throbber
FUNDAMENTALS
`OF
`
`CHEMISTRY
`
`WITH QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS
`
`Third Edi’rion
`
`Jomes E. Brody
`
`S1. John's University. New York
`
`A John R. Holum
`Augsburg College, Minnesofa
`
`WILEY
`
`John Wiley 84 Sons
`
`New York
`
`Chiohesfer
`
`Brisbane
`
`Toronto
`
`Singopore
`
`oooo01
`
`IPR2015-00171
`|PR2015-00171
`Exhibit 1032
`Exhibit ‘I032
`
`000001
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`“-'"-‘?f-‘-?‘f5.’-"-'-*”.‘:'°n":§-'‘C.
`
`Book production supervised by
`Lucille Buonooore ond Down Reiiz.
`
`Cover and text designed by Kevin Murphy.
`Cover orr by Roy Wiemonn.
`Phoio reseorched by Sofro Nimrod.
`Illustrations by John Bolbolis.
`Monusoripf editor wos Josephine Dello Perulo,
`under the supervision of Deboroh Herbert.
`
`Copyright © 1981, 1984, 1988, by John Wiley Sc Sons, Inc.
`
`All rights reserved. Published simultaneously in Canada.
`
`Reproduction or translation of any part of
`this work beyond that permitted by Sections
`107 and 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright
`Act without the permission of the copyright
`owner is unlawful. Requests for permission
`or further information should be addressed to
`the Permissions Department, john Wiley 86 Sons.
`
`ISBN 0-471-84491-8
`
`Printed in the United States of America
`
`10937654321
`
`000002
`
`
`
`000002
`
`

`
`"sis-sew.‘ ror-Ic 10.1 sasszr-oariivo
`
`__
`
`_
`
`_
`
`-
`
`-
`
`_-
`
`-_
`
`'3
`
`_-:
`
`-'
`
`-
`
`!_
`
`Anyone who has watched much television has certainly _
`_ seen advertisements that praise-the virtues of freeze-'
`'
`- fdried instant coffee. "Campers routinely carry freeze-
`dried foods because they are lightweight. In addition.
`- bacteria cannot grow" and reproduce in the complete
`absence of moisture. so freeze-dried foods need. no
`refrigeration. Therefore, freeze-drying is clearly a
`- useful way of.preservi_ng foods. It is accomplished by
`"first freezing the food (or brewed coffee) and then
`placing it in a chamber that is connected to high4ca-
`pacity vacuum pumps. These pumps lower the pressure _
`in_the chamber below the vapor pressure of ice, which
`' causes the ice crystals to sI.Ib1i_me.'Drying foods in" this
`- way has one important advantage over other methods———
`
`the delicate molecules responsible for the flavor of
`
`
`'
`_
`.-
`_
`.
`‘s-..._
`-
`_
`It's common to find freeze-dried foodsarnong the supplies.
`-
`carried by campers."
`'
`'
`"
`'
`"
`
`'
`
`'
`
`'
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`foods are not destroyed. as they would be if the food
`were hfiflted. Freeze-dried foods |'l'I_3¥' 330 be @353?
`reconstituted simply by adding water.
`_
`Freeze-drying is also _used_ by biologists to preserve _
`tissue cultures and bacteria. ‘Removing moisture from
`tissue and storing it at low temperatures allows the
`cells to survive in what amounts to a state of sus-
`- pended animation for periods of at least ‘several -years.
`
`'_
`
`
`
`Vapor Pressures of Solids
`
`Solids have vapor pressures just as liquids do. In a crystal, the particles are not stationary.
`They vibrate back and forth about their equilibrium positions. At a given temperature
`there is a distribution of kinetic energies, so some particles vibrate slowly while others
`vibrate with a great deal of energy. Some particles at the surface have high enough
`energies to break away from their neighbors and enter the vapor state. When particles in
`the vapor collide with the crystal, they can be recaptured, so condensation can occur
`too. Eventually, the concentration of particles in the vapor reaches a point where the rate
`of sublimation from the solid is the same as the rate of condensation, and a dynamic
`equilibrium is established. The pressure of the vapor that is in equilibrium with the solid
`is called the f!t'fl.illll1l'l‘..lI’il vapor presstire of the solid. A5 with liquids, the equilibrium
`vapor pressure is usually referred to simply as the vapor pressure. Like that of a liquid, the
`vapor pressure of a solid is determined by the strengths of the attractive forces between
`its particles and by the temperature.
`
`‘l 0.8 DYNAMIC EQUILIBRIUM
`AND LE Cl-lATELIER'S PRINCIPLE
`
`Disturbing a system at equilibrium causes it to change in a way that counteracts the
`disturbing infiu-ante and brings the system to equilibrium again.
`
`In the last section, you learned that when the temperature of a liquid is raised, its vapor
`pressure increases. We could have reached this conclusion by analyzing what happens to
`the system in the following way. Initially, the liquid is in equilibrium with its vapor, which
`exerts a certain pressure. When the temperature is increased, equilibrium no longer exists
`because evaporation occurs more rapidly than condensation. Eventually, as the concen-
`tration of molecules in the vapor increases, the system reaches a new equilibrium in
`which there is more vapor. This greater amount of vapor exerts a larger pressure.
`What happens to the vapor pressure of a liquid when the temperature is raised is an
`
`000003
`
`000003
`
`

`
`
`
`10.8
`
`_,
`
`Dynamic equiiibrium is indi-
`cated in a chemical equation by
`a pair of arrows pointing in
`opposite directions, =, which
`implies opposing changes
`happening at equal rates.
`
`(10.1)
`
`A rise in temperature moves an
`equilibrium in the direction of
`3" Endmhermic Change-
`
`A decrease in temperature
`f3V0fS 3 net Chafige that 35 EXO-
`"mimic-
`
`heat + liquid : vapor
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`j'_ Chatelier’s Principie. When a system in equilibrium is subjected to a distur-
`bance that upsets the equilibrium, the system responds in a direction that tends to
`ounteract the disturbance and restore equilibrium in the system.
`
`
`
`DYNAMIC EQUILIBRIUM AND LE CI-lATELlER‘S PRINCIPLE
`367
`
` ple of a general phenomenon. Whenever a system at equilibrium is subjected to a
`
`
`bance that upsets the equilibrium, the system changes in a way that will return it to.
`"ilibrium again. For a liquid-vapor equilibrium, such a disturbance is a change of
`
`
`eratute, as we saw in the preceding paragraph.
`We will deal with many kinds of equiiibria, both chemical and physical, from time
`
`
`c. It would be very time consuming and sometimes very diflicult to carry out a
`"ailed analysis each time we wish to know the effects of some disturbance on the
`riutn system. Fortunately, there is a relatively simple and fast method of predicting
`
`
`é.-effect of a disturbance. It is based on a principle proposed in 1388 by a brilliant
`
`
`I;
`-chemist, Henry Le Chatelier (1850 - 1936).
`
`
`
`
`
`-Let's see how we can apply Le Chatelier’s principle to a liquid — vapor equilibrium
`Subjected to a temperature increase. To do this we have to ask ourselves, how do
`go,about increasing the temperature of a system? The answer, of course, is that we
`
`
`' eat to it. When the temperature is increased, it is the addition of heat that is really
`
`
`ilisturbing influence.
`"
`__we write the liquid — vapor equilibrium in the form ofa chemical equation, we can
`tide the energy change as follows.
`
`
`-'
`'
`-
`
`
`
` __
`_' hen heat is added to a liquid— vapor system that is at equilibrium, Le Chatelier’s
`nu 'ple tells us that the system will try to adjust in a way that counteracts the distui-
`
`ce. The system will attempt to change in a way that absorbs some of the heat that is
`_. This can happen if some liquid evaporates, because vaporization is an endother-
`
`
`_
`laange. When liquid evaporates, the amount of vapor increases and the pressure
`
`
`Thus, we have reached the correct conclusion in a very simple way.
`We often use the term position of equilibrium to refer to the relative amounts of the
`
`
`__ stances on both sides of the double arrows in an equlibtium equation such as Equation
`
`
`.
`l_il.1. Then, we think of how a disturbance affects the position of equilibrium. For
`ple, increasing the temperature increases the amount of vapor and decreases the
`
`
`aunt of liquid, and we say that the position of equilibrium has shifted— in this case, it
`-
`ifted in the direction of the vapor, or it has shifted to the right. In using Le
`
`
`Ehfiteliefs principle, it is convenient to think of a disturbance as “shifting the position of
`btium" in one direction or another in the equilibrium equation.
`‘
`1 Now, let's use Le Chateiier’s principle to analyze what happens when the tempera-
`of a liquid —vapor equilibrium is lowered. To lower the temperature, heat must be
`_ovetl. The system responds by undergoing a change in a direction that tends to
`"pi re the lost heat—the position of equilibrium shifts to the left because as some
`=:
`condenses, some heat is evolved. At the new position of equilibrium there is more
`quidand less vapor. Since there is less vapor, the pressure is lower. Once again, we come
`the proper conclusion — that the vapor pressure is lowered by lowering the tempera-
`
`
`
`PRACTICE EXERCISE 2 Use Le Chételier’s principle to predict how a temperature increase will affect the vapor
`pressure of a solid. (Hint: solid + heat : vapor.)
`
`
`000004
`
`
`
`000004
`
`

`
`324
`
`13 / Solutions and Colloids
`
`'
`
`-_ And in 1000 mL solution we have -the following mass of "H
`
`'1.54 _g solution)" - ' I
`
`I
`_
`I
`10.00-mEs.eIution'>< ,_><__
`Sothe ratio of grams of solute to grams of solut_ion,-taken as a" percent," is-'
`}
`_
`gzsgwcio‘)
`.
`,.
`..
`._
`_
`1.54 x 10? 9 (solution) X 19° = 5°‘_W°'_l”‘=’/‘fvi
`H-Thus, é.2o M Hero, is so.'o*i/s (w/w) i_-icIo,.
`__
`
`PRACTICE EXERCISE 14
`I-Iydriodic acid can be purchased as 5.51 M H1. The density of this solution is 1.50
`g/ml... What is the percent concentration (w/w) of Hi in this solution?
`
`
`_- -.
`
`LOWERING OF THE VAPOR PRESSURE
`
`The vapor pressure of any component in a mixture is lowered by the presence of
`the other components-
`The physical properties of solutions to be studied in this and succeeding sections are
`called colligative properties, because they depend mostly on the relative populations of
`articles in mixtures, not on their chemical identities. In this section we will look at the
`P
`.
`u
`c
`’
`|
`effect of a solute on the vapor pressure of a solvent in a liquid solution. The effect
`depends on whether the solute is volatile or nonvolatile, so we will study. these sepa-
`rarely.
`How a Nonvolatile Solute Affects the Vapor Pressure of a Solution
`All liquid solutions of nonvolatile solutes have lower vapor pressures than their pure
`solvents. The extent of the lowering of the vapor pressure of the solvent depends on
`whether the solute is molecular (and does not ionize) or is ionic. We will consider
`nonvolatile molecular solutes, like sugar, first, because there is a particularly simple law
`that correlates the solution’s vapor pressure with the mole fraction of the solvent. This is
`the vapor pressure—conceritration law, or Raoult’s law, and the best statement of it is
`just its equation.
`
`'
`
`Vapor Pressure — Concentration Law (Raoiilt’s Law}
`
`Psolutioli = solvent X
`
`P,,,.,,.;,,,, is the vapor pressure of the solution, P;,,,,,,,, is the vapor pressure of the pure
`solvent, and X,,,,,,,,, is the mole fraction of the solvent in this solution. Thus, the vapor.
`-
`-
`-
`-
`-
`pressure of the solution is a fraction — the mole fraction, X,,,1,,,,,‘—-of the pure solvents
`vapor pressure (at the same temperature).
`plot of P,,,u,i,,,, versus X,,,1,,,,,, _for a solution
`that obeyed Raoult’s law at all concentrations would be linear, as shown in the margin.
`The reason for Raoulfs law is easy to understand. The equilibrium vapor pressure
`of a liquid reflects how far the following equilibrium favors the vapor.
`solvent molecules in solution t————-‘“ solvent molecules in vapor state
`.
`_
`_
`_
`When the rate of evaporation—the forward change—ts relatively large, the vapor
`pressure is relatively high. When we add nonvolatile solute molecules to the solvent, they
`
`After the Greek kol.-‘igativ,
`depending on number and not
`on nature.
`
`Volatile means "can evapo-
`rate," has a low boiling point.
`Nonvolatile means "cannot
`evaporate." has a very high
`boiling point.
`
`we'll study solutions of ions in
`Section 1 3.1 1 .
`
`Francois Marie Raoult (1830 -
`1901) was a French scientist.
`
`Vapor pressure.
`IJUTE Sflllilfifll
`
`I,
`
`
`
`Psoln
`
`0
`
`Psoin =Xso1ventPsoIveni
`
`Xsolvent
`Raoulfs law plot
`
`1
`
`
`
`000005
`
`000005
`
`

`
`
`
`
`13.7
`
`LOWERING OF THE VAPOR PRESSURE
`
`525
`
`FIGURE 13.23 Lowering of vapor
`pressure by a nonvolatile solute.
`Because particles of the solute are
`present. the opportunities for
`escape of the solvent particles are
`reduced. Therefore. the vapor
`pressure of this solution is less than
`the vapor pressure of the pure
`solvent {at the same temperature).
`
`take up spaces at the surface of the solution and leave the solvent’s molecules with a
`fraction of their former surface population. Thus, the solute molecules, which cannot
`evaporate, interfere with the escape of solvent molecules into the vapor state. They
`reduce the rate of the forward change. But they do not interfere with the return of
`solvent molecules to the solution. See Figure 13.23. The equilibrium thus shifts to the left
`and the vapor pressure decreases until the forward and reverse changes are again equal.
`The interference caused by the solute molecules and therefore the extent to which
`the vapor pressure is lowered depends on the fraction of molecules at the surface which
`are the solute. If 25% of these molecules are solute, then the vapor pressure is lowered by
`25%. Another way of looking at this, however, is that 75% of the molecules at the surface
`are those of the solvent, and the vapor pressure, having been lowered by 25%, is now 75%
`of its value for the pure soivent. This is exactly what Raoult’s law says, because if 75% of
`the molecules are those of the solvent, then the mole fraction of the solvent must be 0.75,
`and 0.75 multiplied by the vapor pressure of pure solvent gives a value that is 75% of
`olvent '
`
`Os
`
`
`
`
` -
`
`I
`
`;_.E_-X'AMP___LI_5 13,14. _RAOULT‘S LAW CALCULATION FOR NONVOLATILE sotures I
`-
`- Problem: _.Carbon tetrachloride has a vapor pressure of 100 torr-at'23.°C. _This_solvent'.can dissolve
`'
`candle wax, which is essentially nonvolatile. Although candie wax isa rnixture; we can take
`its moiecular formula to be CnH,,5 (formula weight, 310)..What will be the vapor pressure "at
`23 °C of a solution prepared by dissolving 10.0 g of wax in 40.0 g of CCI,?-The formula
`-weight of CCL, is 154.
`'
`'
`V -
`-
`‘Solution.’ We haveto find the mole fraction of the solvent before.w_e'can-"use_ R_aou|t's lawto answer
`'
`'
`'
`this question. So we have to calculate the rfrolgg of solute and _-solvent-firs-t.
`-
`-
`--
`-
`
`.
`
`For ccr,
`
`_
`
`_
`
`_
`
`_
`
`_'
`
`'
`
`-
`
`.[-
`
`.
`
`.. 4-
`
`5
`
`40.0 g ccI.._>< 15L2‘;—E% = 0.250 ‘moi ccl,
`‘
`'
`"
`'
`t
`i 7Lf¢’r.2H.s
`'= o.o'_323 rnol cu:-1...
`10.0 9 C22H4e >.< ;1"3°;
`_
`total number of moles is the sum: 0.292 mol. Now, we can find the mole-fraction of
`
`Xco-=3Z§§3§§i.=°-3905
`
`
`
`000006
`
`000006
`
`

`
`
`
`Dibutyl phthalate, C151-[1104 (formula weight 278), is an oil sometimes worked into "
`plastic articles to give them greater softness. It has a negligible vapor pressure at room
`temperature. (It has to be heated to 148 “C before its vapor pressure is even 1 torr.) What
`is the vapor pressure, at 20 °C, of a solution of 20.0 g of dibutyl phthalate in 50.0 g of
`oc.t__ane, Cs}-I1, (formula weight, 1 14)? The vapor pressure of pure octane at 20 °C is 10.5
`tort.’ '-
`
`The Effect of a Volatile Solute
`on the Vapor Pressure of a Solution
`
`When two (or more) components of a liquid solution can evaporate, the vapor contains
`molecules of each. Each volatile component contributes its own partial pressure to the
`total pressure and this partial pressure is directly proportional to the component’s mole
`fractions in the solution. This is reasonable because the rate of evaporation of each
`compound has to be lowered by molecules of the others in the same way we described
`just above for nonvolatile solutes. So, by Da1ton’s law, the total vapor pressure will be the
`sum of the partial pressures. To calculate these partial pressures, we use Raoult’s law for
`each component. For component A, present in a mole fraction X3, its partial pressure,
`PA, is found as a fraction of its vapor pressure when pure, P3,; thus,
`
`-PA = XAP;
`
`And the partial pressure of component B would be
`
`Pa = X3133
`
`Similar calculations would be done on other components, but we will stick to two-com-
`ponent systems.
`The total pressure of the solution of liquids A and B is then
`
`P,,,,,]=P,,+P5
`
`APPLYING RAOUI.T'S LAW T0 sotunoris or VOLHATILEHSOLUTES '
`
`F211
`
`1
`
`"l
`
`,’ fstilution:-':1ml('jul!¢sitl's
`
`The mole fraction of CCl,,, the solvent, is 0.890. The-vapor pressure-of the-solution will be '
`this fraction of the vapor pressure of pure CC!‘ (1 00 torr) as calculated by 'Raou'It's law.
`P,..,,,,,,. = 0.890" ><_'1oo torr-
`= 89.0 torr_'_
`'
`The presence of the wax has lowered the vapor pressure ‘of CCl. from 1OD'to 89.0 torr.
`_j
`
`'
`
`'
`
`
`
`
`
`'
`
`Acetone is a solvent for both water and molecularliquids that do not dissolve in "water, lik
`benzene. At 20 ‘C acetone has a vapor pressure ‘of 16'2'torr. The vapor pressure ,_of watera
`20 ‘C is 1 7.5 torr. what is the vapor pressure of a solution of acetone and water with 50'
`
`-
`mole percent of each? (\Ne assume that Raou|t's law applies.)
`-
`-
`-
`'
`To find Plm, we need to calculate the individual partial "pressures and then" add__ them."
`Pm,” = 162 torr ><--0.500 =' 81:.0 tort" 1
`= 17.5 torr X 0.500.-= 8.7-'3-tort
`PW!‘M
`-
`_
`Pm. = B9.8.t_orr _
`Thus the vapor pressure of the solution is much higherthan that of pure water but
`less than that of pure acetone.
`'
`-
`
`_
`
`000007
`
`l":'{.-'5..C'l'lf;'E-. F:?IEF?.{'.l.'-ii?
`
`"=93
`
`lle-meml".-er, PA and P3 here are
`HIV: partial giressums as calcu-
`late:-:i by Flac:u'2t’:; law.
`
`EXAMPLE 13,15"
`Problem:
`
`I Solution:
`
`000007
`
`

`
`
`
`13.7
`
`LOWERING OF THE VAPOR PRESSURE
`
`527
`
`PRACTICE EXERCISE 16 At 20 °C, the vapor pressure of cyciohexarie, a hydrocarbon solvent, is 66.9 torr and that
`of toluene (another solvent) is 21.1 torr. What is the vapor pressure of a solution of these
`two at 20 °C when each is present at a mole fraction of 0.500?
`
`. Figure 13.24 shows how the total vapor pressure of a two-component solution of
`olatile liquids is related to composition and partial pressures according to Raoult’s law.
`Each of the steeper lower lines shows how the partial vapor pressure of one component
`_ nges as its own mole fraction changes. Any point on the top line represents the total
`ressure at a particular pair of values of mole fractions. (Try this out yourself with a
`millimeter ruler. The distance from a point on the baseline to one of the steeper lines plus
`he distance from the same base point to the other steeper line gives the distance from this
`base point to the top line.)
`
`FIGURE 13.24 The vapor pressure
`of an ideal, two-component
`solution of voiatile compounds.
`
`Vapor
`pressure
`of pure B
`
`Vapor
`pressure
`of pure A
`
`Vapor
`
`pressure—D~
`
`A 1
`B D
`
`.
`0.5
`Mole fractions of A and B
`
`,_.
`
`,
`
`_
`
`Ideal Solutions and Deviations from Raou|t's Law
`ilis we described in Section 13.3, an ideal solution is one for which AH,,,.,,,-M is zero, and
`therefore one in which forces of attraction between both like molecules and unlike
`. molecules are identical. Only an ideal solution would obey Raoult’s law exactly. Only an
`ideal solution would give plots like those in Figure 13.24, which we just discussed.
`' Not very many real, two-component solutions come close to being an ideal solu-
`_ on. Figure 13.25 shows two of the typical ways in which real two-component solutions
`
`Positive deviation
`
`Negative deviation”
`
`
`
`
`
`VaDO!|.'.|iB5SIJl'E-—-F
`
`C 1
`‘B O
`
`I 3°»‘uti‘o;,
`
`
`
`Mole fractions of
`C and D
`
`1 F 0
`
`Mole fractions of
`E and F
`
`1
`
`000008
`
`FIGURE 13.25 Typical deviations
`from ideal behavior of the total
`"'ap°' prefsures °f real’ tw°'c°mp°'
`nent solutions of volatile substances.
`
`000008
`
`

`
`528
`
`ll:
`
`_-’
`
`.‘it:luti<n:s -_m.l i_Ti-liiiitls
`
`Acetor-.e-— water solutions show
`negative deviations.
`
`Ethyl nlcol1ol— hexaim Si'..iIl.J'i.lUfi$
`show positive deviations.
`{rliexeiie is El nonpolar compo-
`men! of ga::_~-')|ine.}
`
`
`
`behave. The individual partial pressures are not linear with composition as Raoult’s law
`demands. So the sums of these partial pressures are seldom linear either. The sums given
`by the upper, total-pressure plots show either upward or positive deviations or they give
`downward or negative deviations from Raoult’s law behavior. What causes this?
`Let us identify the molecules of a two-component solution as A and B. Solutions
`with negative deviations generally form exothermically. In them, the attractive forces
`between A and B are stronger than the sum of the attractive forces between A and A and
`between B and B, as we analyzed on page 503. The extra attractive force between A and
`B, therefore, is an extra interference with the escape of either A orB into the vapor phase.
`50 the partial pressure plots (the lower, steeper plots) for A and B sag, which makes the
`plot for total pressure sag, too. Thus, solutions that form exotherrnically tend to show
`negative deviations.
`Solutions with positive deviations from Raoult’s law generally form endothermi-
`cally. In them the attractive forces between A and B are less than the sum of the attractive
`forces fromA to Aand fromBto B. In the solution ofA and B, it is as ifA and Bmolecules
`are not held back as much by their own kind. They are released to evaporate at faster
`rates. This. causes their individual partial pressure plots to curve upward. So the plot of
`total pressure must curve upward, too. Thus, solutions that form endothermically tend
`to show positive deviations. Figure 13.26 summarizes the relationships between Raoult's
`law deviations and the relative attractive forces—A to A, B to B, and A to B—in the
`solute, the solvent, and the solution.
`
`HGURIE 13.26 Deviations from Raou|t's law and attractions between solute and solvent in a
`
`.neiative_Auractivefg_rces_
`[A to A. B to B] > A to 3
`
`.
`
`_
`
`_
`
`I Bae0ll5’s'.lai'r.-iiIdls':=',.
`positive deviations
`
`I
`
`liquid-liquid two-component solution. Letting A represent one component and 13 another compo
`nent, we can represent the attractive forces between molecules within pure A as "A to A", and
`within pure B as "B to B". In the solution, these forces can still operate. but we have to add the
`intermolecular attractive forces of A to B. The net effect of these forces on AH,“ and Raou|t's law
`plots (vapor pressure versus composition) are as follows.
`
`
`- 5 AH'-''
`positive
`(endothermic)
`zero
`
`[A to A. B to B] = A to B
`(ideal solution)
`negative deviations
`negative
`[A to A. B to B] < A to B
`(exothermic)
`
`obeyed perfectly
`
`ELEVATION OF THE BOILING POINT
`
`‘Elie boiling point of :1 solution of a nonvolatile solute is higher than the boiling point
`of the solvent.
`
`When the only volatile component of a solution is the solvent, then the vapor pressure of
`the solution is less than the vapor pressure that the solvent has at any given temperature. _'
`See Figure 13.27. At the temperature at which the pure solvent normally boils, the vapor
`pressure of the solution is still not equal to the atmospheric pressure. 50 to make the
`vapor pressure of the solution come up to atmospheric pressure, we have to increase the
`temperature of the solution further. The presence of a nonvolatile solute thus eleva
`the boiling point of the solution.
`The most common application of this property of solutions occurs in the use
`perrnanent-type antifreezes. These protect the liquid in a vehicle's cooling system no‘
`just from freezing but also from boiling over. These products are based on eithe
`
`'
`
`000009
`
`
`
`000009
`
`

`
`
`
`EQUILIBRIUM LAWS FOR GASEOUS REACTIONS
`
`557
`
`14.4
`
`I here P stands for the partial pressure of the gas. Solving for P gives
`n
`P = — RT
`V
`
`__The quantity :1_/V has units of mol/L, and is simply the molar concentration, M, so we
`-"can write
`
`(14.3)
`P = (molar concentration) X RT
`,
`_
`_
`,
`_
`_-Thus the partial pressure of a gaseous reactant or product is directly proportional to its
`molar concentration at a given temperature.
`The relationship expressed in Equation 14.3 is what lets us write the mass action
`;-expression for reactions between gases either in terms of molarities or in terms of partial
`"pressures. Of course, when we make such a switch we can’t expect the numerical values
`of the equilibrium constants to be the same, so we use two difierent symbols for K.
`‘When molar concentrations are used, we use the symbol K‘. When partial pressures are
`_used, then K, is the symbol. For example, the equilibrium law for the reaction of nitrogen
`and hydrogen to form ammonia
`
`Nzlgl + 3142(8) *1‘ ZNHJUE)
`
`"can be written in either of the following ways.
`
`Doubling the molar concentra-
`tion in a gas without changing
`its volume or temperature
`doubres the p,e55u,e_
`
`lNH3(El]2 = K
`[Nz(3)liH2(g)l’
`
`‘
`
`because concentrations are
`used in the mass action
`expression
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`because partial pressures
`are used in the mass action
`expression
`
`slit equilibrium, the molar concentrations can be used to calculate Kc, while the partial
`' pressures of the gases at equilibrium can be used to calculate K,. We will discuss how to
`convert from K, to K, and vice versa in the next section.
`
`
`
`PRACTICE EXERCISE 2 Using partial pressures, write the equilibrium law for the reaction
`Hzlg) 4' 12(3) :‘ 2H1(gl-
`
`
`__is:-the."expression for'!(,, for the reaction"-
`'-'
`:-' -'
`__ __
`-
`_
`.
`N20-4(9)’ «———-"-* '2No;(§) "j
`,
`‘we use_'par:'tial pressures in the mass action expre'ss_ion.. Therefore,
`
`__
`
`_
`
`
`_
`_
`"Z _
`
`000010
`
`
`
`
`
`"'
`
`-Prcibferrr.
`
`
`
`000010

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket