`
`US
`
`Address-1 of Mailing Address:
`
`Celanese Chemicals
`
`Address-2 of Mailing Address:
`
`PO. Box 58190
`
`City of Mailing Address:
`
`State of Mailing Address:
`
`Houston
`
`TX
`
`Postal Code of Mailing Address:
`
`77258-8190
`
`Country of Mailing Address:
`
`US
`
`Phone:
`
`Fax:
`
`E-mail:
`
`Inventor 3:
`
`Applicant Authority Type:
`
`Inventor
`
`Citizenship:
`
`Name prefix:
`
`Given Name:
`
`Middle Name:
`
`Family Name:
`
`Residence:
`
`City of Residence:
`
`State of Residence:
`
`Country of Residence:
`
`US
`
`Mr.
`
`Raymond
`
`J.
`
`Zinobile
`
`Houston
`
`TX
`
`US
`
`
`
`Address-1 of Mailing Address:
`
`Celanese Chemicals
`
`Address-2 of Mailing Address:
`
`PO. Box 58190
`
`City of Mailing Address:
`
`State of Mailing Address:
`
`Houston
`
`TX
`
`Postal Code of Mailing Address:
`
`77258-8190
`
`Country of Mailing Address:
`
`US
`
`Phone:
`
`Fax:
`
`E-mail:
`
`Attorney Information:
`
`practitioner(s) at Customer Number:
`||||I||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
`23369
`as our attorney(s) or agent(s) to prosecute the application identified above, and to transact all
`business in the United States Patent and Trademark Office connected therewith.
`
`000007
`
`Exh. 1014
`
`

`

`Publication Information:
`
`Suggested Figure for Publication - 2
`Suggested Classification -
`Suggested Technology Center -
`Total Number of Drawing Sheets - 2
`
`Assignee 1 :
`
`Organization Name:
`
`Celanese International Corporation
`
`Address-1 of Mailing Address:
`
`1601 W. LBJ Freeway
`
`Address-2 of Mailing Address:
`
`City of Mailing Address:
`
`State of Mailing Address:
`
`Dallas
`
`TX
`
`Postal Code of Mailing Address:
`
`75234-6034
`
`Country of Mailing Address:
`
`US
`
`E-mail:
`
`Phone:
`
`Fax:
`
`000008
`
`Exh. 1014
`
`000008
`
`Exh. 1014
`
`

`

`Electronic Version
`
`Stylesheet Version v1.1.1
`
`Description
`
`REMOVAL OF PERMANGANATE
`
`REDUCING COMPOUNDS FROM
`
`METHANOL CARBONYLATION PROCESS
`
`STREAM
`
`BACKGROUND OF INVENTION
`
`1. FIELD OF THE INVENTION
`
`[0001] This invention relates to an improved process for the re—
`
`moval of permanganate reducing compounds and alkyl
`
`iodides formed by the carbonylation of methanol in the
`
`presence of a Group VIII metal carbonylation catalyst.
`
`More specifically, this invention relates to an improved
`
`process for reducing and/or removing precursors of per—
`
`manganate reducing compounds and alkyl iodides from
`
`intermediate streams during the formation of acetic acid
`
`by said carbonylation processes.
`
`2. TECHNICAL BACKGROUND
`
`[0002] Among currently employed processes for synthesizing
`000009
`Exh. 1014
`
`000009
`
`Exh. 1014
`
`

`

`acetic acid, one of the most useful commercially is the
`
`catalyzed carbonylation of methanol with carbon monox—
`
`ide as taught in U.S. Pat. No. 3,769,329 issued to Paulik et
`
`al. on Oct. 30, 1973. The carbonylation catalyst contains
`
`rhodium, either dissolved or otherwise dispersed in a liq—
`
`uid reaction medium or supported on an inert solid, along
`
`with a halogen—containing catalyst promoter as exempli—
`
`fied by methyl iodide. The rhodium can be introduced into
`
`the reaction system in any of many forms, and the exact
`
`nature of the rhodium moiety within the active catalyst
`
`complex is uncertain. Likewise, the nature of the halide
`
`promoter is not critical. The patentees disclose a very
`
`large number of suitable promoters, most of which are
`
`organic iodides. Most typically and usefully, the reaction is
`
`conducted by continuously bubbling carbon monoxide
`
`gas through a liquid reaction medium in which the cata—
`
`lyst is dissolved.
`
`[0003] An improvement in the prior art process for the carbony—
`
`lation of an alcohol to produce the carboxylic acid having
`
`one carbon atom more than the alcohol in the presence of
`
`a rhodium catalyst is disclosed in commonly assigned U.S.
`
`Patent Nos. 5,001,259, issued Mar. 19, 1991; 5,026,908,
`
`issuedJun. 25, 1991; and 5,144,068, issued Sep. 1, 1992;
`
`000010
`
`Exh. 1014
`
`000010
`
`Exh. 1014
`
`

