`
`EXHIBIT 2132EXHIBIT 2132
`
`
`
`
`
`RE: zscreen sizes
`
`From:
`Lenny Lipton <"/o=reald/ou=first administrative group/cn=recipients/cn=llipton">
`To:
`Jerry Carollo <jcarollo@creativedis.com>
`Cc:
`Mahir Abrahim <mabrahim@creativedis.com>, Michael Hoppe <mhoppe@creativedis.com>,
`yml7245@yahoo.com, Matt Cowan <"matt cowan">
`Date:
`Sat, 16 Sep 2006 07:55:49 -0700
`
`Jerry et al,
`
`
`The only ZS fully engineered for the theater -- to give the best image -- is the one in production -- 9 by 5.
`
`
`We can make other sizes, but is that worth doing for the proto since we'd have to endure some NRE and
`possible delay and the form-factor may be different for production.
`
`Is it not possible to use the present device even if it is larger than you'd like as a means to get started?
`
`
`Also -- would we require different sizes for different lenses in production?
`
`
`From: Jerry Carollo [mailto:JCarollo@creativedis.com]
`Sent: Fri 9/15/2006 6:08 PM
`To: Lenny Lipton
`Cc: Mahir Abrahim; Michael Hoppe; yml7245@yahoo.com
`Subject: FW: zscreen sizes
`
`
`
`Lenny:
`
`Can you help with this? Thanks
`
`Jerry
`
`________________________________
`
`From: Mahir Abrahim
`Sent: Fri 9/15/2006 7:52 AM
`To: Jerry Carollo
`Cc: Ying-Moh Liu; Michael Hoppe
`Subject: zscreen sizes
`
`
`
`Jerry,
`
`
`
`Can you ask Lenny what stock Z-Screen sizes are readily available. What we measured and have models for is about
`9"x5" clear aperture, but I'd like something closer to 7"x5". That way it's not much more than the 160x100mm clear
`aperture that is called for by Ying-Moh's optical analysis. Thanks.
`
`REALD INC.
`Exhibit 2132-1
`MASTERIMAGE 3D, et al. v REALD INC.
`IPR2015-00035
`
`
`
`
`
`-Mahir
`
`REALD INC.
`Exhibit 2132-2
`MASTERIMAGE 3D, et al. v REALD INC.
`IPR2015-00035
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
