throbber
Tim Arthur Williams, Ph.D.
`
`Curriculum Vitae
`
`
`
`
`
`§Wireless LAN
`§Cellular and PCS Standards
`§Cellular Telephone Architecture
`§Digital Signal Processing
`
`§Telecommunications Technology
`§VoIP Technology
`§Computer Networking
`§Wireless Networks & Protocols
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dr. Williams has thirty-nine years of professional experience in wireless communications and
`telecom technology. He is an entrepreneur who has participated in the organization and
`operation of start up companies that brought wireless LAN, software VoIP PBX, and 2-way
`paging technology to the marketplace. Dr. Williams holds numerous patents in wireless and
`signal processing technology. He is an experienced litigation support consultant with experience
`in patent infringement matters. Dr. Williams is also a registered Patent Agent.
`
`Degree
`MBA
`
`Ph.D., Dissertation:
`“Digital Signal Processing Techniques for Acoustic
`Log Data”
`
`MSEE, Thesis:
`“Cepstral Processing of Speech Signals”
`
`BSEE
`
`
`1 of 6
`
`
`
`Year College or University
`1991 University of Texas at Austin
`
`1985 University of Texas at Austin
`
`1982 University of Texas at Austin
`
`1976 Michigan Technological
`University
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2006
`IPR2015-00089
`
`

`
`
`Tim Arthur Williams, Ph.D.
`
`Curriculum Vitae
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Professional Experience
`
`
`2008
`From:
`2010
`To:
`Organization: Expressume, Inc / Montage Inc. – Milwaukee, WI
`Title:
`Board Member
`Summary: This company sells software for human resource recruiting.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2008
`From:
`2014
`To:
`Organization: Faculte, Inc. – San Jose, CA
`Title:
`Board Member
`Summary: This company provides SaaS (Software as a Service) web video based
`communication products.
`
`
`
`2008
`From:
`2010
`To:
`Organization: BitRail Networks Inc. – Miami, FL
`Title:
`Founder, Board Member
`Summary: This company sells computer networking solutions.
`
`
`
`2008
`From:
`2014
`To:
`Organization: Calumet Venture Management – Madison, WI
`Title:
`Member
`Summary: This company provides seed capital and management expertise to small
`companies.
`
`
`
`2006
`From:
`2015
`To:
`Organization: BEEcube Inc. – Fremont, CA
`Title:
`Founder, Board Member, Board Advisor
`Summary: This company builds high speed processing solutions. This company was sold to
`National Instruments, Inc. in Feb 2015.
`
`
`
`
`2 of 6
`
`

`
`
`
`
`Tim Arthur Williams, Ph.D.
`
`Curriculum Vitae
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2006
`From:
`Present
`To:
`Organization: Topaz Equity, LLC – Danville, CA
`Title:
`Founder, Board Member
`Summary: This is a private equity investment company. It owns AtomAMPD which
`develops, markets and sells software based point of presence network solutions.
`
`
`
`2004
`From:
`Present
`To:
`Organization: DoceoTech Inc. – Danville, CA
`Title:
`Founder, Chairman
`Summary: This is a training company that provides training for engineers in Wireless,
`Networking, and Telephony technologies.
`
`
`
`2004
`From:
`2006
`To:
`Organization: SiBEAM Inc. – Sunnyvale, CA
`Title:
`Founder, Chief Executive Officer
`Summary: This is a fabless semiconductor company that develops high-speed wireless
`networking ICs. This company was sold to Silicon Image, Inc. in Apr 2011.
`
`
`
`2001
`From:
`2004
`To:
`Organization: JetQue, Inc. – Danville, CA
`Title:
`Founder, Chief Executive Officer
`Summary: This company created messaging solutions for the mobile professional.
`
`
`
`1999
`From:
`2000
`To:
`Organization: Atheros Communications, Palo Alto, CA
`Title:
`Interim CEO, Advisory Board Member
`Summary: This company builds wireless LAN ICs. Atheros became a public company in
`May 2004. (ATHR) This company was sold to QCOM in Jan 2011.
`
`
`
`From:
`
`1998
`
`3 of 6
`
`
`
`

`
`
`
`
`Tim Arthur Williams, Ph.D.
`
`Curriculum Vitae
`
`
`
`
`2000
`To:
`Organization: Picazo Communications – San Jose, CA
`Title:
`Chief Technology Officer, Advisory Board Member
`Summary: This company built software PBXs. The company was purchased by Intel.
`
`
`
`
`
`1996
`From:
`Present
`To:
`Organization: Beach Technologies, LLC – Danville, CA
`Title:
`Chief Executive Officer
`Summary: This is a consulting company that provides IP services. It owns DoceoTech LLC
`and Streaming Knowledge LLC, which perform the same services.
`
`
`
`1991
`From:
`1998
`To:
`Organization: Wireless Access, Inc. – Santa Clara, CA
`Title:
`Co-Founder, Chief Technical Officer, Vice President of Engineering, Vice
`President of Business Strategy
`This was a startup company focusing on the Narrow Band PCS equipment
`market. The company developed the over the air protocols, the subscriber
`equipment and the ICs to deploy 2-way paging services. The company was sold
`to Glenarye Electronics.
`
`Summary:
`
`
`
`2014
`From:
`Present
`To:
`Organization: Through Technology, LLC. – Chicago, IL
`Title:
`Partner
`Summary:
`This is a private equity investment company. It owns Through Technology
`Group, registered in Singapore, which markets and sells software based point of
`presence network solutions in Asia.
`
`
`
`1979
`From:
`1991
`To:
`Organization: Motorola, Inc. – Austin, TX – Semiconductor Sector
`Title:
`Sr. Engineer, Member Technical Staff, Sr. MTS
`
`
`4 of 6
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Summary:
`
`
`Tim Arthur Williams, Ph.D.
`
`Curriculum Vitae
`
`
`
`
`
`Business manager, project leader, and senior technical member of the teams
`which were responsible for product development of the following systems:
`§ ADPCM transcoder,
`§ ISDN U-reference point transceiver,
`§ CT-2 voice codec and channel modem,
`§ GSM voice codec and channel modem,
`§ TDMA voice codec and channel modem
`§ CDMA voice codec and channel modem, and
`§ Japanese Digital Cellular voice codec and channel modem.
`
`
`
`Title:
`Summary:
`
`1976
`From:
`1979
`To:
`Organization: Motorola Inc. - Chicago, IL - Communications Sector - Digital Voice Privacy
`Group
`Engineer
`This group built the first commercial digitally encrypted two-way FM land
`mobile radio system.
`
`
`
`
`Professional Certifications
`§Patent Agent – U.S. Patent and Trademark Office #50,790 (Jan 2002)
`
`Issued Patents
`
`
`Date Description
`Patent
`2011
`Wireless Communication Device using Adaptive Beamforming
`7,904,117
`2004
`6,781,962
`Apparatus and Method for Stored Voice Message Control
`6,600,481 2003 Data entry apparatus and method
`6,088,457 2000 Method and apparatus for over the air programming a communication device
`5,854,595 1998 Communications apparatus and method with a computer interchangeable
`integrated circuit card
`5,557,642 1996 Direct conversion receiver for multiple protocols
`5,428,638 1995 Method and apparatus for reducing power consumption in digital
`communications devices
`5,345,406 1994 Bandpass sigma delta converter suitable for multiple protocols
`5,101,344 1992 Data processor having split level control store
`5,001,661 1991 Data processor with combined adaptive LMS and general multiplication
`functions
`
`5 of 6
`
`
`
`

`
`
`
`
`Tim Arthur Williams, Ph.D.
`
`Curriculum Vitae
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4,989,169 1991 Digital tone detector using a ratio of two demodulators of differing frequency
`4,972,356 1990 Systolic IIR decimation filter
`4,965,762 1990 Mixed size radix recoded multiplier
`4,947,363 1990 Pipelined processor for implementing the least-mean-squares algorithm
`4,876,542 1989 Multiple output oversampling A/D converter with each output containing
`data and noise
`4,862,169 1989 Oversampled A/D converter using filtered, cascaded noise shaping
`modulators
`4,843,585 1989 Pipelineable structure for efficient multiplication and accumulation
`operations
`4,843,390 1989 Oversampled A/D converter having digital error correction
`4,796,219 1989 Serial two's complement multiplier
`4,737,925 1988 Method and apparatus for minimizing a memory table for use with nonlinear
`monotonic arithmetic functions
`4,734,876 1988 Circuit for selecting one of a plurality of exponential values to a
`predetermined base to provide a maximum value
`4,727,508 1988 Circuit for adding and/or subtracting numbers in logarithmic representation
`4,722,067 1988 Method and apparatus for implementing modulo arithmetic calculations
`4,682,302 1987 Logarithmic arithmetic logic unit
`4,618,946 1986 Dual page memory system having storage elements which are selectively
`swapped between the pages
`4,406,010 1983 Receiver for CVSD modulation with integral filtering
`4,398,262 1983 Time multiplexed n-ordered digital filter
`
`
`
`Patent Applications
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Appl Number Publish Date Description
`20070037528 2007
`Wireless Communication Device using Adaptive Beamforming
`20040252679 2004
`Stored Voice message Control Extensions
`
`
`
`Litigation Experience
`
`
`
`
`6 of 6
`
`

`
`Firm
`
`Case Name
`
`Client
`
` Baker Botts LLP
`
`AT&T v Airbiquity
`
`AT&T
`
`Venue
`
` N.D. TX
`
`Case Number(s)
`
` 08-cv-01637
`
` Fish and Richardson
`LLP
`
`VirneTX v Avaya
`
`Avaya
`
` E.D. TX
`
` 6:11-cv-00018
`
` Quinn Emanuel LLP
`
`Barnes & Noble v LSI
`
`Barnes & Noble
`
` N.D. CA
`
` 11-cv-02709
`
`Bunsow De Mory
`Smith & Allison LLP
`
` Quinn Emanuel LLP
`
`Cassidian
`Communications v.
`microData GIS Inc.;
`microData LLC; and…
`ESN v Cisco
`
`Cassidian
`Communications
`
`E.D. TX Marshall
`
`2:09-cv-00395-JRG
`
`Cisco
`
`E.D. TX
`
` 5:08-cv-00020
`
` McKenna Long &
`Aldridge LLP
`
`Comerica v Maxim
`Integrated Products
`
`Comerica
`
` W.D. PA
`
` 12-mc-00244
`
` Latham & Watkins LLP Freedom Wireless Inc.
`v. Cricket
`Communications Inc et
`al.
`AIP Acquisition LLC v.
`Cablevision Systems
`Corporation, et al.
`
`Gibson Dunn
`
`Cricket Comm.
`
`E.D. TX
`
` 2:06-CV-504
`
`CSC Holdings LLC
`
`D. Del.
`
` 1:12-cv-01688-GMS)
`
` Irell & Manella LLP
`
`eBay Inc. v. IDT Corp.
`et al.
`
`eBay.
`
` W.D. AR
`
` 4:08-cv-04015
`
` Gibson Dunn LLP
`
`Broadcom v Emulex
`
`Emulex
`
` C.D. CA
`
` 09-cv-01058
`
`Cooley LLP
`
`Monec Holding AG v.
`Motorola Mobility LLC,
`et al.,
`
`Exedea, Inc
`
`CA
`
`11-798-LPS-SRF
`
`- 1 -
`
`

`
`Firm
`
`Case Name
`
`Client
`
` Covington LLP
`
`Fujitsu v Belkin et al.
`
`Fujitsu
`
`Venue
`
` N.D. CA
`
`Case Number(s)
`
` 10-cv-03972-LHK
`
`Kilpatrick Townsend &
`Stockton LLP
`
`SimpleAir Inc. v.
`Microsoft Corporation
`et al.
`
`Google Inc.
`
`E.D. TX
`
` 2:11-cv-00416-JRG
`
` Kecker & Van Nest
`LLP
`
`Kodak v HTC
`
`HTC
`
`HTC v Apple Inc.
`
`HTC
`
`HTC v Apple Inc.
`
`HTC
`
` Finnegan Henderson
`LLP Keker & Van Nest
`LLP
`
` Finnegan Henderson
`LLP
`
`FINNEGAN,
`HENDERSON,LLP
`and HOLLAND & HART
`LLP
`Cooley LLP
`
`Covington & Burling
`LLP
`
`Covington & Burling
`LLP
`
` Covington LLP;Fish
`and Richardson LLP;
`Brinks Hofer Gilson &
`Lione LLP; Alston &…
`Feinberg Day Alberti &
`Thompson LLP
`
` ITC
`
` ITC
`
` ITC
`
` 337-TA-831
`
` 337-TA-721
`
` 337-TA-808
`
`Cellport v. ZTE et al.
`
`HTC Corp., et al
`
`CO
`
`1:13-cv-173 - RBJ
`
`HTC Corporation
`
`CA
`
`11-798-LPS-SRF
`
`Huawei
`
`ITC Del.
`
`337-TA-868 and Case
`No. 13-009 (RGA)).
`
`Huawei
`
`Arbitration
`
`Huawei; LG; ZTE;
`Nokia
`
` ITC
`
` 337-TA-800
`
`Intellectual Ventures
`
`E.D. VA
`
`1:13-cv-740-AJT/TRJ
`
`Monec Holding AG v.
`Motorola Mobility LLC,
`et al.,
`
`InterDigital Technology
`Corp.IPR Licensing
`Inc. and InterDigital
`Holdings Inc
`InterDigital Technology
`Corp.IPR Licensing
`Inc. and InterDigital
`Holdings Inc
`Interdigital v Huawei et
`al.
`
`Intellectual Ventures v
`PNC Bank, Capital
`One, First National
`Bank of Omaha, JP…
`
`- 2 -
`
`