`

`and European Patent No. EP 0 161 874 32, publishedJul.
`
`1, 1992. As disclosed therein, acetic acid is produced
`
`from methanol in a reaction medium containing methyl
`
`acetate, methyl halide, especially methyl iodide, and
`
`rhodium present in a catalytically effective concentration.
`
`These patents disclose that catalyst stability and the pro—
`
`ductivity of the carbonylation reactor can be maintained at
`
`surprisingly high levels, even at very low water concentra—
`
`tions, i.e. 4 weight percent or less, in the reaction medium
`
`(despite the general industrial practice of maintaining ap—
`
`proximately 14—15 wt % water) by maintaining in the reac—
`
`tion medium, along with a catalytically effective amount of
`
`rhodium and at least a finite concentration of water, a
`
`specified concentration of iodide ions over and above the
`
`iodide content which is present as methyl iodide or other
`
`organic iodide. The iodide ion is present as a simple salt,
`
`with lithium iodide being preferred. The patents teach that
`
`the concentration of methyl acetate and iodide salts are
`
`significant parameters in affecting the rate of carbonyla—
`
`tion of methanol to produce acetic acid, especially at low
`
`reactor water concentrations. By using relatively high con—
`
`centrations of the methyl acetate and iodide salt, one ob—
`
`tains a surprising degree of catalyst stability and reactor
`
`000011
`
`Exh. 1014
`
`000011
`
`Exh. 1014
`
`

`

`productivity even when the liquid reaction medium con—
`
`tains water in concentrations as low as about 0.1 wt %, so
`
`low that it can broadly be defined simply as "a finite con—
`
`centration" of water. Furthermore, the reaction medium
`
`employed improves the stability of the rhodium catalyst,
`
`i.e. resistance to catalyst precipitation, especially during
`
`the product recovery steps of the process. In these steps,
`
`distillation for the purpose of recovering the acetic acid
`
`product tends to remove from the catalyst the carbon
`
`monoxide which in the environment maintained in the re—
`
`action vessel, is a ligand with stabilizing effect on the
`
`rhodium. U.S. Patent Nos. 5,001,259, 5,026,908 and
`
`5,144,068 are herein incorporated by reference.
`
`[0004]
`
`It has been found that although a low water carbonylation
`
`process for producing acetic acid reduces such by—
`
`products as carbon dioxide, hydrogen, and propionic acid,
`
`the amount of other impurities, present generally in trace
`
`amounts, is also increased, and the quality of acetic acid
`
`sometimes suffers when attempts are made to increase
`
`the production rate by improving catalysts, or modifying
`
`reaction conditions.
`
`[0005]
`
`These trace impurities affect quality of acetic acid, espe—
`
`cially when they are recirculated through the reaction pro—
`
`000012
`
`Exh. 1014
`
`000012
`
`Exh. 1014
`
`

