throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________________________
`
`HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS, LLC and
`HUGHES COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,
`
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY,
`
`Patent Owner.
`____________________________
`
`IPR2015-00059 (Patent 7,916,781)
`____________________________
`
`
`DECLARATION OF TIMOTHY JEZEK IN SUPPORT OF
`PETITIONERS’ REPLY BRIEF REGARDING IDENTIFICATION OF
`REAL PARTIES-IN-INTEREST
`
`
`
`
`Hughes, Exh. 1076 p. 1
`
`

`
`I, Timothy Jezek, declare:
`
`1.
`
`I am currently employed at Hughes Network Systems, LLC as in-
`
`house Intellectual Property Counsel.
`
`I have been working at Hughes since
`
`November, 2010. I have personal knowledge of the facts set forth herein, and, if
`
`called to testify in person, could and would testify competently thereto. I have been
`
`the Hughes in-house counsel responsible for the pending district comi case
`
`captioned California Institute of Technology v. Hughes Communications, Inc. et
`
`al., No. 13-CV-07245 (CACD) (the "Caltech litigation") since its filing.
`
`2.
`
`I am over the age of 18, have never been convicted of a felony or
`
`crime of moral turpitude and am legally competent to make this declaration.
`
`3.
`
`Hughes Network Systems, LLC and Hughes Communications, Inc.
`
`("Petitioners") are Delaware corporations, and both entities are subsidiaries of
`
`EchoStar Corporation ("EchoStar").
`
`4.
`
`The decision to file the above captioned Petitions for inter partes
`
`review (the "Petitions") was made entirely by Petitioners' in-house counsel
`
`responsible for litigation and intellectual property matters. The decision to file the
`
`Petitions was made independently of DISH Network Corporation, DISH Network
`
`L.L.C., or dishNET Satellite Broadband L.L.C. (collectively, "DISH").
`
`2
`
`Hughes, Exh. 1076, p. 2
`
`

`
`5.
`
`DISH did not direct, control, or suggest the filing of these Petitions.
`
`DISH did not provide any input into the content of the Petitions. DISH did not
`
`participate in the preparation or filing of the petitions.
`
`6.
`
`Petitioners did not receive any reimbursement, payment, or any other
`
`funding from DISH (or any other non-party) related to the filing of the Petitions.
`
`All attorneys' fees and costs incurred in preparing and filing the Petitions were
`
`borne by Petitioners alone.
`
`7.
`
`Neither EchoStar nor Petitioners sought or obtained approval to file
`
`the Petitions from any member of the Boards of EchoStar or DISH, including
`
`Charles Ergen.
`
`8.
`
`No person involved in the decision to file the Petitions, nor in the
`
`preparation of the petitions, is an employee of DISH.
`
`9.
`
`Petitioners have not acted as a proxy for DISH in these proceedings in
`
`any way.
`
`l 0. DISH and EchoStar are separate publicly-traded companies with
`
`different stock trading symbols ("DISH" and "SATS," respectively). Each
`
`company is governed by its own board of directors, has its own management team,
`
`and has separate budgets, financial statements, and operations.
`
`11. Attached as Exhibit I 071 is a non-confidential portion of a larger
`
`omnibus summary judgment filing made under seal in the pending Caltech
`
`3
`
`Hughes, Exh. 1076, p. 3
`
`

`
`litigation. The Exhibit contains that portion of the filing dealing with a motion for
`
`summary judgment to dismiss DISH from the pending Caltech litigation. The
`
`motion was filed on March 5, 2015 and lays out the basis for dismissal. The
`
`motion correctly states that Caltech failed to present any expert testimony in the
`
`district court case on the issue of infringement as to any DISH product. As a
`
`result, Petitioners anticipate that the patent owner's allegations directed to the
`
`DISH products will be dismissed from the Caltech litigation.
`
`I hereby declare that all statements made herein of my own knowledge are
`
`true and that all statements made on information or belief are believed to be true;
`
`and further that these statements were made with the knowledge that willful false
`
`statements and the like so made are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both,
`
`under Section 1001 of Title 18 of the United States Code and that such willful false
`
`statements may jeopardize the results of these procee;
`
`gs.
`
`. ,1 /
`
`March /g 2015 ~
`
`Tim~k
`
`_,
`
`4
`
`Hughes, Exh. 1076, p. 4

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket