`EXHIBIT 2086
`
`
`
`
`
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`Subject:
`
`Ying-Moh Liu <yml7245@yahoo.com>
`Monday, June 29, 2015 11:08 PM
`McCormack, Brian C
`Fw: Nitto Denko
`
`
`----- Forwarded Message -----
`From: Tom Carter <TCarter@creativedis.com>
`To: Ying-Moh Liu <yml7245@yahoo.com>
`Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 11:09 AM
`Subject: RE: Nitto Denko
`
`Ying-Moh,
`
`
`Will we be using the Moxtek at 45°? Although I am not certain, I am concerned about the amount of p-polarization to pass
`at 45°. I will, however, include this test.
`
`-Tom
`
`
`
`From: Ying-Moh Liu [mailto:yml7245@yahoo.com]
`Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 11:06 AM
`To: Tom Carter
`Subject: RE: Nitto Denko
`
`
`Tom:
`
`I am glad to know that you confirmed on the CP+P case. Again, I think it depends on which side the light sees
`first for the CP. The PBS is the Moxtek in this case. Look forward to seeing your test plan.
`
`
`Ying-Moh
`
`Tom Carter <TCarter@creativedis.com> wrote:
`Hi Ying-Moh,
`
`
`By the way, my thoughts on circularly polarized light passing through a linear polarizer unaffected were
`incorrect. As you thought, the light does become linearly polarized after passing through the linear polarizer. I
`will have to brush up on my polarization skills. : )
`
`
`We actually did buy two NIST Linear Polarizers which I plan to use for all testing. I will also include be happy to
`include tests on the Nitto Denko linear polarizing film as well as the Moxtek. I will give you some preliminary
`information from previous experience; the Moxtek polarizers are excellent polarizers within the visible range. I
`am finishing up the test plan today, so you will have it tomorrow.
`
`Is the PBS not available?
`
`-Tom
`
`From: Ying-Moh Liu [mailto:yml7245@yahoo.com]
`Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 10:42 AM
`To: Tom Carter
`
`1
`
`
`
`REALD INC.
`Exhibit 2086-1
`MASTERIMAGE 3D, et al. v REALD INC.
`IPR2015-00035
`
`
`
`Cc: Jerry Carollo
`Subject: Re: Nitto Denko
`
`
`Tom:
`
`I think it is a good idea to test the Nitto polarizer and it may be a self test unless you have some known
`high quality polarizers. I have not developed a clear concept of what the test setup would be for this,
`maybe you could come up with one and share it with me.
`
`
`We would be interested in testing the Moxtek wire-grid polarizer and I have some idea of what I want
`to measure. I did not talk about it last time partly because we ran out of time, and partly it is not so
`critical. I will draw up a diagram to explain what I have in mind and you can detail it. Does this sound
`OK?
`
`
`Thank you for dharing your thoughts with me.
`
`
`Ying-Moh
`
`Tom Carter <TCarter@creativedis.com> wrote:
`Hi Ying-Moh,
`
`I was wondering if you are also interested in characterizing, perhaps, the Nitto Denko linear polarizing
`film? Reviewing my notes I see that you will be employing the PBS. Is this a product that is available
`that we may test it?
`
`
`Thanks,
`
`
`Tom Carter
`
`
`
`Senior Optical Engineer
`5909 Sea Lion Pl. , Ste. A
`Carlsbad , CA 92010
`B: (760) 476-0339 xt. 219
`F: (760) 476-0620
`tcarter@creativedis.com
`
`
`
`
`Stay in the know. Pulse on the new Yahoo.com. Check it out.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.
`
`
`2
`
`REALD INC.
`Exhibit 2086-2
`MASTERIMAGE 3D, et al. v REALD INC.
`IPR2015-00035
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