`

`cess. The impurities that decrease the permanganate time
`
`of the acetic acid include carbonyl compounds and unsat—
`
`urated carbonyl compounds. As used herein, the phrase
`
`"carbonyl" is intended to mean compounds that contain
`
`aldehyde or ketone functional groups, which compounds
`
`may or may not possess unsaturation. See Catalysis ofOr—
`
`ganic Reaction, 75, 369—380 (1998), for further discussion
`
`on impurities in a carbonylation process.
`
`[0006]
`
`The present invention is directed to reducing and/or re—
`
`moving permanganate reducing compounds (PRC"s) such
`
`as acetaldehyde, acetone, methyl ethyl ketone, butyralde—
`
`hyde, crotonaldehyde, 2—ethyl crotonaldehyde, and
`
`2—ethyl butyraldehyde and the like, and the aldol conden—
`
`sation products thereof. The present invention also leads
`
`to reduction of propionic acid.
`
`[0007]
`
`The carbonyl impurities described above, such as ac—
`
`etaldehyde, may react with iodide catalyst promoters to
`
`form multi—carbon alkyl iodides, e.g., ethyl iodide, propyl
`
`iodide, butyl iodide, pentyl iodide, hexyl iodide and the
`
`like. It is desirable to remove alkyl iodides from the reac—
`
`tion product because even small amounts of these impu—
`
`rities in the acetic acid product tend to poison the catalyst
`
`used in the production of vinyl acetate, the product most
`
`000013
`
`Exh. 1014
`
`000013
`
`Exh. 1014
`
`

`

`commonly produced from acetic acid. The present inven—
`
`tion is thus also directed to removal of alkyl iodides, in
`
`particular C2_12 alkyl iodide compounds. Accordingly, be—
`
`cause many impurities originate with acetaldehyde, it is a
`
`primary objective to remove acetaldehyde from the pro—
`
`cess so as to reduce the alkyl iodide content.
`
`[0008]
`
`Conventional techniques to remove impurities include
`
`treating the acetic acid product with oxidizers, ozone, wa—
`
`ter, methanol, activated—carbon, amines, and the like,
`
`which treatment may or may not be combined with distil—
`
`lation of the acetic acid. The most typical purification
`
`treatment involves a series of distillations of the final
`
`product. It is also known, for example from U.S. Patent
`
`No. 5,783,731, to remove carbonyl impurities from or—
`
`ganic streams by treating the organic streams with an
`
`amine compound such as hydroxylamine, which reacts
`
`with the carbonyl compounds to form oximes, followed by
`
`distillation to separate the purified organic product from
`
`the oxime reaction products. However, the additional
`
`treatment of the final product adds cost to the process,
`
`and distillation of the treated acetic acid product can re—
`
`sult in additional impurities being formed.
`
`[0009] While it is possible to obtain acetic acid of relatively high
`
`000014
`
`Exh. 1014
`
`000014
`
`Exh. 1014
`
`

`

`purity, the acetic acid product formed by the low—water
`
`carbonylation process and purification treatment de—
`
`scribed above frequently remains somewhat deficient with
`
`respect to the permanganate time due to the presence of
`
`small proportions of residual impurities. Since a sufficient
`
`permanganate time is an important commercial test,
`
`which the acid product must meet to be suitable for many
`
`uses, the presence of impurities that decrease perman—
`
`ganate time is objectionable. Moreover, it is not economi—
`
`cally or commercially feasible to remove minute quantities
`
`of these impurities from the acetic acid by distillation be—
`
`cause some of the impurities have boiling points close to
`
`that of the acetic acid product.
`
`[0010]
`
`It has thus become important to identify economically vi—
`
`able methods of removing impurities elsewhere in the
`
`carbonylation process without contaminating the final
`
`product or adding unnecessary costs. U.S. Patent No.
`
`5,756,836, incorporated herein by reference, discloses a
`
`method for manufacturing high purity acetic acid by ad—
`
`justing the acetaldehyde concentration of the reaction so—
`
`lution below 1500 ppm. It is stated that by maintaining
`
`the acetaldehyde concentration below this threshold, it is
`
`possible to suppress the formation of impurities such that
`
`000015
`
`Exh. 1014
`
`000015
`
`Exh. 1014
`
`

`

`one need only distill the crude acetic acid product to ob—
`
`tain high purity acetic acid.
`
`[0011]
`
`European Patent No. EP 0 487 284 Bl, published April 12,
`
`1995, discloses that carbonyl impurities present in the
`
`acetic acid product generally concentrate in the overhead
`
`from the light ends column. Accordingly, the light ends
`
`column overhead is treated with an amine compound
`
`(such as hydroxylamine), which reacts with the carbonyl
`
`compounds to form oxime derivatives that can be sepa—
`
`rated from the remaining overhead by distillation, result—
`
`ing in an acetic acid product with improved permanganate
`
`time.
`
`[0012]
`
`European Patent Application No. EP 0 687 662 A2 and U.S.
`
`Patent No. 5,625,095 describe a process for producing
`
`high purity acetic acid in which it is stated that an ac—
`
`etaldehyde concentration of 400 ppm or less is main—
`
`tained in the reactor by using a single or multi—stage dis—
`
`tillation process to remove acetaldehyde. Streams sug—
`
`gested for processing to remove acetaldehyde include a
`
`light phase containing primarily water, acetic acid and
`
`methyl acetate; a heavy phase containing primarily methyl
`
`iodide, methyl acetate and acetic acid; an overhead stream
`
`containing primarily methyl iodide and methyl acetate; or
`
`000016
`
`Exh. 1014
`
`000016
`
`Exh. 1014
`
`

`

`a recirculating stream formed by combining the light and
`
`heavy phase. These references do not identify which of
`
`these streams possesses the greatest concentration of ac—
`
`etaldehyde.
`
`[0013]
`
`EP 0 687 662 A2 and U.S. Patent No. 5,625,095 also dis—
`
`close management of reaction conditions to control the
`
`formation of acetaldehyde in the reactor. Although it is
`
`stated that formation of by—products such as crotonalde—
`
`hyde, 2—ethylcrotonaldehyde, and alkyl iodides is reduced
`
`by controlling the formation of acetaldehyde, it is also
`
`pointed out that management of reaction conditions as
`
`proposed increases the formation of propionic acid, an
`
`undesirable by—product.
`
`[0014]
`
`More recently, it has been disclosed in commonly as—
`
`signed U.S. Patent Nos. 6,143,930 and 6,339,171 that it is
`
`possible to significantly reduce the undesirable impurities
`
`in the acetic acid product by performing a multi—stage
`
`purification on the light ends column overhead. These
`
`patents disclose a purification process in which the light
`
`ends overhead is distilled twice, in each case taking the
`
`acetaldehyde overhead and returning a methyl iodide rich
`
`residuum to the reactor. The acetaldehyde—rich distillate
`
`is optionally extracted with water to remove the majority
`
`000017
`
`Exh. 1014
`
`000017
`
`Exh. 1014
`
`

`

`of the acetaldehyde for disposal, leaving a significantly
`
`lower acetaldehyde concentration in the raffinate that is
`
`recycled to the reactor. U.S. Patent Nos. 6,143,930 and
`
`6,339,171 are incorporated herein by reference in their
`
`entirety.
`
`[0015]
`
`While the above—described processes have been success—
`
`ful in removing carbonyl impurities from the carbonylation
`
`system and for the most part controlling acetaldehyde
`
`levels and permanganate time problems in the final acetic
`
`acid product, further improvements can still be made. Ac—
`
`cordingly, there remains a need for alternative processes
`
`to improve the efficiency of acetaldehyde removal. The
`
`present invention provides one such alternative solution.
`
`SUMMARY OF INVENTION
`
`[0016]
`
`In one aspect, the present invention provides a process
`
`for producing acetic acid that includes the following steps:
`
`(a) reacting methanol, methyl acetate, methyl formate or
`
`dimethyl ether with carbon monoxide in a suitable reac—
`
`tion medium that includes a catalyst and an organic io—
`
`dide;(b) separating the products of the reaction into a
`
`volatile product phase that contains acetic acid, methyl
`
`iodide, water, and permanganate reducing compounds
`
`(PRC's), and a less volatile phase containing the catalyst
`
`000018
`
`Exh. 1014
`
`000018
`
`Exh. 1014
`
`

`

`and acetic acid;(c) distilling the volatile product phase to
`
`yield a purified product and a first overhead that contains
`
`organic iodide, water, acetic acid, and unreacted
`
`methanol; (d) distilling at least a portion of the first over—
`
`head to produce a second overhead containing methyl io—
`
`dide, water, C2_ 2 alkyl iodides, PRC's and dimethyl
`
`1
`
`ether;(e) extracting the second overhead with water to
`
`provide a first aqueous extract and a first raffinate; and (f)
`
`extracting the first raffinate with water to provide a sec—
`
`ond raffinate and a second aqueous extract containing
`
`concentrated PRC's for disposal.
`
`[0017]
`
`Preferably, at least a portion of the second raffinate is re—
`
`cycled directly or indirectly to the reactor, as are the bot—
`
`toms from the distillation steps. Most preferably, the sec—
`
`ond overhead contains sufficient dimethyl ether to reduce
`
`the solubility of methyl iodide in the aqueous extracts, as
`
`will be explained further below.
`
`[0018]
`
`In another aspect, the present invention provides an im—
`
`proved method for separating a mixture containing water,
`
`acetic acid, methyl iodide, methyl acetate, methanol, at
`
`least one C2_12 alkyl iodide and at least one permanganate
`
`reducing compound (PRC). The improved method includes
`
`the following steps: (a) distilling the mixture to form a
`
`000019
`
`Exh. 1014
`
`000019
`
`Exh. 1014
`
`

`

`PRC enriched overhead stream containing dimethyl ether;
`
`(b) extracting the overhead stream with water and sepa—
`
`rating therefrom a first aqueous stream containing at least
`
`one PRC; and (c) extracting the extracted overhead stream
`
`with water and separating therefrom a second aqueous
`
`stream containing at least one PRC. Most preferably, the
`
`overhead stream contains sufficient dimethyl ether to re—
`
`duce the solubility of methyl iodide in the aqueous ex—
`
`tracts.
`
`[0019]
`
`In still another aspect, the present invention provides an
`
`improved method for reduction and/or removal of per—
`
`manganate—reducing compounds (PRC's) and C2
`
`2 alkyl
`
`—1
`
`iodide compounds formed in the carbonylation of a car—
`
`bonylatable material such as methanol, methyl acetate,
`
`methyl formate or dimethyl ether to a product of acetic
`
`acid. In the improved method, the methanol is carbony—
`
`lated in a reaction medium containing a catalyst and an
`
`organic iodide; the products of the carbonylation reaction
`
`are phase separated into (1) a volatile phase containing
`
`acetic acid product, organic iodide, water, and at least one
`
`PRC, and (2) a less volatile phase; and the volatile phase is
`
`distilled to yield a purified product and an overhead con—
`
`taining organic iodide, water, acetic acid, and PRC. The
`
`000020
`
`Exh. 1014
`
`000020
`
`Exh. 1014
`
`

`

`improvement includes the steps of (a) distilling at least a
`
`portion of the overhead to provide a PRC enriched over—
`
`head stream containing dimethyl ether; (b) extracting the
`
`PRC enriched overhead stream with water and separating
`
`therefrom an aqueous waste stream containing PRC's; and
`
`(c) extracting the extracted overhead stream with water
`
`and separating therefrom a second aqueous waste stream
`
`also containing at least one PRC. Most preferably, the
`
`overhead stream contains sufficient dimethyl ether to re—
`
`duce the solubility of methyl iodide in the aqueous ex—
`
`tracts.
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
`
`[0020]
`
`FIG. 1 illustrates the prior art process, as disclosed in U.S.
`
`Patent No. 6,339,171, for the removal of carbonyl impuri—
`
`ties from an intermediate stream of the carbonylation
`
`process for the production of acetic acid by a carbonyla—
`
`tion reaction.
`
`[0021]
`
`FIG. 2 illustrates a preferred embodiment of the present
`
`invention.
`
`[0022] While the invention is susceptible to various modifications
`
`and alternative forms, specific embodiments have been
`
`shown by way of example in the drawings and will be de—
`
`scribed in detail herein. It should be understood, however,
`
`000021
`
`Exh. 1014
`
`000021
`
`Exh. 1014
`
`

`

`that the invention is not intended to be limited to the par—
`
`ticular forms disclosed. Rather, the invention is intended
`
`to cover all modifications, equivalents and alternatives
`
`falling within the scope of the invention as defined by the
`
`appended claims.
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION
`
`[0023]
`
`Illustrative embodiments of the invention are described
`
`below. In the interest of clarity, not all features of an ac—
`
`tual implementation are described in this specification. It
`
`will of course be appreciated that in the development of
`
`any such actual embodiment, numerous implementation—spe—
`
`cific decisions must be made to achieve the developers'
`
`specific goals, such as compliance with system—related
`
`and business—related constraints, which will vary from one
`
`implementation to another. Moreover, it will be appreci—
`
`ated that such a development effort might be complex
`
`and time—consuming, but would nevertheless be a routine
`
`undertaking for those of ordinary skill in the art having
`
`the benefit of this disclosure.
`
`[0024]
`
`The purification process of the present invention is useful
`
`in any process used to carbonylate methanol (or another
`
`carbonylatable material such as methyl acetate, methyl
`
`formate or dimethyl ether, or mixtures thereof) to acetic
`
`000022
`
`Exh. 1014
`
`000022
`
`Exh. 1014
`
`