`
`Feinberg Day Alberti &
`Thompson LLP
`
` Dechert LLP
`
`Tensegrity Law Group
`LLP
`
`Tensegrity Law Group
`LLP
`
` Foley & Lardner LLP
`
`Intellectual Ventures v
`PNC Bank, Capital
`One, First National
`Bank of Omaha, JP…
`Intellectual Ventures I
`LLC and Intellectual
`Ventures II LLC v. AT&T
`Mobility LLC; AT&T…
`Intellectual Ventures I
`LLC and Intellectual
`Ventures II LLC v
`Canon Inc. Canon U.…
`Intellectual Ventures I
`LLC and Intellectual
`Ventures II LLC v Ricoh
`Company Ltd. Ricoh…
`SPH America LLC v.
`Kyocera Wireless
`Corp. et al.
`
` D. Del.
`
` 1:2012-cv-00193
`
`Intellectual Ventures I
`LLC and Intellectual
`Ventures II LLC
`
`Intellectual Ventures I
`LLC and Intellectual
`Ventures II LLC
`
`Intellectual Ventures I
`LLC and Intellectual
`Ventures II LLC
`
`Del.
`
`Del.
`
`Kyocera.
`
` S.D. CA
`
`Firm
`
`Case Name
`
`Client
`
`Venue
`
`Case Number(s)
`
`Intellectual Ventures
`
`W.D. PA
`
`2: 13-cv-00740-AJS
`
`1:13-CV-00473-SLR
`(D. Del.)
`
`1:13-CV-00474-SLR
`(D. Del.)
`
` 3:08-cv-02146; 3:09-
`cv-00299; 3:09-
`cv-00572
`
`1:13-cv-175 - RBJ
`
`Dickstein Shapiro LLP,
`Lathrop & Gage, LLP
`
`Cellport v. ZTE et al.
`
`LG Electronics, Inc., et
`al
`
`CO
`
` Proskauer LLP
`
`MMI v Apple Inc.
`
`MMI
`
` D. Del.
`
` 1:10-cv-00258
`
` Hogan Lovells LLP
`
`MOSAID v Cisco Inc.
`
`MOSAID
`
` ITC
`
` 337-TA-778
`
` Mayer Brown LLP
`
`MOSAID v Cisco
`
`MOSAID
`
` D. Del.
`
` 10-cv-00687
`
` Howrey LLP
`
`WiAV v Motorola
`
`Motorola
`
` E.D. VA
`
` 3:09-cv-00447
`
` Quinn Emanuel LLP
`
`Motorola v Apple Inc.
`
`Motorola
`
` S.D. FL; D. Del.
`
` 1:2010-cv-23580
`1:2010-cv-00867
`
`- 3 -
`
`

`
`Firm
`
`Case Name
`
`Client
`
`Venue
`
`Case Number(s)
`
` Ropes and Grey LLP
`
`Motorola v Microsoft
`Inc.
`
`Motorola
`
` W.D. WA.
`
` 10-cv-01823
`
` Kilpatrick Townsend
`LLP
`
`Golden Bridge v
`Motorola.
`
`Motorola
`
` D. Del.
`
` 1:2010-cv-00428
`
` Kilpatrick Townsend
`LLP
`
`Digitude v Motorola
`
`Motorola
`
` ITC.
`
` 337-TA-827
`
`Winston & Strawn LLP
`
`Adaptix v Motorola
`Mobility LLC et al.
`
`Motorola Mobility
`
`E.D. TX Tyler
`
`6:12-cv-00016-MHS
`
`Winston & Strawn LLP
`
`Adaptix v Motorola
`Mobility LLC et al.
`
`Motorola Mobility
`
`N.D. CA
`
`5:13-cv-01774-PSG
`
`Kilpatrick Townsend &
`Stockton
`
`Monec Holding AG v.
`Motorola Mobility LLC,
`et al.,
`
`Motorola Mobility LLC CA
`
`11-798-LPS-SRF
`
` Foley and Lardner LLP SPH v Nokia
`
`Nokia
`
` S.D. CA
`
` 3:2009-cv-02535
`
`FOX ROTHSCHILD
`LLP, KING &
`SPALDING LLP
`
`Alston & Bird LLP
`
`BAKER & McKENZIE
`LLP
`
`Cellport v. ZTE et al.
`
`Nokia Corp., et al.
`
`CO
`
`1:13-cv-178 - RBJ
`
`InterDigital Technology
`Corp.IPR Licensing
`Inc. and InterDigital
`Holdings Inc
`Cellport v. ZTE et al.
`
`Nokia Corporation and
`Nokia Inc
`
`ITC Del.
`
`337-TA-868 and Case
`No. 13-010 (RGA)).
`
`Pantech Co. Ltd., et al CO
`
`1:13-cv-179 - RBJ
`
` Banner & Witcoff
`
`Paradox Ltd. v. ADT
`Ltd.
`
`Paradox
`
`E.D. TX
`
` 2:06-cv-00462
`
`- 4 -
`
`

`
`Firm
`
`Case Name
`
`Client
`
` Fish and Richardson
`LLP
`
`Tekelec v Performance
`Technologies Inc.
`
`Performance
`Technologies; Inc.
`
`Venue
`
` E.D. NC
`
`Case Number(s)
`
` 09-cv-00531
`
` Cravath Swaine &
`Moore
`
`Broadcom Inc. v
`Qualcomm Inc.
`
`Qualcomm
`
`C.D. CA
`
` 05-cv-00467
`
` Cooley Godward
`Kronish LLP
`
`Broadcom Inc. v
`Qualcomm Inc.
`
`Qualcomm
`
` ITC
`
` 337-TA-543
`
` Cravath LLP
`
`Parkervision v
`Qualcomm
`
`Qualcomm
`
` M.D. FL.
`
` 11-cv-00179
`
` Howrey LLP
`
`Minerva Inc. v
`Motorola Inc. et al.
`
`Research in Motion
`
` E.D. TX
`
` 2:2007-cv-00229
`
` Quinn Emanuel LLP
`
`Samsung v Apple Inc.
`
`Samsung
`
` N.D. CA
`
` 11-cv-01846
`
` ITC
`
` ITC
`
`CA
`
`CO
`
` 337-TA-853
`
` 337-TA-862
`
`11-798-LPS-SRF
`
`1:13-cv-180 - RBJ
`
`E.D. TX
`
` 2:11-cv-00416-JRG
`
` DLA Piper LLP
`
` Fish and Richardson
`LLP
`
`Technology Properties
`Limited LLC
`("TPL");Phoenix Digital
`Solutions LLC ("PDS…
`Ericsson v Samsung
`
`Samsung
`
`Samsung
`
`Fish & Richardson P.C. Monec Holding AG v.
`Motorola Mobility LLC,
`et al.,
`
`GREENBERG
`TRAURIG, LLP
`
`Cellport v. ZTE et al.
`
`Kirkland & Ellis LLP
`
`SimpleAir Inc. v.
`Microsoft Corp. et al.
`
`Samsung Electronics
`America, Inc. and
`Samsung Electronics,
`Inc.
`Samsung Electronics
`Co., Ltd., et al
`
`Samsung Electronics
`Co.; Ltd.; Samsung
`Electronics America;
`Inc.; and Samsung T…
`
`- 5 -
`
`

`
`Firm
`
`Case Name
`
`Client
`
`Ropes & Gray LLP
`
`OêMelveny & Myers
`LLP
`
` Covington & Burling;
`Cooley; Howrey; DLA
`Piper
`
` Nixon Peabody; K&L
`Gates; Altson and Bird;
`Greenberg Traurig;
`Spotts Fain; Winston…
` Quinn Emanuel
`
`InterDigital Technology
`Corp.IPR Licensing
`Inc. and InterDigital
`Holdings Inc
`Commonwealth
`Scientific and Industrial
`Research Organisation
`v. MediaTek Inc. et al.
`Saxon Innovations
`LLC. v. Nokia Corp. et
`al.
`
`SPH America v Acer
`Inc. et al
`
`WiAV v Sony
`
`Samsung Electronics
`Co.; LTD.; Samsung
`Electronics America;
`Inc.; and Samsung T…
`Samsung Electronics
`Co.; Ltd.; Samsung
`Semiconductor Inc.;
`and Samsung Teleco…
`Samsung; Nintento;
`RIM; Palm
`
`Sierra Wireless;
`Novatel; Nokia;
`Hewlett Packard; UT
`Starcom; Motorola S…
`Sony
`
`Venue
`
`ITC Del.
`
`Case Number(s)
`
`337-TA-868 and Case
`No. 13-cv-OOO I I
`
`E.D. TX
`
`6:12-cv-578-LED
`
`E.D. TX
`
` 6:2007-cv-00490
`
` S.D. CA
`
` 3:2009-cv-02535
`
` E.D. VA
`
` 3:09-cv-00447
`
` McDermott Will &
`Emery LLP
`
`Telecommunications
`Systems Inc. v Sybase
`365 Inc.
`
` Latham & Watkins LLP Sprint
`Communications v
`Time Warner Cable et
`al.
`Data Treasury Corp. v.
`Wells Fargo. et al.
`
` Baker & McKenzie
`LLP and Kilpatrick
`Stockton LLP
`
`Sybase
`
` E.D. VA
`
` 09-cv-00387
`
`Time Warner Cable
`
` D. KS
`
` 2:2011-cv-02686
`
`Wells Fargo and
`Wachovia.
`
`E.D. TX
`
` 2:2005-cv-00291;
`2:2005-cv-00293
`
`Goodwin Procter LLP WIAV Solutions v. ZTE
`Corporation. et at.
`
`ZTE Corporation and
`ZTE (USA)
`
`E.D. VA
`
`Cellport v. ZTE et al.
`
`ZTE Corporation and
`ZTE (USA)
`
`CO
`
`1:12CV907
`
`1:12-cv-3296
`
`Sheppard Mullin
`Richter & Hampton
`LLP
`
`Brinks Hofer Gilson &
`Lione
`
`InterDigital Technology
`Corp.IPR Licensing
`Inc. and InterDigital
`Holdings Inc
`
`ZTE Corporation and
`ZTE (USA) Inc.
`
`ITC Del.
`
`337-TA-868 and Case
`No. 13-009 (RGA)).
`
`- 6 -
`
`

`
`Firm
`
`Case Name
`
`Client
`
` Heller Ehrman White &
`McAuliffe
`
`Qualcomm Inc v.
`Broadcom Inc.
`
`Qualcomm
`
`Venue
`
` S.D. CA
`
`Case Number(s)
`
` 06-cv-0660
`
` Heller Ehrman White &
`McAuliffe
`
`Broadcom Inc. v
`Qualcomm Inc.
`
`Qualcomm
`
` S.D. CA
`
` 05-cv-1392
`
` McKool Smith
`
`Ericsson Inc v.
`Samsung Inc.
`
`Ericsson
`
` ITC
`
` 337-TA-577
`
` Cooley Godward
`Kronish LLP
`
`Qualcomm Inc. v.
`Broadcom Inc.
`
`Qualcomm
`
` S.D. CA
`
` 08-cv-01607; 08-
`cv-01829_
`
` DLA Piper
`
`Qualcomm Inc. v.
`Nokia Inc.
`
`Qualcomm
`
` W.D. WI; S.D. CA; S.D.
`CA
`
` 3:07-cv-00187; 3:07-
`cv-01366; 3:05-
`cv-02063
`
` Heller Ehrman White &
`McAuliffe
`
`GlobespanVirata v.
`Texas Instruments
`
`Texas Instruments;
`Stanford University
`
` D.N.J.
`
` 03-cv-02854
`
` Simpson Thacher &
`Bartlett LLP
`
`3Com Inc. v. D-Link/
`Realtek Inc.
`
`3Com
`
` N.D. CA
`
` 03-cv-02177
`
` Simpson Thacher &
`Bartlett LLP
`
`Commil USA LLC v.
`Cisco Systems Inc.
`
`Cisco
`
`E.D. TX
`
` 2:07-cv-341; 2:11-
`cv-00417; 2:11-
`cv-00265
`
` Howrey
`
` Howrey
`
`Foundry Networks v.
`Alcatel Inc.
`
`Foundry Networks v.
`Lucent Technologies
`Inc.
`
`Foundry Networks
`
`E.D. TX
`
` 2:04-cv-00040
`
`Foundry Networks
`
`E.D. TX
`
` 2:04-cv-00040
`
` Fish and Richardson
`
`Microsoft Inc. v. Alcatel
`Inc.
`
`Microsoft
`
` ITC
`
` 337-TA-598
`
`- 7 -
`
`

`
`Firm
`
`Case Name
`
`Client
`
` Jones Day LLP
`
`in re Katz Interactive
`Call Processing
`
`Citizens
`Communications
`
`Venue
`
`C.D. CA
`
`Case Number(s)
`
` 07-ml-01816
`
` Sidley Austin LLP
`
`C2 Comm. Tech Inc. v.
`AT&T Inc.
`
`AT&T
`
`E.D. TX
`
` 2:06-cv-00241
`
` Jones Day LLP
`
`in re Katz Patents
`
`Experian
`
`C.D. CA
`
` 07-ml-01816
`
` Howrey
`
`in re Katz Patents
`
`General Electric
`
`C.D. CA
`
` 07-ml-01816
`
` Kilpatrick Stockton
`LLP
`
`Verizon Corp. v. Cox
`Inc.
`
`Cox
`
`E.D. VA
`
` 1:08-cv-00157
`
` Fish and Richardson
`
`STS Networks v.
`Witness Systems
`
`Witness Systems
`
` N.D. Ga.
`
` 04-cv-02111
`
` Ropes & Grey LLP
`
`Motorola Inc. v.
`Research in Motion
`Inc.
`
`Motorola
`
` N.D. TX
`
` 3:08-cv-00284
`
` Kirkland and Ellis LLP
`
`Intel Corp. v. Wi-LAN
`Inc.
`
`Intel
`
` N.D. CA
`
` 08-cv-04555
`
` Keker & Van Nest LLP Intel Corp. v. CSIRO
`Inc.
`
`Intel
`
`E.D. TX
`
` 06-cv-00551
`
` Morgan Miller and
`Blair
`
`Proxim v. 3Com
`
`3Com.
`
` D. Del.
`
` 1:2001-cv-00155;
`1:2001-cv-00755
`
` Weil Gotshal &
`Manges
`
`Agere Systems v.
`Broadcom Inc.
`
`Broadcom
`
` E.D. PA
`
` 03-cv-03138
`
`- 8 -
`
`

`
`Firm
`
`Case Name
`
`Client
`
` Heller Ehrman LLP
`and Covington &
`Burling LLP
`
`Intermec Tech. V. Palm
`Inc.
`
`Palm
`
`Venue
`
` D. Del.
`
`Case Number(s)
`
` 1:2007-cv-00272
`
`Sidley Austin LLP
`
`AT&T v. Intrado
`
`Covington & Burling
`LLP
`
`Hill, Kertscher &
`Wharton, LLP
`
`Hill, Kertscher &
`Wharton, LLP
`
`Sasken
`Communication
`Technologies Limited v.
`Spreadtrum Commu…
`Regarding the U.S.
`Patent No. 8,400,926
`B2
`
`Regarding the U.S.
`Patent No. 8,134,600,
`8,477,197, 8581,991
`
`Foley and Lardner LLP Regarding the U.S.
`Patent No. 8,532,231,
`8,565,346
`
`Morgan, Lewis &
`Bockius_LLP
`
`H.C. Park &
`Associates, PLC
`
`Regarding the
`U.S.Patent No.
`6,819,923
`
`Regarding the
`U.S.Patent No.
`7,218,923
`
`AT&T Mobility LLC (f/k/
`a Cingular Wireless
`LLC) (_AT&T”);
`
`Arbitration
`
`Spreadtrum
`
`HTC Corporation
`
`American Arbitration
`Association
`International Centre for
`Dispute Resolution
`USPTO
`
`HTC Corporation
`
`USPTO
`
`USPTO
`
`Huawei Technologies
`Co., Ltd., Futurewei
`Technologies, Inc. and
`Huawei Device USA,
`NEC Casio Mobile
`Communications Ltd.
`and NEC Corp of
`America
`Pantech Co. Ltd., et al USPTO
`
`USPTO
`
`Everett Upshaw, PLLC Regarding the
`U.S.Patent No.
`7,215,962
`
`ZTE Corporation and
`ZTE (USA)
`
`USPTO
`
`Pillsbury Winthrop
`Shaw Pittman
`
`Regarding Vringo
`patents
`
`ZTE Corporation and
`ZTE (USA) Inc.
`
`USPTO
`
`50-117-T-00924-12
`
`U.S. Patent No.
`8,400,926 B2
`
`U.S. Patent No.
`8,134,600, 8,477,197,
`8581,991
`
`Regarding the U.S.
`Patent No. 8,532,231,
`8,565,346
`
`U.S.Patent No.
`6,819,923
`
`U.S.Patent No.
`7,218,923
`
`U.S.Patent No.
`7,215,962
`
`U.S. Patents
`
`Qualcomm
`
`Analysis of Qualcomm
`portfolio
`
`Qualcomm
`
`Consulting
`
`Analysis of Qualcomm
`portfolio
`
`- 9 -
`
`

`
`Firm
`
`Case Name
`
`Client
`
`Venue
`
`E.D. TX
`
`Amazon Inc.
`
`Fenwick & West LLP
`
`Ropes & Gray LLP
`
`Pillsbury Winthrop
`Shaw Pittman
`
`Desmarais LLP
`
`Quin Emanuel
`
`Cellular
`Communications
`Equipment LLC v.
`Amazon.com, Inc. et al
`Broadcom Corp. v.
`NXP Semiconductors
`USA, Inc.
`
`Cellular
`Communications
`Equipment LLC v. HTC
`Corporation et al
`Intellectual Ventures I
`LLC and Intellectual
`Ventures 11 LLC v.
`Nikon Corp., et al
`GENBAND US LLC v.
`Metaswitch Networks
`Ltd., et. al.
`
`Case Number(s)
`
`TXED-6-13-cv-00569;
`consolidated with
`Case No. 6-13-
`cv-00507
`CV SA 13-829-
`MRP(MANx)
`
`Broadcom
`
`CDCA
`
`HTC Corporation
`
`E.D. TX
`
`6:13-cv-00507
`
`Intellectual Ventures I
`LLC and Intellectual
`Ventures II LLC
`
`Del.
`
`Metaswitch Networks
`Ltd.
`
`E.D. TX
`
`1:11-CV-1025-SLR
`
`2:14-CV-33-JRG-RSP
`
`Finnegan, Henderson,
`Farabow,Garrett &
`Dunner, L.L.P.
`
`OpenTV Inc. et. al. v.
`Apple, Inc.
`
`OpenTV, Inc. and
`Nagravision, SA of the
`Kudelski Group
`
`N.D. CA
`
`14-cv-01622-JST
`
`O'Melveny & Myers
`LLP
`
`Pillsbury Winthrop
`Shaw Pittman
`
`Concinnitas, LLC and
`George Hindman v.
`Samsung
`Telecommunications…
`SPH America LLC v.
`ZTE Corp et. al.
`
`Samsung Electronics
`America, Inc. and
`Samsung
`Telecommunications…
`ZTE Corporation and
`ZTE (USA) Inc.
`
`E.D. TX
`
`2: 13-CV-824-JRG-
`RSP
`
`ED TX
`
`3:13-cv-02326
`
`Pillsbury Winthrop
`Shaw Pittman
`
`Novatel Wireless, Inc.
`v. ZTE Corp. et. al.
`
`ZTE Corporation and
`ZTE (USA) Inc.
`
`ED TX
`
`3:12-cv-02576
`
`Cooley LLP
`
`DLA Piper LLP
`
`ParkerVision, Inc. v
`Qualcomm
`Incorporated, et al
`
`Technology Properties
`Ltd LLC v Samsung
`Electronics Co, Ltd
`
`Qualcomm
`
`MDFL
`
`6:14-cv-00687
`
`Samsung
`
`NDCA
`
`3:12-cv-03879
`
`- 10 -
`
`

`
`Firm
`
`Case Name
`
`Client
`
`Venue
`
`Case Number(s)
`
`Kolpatrick Townsend &
`Stockton LLP
`
`Summit 6 LLC v.
`Motorola
`
`Google/Motorola
`
`NDTX
`
`7:14-cv-00014
`
`Paul Hastings
`
`Summit 6 LLC v. HTC
`Corp.
`
`HTC Corp and HTC
`America
`
`NDTX
`
`7:14-cv-00014
`
`Foley and Lardner LLP Application Serial No
`10/304,121 and U.S.
`Patent No. 7,084,529,
`Patent Interference…
`
`EnOcean GMBH
`
`USPTO
`
`Application Serial No
`10/304,121 and U.S.
`Patent No. 7,084,529,
`Patent Interference…
`
`- 11 -

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket