`IPR2015-00163
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`APPLE INC., HTC CORPORATION, HTC AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG
`ELECTRONICS CO. LTD, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,
`SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC AND
`AMAZON.COM, INC.
`Petitioners
`
`v.
`
`MEMORY INTEGRITY, LLC
`Patent Owner
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,296,121
`
`
`
`Inter Partes Review Case No. 2015-00163
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a), the Board’s May 8, 2015 Scheduling
`
`Patent No. 7,296,121
`IPR2015-00163
`
`
`Order (Paper 19), and the June 2, 2015 Joint Stipulation Regarding Due Dates
`
`(Paper 21), Patent Owner Memory Integrity, LLC hereby requests an oral
`
`argument on the issues set forth below at a time set by the Board. Oral argument is
`
`presently scheduled for February 8, 2016 (Paper 23 –Update to Scheduling Order).
`
`
`
`The Board has also scheduled oral argument in IPR2015-00158 and
`
`IPR2015-00159 on the same date of February 8, 2016. In the interest of efficiency,
`
`Patent Owner respectfully requests that the Board hold a consolidated hearing with
`
`IPR2015-00158 and IPR2015-00159, which, along with the instant matter, all
`
`relate to U.S. Patent No. 7,296,121.
`
`
`
`Patent Owner requests a three-hour consolidated hearing, with 90 minutes of
`
`argument time for Patent Owner and 90 minutes to be divided among the
`
`Petitioners. With respect to this proceeding, Patent Owner requests oral argument
`
`on all issues raised in the parties’ filings, including but not limited to the following:
`
`1. Whether claims 4-6, 11-12, and 19-24 of U.S. Patent No. 7,296,121
`
`are unpatentable based on the grounds on which the Board instituted
`
`trial;
`
`2. Whether Patent Owner’s contingent Motion to Amend should be
`
`granted;
`
`
`
`
`
`3. Any issues specified in any motions to exclude or motions for
`
`Patent No. 7,296,121
`IPR2015-00163
`
`
`observation regarding cross-examination of reply witness filed by the
`
`parties;
`
`4. Any issues specified by Petitioner in a request for oral argument;
`
`5. Rebuttal to Petitioner’s presentation on all matters; and
`
`6. Any issues otherwise raised by the Board.
`
`Patent Owner also requests that the Board provide audio-visual equipment to
`
`display a demonstrative PowerPoint presentation. The requested equipment
`
`includes a projector to be connected to Patent Owner’s laptop computer, and a
`
`screen for displaying the projected image.
`
`
`
`Date: January 11, 2016
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
` /Jonathan D. Baker/
`Jonathan D. Baker
`Reg. No. 45708
`Farney Daniels PC
`411 Borel Avenue, Suite 350
`San Mateo, California 94402
`Phone: 424-268-5210
`E-mail: jbaker@farneydaniels.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Patent No. 7,296,121
`IPR2015-00163
`
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing Patent Owner
`
`Request for Oral Argument Pursuant to 37 CFR § 42.70(a) was served via email on
`
`January 11, 2016, on the attorneys for the Petitioners:
`
`W. Karl Renner, Reg. No. 41,265
`Roberto Devoto, Reg. No. 55,108
`Michael Rueckheim, pro hac vice
`3200 RBC Plaza
`60 South Sixth Street
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`Phone: 202-783-5070
`Fax:
`202-783-2331
`Email:
`IPR39521-0007IP1@fr.com
`
`
`IPR39521-0007IP2@fr.com
`
`
`IPR39521-0007IP3@fr.com
`
`
`IPR39521-0007IP4@fr.com
`
`
`renner@fr.com
`
`
`devoto@fr.com
`
`
`rueckheim@fr.com
`
`
`
` /Jonathan D. Baker/
`Jonathan D. Baker
`Reg. No. 45708
`
`Date: January 11, 2016
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