`

`acid in the presence of a Group VIII metal catalyst such as
`
`rhodium and an iodide promoter. A particularly useful
`
`process is the low water rhodium—catalyzed carbonylation
`
`of methanol to acetic acid as exemplified in U.S. Patent
`
`No. 5,001,259. Generally, the rhodium component of the
`
`catalyst system is believed to be present in the form of a
`
`coordination compound of rhodium with a halogen com—
`
`ponent providing at least one of the ligands of such coor—
`
`dination compound. In addition to the coordination of
`
`rhodium and halogen, it is also believed that carbon
`
`monoxide coordinates with rhodium. The rhodium com—
`
`ponent of the catalyst system may be provided by intro—
`
`ducing into the reaction zone rhodium in the form of
`
`rhodium metal, rhodium salts such as the oxides, ac—
`
`etates, iodides, etc., or other coordination compounds of
`
`rhodium, and the like.
`
`[0025] The halogen—promoting component of the catalyst system
`
`consists of a halogen compound comprising an organic
`
`halide. Thus, alkyl, aryl, and substituted alkyl or aryl
`
`halides can be used. Preferably, the halide promoter is
`
`present in the form of an alkyl halide in which the alkyl
`
`radical corresponds to the alkyl radical of the feed alco—
`
`hol, which is carbonylated. Thus, in the carbonylation of
`
`000023
`
`Exh. 1014
`
`000023
`
`Exh. 1014
`
`

`

`methanol to acetic acid, the halide promoter will include
`
`methyl halide, and more preferably methyl iodide.
`
`[0026]
`
`The liquid reaction medium employed may include any
`
`solvent compatible with the catalyst system and may in—
`
`clude pure alcohols, or mixtures of the alcohol feedstock
`
`and/or the desired carboxylic acid and/or esters of these
`
`two compounds. The preferred solvent and liquid reaction
`
`medium for the low water carbonylation process is the
`
`carboxylic acid product. Thus, in the carbonylation of
`
`methanol to acetic acid, the preferred solvent is acetic
`
`acid.
`
`[0027]
`
`Water is contained in the reaction medium but at concen—
`
`trations well below that which has heretofore been
`
`thought practical for achieving sufficient reaction rates. It
`
`has previously been taught that in rhodium—catalyzed car—
`
`bonylation reactions of the type set forth in this invention,
`
`the addition of water exerts a beneficial effect upon the
`
`reaction rate (U.S. Patent No. 3,769,329). Thus most com—
`
`mercial operations run at water concentrations of at least
`
`about 14 wt %. Accordingly, it is quite unexpected that re—
`
`action rates substantially equal to and above reaction
`
`rates obtained with such high levels of water concentra—
`
`tion can be achieved with water concentrations below 14
`
`000024
`
`Exh. 1014
`
`000024
`
`Exh. 1014
`
`

`

`wt % and as low as about 0.1 wt %.
`
`[0028]
`
`In accordance with the carbonylation process most useful
`
`to manufacture acetic acid according to the present in—
`
`vention, the desired reaction rates are obtained even at
`
`low water concentrations by including in the reaction
`
`medium methyl acetate and an additional iodide ion which
`
`is over and above the iodide which is present as a catalyst
`
`promoter such as methyl iodide or other organic iodide.
`
`The additional iodide promoter is an iodide salt, with
`
`lithium iodide being preferred. It has been found that un—
`
`der low water concentrations, methyl acetate and lithium
`
`iodide act as rate promoters only when relatively high
`
`concentrations of each of these components are present
`
`and that the promotion is higher when both of these com—
`
`ponents are present simultaneously (U.S. Patent No.
`
`5,001,259). The concentration of lithium iodide used in
`
`the reaction medium of the preferred carbonylation reac—
`
`tion system is believed to be quite high as compared with
`
`what little prior art there is dealing with the use of halide
`
`salts in reaction systems of this sort. The absolute con—
`
`centration of iodide ion content is not a limitation on the
`
`usefulness of the present invention.
`
`[0029]
`
`The carbonylation reaction of methanol to acetic acid
`
`000025
`
`Exh. 1014
`
`000025
`
`Exh. 1014
`
`

`

`product may be carried out by contacting the methanol
`
`feed, which is in the liquid phase, with gaseous carbon
`
`monoxide bubbled through a liquid acetic acid solvent re—
`
`action medium containing the rhodium catalyst, methyl
`
`iodide promoter, methyl acetate, and additional soluble
`
`iodide salt, at conditions of temperature and pressure
`
`suitable to form the carbonylation product. It will be gen—
`
`erally recognized that it is the concentration of iodide ion
`
`in the catalyst system that is important and not the cation
`
`associated with the iodide, and that at a given molar con—
`
`centration of iodide the nature of the cation is not as sig—
`
`nificant as the effect of the iodide concentration. Any
`
`metal iodide salt, or any iodide salt of any organic cation,
`
`or quaternary cation such as a quaternary amine or phos—
`
`phine or inorganic cation can be used provided that the
`
`salt is sufficiently soluble in the reaction medium to pro—
`
`vide the desired level of the iodide. When the iodide is
`
`added as a metal salt, preferably it is an iodide salt of a
`
`member of the group consisting of the metals of Group IA
`
`and Group ”A of the periodic table as set forth in the
`
`"Handbook of Chemistry and Physics" published by CRC
`
`Press, Cleveland, Ohio, 2002—03 (83rd edition). In partic—
`
`ular, alkali metal iodides are useful, with lithium iodide
`
`000026
`
`Exh. 1014
`
`000026
`
`Exh. 1014
`
`

`

`being preferred. In the low water carbonylation process
`
`most useful in this invention, the additional iodide over
`
`and above the organic iodide promoter is present in the
`
`catalyst solution in amounts of from about 2 to about 20
`
`wt %, the methyl acetate is present in amounts of from
`
`about 0.5 to about 30 wt %, and the lithium iodide is
`
`present in amounts of from about 5 to about 20 wt %. The
`
`rhodium catalyst is present in amounts of from about 200
`
`to about 2000 parts per million (ppm).
`
`[0030]
`
`Typical reaction temperatures for carbonylation will be
`
`approximately 150 to about 250°C, with the temperature
`
`range of about 180 to about 220°C being the preferred
`
`range. The carbon monoxide partial pressure in the reac—
`
`tor can vary widely but is typically about 2 to about 30 at—
`
`mospheres, and preferably, about 3 to about 10 atmo—
`
`spheres. Because of the partial pressure of by—products
`
`and the vapor pressure of the contained liquids, the total
`
`reactor pressure will range from about 15 to about 40 at—
`
`mospheres.
`
`[0031]
`
`A typical reaction and acetic acid recovery system that is
`
`used for the iodide—promoted rhodium catalyzed car—
`
`bonylation of methanol to acetic acid is shown in FIG. 1
`
`and includes a liquid phase carbonylation reactor, flasher,
`
`000027
`
`Exh. 1014
`
`000027
`
`Exh. 1014
`
`

`

`and a methyl iodide acetic acid light ends column 14
`
`which has an acetic acid side stream 17 which proceeds to
`
`further purification. The reactor and flasher are not shown
`
`in FIG. 1. These are considered standard equipment now
`
`well known in the carbonylation process art. The carbony—
`
`lation reactor is typically either a stirred vessel or bubble—
`
`column type within which the reacting liquid or slurry
`
`contents are maintained automatically at a constant level.
`
`Into this reactor there are continuously introduced fresh
`
`methanol, carbon monoxide, sufficient water as needed to
`
`maintain at least a finite concentration of water in the re—
`
`action medium, recycled catalyst solution from the flasher
`
`base, a recycled methyl iodide and methyl acetate phase,
`
`and a recycled aqueous acetic acid phase from an over—
`
`head receiver decanter of the methyl iodide acetic acid
`
`light ends or splitter column 14. Distillation systems are
`
`employed that provide means for recovering the crude
`
`acetic acid and recycling catalyst solution, methyl iodide,
`
`and methyl acetate to the reactor. In a preferred process,
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket