throbber
Argenti, Matthew
`
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`Cc:
`
`Subject:
`
`Eliot,
`
`Rosato, Michael
`Thursday, July 09, 2015 3:00 PM
`Eliot.Williams@bakerbotts.com
`Argenti, Matthew; hop.guy@bakerbotts.com; brad.bowling@bakerbotts.com; Torczon,
`Richard
`RE: Echostar/Hughes v. Caltech: IPR2015-00059
`
` I
`
` am surprised anyone would consider objectionable our inquiring as to the circumstances of your witness’
`unavailability. Nevertheless, because you are either unwilling or unable to produce your witness, Hughes’ formal
`withdrawal of Ms. Fradenburg’s testimony is appropriate.
`
`Regarding Dr. Pfister, after having further reviewed his direct testimony, his cross-examination is unnecessary.
`
`Best regards,
`
`
`- Mike
`
`
`
`From: Eliot.Williams@bakerbotts.com [mailto:Eliot.Williams@bakerbotts.com]
`Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 1:27 PM
`To: Rosato, Michael
`Cc: Argenti, Matthew; hop.guy@bakerbotts.com; brad.bowling@bakerbotts.com; Torczon, Richard
`Subject: RE: Echostar/Hughes v. Caltech: IPR2015-00059
`
`Mike:
`
`We’ve responded to the non-objectionable portions of your inquiry. We reached out to Ms. Fradenburg’s
`counsel promptly after receiving your request for her deposition, and learned late last week that she would not
`appear voluntarily. At that point, we obtained Dr. Pfister’s availability. If you intend to move forward with
`Dr. Pfister on the 22nd, please let us know today. Otherwise, he will need to release that day from his
`schedule to accommodate other commitments.
`
`The remainder of your inquiry seems to be based on flawed assumptions.
`
`Regards,
`
`Eliot D. Williams
`■
`BAKER BOTTS LLP
`1001 Page Mill Road
`Bldg. One, Ste. 200
`Palo Alto, CA 94304-1007
`+1 650 739-7511 (Direct Dial)
`+1 650 739-7611 (Fax)
`
`
`From: Rosato, Michael [mailto:mrosato@wsgr.com]
`Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 11:29 AM
`
`1
`
`CALTECH - EXHIBIT 2028
`
`

`
`To: Williams, Eliot D.
`Cc: Argenti, Matthew; Guy, Hop; Bowling, Brad; Torczon, Richard
`Subject: RE: Echostar/Hughes v. Caltech: IPR2015-00059
`
`Eliot,
`
`Thank you for the comments. However, that is not fully responsive to my inquiry. When you procured Ms. Fradenburg’s
`direct testimony on behalf of Hughes, was she instructed she would be required to appear for cross-examination if
`called? When did you first request she be made available for a deposition? Ms. Fradenburg is a Hughes witness, so I’m
`trying to understand how and why Hughes has put itself in this position. I am also trying to understand why it took you
`so long to bring this to my attention.
`
`Thanks in advance.
`
`
`- Mike
`
`
`
`From: Eliot.Williams@bakerbotts.com [mailto:Eliot.Williams@bakerbotts.com]
`Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 10:24 AM
`To: Rosato, Michael
`Cc: Argenti, Matthew; hop.guy@bakerbotts.com; brad.bowling@bakerbotts.com; Torczon, Richard
`Subject: RE: Echostar/Hughes v. Caltech: IPR2015-00059
`
`Mike:
`
`Ms. Fradenburg is an employee of the University of Texas, a non-party, whom we understand to be
`represented by the University’s legal affairs office. We have requested the University of Texas, via its Legal
`Affairs Office, to make Ms. Fradenburg available for a deposition. Counsel for the University responded that
`she would not appear voluntarily, and that subpoena would be required to secure her appearance.
`
`Please let us know if you intend to move forward with the deposition of Dr. Pfister on the 22nd. His
`availability is limited.
`
`
`
`Eliot D. Williams
`■
`BAKER BOTTS LLP
`1001 Page Mill Road
`Bldg. One, Ste. 200
`Palo Alto, CA 94304-1007
`+1 650 739-7511 (Direct Dial)
`+1 650 739-7611 (Fax)
`
`
`From: Rosato, Michael [mailto:mrosato@wsgr.com]
`Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 1:54 PM
`To: Williams, Eliot D.
`Cc: Argenti, Matthew; Guy, Hop; Bowling, Brad; Torczon, Richard
`Subject: RE: Echostar/Hughes v. Caltech: IPR2015-00059
`
`Eliot,
`
`Thank you for the response. Although I am a bit confused – did you not instruct Ms. Fradenburg at the time of obtaining
`her direct testimony that she would be required to appear for cross-examination if called? Also, please clarify precisely
`what attempts you’ve made to gain her appearance.
`
`2
`
`

