1
`
`APPLE 1024
`Apple et al. v. Memory Integrity
`IPR2015-00163
`
`
`
`APPLE 1024
`Apple et al. v. Memory Integrity
`IPR2015-00163
`
`
`
`I, Michael Rueckheim, being duly sworn and upon oath, hereby attest to the
`
`Proceeding No.2 IPR2015—OO163
`Attorney Docket: 39521—0O07IP4
`
`following:
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`I am a member in good standing of the State Bar of Texas.
`
`I have not been suspended or disbarred from practice before any court or
`
`administrative body.
`
`3.
`
`I have never had an application for admission to practice before any court or
`
`administrative body denied.
`
`4.
`
`No sanction or contempt citation has been imposed against me by any court
`
`or administrative body.
`
`5.
`
`I have read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide and
`
`the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of the Code of Federal
`
`Regulations.
`
`6.
`
`I will be subject to the USPTO Code of Professional Conduct set forth in 37
`
`C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq. and disciplinaryjurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a).
`
`7.
`
`I have applied and been granted pro hac vice admission before the Office in
`
`IPR20l4—O090l.
`
`I am contemporaneously applying for pro hac vice admission
`
`before the Office in IPR20l5—00l59 which relates to the patent at issue in this
`
`proceeding, U.S. Patent. No. 7,296,121 (“the ’12l patent”).
`
`8.
`
`I am an experienced litigation attorney with more than 6 years of experience
`
`representing clients in patent cases involving technologies such as memory,
`
`
`
`Proceeding No.: IPR20l 5-00163
`Attorney Docket: 39521-00071134
`
`computer architecture, wireless transmission, and software. I regularly litigate
`
`patent cases in various forums including federal district courts. Through my
`
`experience in patent litigation matters, I have represented clients in many phases of
`
`litigation including discovery, Markmcm hearings, jury trials, bench trials, and
`
`appeals. My biography is attached hereto as Exhibit A. I also represent Apple in
`
`the co—pending litigation involving the ’l21 patent: Memory Integrity LLC v. Apple
`
`Inc, Case No. 1:13-cv—Ol796—GMS in the United States District Court for the
`
`District of Delaware, filed on November 1, 2013. I am deeply involved in all
`
`aspects of the Delaware litigation, including claim construction and validity
`
`analysis, and have significant familiarity with the ’l2l patent.
`
`Date;
`
`.-
`7
`,
`‘
`‘I j
`”
`\ "
`
`'4 ’
`I)
`=~» /'
`I
`., WC)
`i
`
`I
`
`,
`.
`Respectfullyfsubinitted,
`J ‘V’
`.« " /
`,
`/_,,. ,5.“
`,4
`,
`, ’
`-V -~--~ ‘4.
`/ii"
`»
`.~;.:~~
`,5,-'
`ax." L./W
`/'
`._-,.-v»~**'“
`K.
`/'
`“I "
`
`' Michael Rueckheim
`
`___-_ ,
`
`‘
`
`./~
`
`Fish & Richardson P.C.
`
`3200 RBC Plaza
`
`60 South Sixth Street
`
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`Tel: (713) 654-5343
`Email: rueckheim@,fr.com
`
`Sworn tgand subscribed before me,
`this 2 it day of
`is
`p
`, ZOE.
`‘<7
`(F;
`I
`
`LHWL I
`Notary
`lic
`My Commission expires: 1
`
`
`
`_/___
`
`
`
`EVELYN LEA cnmev
`W ?’:l|;\l;.8l;‘;I1E7xDiras
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT AEXHIBIT AEXHIBIT A
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`Michael Rueckheim
`
`Houston
`713-654-5343
`Email rueckheim@fr.com
`
`
`
`(cid:160)
`Services
`Litigation
`
`n
`
`n Trade Secret Litigation
`
`n Patent Litigation
`
`Sectors
`n Consumer Products
`
`n Hardware
`
`n Software
`
`n
`
`Life Sciences
`
`n Medical Devices
`
`n Manufacturing
`
`n Digital Health
`
`Michael Rueckheim is an Associate in Fish & Richardson’s Houston office. Mr. Rueckheim has extensive
`experience in complex patent and trade secret litigation in a variety of technical fields, including
`consumer electronics, computer hardware and software, pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and
`manufacturing equipment. Mr. Rueckheim has represented leading companies in high-stakes cases
`involving products such as smartphones and music players, tablet computers, microprocessors, high-
`definition televisions, film-extrusion dies, blood glucose meters, catheters, centrifuges, and topical anti-
`cancer creams.
`
`Mr. Rueckheim has participated in all stages of litigation from pre-suit investigation to jury verdict and
`from post-trial matters through appeal in the Federal Circuit. In connection with these litigations, among
`other things, Mr. Rueckheim has deposed and defended fact and expert witnesses, argued(cid:160)claim
`construction (Markman) positions to the court,(cid:160)and has advised clients on filing patent reexamination
`requests and conducting discovery abroad. Mr. Rueckheim has represented clients in a variety of federal
`courts, including in the Eastern District of Texas, the Northern Districts of California and Illinois, and the
`Districts of Delaware and New Jersey.
`
`In addition to patent litigation, Mr. Rueckheim has participated in a variety of pro bono matters,
`including successfully representing clients at hearings in federal immigration courts and local family
`courts.
`
`During law school, Mr. Rueckheim was an intern for the Honorable Judge Rodney W. Sippel in the
`Eastern District of Missouri. Mr. Rueckheim also interned at a large law firm, focusing primarily on patent
`
`5
`
`
`
`drafting and prosecution.
`
`Prior to attending law school, Mr. Rueckheim obtained nearly ten years of experience trouble-shooting
`high-tech instrumentation, including semiconductor manufacturing experience, focusing on plasma-
`etchers, at Motorola Inc., and analytical chemistry experience, focusing on gas chromatography-mass
`spectrometers (GC-MS), as a chemist in oil & gas and environmental laboratories.
`
`Education
`n BS, University of Texas 2000
`Biochemistry
`
`n
`
`JD, Washington University School of Law 2008
`magna cum laude, Order of the Coif
`Washington University Law Review
`
`Admissions
`n New York 2009
`
`n Texas 2012
`
`n United States District Court for the Southern District of New York 2009
`
`n United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas 2012
`
`n United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois 2012
`
`n United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas 2012
`
`6
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
