EXHIBIT 2135
`
`
`EXHIBIT 2135EXHIBIT 2135EXHIBIT 2135
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 2135EXHIBIT 2135EXHIBIT 2135
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`RE: zscreen sizes
`
`From:
`Matt Cowan <"matt cowan">
`To:
`Lenny Lipton <llipton@reald.com>, Jerry Carollo <jcarollo@creativedis.com>
`Date:
`Mon, 18 Sep 2006 07:55:33 -0700
`
`I suggest taking the Z screen out of the case completely and using only the glass elements.. Note it has
`only one polarizer - on the input side. this is a high quality dyestuff polarizer with transmission of about
`42%. The Z screen also has A/R coated glass end caps on it.
`
`If you can tell us what you want, we can probably have a sample assembled using the same pi cells, and
`polarizer and A/R coatings of choice.
`
`
`We can supply you a unit(s) that are in the housing.
`
`
`Matt.
`
`
`From: Lenny Lipton
`Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 10:49 AM
`To: Jerry Carollo; Matt Cowan
`Subject: RE: zscreen sizes
`
`
`
`
`From: Jerry Carollo [mailto:JCarollo@creativedis.com]
`Sent: Mon 9/18/2006 7:31 AM
`To: Mahir Abrahim
`Cc: Michael Hoppe; Ying-Moh Liu; Lenny Lipton
`Subject: RE: zscreen sizes
`
`Correct. It will make the assembly larger for the prototype but enable us to test the prototype quicker.
`
`
` J
`
`
`
`
`From: Mahir Abrahim
`Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 7:25 AM
`To: Jerry Carollo
`Cc: Michael Hoppe; Ying-Moh Liu
`Subject: RE: zscreen sizes
`
`
`OK. Thanks, Jerry. So it looks like I’ll be gutting the existing ZScreen. The current assembly includes a
`squirrel cage fan and two polarizer plates. Unless told otherwise, I will remove one of the polarizers and
`the fan to make the package smaller and easier to integrate. The fan should not be an issue since each
`ZScreen is seeing half the light normally would, and the remaining polarizer is only absorbing enough
`light to clean up anything the beam splitter missed.
`
`
`REALD INC.
`Exhibit 2135-1
`MASTERIMAGE 3D, et al. v REALD INC.
`IPR2015-00035
`
`
`
`-Mahir
`
`
`From: Jerry Carollo
`Sent: Sunday, September 17, 2006 11:10 AM
`To: Mahir Abrahim; yml7245@yahoo.com; Michael Hoppe
`Subject: RE: zscreen sizes
`
`
`Guys:
`
`It looks like we will have to jury-rig the existing ZScreens recognizing that we will have to do another
`design turn for production.
`
`
`Jerry
`
`
`From: Matt Cowan [mailto:mcowan@reald.com]
`Sent: Sunday, September 17, 2006 7:54 AM
`To: Lenny Lipton; Jerry Carollo
`Cc: Mahir Abrahim; Michael Hoppe; yml7245@yahoo.com
`Subject: RE: zscreen sizes
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Jerry:
`
`The pi cells in the Z screen require tooling - the major implication is timing (an optical part - 12 - 16 weeks). Can
`you make the larger part work?
`
`We recognize that this is a proof of concept.
`
`Another question is what kind of polarizer you want on the ZS. We have much more flexibility on the assembly of
`the pi cells in terms of AR treatment and polarizer and if it isn't exotic can probably get reasonable turn around. If
`our standard assembly works all the better.
`
`Matt.
`
` -----Original Message-----
`From: Lenny Lipton
`Sent: Sat Sep 16 07:55:49 2006
`To: Jerry Carollo
`Cc: Mahir Abrahim; Michael Hoppe; yml7245@yahoo.com; Matt Cowan
`Subject: RE: zscreen sizes
`
`Jerry et al,
`
`The only ZS fully engineered for the theater -- to give the best image -- is the one in production -- 9 by 5.
`
`We can make other sizes, but is that worth doing for the proto since we'd have to endure some NRE and possible
`delay and the form-factor may be different for production.
`
`Is it not possible to use the present device even if it is larger than you'd like as a means to get started?
`
`Also -- would we require different sizes for different lenses in production?
`
`
`REALD INC.
`Exhibit 2135-2
`MASTERIMAGE 3D, et al. v REALD INC.
`IPR2015-00035
`
`
`
`________________________________
`
`From: Jerry Carollo [mailto:JCarollo@creativedis.com]
`Sent: Fri 9/15/2006 6:08 PM
`To: Lenny Lipton
`Cc: Mahir Abrahim; Michael Hoppe; yml7245@yahoo.com
`Subject: FW: zscreen sizes
`
`
`
`Lenny:
`
`Can you help with this? Thanks
`
`Jerry
`
`________________________________
`
`From: Mahir Abrahim
`Sent: Fri 9/15/2006 7:52 AM
`To: Jerry Carollo
`Cc: Ying-Moh Liu; Michael Hoppe
`Subject: zscreen sizes
`
`Jerry,
`
`
`
`
`
`Can you ask Lenny what stock Z-Screen sizes are readily available. What we measured and have models for is about
`9"x5" clear aperture, but I'd like something closer to 7"x5". That way it's not much more than the 160x100mm clear
`aperture that is called for by Ying-Moh's optical analysis. Thanks.
`
`
`
`-Mahir
`
`***********************************************************************************************
`This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely
`for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed and may
`contain confidential and privileged information. No one else is authorized to
`distribute, forward, print, copy or act upon any information contained in this email.
`If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email
`and destroy all copies of the original message.
`************************************************************************************************
`
`REALD INC.
`Exhibit 2135-3
`MASTERIMAGE 3D, et al. v REALD INC.
`IPR2015-00035
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