`
`
`Best regards,
`
`
`- Mike
`
`
`Michael T Rosato
`Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
`[o] 206.883.2529 | [f] 206.883.2699
`mrosato@wsgr.com
`
`
`
`From: Eliot.Williams@bakerbotts.com [mailto:Eliot.Williams@bakerbotts.com]
`Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 4:29 PM
`To: Rosato, Michael
`Cc: Argenti, Matthew; hop.guy@bakerbotts.com; brad.bowling@bakerbotts.com
`Subject: RE: Echostar/Hughes v. Caltech: IPR2015-00059
`
`Michael:
`
`We have attempted to schedule the deposition of Ms. Fradenburg, but she is unwilling to appear
`voluntarily. To the extent Patent Owner would like her deposition, we suggest that you request issuance of a
`subpoena to compel her deposition. See Marvell v. IV, IPR2014-00553, Paper 28 (April 8, 2015). We also
`question whether the authenticity and publication date of the reference at issue is genuinely in dispute in this
`proceeding.
`
`Regarding Dr. Pfister’s availability, we can make him available at our offices in Palo Alto on July 22nd. As that
`would be slightly outside the typical time for completing the deposition, we would be amenable to a slight
`adjustment to the due dates in the current schedule. Let us know if you would like to propose such a
`modification.
`
`Regards,
`
`Eliot D. Williams
`■
`BAKER BOTTS LLP
`1001 Page Mill Road
`Bldg. One, Ste. 200
`Palo Alto, CA 94304-1007
`+1 650 739-7511 (Direct Dial)
`+1 650 739-7611 (Fax)
`
`
`From: Rosato, Michael [mailto:mrosato@wsgr.com]
`Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 3:42 PM
`To: Williams, Eliot D.
`Cc: Argenti, Matthew; Guy, Hop
`Subject: Echostar/Hughes v. Caltech: IPR2015-00059
`
`Eliot,
`
`We would like to schedule cross-examination of the witnesses who provided affidavit testimony in support of the
`EchoStar/Hughes petition. As you know, Rule 42.53(d)(2) prescribes that the party requesting cross-examination
`
`3
`
`

`
`testimony choose the order in which the witnesses are to be cross-examined. As such, we will cross the witnesses in the
`following order, beginning with Ms. Fradenburg.
`
`
`• Robin Fradenburg
`• Dr. Pfister
`
`
`Please provide us with dates on which the witnesses can be made available for cross-examination. You’ll recall that the
`period for cross concludes on July 21st based on the scheduling order.
`
`Best regards,
`
`Michael T Rosato
`Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
`[o] 206.883.2529 | [f] 206.883.2699
`mrosato@wsgr.com
`
`
`
`This email and any attachments thereto may contain private, confidential, and privileged material for the sole
`use of the intended recipient. Any review, copying, or distribution of this email (or any attachments thereto) by
`others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and
`permanently delete the original and any copies of this email and any attachments thereto.
`
`Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this email and any attachments is intended only for the recipient[s]
`listed above and may be privileged and confidential. Any dissemination, copying, or use of or reliance upon such
`information by or to anyone other than the recipient[s] listed above is prohibited. If you have received this message in
`error, please notify the sender immediately at the email address above and destroy any and all copies of this message.
`
`
`
`4

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket