throbber
EXHIBIT 2076
`EXHIBIT 2076
`
`
`
`

`
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`Subject:
`
`Ying-Moh Liu <yml7245@yahoo.com>
`Saturday, June 27, 2015 6:41 PM
`McCormack, Brian C
`Fw: RFQ EML 06-1009 (Drawing Number 105-1012 Rev 2 with
`exceptions/modifications)
`
`
`----- Forwarded Message -----
`From: Tom Carter <TCarter@creativedis.com>
`To: Ying-Moh Liu <yml7245@yahoo.com>
`Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 10:51 AM
`Subject: RE: RFQ EML 06-1009 (Drawing Number 105-1012 Rev 2 with exceptions/modifications)
`
`Hi Ting-Moh
`
`I am an optical engineer and will, perhaps, have considerably more insight into the test procedure. We have a (un-
`calibrated) Photoresearch SpectraScan 705 spectroradiometer. I was planning to use this for a relative measurement. (I
`can’t imagine it is too far out of calibration, but one never really knows.) I have set up such a test set to measure the
`leakage of a Nitto Circular Polarizer. The results were disappointing. I’m not sure what a Z-screen is, if you could
`enlighten me I would appreciate it. Additionally, any thoughts on testing the part is welcome. I figured, measure parallel
`polarizers, crossed polarizers, and then both with the Nitto in between. I can alter the Nitto angle as necessary.
`
`
`Regards,
`
`-Tom
`
`
`
`From: Ying-Moh Liu [mailto:yml7245@yahoo.com]
`Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 10:26 AM
`To: Jerry Carollo ; Mahir Abrahim
`Cc: Tom Carter ; Michael Hoppe
`Subject: RE: RFQ EML 06-1009 (Drawing Number 105-1012 Rev 2 with exceptions/modifications)
`
`
`Jerry:
`
`I understand you want Tom to do the tests and I would be happy to help on the side. I would suggest that we
`think about the few configurations that we want to characterize, e.g., the film between crossed polarizers and
`the film with the Z-screen, etc. The angular properties are of interests as well. These measurements will help
`our understanding of on-screen performance of our module.
`
`
`Ying-Moh
`
`Jerry Carollo <JCarollo@creativedis.com> wrote:
`Guys:
`
`I recommend Tom do the test.
`
`
`
`
` J
`
`
`
`1
`
`REALD INC.
`Exhibit 2076-1
`MASTERIMAGE 3D, et al. v REALD INC.
`IPR2015-00035
`
`

`
`From: Mahir Abrahim
`Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 9:13 AM
`To: Ying-Moh Liu
`Cc: Tom Carter ; Michael Hoppe ; Jerry Carollo
`Subject: RE: RFQ EML 06-1009 (Drawing Number 105-1012 Rev 2 with exceptions/modifications)
`
`
`Ying-Moh,
`
`I’m not familiar with optical validation tests. Would you mind coming to do the testing? Either that or Tom could
`take a look at them if he’s not busy.
`
`-Mahir
`
`
`
`
`From: Ying-Moh Liu [mailto:yml7245@yahoo.com]
`Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 9:36 AM
`To: Mahir Abrahim ; Jerry Carollo ; Michael Hoppe
`Cc: David Lynch ; Bill Maffucci
`Subject: RE: RFQ EML 06-1009 (Drawing Number 105-1012 Rev 2 with exceptions/modifications)
`
`It may be useful to test the Nitto HWF in between two crossed polarizers and backlit with filtered white
`light to see its chromatic leakage. A silicon detector with a collection lens can be used to quantify it.
`
`
`Ying-Moh
`
`Mahir Abrahim <MAbrahim@creativedis.com> wrote:
`I just received the Nitto half-wave films. I will put them with the Nitto polarizing films that RealD sent us.
`
`
`
`
`From: Ying-Moh Liu [mailto:yml7245@yahoo.com]
`Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 9:09 AM
`To: Jerry Carollo ; Mahir Abrahim ; Michael Hoppe
`Cc: David Lynch ; Bill Maffucci
`Subject: RE: RFQ EML 06-1009 (Drawing Number 105-1012 Rev 2 with exceptions/modifications)
`
`Jerry:
`
`I am still working with Newport Glass to see if they can agree to be the prime for a coated
`mirror with Cascade to be the sub for the coating. Do you agree with this approach? Once I
`confirm that one way or the other, we can place the order.
`
`I believe the Proflux is ready to go. So, if you like, we can place the order now. I assume
`someone in CDS will prepare the PO , right?
`
`I asked Nitto Denko to ship some half-wave films to CDS address under my name. Please let
`me know when you receive them. I am not sure if you want to characterize them in your lab
`and I would be happy to do that with someone in CDS. Please think about it and let me know.
`
`I am not sure what to do with Colorlink at this point. Lenny was gonna talk to Josh, their CEO,
`and see if Josh could push CL. No further news so far. Do you want me to continue my dialog
`with Lenny or you may be more effective in taking care of this?
`
`
`2
`
`REALD INC.
`Exhibit 2076-2
`MASTERIMAGE 3D, et al. v REALD INC.
`IPR2015-00035
`
`

`
`Ying-Moh
`
`Jerry Carollo <JCarollo@creativedis.com> wrote:
`I would place it now.
`
`
`
`
` J
`
`
`
`From: Ying-Moh Liu [mailto:yml7245@yahoo.com]
`Sent: Monday, October 09, 2006 4:12 PM
`To: Jerry Carollo ; Mahir Abrahim ; Michael Hoppe
`Subject: Fwd: RFQ EML 06-1009 (Drawing Number 105-1012 Rev 2 with
`exceptions/modifications)
`
`Jerry:
`
`
`Here is the quote for the fabrication of the 12" mirror. I have a separate quote for the
`enhanced aluminum coating for the mirror from Cascade as attached. I will talk to
`both vendors to decide which vendor will be the prime. When do we need to place the
`order?
`
`
`Ying-Moh
`
`Newport Glass <newportglass@earthlink.net> wrote:
`Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 14:56:19 -0700
`To: Ying-Moh Liu <yml7245@yahoo.com>
`From: Newport Glass <newportglass@earthlink.net>
`Subject: RFQ EML 06-1009 (Drawing Number 105-1012 Rev 2 with
`exceptions/modifications)
`
`Per your request ~
`
`
`
`Material = Pyrex, Fine annealed
`Part Number = 105-1012 Rev A (mirror, 12" diameter, D-Cut)
`
`Diameter = Requested 12.000" +/- .005" ~ Offered = 12.000" +/- .010"
`Thickness = .500" +/- .005"
`Circumference = machine ground
`Circumference reference flat = Requested 4.500" +/- .005" from the center ~
`Offered 4.500" +/- .010" from the center
`Edges = Requested B evel .020" +.010 - .000" ~ Offered = .020" + .015" -
`.005"
`Face 1 = machine ground and polished
`= flatness = 1/2 wave or better at 633 nm ~~ (best effort
`due to the thickness of the substrate)
`= scratch/dig = 80/50
`= clear aperture 2.5mm from the circumference
`Face 2 = ground
`Coating = none
`
`
`3
`
`REALD INC.
`Exhibit 2076-3
`MASTERIMAGE 3D, et al. v REALD INC.
`IPR2015-00035
`
`

`
`Qty = 2 pcs.
`Price/each =$573.80
`____________________________________________________________
`
`Terms
`
`FO B Stanton, CA. ( Los Angeles Metropolitan Area)
`
`Estimated processing time is 20 to 25 working days prior to shipment.
`
`Payment terms ~ credit card
`
`Orders are to be submitted in writing, e.g., e-mail, fax (714-484-7600)
`showing the " ship to" and "bill to" address and a telephone number where
`you can reached during normal business hours.
`
`This quotation is valid for 30 days
`
`Respectfully
`
`Ray Larsen
`
`
`
`At 01:55 PM 10/3/2006 -0700, you wrote:
`
`>Ray:
`>
`>The drawing shows a flat cut on the mirror for mechanical reasons. Per
`>our conversation, I may be able to live with a 0.5" clearance if 0.25"
`>costs a lot more. We may be able to live with 1 wave flatness if it saves
`>a little money. Please advise the differences. Please also separate the
`>fabrication charge from the coating charge. You may call me @
`>(949)241-4799 anytime for questions. Look forward to receiving your quote
`>today if possible. Thank you.
`>
`>Ying-Moh
`>
`
`
`Get your email and more, right on the new Yahoo.com
`
`
`
`Get your email and more, right on the new Yahoo.com
`
`
`
`All-new Yahoo! Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster.
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`REALD INC.
`Exhibit 2076-4
`MASTERIMAGE 3D, et al. v REALD INC.
`IPR2015-00035
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`Get your email and more, right on the new Yahoo.com
`
`
`5
`
`REALD INC.
`Exhibit 2076-5
`MASTERIMAGE 3D, et al. v REALD INC.
`IPR2015-00035

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket