`EXHIBIT 2076
`
`
`
`
`
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`Subject:
`
`Ying-Moh Liu <yml7245@yahoo.com>
`Saturday, June 27, 2015 6:41 PM
`McCormack, Brian C
`Fw: RFQ EML 06-1009 (Drawing Number 105-1012 Rev 2 with
`exceptions/modifications)
`
`
`----- Forwarded Message -----
`From: Tom Carter <TCarter@creativedis.com>
`To: Ying-Moh Liu <yml7245@yahoo.com>
`Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 10:51 AM
`Subject: RE: RFQ EML 06-1009 (Drawing Number 105-1012 Rev 2 with exceptions/modifications)
`
`Hi Ting-Moh
`
`I am an optical engineer and will, perhaps, have considerably more insight into the test procedure. We have a (un-
`calibrated) Photoresearch SpectraScan 705 spectroradiometer. I was planning to use this for a relative measurement. (I
`can’t imagine it is too far out of calibration, but one never really knows.) I have set up such a test set to measure the
`leakage of a Nitto Circular Polarizer. The results were disappointing. I’m not sure what a Z-screen is, if you could
`enlighten me I would appreciate it. Additionally, any thoughts on testing the part is welcome. I figured, measure parallel
`polarizers, crossed polarizers, and then both with the Nitto in between. I can alter the Nitto angle as necessary.
`
`
`Regards,
`
`-Tom
`
`
`
`From: Ying-Moh Liu [mailto:yml7245@yahoo.com]
`Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 10:26 AM
`To: Jerry Carollo ; Mahir Abrahim
`Cc: Tom Carter ; Michael Hoppe
`Subject: RE: RFQ EML 06-1009 (Drawing Number 105-1012 Rev 2 with exceptions/modifications)
`
`
`Jerry:
`
`I understand you want Tom to do the tests and I would be happy to help on the side. I would suggest that we
`think about the few configurations that we want to characterize, e.g., the film between crossed polarizers and
`the film with the Z-screen, etc. The angular properties are of interests as well. These measurements will help
`our understanding of on-screen performance of our module.
`
`
`Ying-Moh
`
`Jerry Carollo <JCarollo@creativedis.com> wrote:
`Guys:
`
`I recommend Tom do the test.
`
`
`
`
` J
`
`
`
`1
`
`REALD INC.
`Exhibit 2076-1
`MASTERIMAGE 3D, et al. v REALD INC.
`IPR2015-00035
`
`
`
`From: Mahir Abrahim
`Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 9:13 AM
`To: Ying-Moh Liu
`Cc: Tom Carter ; Michael Hoppe ; Jerry Carollo
`Subject: RE: RFQ EML 06-1009 (Drawing Number 105-1012 Rev 2 with exceptions/modifications)
`
`
`Ying-Moh,
`
`I’m not familiar with optical validation tests. Would you mind coming to do the testing? Either that or Tom could
`take a look at them if he’s not busy.
`
`-Mahir
`
`
`
`
`From: Ying-Moh Liu [mailto:yml7245@yahoo.com]
`Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 9:36 AM
`To: Mahir Abrahim ; Jerry Carollo ; Michael Hoppe
`Cc: David Lynch ; Bill Maffucci
`Subject: RE: RFQ EML 06-1009 (Drawing Number 105-1012 Rev 2 with exceptions/modifications)
`
`It may be useful to test the Nitto HWF in between two crossed polarizers and backlit with filtered white
`light to see its chromatic leakage. A silicon detector with a collection lens can be used to quantify it.
`
`
`Ying-Moh
`
`Mahir Abrahim <MAbrahim@creativedis.com> wrote:
`I just received the Nitto half-wave films. I will put them with the Nitto polarizing films that RealD sent us.
`
`
`
`
`From: Ying-Moh Liu [mailto:yml7245@yahoo.com]
`Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 9:09 AM
`To: Jerry Carollo ; Mahir Abrahim ; Michael Hoppe
`Cc: David Lynch ; Bill Maffucci
`Subject: RE: RFQ EML 06-1009 (Drawing Number 105-1012 Rev 2 with exceptions/modifications)
`
`Jerry:
`
`I am still working with Newport Glass to see if they can agree to be the prime for a coated
`mirror with Cascade to be the sub for the coating. Do you agree with this approach? Once I
`confirm that one way or the other, we can place the order.
`
`I believe the Proflux is ready to go. So, if you like, we can place the order now. I assume
`someone in CDS will prepare the PO , right?
`
`I asked Nitto Denko to ship some half-wave films to CDS address under my name. Please let
`me know when you receive them. I am not sure if you want to characterize them in your lab
`and I would be happy to do that with someone in CDS. Please think about it and let me know.
`
`I am not sure what to do with Colorlink at this point. Lenny was gonna talk to Josh, their CEO,
`and see if Josh could push CL. No further news so far. Do you want me to continue my dialog
`with Lenny or you may be more effective in taking care of this?
`
`
`2
`
`REALD INC.
`Exhibit 2076-2
`MASTERIMAGE 3D, et al. v REALD INC.
`IPR2015-00035
`
`
`
`Ying-Moh
`
`Jerry Carollo <JCarollo@creativedis.com> wrote:
`I would place it now.
`
`
`
`
` J
`
`
`
`From: Ying-Moh Liu [mailto:yml7245@yahoo.com]
`Sent: Monday, October 09, 2006 4:12 PM
`To: Jerry Carollo ; Mahir Abrahim ; Michael Hoppe
`Subject: Fwd: RFQ EML 06-1009 (Drawing Number 105-1012 Rev 2 with
`exceptions/modifications)
`
`Jerry:
`
`
`Here is the quote for the fabrication of the 12" mirror. I have a separate quote for the
`enhanced aluminum coating for the mirror from Cascade as attached. I will talk to
`both vendors to decide which vendor will be the prime. When do we need to place the
`order?
`
`
`Ying-Moh
`
`Newport Glass <newportglass@earthlink.net> wrote:
`Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 14:56:19 -0700
`To: Ying-Moh Liu <yml7245@yahoo.com>
`From: Newport Glass <newportglass@earthlink.net>
`Subject: RFQ EML 06-1009 (Drawing Number 105-1012 Rev 2 with
`exceptions/modifications)
`
`Per your request ~
`
`
`
`Material = Pyrex, Fine annealed
`Part Number = 105-1012 Rev A (mirror, 12" diameter, D-Cut)
`
`Diameter = Requested 12.000" +/- .005" ~ Offered = 12.000" +/- .010"
`Thickness = .500" +/- .005"
`Circumference = machine ground
`Circumference reference flat = Requested 4.500" +/- .005" from the center ~
`Offered 4.500" +/- .010" from the center
`Edges = Requested B evel .020" +.010 - .000" ~ Offered = .020" + .015" -
`.005"
`Face 1 = machine ground and polished
`= flatness = 1/2 wave or better at 633 nm ~~ (best effort
`due to the thickness of the substrate)
`= scratch/dig = 80/50
`= clear aperture 2.5mm from the circumference
`Face 2 = ground
`Coating = none
`
`
`3
`
`REALD INC.
`Exhibit 2076-3
`MASTERIMAGE 3D, et al. v REALD INC.
`IPR2015-00035
`
`
`
`Qty = 2 pcs.
`Price/each =$573.80
`____________________________________________________________
`
`Terms
`
`FO B Stanton, CA. ( Los Angeles Metropolitan Area)
`
`Estimated processing time is 20 to 25 working days prior to shipment.
`
`Payment terms ~ credit card
`
`Orders are to be submitted in writing, e.g., e-mail, fax (714-484-7600)
`showing the " ship to" and "bill to" address and a telephone number where
`you can reached during normal business hours.
`
`This quotation is valid for 30 days
`
`Respectfully
`
`Ray Larsen
`
`
`
`At 01:55 PM 10/3/2006 -0700, you wrote:
`
`>Ray:
`>
`>The drawing shows a flat cut on the mirror for mechanical reasons. Per
`>our conversation, I may be able to live with a 0.5" clearance if 0.25"
`>costs a lot more. We may be able to live with 1 wave flatness if it saves
`>a little money. Please advise the differences. Please also separate the
`>fabrication charge from the coating charge. You may call me @
`>(949)241-4799 anytime for questions. Look forward to receiving your quote
`>today if possible. Thank you.
`>
`>Ying-Moh
`>
`
`
`Get your email and more, right on the new Yahoo.com
`
`
`
`Get your email and more, right on the new Yahoo.com
`
`
`
`All-new Yahoo! Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster.
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`REALD INC.
`Exhibit 2076-4
`MASTERIMAGE 3D, et al. v REALD INC.
`IPR2015-00035
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Get your email and more, right on the new Yahoo.com
`
`
`5
`
`REALD INC.
`Exhibit 2076-5
`MASTERIMAGE 3D, et al. v REALD INC.
`IPR2015-00035