`EXHIBIT 2163
`
`
`
`
`
`RE: What is screen size
`
`From:
`Matt Cowan <"/o=reald/ou=first administrative group/cn=recipients/cn=mcowan">
`To:
`Joshua Greer <jgreer@reald.com>, "Michael V. Lewis" <mlewis@reald.com>
`Date:
`Mon, 25 Sep 2006 13:31:55 -0700
`
`If we assume 4 fL at the eyeball - essentially the target for Monster House
`
`PBS = XL and Dual Head = XXL. Assume that each will individually offer 66% more light - so benefit from PBS is
`the same as benefit from Dual head.
`
`With current EFIB
`Regular flat - 40'
`Regular scope - 47'
`
`With XL flat - 51'
`With XL scope- 60'
`
`With XL+ XXL flat - 66'
`With XL+ XXL scope - 78'
`
`With new EFIB
`Regular flat - 49'
`Regular scope - 50'
`With XL flat - 63'
`With XL scope - 64'
`With XL+XXL flat 81'
`With XL+XXL scope 83'
`
`In reality, we may want to take some of this light and go up to 6 fL. This would reduce these numbers to 80% of the
`width specified above. For example XL+XXL scope would be about 66'. Or perhaps some of each.
`
`Matt.
`
`-----Original Message-----
`From: Joshua Greer
`Sent: Monday, September 25, 2006 2:09 PM
`To: Michael V. Lewis
`Cc: Matt Cowan
`Subject: RE: What is screen size
`
`Matt, could you please give Michael a breakdown of the light levels for PBS, Dual Head and PBS/Dual Head
`combo.
`
`We should also show the difference if we get full triple flash from TI.
`
`Thanks, I'm jumping on a plane now to Denver.
`
`REALD INC.
`Exhibit 2163-1
`MASTERIMAGE 3D, et al. v REALD INC.
`IPR2015-00035
`
`
`
`Joshua
`
`-----Original Message-----
`From: Michael V. Lewis
`Sent: Mon Sep 25 11:00:00 2006
`To: Joshua Greer
`Subject: What is screen size
`
`With xL and xxL tech...best guess.
`
`Sent from my GoodLink synchronized handheld (www.good.com)
`
`REALD INC.
`Exhibit 2163-2
`MASTERIMAGE 3D, et al. v REALD INC.
`IPR2015-00035
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site